Re: Recommend documentation
Le mardi 18 juin 2013 à 00:18 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit : > I have noticed that a number of packages tend to recommend documentation, > which is then by default normally installed. > Is there a policy for that? I don’t think so, apart from the maintainer’s good judgement as to who needs the doc. In the general case, these are useful: - foo-bin Recommends: foo-user-doc - libfoo-dev Recommends: foo-api-doc > Using dpkg I found a number of latex -doc packages installed with > recommends for the total size of 694MB. Isn’t it a good thing? Whenever you do latex, you need the documentation sometimes. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1371542082.4117.215.camel@pi0307572
Bug#712647: ITP: digitd -- A simple, flexible and safe finger daemon
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Radovan Garabík" * Package name: digitd Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Reuben Thomas * URL : https://github.com/rrthomas/digitd * License : GPL Programming Lang: Perl Description : A simple, flexible and safe finger daemon digitd is ready-to-run out of the box, yet easy to customize. It allows users to opt in to being fingerable, rather than the usual opt-out. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers stable APT policy: (900, 'stable'), (400, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130618084641.16203.60171.reportbug@localhost.localdomain
Mail breaks spamassassin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, Currently I encountered the mail <20130617170434.ga10...@scru.org> breaking spamassassin version 3.3.2-2~bpo60+1 on oldstable. The effect was that I had to disable spamassassin selective for bendel.debian.org to get the mail. Anybody similar experiences? Regards Klaus - -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJRwDWeAAoJEKZ8CrGAGfas4eQL/0WJFBstrswop3duZjH6kpy2 C+y1L3vL40fsFXGKqSI3J0tt196mhdjxo5x8m56TOmp4U8EC7Kw/F/Nd7K9kF0BL tzIUftDGWjdtjCV5ntZmOM7ao3nBppJVL5jlnyLge/9ss0iIVU/7xD0H5S3mYmoc PF3CxWo7s/5dC9AtdUZ2gzEJS0mBT46M8Im800Oh8JwxYUkHDtXpEMBwbqtbaQkc SAe85+WExj+gWKHrgeyRVuoaCfQIYcwTSmozTJ71FT5Odx4KxPvhE/ZADxfcXoKk 5Iq1Nf2vGCQOP+9/fWzmcO6cV2xdQMAtXI+MZWN5jtpsfOja69b67Uyvb33nGbJS vya/CWSqHV85Oya5hYpPwA62STd9FNlJHac92aOBY861ck4xf2nR0s2DwcvVUjFM G682bh2/59DIZAKu9GgHpsz41gReBiJaAIQqxWYBcsxCzZXdNRg0XPRhyuuNyVHM mlhpKmvBvb1gjbHnhOaKE0yiXBwigKXAgc5C021vYw== =DDSs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130618102534.ga28...@ikki.ethgen.ch
Re: Mail breaks spamassassin
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > Currently I encountered the mail <20130617170434.ga10...@scru.org> > breaking spamassassin version 3.3.2-2~bpo60+1 on oldstable. > > The effect was that I had to disable spamassassin selective for > bendel.debian.org to get the mail. > > Anybody similar experiences? Please file a bug against spamassassin and add some details to it; what the error message was for example. http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6ghc2ijk8nvwzonur6p_xpnpfnuobf+yew12cjpy8x...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Mail breaks spamassassin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, Am Di den 18. Jun 2013 um 12:45 schrieb Paul Wise: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > > Currently I encountered the mail <20130617170434.ga10...@scru.org> > > breaking spamassassin version 3.3.2-2~bpo60+1 on oldstable. > > > > The effect was that I had to disable spamassassin selective for > > bendel.debian.org to get the mail. > > > > Anybody similar experiences? > > Please file a bug against spamassassin and add some details to it; > what the error message was for example. > > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting I do not like to use browsers. Especially to report bugs. However, this is oldstable as you might have read. And the message I mention was coming over debian-devel list. And I asked if there is similar experiences _before_ I file a bug. It makes no sense to file a bug if it is only in oldstable. Also there was no error message than the spamd did not finished scanning the message. Regards Klaus - -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJRwEtNAAoJEKZ8CrGAGfasG6QMAJou4/E3eZ6p8rRn6E/KKUAH LcCjciY1ZX9QR/ta+oN3ot6X7+dodCZeDbOvTXJlqfyeoH2cixfAgdT0bLpkzNXL wemZ7dvBd2N+Q3WPaEE8FSnldZGkruOimg3GOubkVVElm90M4r4dhGlMROoiSfHW 5HQjUEQxyrh5JaP0WPqkJOJRUcBSjomrlrY/1mNvzdOJD6ou5J02EcwzYwNvHjbA b46bnQFOfwT0UK+PwQ1iCtaEDHyKXpfk6A8DqJLz8+kOyZMr9u35Xy+VX3UR8A5h VRnaXvPokgWg69RKaD4v9oXdYaZkQo3hLzvZOF0+UcSgn17RP3bjc4GmpqNc/eUm iLPP1lAavPkmiaP+bkZ65WDZsuhdL146W2CldQw2vL0XxKTjzpeOgMm1LsrL16ZN Q5jRiTFw8DuIdCQ0Y/5lwcneQssCH+BLXGC7nw1DEIRxlunlsH4N7vZi1hdupFw5 U5dl+T/rQkz1fbAOH1aQd69rdvGsMj4F+Op9jAmieg== =CPN7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130618115805.gb28...@ikki.ethgen.ch
