Re: default MTA

2013-06-15 Thread David Weinehall
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> The issue that worries me most about these desktop notification plans is
> the possibility that some package may decide to unnecessarily drop
> support for non-desktop systems, adding dependencies on the desktop
> notification system. I believe we already have had a few examples of
> such unnecessary dependencies on services which are "nice to have", like
> GNOME depending on NetworkManager for example.

I'm having a hard time understanding this particular gripe.  If you're
running a non-desktop system (by this I take it to mean that you're not
using a GUI), why would you worry about GNOME's dependencies anyhow?

If you're using a desktop system it doesn't feel like a stretch to use
functionality that fits in with the desktop system.  And vice versa,
obviously.


Regards: David
-- 
 /) David Weinehall  /) Rime on my window   (\
//  ~   //  Diamond-white roses of fire //
\)  http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/(/   Beautiful hoar-frost   (/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130615110439.gc26...@hirohito.acc.umu.se



Bug#712377: ITP: mapcache -- tile caching server

2013-06-15 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bas Couwenberg 

* Package name: mapcache
  Version : 1.0.0
  Upstream Author : Thomas Bonfort and the MapServer team
* URL : http://mapserver.org/en/mapcache/
* License : MIT/X with BSD-3-clause and GPL-2+ components.
  Programming Lang: C, Python
  Description : tile caching server

MapCache is a server that implements tile caching to speed up access to
WMS layers. The primary objectives are to be fast and easily deployable,
while offering the essential features (and more!) expected from a tile
caching solution.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20130615122124.28516.19348.report...@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl



Fwd: Debian RT

2013-06-15 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
Hello,

What is the right way to contact the Security Team? I have tried the
tracker, and a variety of e-mail addresses but nothing yet (maybe I'm doing
something wrong?). An update to Debian 7 was released today without a
security fix for my package jquery-jplayer, even though the fix has been
available for one solid month :-/


-- Forwarded message --
From: Pau Garcia i Quiles 
Date: Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:09 AM
Subject: Fwd: Debian RT
To: secur...@rt.debian.org
Cc: secur...@debian.org, t...@security.debian.org, Vincent Bernat <
ber...@debian.org>


Hello,

I have had no response for my security report in two weeks. Any news on
allowing jquery-jplayer 2.1.0-3 in the security repository?

Also, this is wrong:

https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2013-2023

ALL versions are vulnerable. The fix for stable is 2.1.0-3 (waiting for an
answer from the Security Team) and the "fix" for testing/unstable is
2.3.4-1, which Vincent just sponsored.

Thank you.

-- Forwarded message --
From: Pau Garcia i Quiles 
Date: Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:22 PM
Subject: Debian RT
To: secur...@rt.debian.org
Cc: Vincent Bernat 


Hello,

A new XSS vulnerability was discovered in my package jquery-jplayer.

Useful information (as listed in the DD Reference) :

- Whether or not the bug is already public

  The bug is public and classified as CVE-2013-2023


- Which versions of the package are known to be affected by the bug. Check
each version that is present in a supported Debian release, as well as
testing and unstable

  Upstream versions 2.2.19 and newer are affected, including 2.3.0

  Wheezy contains 2.1.0-2, which is upstream's 2.1.0 plus three backported
security fixes

   Testing contains 2.1.0-2 too

  Sid contains 2.3.0-1, which is upstream's 2.3.0, unchanged. I am
packaging upstream's 2.3.2 as 2.3.2-1 and it will be ready later today.


- The nature of the fix, if any is available (patches are especially
helpful)

  Backport of upstream's fixes


- Any fixed packages that you have prepared yourself (send only the
.diff.gz and .dsc files and read Section 5.8.5.4, “Preparing packages to
address security issues” first)

  jquery-jplayer 2.1.0-3 contains the fixes. It is available from mentors:


http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jquery-jplayer/jquery-jplayer_2.1.0-3.dsc

  Debdiff to 2.1.0-2 attached

- Any assistance you can provide to help with testing (exploits, regression
testing, etc.)
- Any information needed for the advisory (see Section 5.8.5.3, “Security
Advisories”)

  Please check CVE-2013-2023

-- 
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)



-- 
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)



-- 
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)


jquery-jplayer_2.1.0-2_to_2.1.0-3.debdiff
Description: Binary data


how to deal with "not yet built" / "missing binaries" on autobuilders, requesting transition needed?

