Bug#782436: ITP: pyomo -- Python Optimization Modeling Objects

2015-04-12 Thread Daniel Stender
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Stender 

* Package name: pyomo
  Version : 4.0.9682
  Upstream Author : William E. Hart
* URL : http://pyomo.org
* License : BSD
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description : Python Optimization Modeling Objects

Pyomo is a tool for writing and analyzing optimization
models. It could be compared to algebraic modeling languages
(AML) [1], but has the advantage of having its objects
within the Python environment. A example of finding
optimal daily fantasy leagues is on the net here [2].

Pyomo features public modules, but these are for writing
the models [3]. So it would belong to the PAPT. A
prerequisite for a Pyomo package is PyUtilib.

Cheers,
DS

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_modeling_language

[2] 
https://thedatabarista.wordpress.com/2015/01/27/pyomo-meets-fantasy-football/

[3] https://software.sandia.gov/downloads/pub/pyomo/PyomoOnlineDocs.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20150412082120.5258.37767.report...@varuna.home



facts/stats/titbits for release live-denting

2015-04-12 Thread Paul Wise
Hi all,

Some folks in the publicity team are thinking about live-denting the
release. This will basically be relaying IRC to identi.ca/debian and
elswhere, with wording changes for people not as familiar with Debian.
In the past we have interspersed the updates with some filler during the
slow periods; random facts, stats and other titbits. If you or your team
have some info you would like to add, please commit to SVN (all Debian
members), reply to debian-publicity or share on IRC in #debian-publicity

svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/publicity/release/dents/filler.txt
https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/publicity/release/dents/filler.txt?view=markup

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#782448: ITP: telepathy-gabble-legacy -- Jabber/XMPP connection manager (legacy branch)

2015-04-12 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

* Package name: telepathy-gabble-legacy
  Version : 0.16.7
  Upstream Author : Collabora Ltd.
* URL : http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/wiki/
* License : LGPL-2.1+
  Programming Lang: C
  Description : Jabber/XMPP connection manager (legacy branch)

 Gabble is a Jabber/XMPP connection manager for the Telepathy framework,
 currently supporting single user chats, multi user chats and voice/video
 calls. Install this package to use Telepathy instant messaging clients
 with Jabber/XMPP servers, including Google Talk and Facebook Chat.
 .
 NB! This is an older legacy branch of Gabble with Tubes API, requires
 for use with Sugar.  If you do not need Tubes API then you are strongly
 recommended to instead use the regular telepathy-gabble package.

This package is needed by (all branches of) Sugar, which rely on the
Tubes API no longer provided by mainline telepathy-gabble.

The packaging will be maintained by the Debian Sugar Team - unless the
Debian Telepathy maintainers is willing to take over (hence Cc'ed) :-)

 - Jonas

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=bo68
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20150412115131.30463.23539.report...@bastian.jones.dk



Re: Minified javascripts in packages

2015-04-12 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Paul Wise  wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
>> What is mandatory is being able to rebuild everything from source with
>> tools available in Debian (main)
>
> Unfortunately we don't have any consistent way to manually or
> automatically verify that we can do this.
>
> I expect we would need Build-Depends-Extra and debian/rules distclean
> to make that happen. Thoughts?

I prefer from a lintian maintainer point of view to rebuild everything
from source. At least it is easier to detect.

Please also help me to improve source-is-missing tag. It has a lot of
override and it will be better to automatically detect false positive.

If missing source are not detected please fill a bug against lintian
with if possible a patch.

Bastien

> --
> bye,
> pabs
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: 
> https://lists.debian.org/caktje6etzjk986dkxzhu5oqn4xa9ysqzgbmwrmhucr4voqg...@mail.gmail.com
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/cae2spaad0k7dfnz7v_y391sioks2vpoa8-a1mgutyd79ql1...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#782464: general: access violation 7e9bc87f in module gdi32 dill read of address 00aiffo2

2015-04-12 Thread time
Package: general
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation? updates of system
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffectived)  I tried to reinstall program, did not help, mint 17 has
same problem
   * What was the outcome of this action?voaprop in wine quit working
   * What outcome did you expect instead?with update not to make program to
stop working in get message (access violation 7e9bc87f in module gdi32 dill
read of ooaiffo2

*** End of the template - remove these lines ***



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.8
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150412172420.3748.13900.reportbug@debian



Bug#782464: general: access violation 7e9bc87f in module gdi32 dill read of address 00aiffo2

2015-04-12 Thread Simon Richter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

retitle 782646 [regression] segmentation fault running voaprop.exe
reassign 782646 wine
severity 782646 normal
tags 782646 +upstream +moreinfo
thanks

Hi,

This appears to be a wine bug, so I've reassigned it to the wine
maintainers. I'm fairly sure they have further questions and/or
instructions. If I've made an error in the initial classification,
please speak up.

> * What led up to the situation? updates of system

Since you appear to be running Debian wheezy (7.8), that should never
happen. Have you upgraded to Debian jessie (in that case, your update
seems incomplete), or just run a regular update?

> * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or 
> ineffectived)

> I tried to reinstall program, did not help, mint 17 has same
> problem

This affects multiple distributions, so it is likely to be a general
problem with the software rather than with the packaging ("upstream").

> * What was the outcome of this action?

> voaprop in wine quit working

What software is that?

> * What outcome did you expect instead?

> with update not to make program to stop working in get message
> (access violation 7e9bc87f in module gdi32 dill read of ooaiffo2

> -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.8 APT prefers
> stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500,
> 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686)

> Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale:
> LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh
> linked to /bin/dash

As said, there may be further questions, but if I have guessed wrong
somewhere, please tell us at the address specific for this bug report
(782...@bugs.debian.org). You should receive copies of most of the
conversation about this problem anyway, and the current state of the
discussion can always be found at http://bugs.debian/org/782646 .

