Re: Bug#806642: ITP: ruby-flowdock -- Practiced debian packaging
Control: reassign -1 wnpp Control: owner -1 sudheeshshe...@gmail.com Control: retitle -1 ITP: ruby-flowdoc -- gem for using the Flowdock Push API On Du, 29 nov 15, 23:21:40, sudheesh shetty wrote: > package: flowdockSeverity: wishlistOwner: Sudheesh Shetty > *Package Name : flowdock Version : 0.0.0 > Upstream Author : Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers*URL : > https://github.com/flowdock/flowdock-api*License : GPL-2+*Description > : This is just for practicing of the packaging.I am packaging > flowdock for practice. -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Upcoming version of apt-file - using apt-acquire and incompatibilities
Hi, In the new version of apt-file (currently in experimental), we have changed/removed some features that will affect some packages. Packages listed below are BCC'ed to this mail. Notably: * /var/cache/apt-file will disappear - command-not-found and dh-make-perl are known consumers * Personal caches have been removed (-c) - apt-venv creates files that uses that option * "apt-file update" will become a thin call to "apt update" - live-build uses this in a hook * "apt-file search/show ..." will exit 1 when no matches are found. - Presumably some will be bitten by this! - I am open to having a switch in apt-file to make it exit 0 even with no matches (but I believe that exit 1 should be the default). * "apt-file show foo" now only lists the contents of "foo" rather than any package containing "foo" as a part of its name. - similar to dpkg -L foo * The full list of known incompatibilities is in the changelog[1] If you know of packages/pieces of the Debian infrastructure that are affected by this, please let me know so I can file bugs against them. Thanks, ~Niels [1] https://tracker.debian.org/news/712486 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Upcoming version of apt-file - using apt-acquire and incompatibilities
On 2015-12-05 at 07:39, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > In the new version of apt-file (currently in experimental), we have > changed/removed some features that will affect some packages. Packages > listed below are BCC'ed to this mail. > > Notably: > * "apt-file update" will become a thin call to "apt update" >- live-build uses this in a hook Will it still be possible to update just the apt-file index, separately from updating the main package index? I see no indication in the current apt(8) man page of a way to tell apt to do this. I don't use 'apt update', but rather 'apt-get update', paired with a separate 'apt-file update'. While unifying the two commands would be useful for those who use apt, it would also seem to leave those who don't with at most three options: switch to apt, stop updating the apt-file index, or deal with redundant updates to the package index (which might quality as "switch to apt" in practice). -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Upcoming version of apt-file - using apt-acquire and incompatibilities
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > * The full list of known incompatibilities is in the changelog[1] - Special uses of "-a" to search in Source packages or udebs have been replaced by "--index-names". Would it be possible to get a `-a source` to map to `--index-names dsc` or to get a shorter option to search source packages (maybe `apt-file -s`)? I use this on the terminal a fair bit and typing the new option could get tedious. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Re: Upcoming version of apt-file - using apt-acquire and incompatibilities
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 05/12/2015 13:58, The Wanderer a écrit : > On 2015-12-05 at 07:39, Niels Thykier wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> In the new version of apt-file (currently in experimental), we have >> changed/removed some features that will affect some packages. Packages >> listed below are BCC'ed to this mail. As there have been interface modifications, I would have been very pleased if #525813 was fixed (ie a way to show package version and/or suite) >> Notably: > >> * "apt-file update" will become a thin call to "apt update" - live-build >> uses this in a hook > > Will it still be possible to update just the apt-file index, separately from > updating the main package index? I see no indication in the current apt(8) > man page of a way to tell apt to do this. Even if using "apt update", I do not wish to update the Contents each time I do an "apt update". I just discovered with this thread that "apt-get update" will do it. It is a significant download time by default that wont be useful to lots of people. I just installed apt-file from experimental: $ sudo apt-file update [...] 582 Mo réceptionnés en 11min 12s (866 ko/s) [...] $ Regards, Vincent - -- Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0xD17897FA vdanj...@debian.org GPG key fingerprint: 621E 3509 654D D77C 43F5 CA4A F6AE F2AF D178 97FA Unofficial pkgs: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html APT repo: deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main
Bug#807121: ITP: golang-github-dgryski-go-bits -- amd64 optimized bit operations
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alexandre Viau * Package name: golang-github-dgryski-go-bits Version : 0.0~git20151205.0.86c69b3-1 Upstream Author : Damian Gryski * URL : https://github.com/dgryski/go-bits * License : TODO Programming Lang: Go Description : amd64 optimized bit operations This is needed for InfluxDB signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#804621: ITP: liblightify -- library to control OSRAM LIGHTIFY products
Package: wnpp Followup-For: Bug #804621 Owner: Tobias Frost Package is now in NEW. Tobi
Bug#807146: ITP: koji -- RPM-based build system
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" * Package name: koji Version : 1.10.0 Upstream Author : Mike McLean , Dennis Gregorovic , Mike Bonnet , Jesse Keating * URL : https://fedorahosted.org/koji/ * License : LGPL Programming Lang: Python Description : RPM-based build system The Fedora Project uses Koji for their build system, as do several other projects. Koji's goal is to provide a flexible, secure, and reproducible way to build software. Key features: - New buildroot for each build - Robust XML-RPC APIs for easy integration with other tools - Web interface with SSL and Kerberos authentication - Thin, portable command line client - Users can create local buildroots - Buildroot contents are tracked in the database - Versioned data The package required to plug Fedora packages into reproducible build testing infrastructure.
Re: Upcoming version of apt-file - using apt-acquire and incompatibilities
Paul Wise: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > >> * The full list of known incompatibilities is in the changelog[1] > > - Special uses of "-a" to search in Source packages or >udebs have been replaced by "--index-names". > > Would it be possible to get a `-a source` to map to `--index-names > dsc` or to get a shorter option to search source packages (maybe > `apt-file -s`)? I use this on the terminal a fair bit and typing the > new option could get tedious. > Certainly, I have reserved -I as a short hand of --index-names, so it will be "apt-file -I dsc ...". Thanks, ~Niels signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Upcoming version of apt-file - using apt-acquire and incompatibilities
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Certainly, I have reserved -I as a short hand of --index-names, so it > will be "apt-file -I dsc ...".' Ok, -s would be easier but I guess I can make do. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Re: Upcoming version of apt-file - using apt-acquire and incompatibilities
Vincent Danjean: > Le 05/12/2015 13:58, The Wanderer a écrit : >> On 2015-12-05 at 07:39, Niels Thykier wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> In the new version of apt-file (currently in experimental), we have >>> changed/removed some features that will affect some packages. Packages >>> listed below are BCC'ed to this mail. > > As there have been interface modifications, I would have been very pleased > if #525813 was fixed (ie a way to show package version and/or suite) > I will have a look at it. :) >>> Notably: >> >>> * "apt-file update" will become a thin call to "apt update" - live-build >>> uses this in a hook >> >> Will it still be possible to update just the apt-file index, separately from >> updating the main package index? I see no indication in the current apt(8) >> man page of a way to tell apt to do this. > > Even if using "apt update", I do not wish to update the Contents each > time I do an "apt update". I just discovered with this thread that > "apt-get update" will do it. It is a significant download time by > default that wont be useful to lots of people. > > [...] > > Regards, > Vincent > > [...] Please file a bug against APT for this feature. :) Thanks, ~Niels signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
