Bug#360163: ITP: libannexlib-ocaml -- Library of miscellaneous OCaml code
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ewan Mellor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libannexlib-ocaml Version : 0.13.2 Upstream Author : Shawn Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://raevnos.pennmush.org/code/annexlib * License : LGPL Description : Library of miscellaneous OCaml code Annexlib contains miscellaneous and generally useful routines that are not in the OCaml standard library. Highlights include wildcard globbing, lots of string searching and manipulation routines, locale support, ~user-style path expansion, and more. Since it includes some native stubs, this library will be packaged as two Debian packages -- libannexlib-ocaml and libannexlib-ocaml-dev. Proposed packages are available at http://www.ewanmellor.org.uk/annexlib.html. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#360163: ITP: libannexlib-ocaml -- Library of miscellaneous OCaml code
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 10:48:01PM -0500, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 01:19:28AM +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote: > > * Package name: libannexlib-ocaml > > Please X-Debbugs-Cc debian-ocaml-maint for ITP related to OCaml. Sorry about that. > That said, I think the package name should reflect upstream's being > "annexlib". The binary name can be those you proporse. Right -- I misunderstood the term "package name" in that context. My intention is as you suggest -- the package name is "annexlib", producing two binary packages, "libannexlib-ocaml" and "libannexlib-ocaml-dev". Do I need to do anything to the ITP to reflect this, or should I just close it any start again? Ewan. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
