link exchange
Hi: I have many sites to exchange and here are the details. If you have any Interest , pls give me your code and add me .I will add you at all of them .We can also do 3-way link exchange. Thanks 1)http://www.weddinggowndress.com/link.htmlpr4 link code: http://www.weddinggowndress.com/";>wedding gown and wedding dressPlace Holder for weddinggowndress 2)http://www.sofa.sculptureyard.com pr4 link code: http://www.sofa.sculptureyard.com/";>Sofa.SculptureyardLeather Sofa, Leather Furniture, Leather Chairs 3)http://www.leatherfamous.com/leather.html pr3 link code: http://www.leatherfamous.com";>Leatherfamous Leather Furniture Leather Sofa Leather Chairs 4)http://www.iantiquefurniture.com/resource.htmpr3 link code: http://www.iantiquefurniture.com";>Furniture Sofa Table Bed Pool Table from International Antique Furniture . 5)http://www.trophy.sculptureyard.com pr4 link code: http://www.trophy.sculptureyard.com";>trophy.sculptureyard 6)http://www.weddinggowndress.sculptureyard.com pr3 link code: http://weddinggowndress.sculptureyard.com/";>weddinggowndress.sculptureyardvarious kinds of wedding gown dress 7)http://www.weddingfavors.sculptureyard.com pr4 linkcode:http://www.weddingfavors.tamsquare.com";>weddingfavors.tamsquare 8)http://www.weddinggowndress.tamsquare.com pr3 link code: http://www.weddinggowndress.tamsquare.com";>wedding gown dressweddinggowndress.tamsquare.com 9)http://www.egi/html/store.htmtflower.com pr3 ink code: http://www.egiftflower.com";>egiftflower-Pearl jewelry, Gold jewelry, Silver jewelry, Diamond jewelry 10)http://www.aussiepins.com pr3 link code: http://www.aussiepins.com";>Wedding Gowns, Wedding Dress, Evening Gowns! 11)http://www.paintings-oil.com/blog.htmlpr3 link code: http://www.paintings-oil.com";> Oil Painting ReproductionsPaintings-oil.com 12)http://www.masterworksartgallery.com/resources.htm pr3 link code: http://www.masterworksartgallery.com/";>Oil Painting Master Works Art Gallery. 13)http://www.wholesaleoilpainting.com/html/wstore.htm pr4 link code: http://www.wholesaleoilpainting.com";>Oil Painting of Landscape, Photo Portrait Reproductions from America's WholesaleOil Painting 14)http://www.wholesaleoilpainting.com/resources.htm pr4 link code: http://www.wholesaleoilpainting.com/masterpiece";>Oil Painting of Landscape, Photo Portrait Reproductions from America's WholesaleOil Painting 15)http://rugs.tamsquare.com pr3 link code: http://rugs.tamsquare.com";>Rugs- Oriental Rugs Area rug Persian Rug Rug Carpet 16)http://frames.tamsquare.com pr3 link code: http://frames.tamsquare.com";>Frames.tamsquare 17)http://leatherjacket.tamsquare.com pr3 link code: http://leatherjacket.tamsquare.com";>Leather Jacket 18)http://tiffany.sculptureyard.com pr4 link code: http://tiffany.sculptureyard.com";>Tiffany Lamp 19)http://diamond.ajewelrygift.com/diamond-stores.html pr3 ??? link code: http://diamond.ajewelrygift.com";>Diamond jewelry, diamond necklace, diamond earrings, diamond pendant, diamond ring 20)http://silver.ajewelrygift.com pr3 link code: http://silver.ajewelrygift.com/";>Silver Jewelry from America's Jewelry Gift! 21)http://www.ajewelrygift.com/html/store.htm pr3 link code: http://www.ajewelrygift.com/";>ajewelrygift.comPearl Jewelry Pearl Necklace Pearl Earrings Gold Jewelry Silver Jewelry Gold Chains Gold Necklace Gold Ring Gold Earrings Silver Necklace Silver Earrings. 22)http://gold.ajewelrygift.com pr4 link code: http://gold.ajewelrygift.com/";>Gold Jewelry from America's Jewelry Gift! 23)http://www.sculptureyard.com/artlinks.html pr4 link code: http://www.sculptureyard.com";>SculptureYard.comArt Reproductions, Sculpture Reproductions 24)http://www.artonrock.com/links.html pr3 link code: http://www.artonrock.com";>artonrockArtonrock.com is very pleased to make it possible to acquire beautiful art reproductions at affordable prices. 25)http://www.arts-plaza.com/html/art-resource.htmpr3 link code: http://www.arts-plaza.com";>arts-plazaArts Plaza Oil Paintings Masterpiece Reproduction 26)http://handbag.tamsquare.com/designer-handbag.html pr3 link code: http://handbag.tamsquare.com/";>Handbag, Designer Handbag, Leather Handbag,Fashion Handbag 27)http://www.tamsquare.com/html/artlink.htm pr3 link code: http://www.tamsquare.com";>Tamsquare.com Art Oil Painting Gallery 28)http://www.wholesaleorientalrug.com pr4 link code: http://www.wholesaleorientalrug.com";>Oriental Rugs Area rug Persian Rug Rug Carpet - Wholesale Oriental Rug 29)http://www.hamelinfurniture.com pr3 link code: http://www.hamelinfurniture.com";>HamelinfurnitureHome & Garden Area Rugs Bath Bedding Bedroom Cookware Cookware & Cutlery Doors & Windows Down Bedding 30)http://www.sofa.tamsquare.com pr3 link code: http://www.sofa.tamsquare.com/";>Sofa.Sculptureyar
Re: Rejuvenated kernel-package uploaded to unstable, please test