2013-06-15 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić
Hi,

3 weeks ago I've uploaded package ticcutils 0.4-3 to unstable.
It got accepted for unstable.  However, I believe I've made a
mistake and didn't request the release team for some measures to
be taken.  The buildd's are stuck:

"trying to update ticcutils from 0.3-1 to 0.4-3 (candidate is 20 days old)
ticcutils is not yet built on i386: 0.3-1 vs 0.4-3 (missing 2 binaries: 
libticcutils1, libticcutils1-dev)
ticcutils is not yet built on amd64: 0.3-1 vs 0.4-3 (missing 2 binaries: 
libticcutils1, libticcutils1-dev)
[...]"

(see http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ticcutils)

ticcutils 0.3-1 builds binary packages libticcutils1 and
libticcutils1-dev

ticcutils 0.4-3 builds binary packages libticcutils2 and
libticcutils2-dev

(Reverse dependencies of those are all maintained/sponsored by me.)

I believe I should now:

1) Prepare a better ticcutils 0.4-4 package, which builds libticcutils2
and unversioned libticcutils-dev (which Conflicts: libticcutils1-dev,
libticcutils2-dev and Replaces: libticcutils1-dev, libticcutils2-dev).

2) Submit a bug to release.debian.org, requesting "transition tracking"
(as per http://release.debian.org/transitions/), apologising for previous
mistake and requesting an ACK for uploading ticcutils 0.4-4.

3) Once ACK'd, upload and keep an eye on autobuilders

Correct?

Please honor mail-followup-to and Cc me on replies.

Thanks, Bye,

Joost

PS / Note to self: ucto 0.5.3-3, timblserver 1.7-3, mbt 3.2.10-3 (this
morning) and other stuff in http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html

-- 
Worrying is like paying interest on a debt you may never have owed.
 --Charlie Papazian about Home Brewing, 1991, quoted by
http://mdcc.cx/  Sandor  "Wild Fermentation"  Elix Katz
Joost van Baal-Ilić   ※   http://ad1810.com/※Eindhoven, .nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130615163501.gg...@beskar.mdcc.cx



Bug#712406: ITP: libpgobject-simple-role-perl -- Moo/Moose mappers for minimalist PGObject framework

2013-06-15 Thread RJ Clay
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org

* Package name: libpgobject-simple-role-perl
  Version : 0.11
  Upstream Author : Chris Travers 
* URL or Web page : http://search.cpan.org/dist/PGObject-Simple-Role/
* License : BSD (2 clause)
  Description : PGObject::Simple::Role - Moo/Moose mappers for
minimalist PGObject framework.

PGObject::Simple::Role is a role implementation of the PGObject::Simple 
functionality aimed at cases where the quick and dirty approach is not
ideal.

PGObject::Simple::Role is a Moo role which allows you to use this
functionality in Moo and Moose environments. The role itself makes no
assumptions about database state, but provides hooks for classes to use
to retrieve or create database handles for their use.

This module is suited to quick and easy integration of PostgreSQL stored
procedures with Moo and Moose object models. It is quite powerful and
it makes developing in such environments relatively easy.



Robert James Clay
j...@rocasa.us
rjc...@gmail.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130615110742.13b79...@rocasa.us



Bug#712407: ITP: libpgobject-perl -- A toolkit integrating intelligent PostgreSQL dbs into Perl objects

2013-06-15 Thread Robert James Clay
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org

* Package name: libpgobject-perl
  Version : 1.2
  Upstream Author : Chris Travers 
* URL or Web page : http://search.cpan.org/dist/PGObject/
* License : BSD (2 clause)
  Description : PGObject - A toolkit integrating intelligent
PostgreSQL dbs into Perl objects

PGObject contains the base routines for object management using
discoverable stored procedures in PostgreSQL databases. PGObject
contains only common functionality and support structures, and
low-level API's. Most developers will want to use more functional
modules which add to these functions.

The overall approach here is to provide the basics for a toolkit that
other modules can extend. This is thus intended to be a component for
building integration between PostgreSQL user defined functions and Perl
objects.

Because decisions such as state handling are largely outside of the
scope of this module, this module itself does not do any significant
state handling. Database handles (using DBD::Pg 2.0 or later) must be
passed in on every call. This decision was made in order to allow for
diversity in this area, with the idea that wrapper classes would be
written to implement this.



Robert James Clay
j...@rocasa.us
rjc...@gmail.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130615103453.2cc8d...@rocasa.us



Bug#712408: ITP: libpgobject-simple-perl -- Minimalist stored procedure mapper based on LedgerSMB's DBObject.

2013-06-15 Thread RJ Clay
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org

* Package name: libpgobject-simple-perl
  Version : 1.3
  Upstream Author : Chris Travers 
* URL or Web page : http://search.cpan.org/dist/PGObject-Simple/
* License : BSD (2 clause)
  Description : PGObject::Simple - Minimalist stored procedure
  mapper based on LedgerSMB's DBObject.

