Bug#1006200: ITP: asdf-standard -- Standards document describing ASDF
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ole Streicher X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org, debian-as...@lists.debian.org * Package name: asdf-standard Version : 1.6.0 Upstream Author : The ASDF Developers * URL : https://github.com/asdf-format/asdf-standard * License : BSD-3-Clause Programming Lang: Python Description : Standards document describing ASDF This document describes the Advanced Scientific Data Format (ASDF). ASDF is a proposed next generation interchange format for scientific data. ASDF aims to exist in the same middle ground that made FITS so successful, by being a hybrid text and binary format: containing humanditable metadata for interchange, and raw binary data that is fast to load and use. Unlike FITS, the metadata is highly structured and is designed up-front for extensibility. It is a build dependency of the asdf-astropy package. I will maintain it within the Debian Astro team in Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/debian-astro-team/asdf-standard Best regards Ole
libzstd should not be maintained by Debian Med team - could some core team please take over (Was: libzstd 1.5.2 in Debian)
Hi, there was a (private) request to upgrade libzstd to latest 1.5.2. I'd like to repeat that I'm really convinced that libzstd should *not* be maintained in the Debian Med team but rather some core team in Debian. It is here for historic reasons but should have moved somewhere more appropriately since it became its general importance. Please consider this mail a team-orphane of the package. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#1006210: ITP: qcoro -- C++20 coroutines for Qt
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hefee X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, he...@debian.org * Package name: qcoro Version : 0.4.0 Upstream Author : Daniel Vrátil * URL : https://qcoro.github.io * License : MIT Programming Lang: C++ Description : C++20 coroutines for Qt QCoro is a C++ library that provide set of tools to make use of C++20 coroutines in connection with certain asynchronous Qt actions. It is already Qt6 ready and Neochat(#989529) depends on it. I will package it under the Qt/KDE Maintainer team umbrella: https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/extras/qcoro Regards, hefee
Re: libzstd should not be maintained by Debian Med team - could some core team please take over (Was: libzstd 1.5.2 in Debian)
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 11:40:36AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > there was a (private) request to upgrade libzstd to latest 1.5.2. > > I'd like to repeat that I'm really convinced that libzstd should *not* > be maintained in the Debian Med team but rather some core team in > Debian. It is here for historic reasons but should have moved somewhere > more appropriately since it became its general importance. > > Please consider this mail a team-orphane of the package. I'm sorry; I do indeed intend to bring it into pkg-rpm, and I will try to do that in the next couple of days. Apologies for the months of delay, and thanks a lot for all of your team's work! G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: libzstd should not be maintained by Debian Med team - could some core team please take over (Was: libzstd 1.5.2 in Debian)
On Monday, February 21, 2022 12:40:26 PM EST Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 11:40:36AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi, > > > > there was a (private) request to upgrade libzstd to latest 1.5.2. > > > > I'd like to repeat that I'm really convinced that libzstd should *not* > > be maintained in the Debian Med team but rather some core team in > > Debian. It is here for historic reasons but should have moved somewhere > > more appropriately since it became its general importance. > > > > Please consider this mail a team-orphane of the package. > > I'm sorry; I do indeed intend to bring it into pkg-rpm, and I will try > to do that in the next couple of days. Apologies for the months of > delay, and thanks a lot for all of your team's work! > > G'luck, > Peter Please consider the pending rm bug for armhf [1]. I suspect this is related. Scott K https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006139#10 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