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Manoj Srivastava engaged keyboard and shared this with us all: >--} Hi folks, >--} >--} A new version of kernel-package has made its way to unstable. >--} This is a extensive change, and addresses most of the problems that >--} have been plaguing kernel-package, partially thanks to patches provided >--} by other folk. Thank you as always for your good work which is much appreciated. Sincerely, Charlie -- Registered Linux User:- 329524 *** I put a piece of paper under my pillow, and when I could not sleep I wrote in the dark. ...Henry David Thoreau *** Debian, just the best way to create magic ___ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Ampache updated] packages that use deprecated SQL escape functions
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:26 +1100, Steffen Joeris wrote: > Hi everyone > > We had a few issues in the past with insufficient database escaping, which > lead > to possible SQL injections due to the use of the deprecated functions > mysql_escape_string() and PQescapeString(). > These functions do not take the encoding of the established connection into > account, which can lead to insufficient escaping, if the encoding of this > connection can be set to certain multibyte character encodings (such as GBK). > I found the explanation given in this email[0] quite useful to elaborate on > the thread. > > In order to prevent this issue, the new functions mysql_real_escape_string() > [1] and PQescapeStringConn()[2] have been added, which honour the specific > encoding of the connection. > [snip] > > ampache: Charlie Smotherman > > ./ampache-3.5.1/modules/getid3/extension.cache.mysql.php: > $filenam2 > = mysql_escape_string($filename); > ./ampache-3.5.1/modules/getid3/extension.cache.mysql.php:$res2 = > mysql_escape_string(serialize($result)); > Steffen, Thanks for the mail. I have patched ampache to use mysql_real_escape_string(). I would appreciate it if someone would sponsor this fix. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/ampache/ampache_3.5.1-2.dsc Thank you Charlie Smotherman signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Proposed mass prototypejs bug filing for multiple security issues
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 20:43 -0400, Michael S Gilbert wrote: > Hi, > > The prototypejs script has been found to be vulnerable to a couple > security issues [0],[1]. This script is embedded in about 32 other > packages and I would like to file bugs against all of those that are > affected. Since this would probably be considered a mass filing, I am > running it past -devel first. > > - ampache 3.4.1-2 (embed) Not shipped in the resulting binary package. See Depends:, Charlie signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RFH: How to compile swf files from source
Hello all, In my package ampache it ships xspf_jukebox.fla and xspf_jukebox.swf and I recently received bug #591202 which states: "ampache ships a swf file but does not build it from source." I am curious to know which part of Debian Policy states that this is required? I have search but was unable to find anything. If the source code accompanies the precompiled file how does that make the package non compliant with DFSG? (bug #591196) Are there debian tools available to do this? If so what are they? It seems I am not the only one having this problem #591199, #591383. Any help in this matter would be greatly appreciated. Charlie Smotherman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1280958574.29450.39.ca...@debian
RFH: How to compile swf files from source
Hello all, In my package ampache it ships xspf_jukebox.fla and xspf_jukebox.swf and I recently received bug #591202 which states: "ampache ships a swf file but does not build it from source." I am curious to know which part of Debian Policy states that this is required? I have search but was unable to find anything. If the source code accompanies the precompiled file how does that make the package non compliant with DFSG? (bug #591196) Are there debian tools available to do this? If so what are they? It seems I am not the only one having this problem #591199, #591383. Any help in this matter would be greatly appreciated. Charlie Smotherman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1280958365.29450.37.ca...@debian
Re: RFH: How to compile swf files from source
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 16:59 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > [Charlie Smotherman] > > "ampache ships a swf file but does not build it from source." > > > > I am curious to know which part of Debian Policy states that this is > > required? I have search but was unable to find anything. > > It is the principle. If I am an end user, and I want to modify your > .swf file on my Debian system, how do I do it? What do I edit? Do I > need to go through a separate step to obtain a usable .swf with my > modifications in it? > > Source code is a means to an end. The end is the ability of the end > user to customize the software. If you get source code but no way to > build a new .swf file from it, this end is not served. > > (Although Debian doesn't strictly subscribe to the FSF's "Four > Freedoms" (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html), I think the > FSF's explanation of "freedom 1" is pretty good.) > If I interpret your above statement correctly, there is no policy that states that this is required. Is that a fair statement? If there is nothing in policy to support bug #519202, how can it be considered valid? I'm not trying to start a flame war or anything I'm just trying to understand how a bug can be filed against my package and be considered a serious violation of policy when there is nothing in the policy manual stating such. Charlie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1280965190.30107.48.ca...@debian
