Bug#894031: ITP: r-cran-multcompview -- GNU R visualizations of paired comparisons
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-cran-multcompview
Version : 0.1-7
Upstream Author : Spencer Graves, Hans-Peter Piepho and Luciano Selzer
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=multcompView
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: GNU R
Description : GNU R visualizations of paired comparisons
Convert a logical vector or a vector of p-values or a correlation,
difference, or distance matrix into a display identifying the pairs
for which the differences were not significantly different.
Designed for use in conjunction with the output of functions like
TukeyHSD, dist{stats}, simint, simtest, csimint, csimtest{multcomp},
friedmanmc, kruskalmc{pgirmess}.
Remark: This package is needed to run the test suite of r-cran-lsmeans
(see #877409). It will be maintained by the r-pkg team at
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-multcompview
Bug#894057: ITP: golang-github-jedisct1-xsecretbox -- Go implementation of crypto_secretbox_xchacha20poly1305
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Eric Dorland * Package name: golang-github-jedisct1-xsecretbox Version : 0.0~git20180214.88b1956-1 Upstream Author : Frank Denis * URL : https://github.com/jedisct1/xsecretbox * License : MIT Programming Lang: Go Description : Go implementation of crypto_secretbox_xchacha20poly1305 xsecretbox is a Go implementation of crypto_secretbox_xchacha20poly1305.
Re: [NLnet Labs Maintainers] Looking for new opendnssec and softhsm maintainer
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Berry A.W. van Halderen wrote: > On 31 July 2017, Ondřej Surý wrote: >> I am looking for a new maintainer for opendnssec and softhsm package. >> Honestly, I am not using neither, and it's quite hard to do a packaging >> when you don't use the packages in question, and I think the package >> suffer as a consequence, and I very much dislike that, so a new >> maintainer using the package and interested in improving the Debian >> packages would be great. > > At NLnet Labs we prefer these open source packages are better maintained > by someone from within the (Debian) community. It allows non-affiliated > persons to be more in-tune with the packaging method of the distribution > and are more free to make own choices. We don't advocate a particular > distribution. > > Having said that, we have a natural interest that the maintenance > does not get orphaned. I'm sure that one of us, on a personal > basis (i.e. outside of our organization control) would want to > volunteer, but only if there are really no other candidates and > for a transitional period. Our organization allows for us to do > these kind of things, without NLnet Labs having any responsibility > or accountability in this. > > But it would be a lot better for Debian as well to have others step in. I moved softhsm2 to salsa, and upload 2.4.0 to Debian with 3 days delayed. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/softhsm2 If you don't agree with it, please feel free to cancel it. > > With kind regards, > Berry van Halderen > -- YunQiang Su