   Simon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/552ae781.60...@debian.org



Processed: Re: Processed (with 4 errors): Re: Bug#782464: general: access violation 7e9bc87f in module gdi32 dill read of address 00aiffo2

2015-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 782464 [regression] segmentation fault running voaprop.exe
Bug #782464 [general] general: access violation 7e9bc87f in module gdi32 dill 
read of address 00aiffo2
Changed Bug title to '[regression] segmentation fault running voaprop.exe' from 
'general: access violation 7e9bc87f in module gdi32 dill read of address 
00aiffo2'
> reassign 782464 wine
Bug #782464 [general] [regression] segmentation fault running voaprop.exe
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'wine'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #782464 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #782464 to the same values 
previously set
> severity 782464 normal
Bug #782464 [wine] [regression] segmentation fault running voaprop.exe
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
> tags 782464 +upstream +moreinfo
Bug #782464 [wine] [regression] segmentation fault running voaprop.exe
Added tag(s) upstream.
Bug #782464 [wine] [regression] segmentation fault running voaprop.exe
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
782464: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782464
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.142888480821510.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: Minified javascripts in packages

2015-04-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:

> I prefer from a lintian maintainer point of view to rebuild everything
> from source. At least it is easier to detect.

That is indeed preferable since we can then prove we are distributing
the source but it is unlikely we can get there any time soon. Examples
include all the packages not using dh-autoreconf, autotools-using
packages that don't build-depend on other packages containing m4
macros they embed, firmware-linux-free and other firmware packages,
fonts, things that can only be built manually because they have
interactive build tools, things that have build-deps that are
hard/complicated to package (such as the Flash/Flex SDK), packages
that behave differently when built from source on Debian and so on.

> Please also help me to improve source-is-missing tag. It has a lot of
> override and it will be better to automatically detect false positive.

I think we need to do an archive-wide audit of all lintian overrides,
I'm not convinced that most of them were added in good faith.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6HU_0CggWWA--wd=f7n14wozfzjeazbjgqmxdpyyne...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Minified javascripts in packages

2015-04-12 Thread Ben Finney
Paul Wise  writes:

> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>
> > I prefer from a lintian maintainer point of view to rebuild
> > everything from source. At least it is easier to detect.
>
> That is indeed preferable since we can then prove we are distributing
> the source but it is unlikely we can get there any time soon.

Can we agree, in the context of the original post of this thread:

Rebuilding from source *is* a reasonable requirement, attainable with
what we have today in Debian, for JavaScript works.

-- 
 \  “I am too firm in my consciousness of the marvelous to be ever |
  `\   fascinated by the mere supernatural …” —Joseph Conrad, _The |
_o__) Shadow-Line_ |
Ben Finney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/85bniswvey@benfinney.id.au



Re: Minified javascripts in packages

2015-04-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Ben Finney wrote:

> Can we agree, in the context of the original post of this thread:
>
> Rebuilding from source *is* a reasonable requirement, attainable with
> what we have today in Debian, for JavaScript works.

The first mail mentioned that grunt is not yet in Debian and seemed to
suggest this is required for building newer versions of jQuery and
some software uses/embeds prebuilt copies of these newer versions of
jQuery. So your statement doesn't appear to be correct as we are
missing grunt and newer versions of jQuery.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/caktje6efyyw4nkdvfnh5a03tyuhefsaj_pc0ngjdlopbyrn...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Minified javascripts in packages

2015-04-12 Thread Ben Finney
Paul Wise  writes:

> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > Can we agree, in the context of the original post of this thread:
> >
> > Rebuilding from source *is* a reasonable requirement, attainable with
> > what we have today in Debian, for JavaScript works.
>
> The first mail mentioned that grunt is not yet in Debian and seemed to
> suggest this is required for building newer versions of jQuery

I don't know what Grunt is, or what role it plays in building jQuery. If
Grunt is a build dependency, it seems “package it as free software in
Debian” is a resonable pre-requisite for those jQuery works to be in
Debian.

> and some software uses/embeds prebuilt copies of these newer versions
> of jQuery.

Yes, there is a lot of such software. I think the point to be made here
is that, unlike kernel firmware, compiling JavaScript does not require
onerous toolchains.

As I understand it, no JavaScript library is special enough to be an
exception to our general requirement that all parts of Debian must be
demonstrably buildable from source form, with only what's in Debian
already.

> So your statement doesn't appear to be correct as we are missing grunt
> and newer versions of jQuery.

Right, I wasn't clear enough: I'm saying that despite all the other
non-JavaScript cases brought up later in the thread, the requirement
(build from source form, with only build dependencies also in Debian)
applies just fine to JavaScript libraries.

Can we agree on that?

-- 
 \ “I must say that I find television very educational. The minute |
  `\   somebody turns it on, I go to the library and read a book.” |
_o__)—Groucho Marx |
Ben Finney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/857ftgwrln@benfinney.id.au



Re: Minified javascripts in packages

2015-04-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Ben Finney wrote:

> Right, I wasn't clear enough: I'm saying that despite all the other
> non-JavaScript cases brought up later in the thread, the requirement
> (build from source form, with only build dependencies also in Debian)
> applies just fine to JavaScript libraries.
>
> Can we agree on that?

As I have seen instances where the JavaScript was built by web
services, I'd say the real world is much too complicated to even agree
on that.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/caktje6eg9ezqvqk6_aotmmymturrhmt5jrxniryw3v2bqaj...@mail.gmail.com