Re: Mail breaks spamassassin
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: >> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting > > I do not like to use browsers. Especially to report bugs. Likewise, however bug reporting in Debian is only done via email not via a web browser. You can either use the reportbug program or send mail manually. > It makes no sense to file a bug if it is only in oldstable. It definitely makes sense to file a bug no matter what the suite is, since this is a security issue (Denial of Service at minimum) and oldstable currently has security support. > Also there was no error message than the spamd did not finished scanning > the message. There should be an error message listed in syslog. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6fq-azy3ouyd+bbrtsbid3vym9xfwd8o44seir7cux...@mail.gmail.com
Feedback regarding Debian 7.1's handling of services
Hello, When I install software designed to be ran as a service in Debian 7.1 using dpkg, its gets started automatically. This is dangerous and I think this behaviour should be changed to not start the service automatically. Some default settings in software is not suitable for some environments software gets installed into I.E: Tor; Postfix. Also, I think most people generally don't use default settings when installing software that runs as a service, so they would need to restart the service after configuring it anyway. Regards, Nikolas Kallis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51c05156.1080...@nikolaskallis.com
Re: Feedback regarding Debian 7.1's handling of services
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:23:50PM +1000, Nikolas Kallis wrote: > Some default settings in software is not suitable for some > environments software gets installed into I.E: Tor; Postfix. Care to explain? Tor is client-only in the standard config and the Postfix standard config is safe and suitable for a standalone system. Bastian -- Insufficient facts always invite danger. -- Spock, "Space Seed", stardate 3141.9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2013061812.gb15...@mail.waldi.eu.org
Bug#712679: ITP: mrs -- Complete Information Retrieval System for Biomedical databanks
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Maarten L. Hekkelman" * Package name: mrs Version : 6.0.1 Upstream Author : Maarten L. Hekkelman * URL : http://mrs.cmbi.ru.nl/ * License : Boost Programming Lang: C++, Perl, JavaScript Description : Complete Information Retrieval System for Biomedical databanks MRS which stands for Maartens Retrieval System is a complete information retrieval system. It comes with all the code necessary to keep a set of biological or medial text databanks up-to-date and indexed, allows for fast full text searches and can even provide Blast compatible protein searches. Data can be accessed using the builtin web application or via webservices. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130617073310.45008.15930.report...@debian-7.cmbi.umcn.nl
Re: Mail breaks spamassassin
Hi, Le 18/06/2013 07:45, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > >> Currently I encountered the mail <20130617170434.ga10...@scru.org> >> breaking spamassassin version 3.3.2-2~bpo60+1 on oldstable. > Please file a bug against spamassassin Even for backported stuff? Does the documentation need an update? http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/#index6h2 Regards David signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Recommend documentation
> Isn’t it a good thing? Whenever you do latex, you need the documentation > sometimes. I just use the documentation online, so I can search, most of the time my problem aren't the options but which package am I supposed to use, so since I can't search in the local documentation as easily as I do online, it's not that useful for me. -- Salvo Tomaselli http://web.student.chalmers.se/~saltom/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2779661.H3gqeAc2il@hal9000
Re: Mail breaks spamassassin
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:07:09 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: >On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > >>> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting >> >> I do not like to use browsers. Especially to report bugs. > >Likewise, however bug reporting in Debian is only done via email not >via a web browser. You can either use the reportbug program or send >mail manually. Klaus knows that very well, as he is a user of the Debian BTS for decades. Greetings Marc -- -- !! No courtesy copies, please !! - Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1up2zg-0003fj...@drop.zugschlus.de