Re: Are binary packages required to be built from the corresponding source files? (was: RFH: How to compile swf files from source)
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:48 +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Charlie Smotherman writes: > > > "ampache ships a swf file but does not build it from source." > > > > I am curious to know which part of Debian Policy states that this is > > required? I have search but was unable to find anything. > > I would interpret it as follows: > > Policy §2.2.1 states “Every package in _main_ must comply with the DFSG > (Debian Free Software Guidelines).” > > To comply with DFSG §2, the source package must include the binary > package's corresponding source code. > > To comply with DFSG §3, the package must allow the recipient to make > modifications and build a package suitable for redistribution. > > Policy §2.2.1 further states “In addition, the packages in _main_ […] > must not require a package outside of _main_ for compilation or > execution […]”. > > Perhaps that could be interpreted in a way that permits the package > build process to ignore the recipient's changes to the source file and > continue to supply the pre-compiled binary, but that interpretation > seems like a perverse one. > > If the package build process doesn't use the source, as modified by the > recipient, then it's disingenuous to claim that DFSG §3 is being met. > Perhaps the letter is followed, but I would maintain that its intent is > not. > > Perhaps I misunderstand the intent, though. It's happened before :-) Ben, Thanks for you insight, I found it informative and educational. Charlie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1280971778.30943.2.ca...@debian
Re: Non-recompilable binaries in source and binary packages (Adobe Flash strikes again)
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 20:31 +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: > Le jeudi 12 août 2010, Ian Jackson a écrit : > > The current approach of the project in these cases seems to be that > > the right thing to do is to rebuild the source package so that the > > non-free pieces are removed. > > Non-free? According to the DFSG, are not they free? I cannot see any > point of the DFSG that such a program, distributed both in source and > compiled form, with a free license, compilable only with non-free tools, > would infringe. > > I thought they were only failing one policy condition to be in the free > area, but not the DFSG. As the policy section 2.2.2 says: > > Every package in contrib must comply with the DFSG. > > So if such a non-recompilable, free-licensed binary fails the DFSG, it > should not even go to contrib, but to non-free! > Tanguy You may want to look at this thread http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/08/msg00082.html Best regards Charlie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1281639570.2772.27.ca...@debian
(Possible) bug in fglrx dependencies in Sid(Unstable)
Hi, I'm using Sid(Unstable). I tried to install fglrx-driver, and failed. It seems that fglrx-driver requires xorg-video-abi-15 or below, but xserver-xorg-core(1.16.0) in Sid doesn't provide any of them. A search in aptitude shows that it provides xorg-video-abi-18. So I try to install xserver from Wheezy(stable), but xserver-xorg-core(1.12.0) in stable requires libaudit0, which is broken by libaudit-common needed by systemd-208, which in turn is why I choose unstable:). I've checked the content of libaudit0, apart from /etc/libaudit.conf, it doesn't conflict with libaudit1 and libaudit-common. (See this thread: http://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=158459&p=831357) Maybe it's possible to remove the "Brokens: libaudit0" in libaudi-common? Then users of Unstable can use backport version of xserver-xorg-core. Thanks for making debian. It's great. Sincerely, 王文鑫 Charlie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/capf+gf_fyxkbayq1me6jdmestee3rsg-vzusy5vbsa28yco...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#647913: O: boa-constructor -- RAD tool for Python and wxWindows application
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I no longer use boa-constructor and I am not interested in maintaining it anymore. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2007092522.6948.32760.reportbug@eagle