system time has change while installing
Hello. I use debian-live-7.0.0-amd64-gnome-desktop. And it has error in Time Zones Settings. System Time changes during installation. It`s possible that date can changes too. for example: when i boot from livecd i change location settings from London to Russia (Asia), Krasnoyarsk and my system time changes from 20:20 to 04:20 example2: when i install version to hdd my system time changed from 00:50 to 08:50 i suppose that error present in other versions. same problem i noticed in Scientific Linux. i use ROSA Desktop Fresh and looks like it hasn`t error. in my own apinion: date and time must be stay as it set in local pc, while time zones parameters sets in configs. -- Maxim Markov
Re: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:12:30PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 13.06.2013 16:46, schrieb Steven Chamberlain:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 13/06/13 13:51, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> GCC 4.8 is now the default on all x86 architectures, and on all ARM
> >> architectures (the latter confirmed by the Debian ARM porters). I did not
> >> get
> >> any feedback from other port maintainers, so unless this does change and
> >> port
> >> maintainers get involved with toolchain maintenance, the architectures
> >> staying
> >> at 4.6 or 4.7 shouldn't be considered for a successful release
> >> (re-)qualification.
> >
> > I trust these are the architectures that are okay so far:
> > | gcc48_archs = amd64 armel armhf arm64 i386 x32 kfreebsd-amd64
> > kfreebsd-i386 hurd-i386
>
> no, they are probably not ok, and there surely are yet undiscovered
> regressions,
> but at least the ARM porters did agree to address these. Same seems to be true
> for the kfreebsd and hurd porters. They did change GCC defaults usually at the
> same time as this was done for the x86 linux archs.
>
> > So the following would be the architectures for which some response is
> > requested urgently from port maintainers, to confirm they are ready for
> > GCC 4.8 as default:
> >
> > Release arches: ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x sparc
> >
> > All the above have built gcc-4.8.1-2 or higher.
>
> and nobody committing to scan the bts for architecture specific issues, nobody
> to prepare test cases, nobody to forward these.
I did report a few mips/mipsel issue to upstream binutils and gcc, and
they have all been solved. I am not aware of any reported mips/mipsel
binutils or gcc-4.{6,7,8} problem reported in the debian BTS, except
#710683, which is recent and I haven't investigated it yet (but is likely
an OOM issue on the buildd).
Could you please provide me a few pointers?
> > Other ports: alpha hppa* m68k powerpcspe ppc64 sh4* sparc64*
> >
> > * these ports don't appear to have successfully built GCC 4.8 yet.
>
> afaics, alpha, powerpcspe and ppc64 did build. Note that you cannot trust the
> hppa status, this port is still denied access to ports.debian.org and is kept
> in
> another place.
>
hppa porters have ignored my emails during a few years, and then started
to write me during a few more years using an email address that went
to /dev/null, so they never got my answers, and thus never answered me...
This is true that they have recently contacted me through another email
address, but I haven't found time to work on that. Just stay tuned.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130618220536.ga22...@hall.aurel32.net
Re: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie
Hi Aurelien, On 18-Jun-13, at 6:05 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: This is true that they have recently contacted me through another email address, but I haven't found time to work on that. Just stay tuned. That's great news. Helge and I have been working away as best we can to maintain the port. I know everybody is busy and this is a significant effort. Dave -- John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/blu0-smtp54755f6f47f39a181d6a697...@phx.gbl
Re: Mail breaks spamassassin
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:32:20PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > >>> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting > >> > >> I do not like to use browsers. Especially to report bugs. > > > >Likewise, however bug reporting in Debian is only done via email not > >via a web browser. You can either use the reportbug program or send > >mail manually. > > Klaus knows that very well, as he is a user of the Debian BTS for > decades. Why he wrote that then? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