PGObject::Simple a top-half object system for PGObject which is simple
and inspired by (and a subset functionally speaking of) the simple
stored procedure object method system of LedgerSMB 1.3. The framework
discovers stored procedure APIs and dispatches to them and can
therefore be a base for application-specific object models and much
more.

PGObject::Simple is designed to be light-weight and yet robust glue
between your object model and the RDBMS's stored procedures. It works
by looking up the stored procedure arguments, stripping them of the
conventional prefix 'in_', and mapping what is left to object property
names. Properties can be overridden by passing in a hashrefs in the
args named argument. Named arguments there will be used in place of
object properties.

This system is quite flexible, perhaps too much so, and it relies on the
database encapsulating its own logic behind self-documenting stored
procedures using consistent conventions. No function which is expected
to be discovered can be overloaded, and all arguments must be named for
their object properties. For this reason the use of this module
fundamentally changes the contract of the stored procedure from that of
a fixed number of arguments in fixed types contract to one where the
name must be unique and the stored procedures must be coded to the
application's interface. This inverts the way we typically think about
stored procedures and makes them much more application friendly.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130615105720.50450...@rocasa.us



[rt.debian.org #4305] communicating with Debian Security Team

2013-06-15 Thread Luca Filipozzi
Hi,

The ticket number in Debian's RT for your request is 4305.  I'm adding the
appropriate subject line and carbon copying secur...@rt.debian.org to add this
conversation to the history of the ticket.

To answer your question, yes, your ticket has been received by the Debian
Security Team.  Feel free to reply to this email (I've set the reply-to of this
email to secur...@rt.debian.org) to send more information to the Security Team.

Luca

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 05:02:18PM +0200, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> What is the right way to contact the Security Team? I have tried the
> tracker, and a variety of e-mail addresses but nothing yet (maybe I'm doing
> something wrong?). An update to Debian 7 was released today without a
> security fix for my package jquery-jplayer, even though the fix has been
> available for one solid month :-/

-- 
Luca Filipozzi
http://www.crowdrise.com/SupportDebian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130615171102.ga27...@emyr.net



Re: boot ordering and resolvconf

2013-06-15 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On 10-06-13 18:36, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > B. resolv.conf is not static and may change due to network
> >environment changes.
> > Implications:
> > 1. All existing DNS applications must be modified to notice
> >changes to resolv.conf.
> > 2. Corollary: all existing DNS resolver libraries must be
> >so modified.
> > 3. This will be impractical unless a common mechanism with
> >a convenient interface (and low impact on the rest of a
> >program) is provided.  Hopefully resolvconf fits this bill.
> > 
> > I don't know exactly how impractical B2 is.  The libc's resolver is
> > probably a hard case because of the libc's low level in the protocol
> > stack.  Can we make it aware of resolvconf ?
> 
> You can replace it (through nsswitch.conf) by lwresd, which can easily
> be restarted when resolv.conf is updated.

I've been using lwresd for a long time (2+ years), and it isn't very
reliable.  I don't think it is widely used at all, we'd need to talk to
upstream about it and probably hit lwresd hard to flush out the worst bugs.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130615220446.ga10...@khazad-dum.debian.net



cc65 in non-free

2013-06-15 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

Hey there!

I am interested in packaging cc65 for Debian but I am having my
doubts if that's actually possible license-wise. The cc65 license
states [1]:

"  1:  You don't charge anything for the copy.  It is permissable to
  charge a nominal fee for media, etc."

While as we all know this declares such software as non-free, see
point i. in [2].

Yet, I am wondering, would it still be legal to upload such a
software package to the non-free section?

Cheers,

Adrian

> [1] http://www.cc65.org/index.php#Copyright
> [2] http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html

--
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51bcf0b7.8000...@physik.fu-berlin.de



Re: cc65 in non-free

2013-06-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 00:54 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hey there!
> 
> I am interested in packaging cc65 for Debian but I am having my
> doubts if that's actually possible license-wise. The cc65 license
> states [1]:
> 
> "  1:  You don't charge anything for the copy.  It is permissable to
>charge a nominal fee for media, etc."
> 
> While as we all know this declares such software as non-free, see
> point i. in [2].
> 
> Yet, I am wondering, would it still be legal to upload such a
> software package to the non-free section?

This is fine for the non-free section.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Klipstein's 4th Law of Prototyping and Production:
A fail-safe circuit will destroy others.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: how to deal with "not yet built" / "missing binaries" on autobuilders, requesting transition needed?

2013-06-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:

> 1) Prepare a better ticcutils 0.4-4 package, which builds libticcutils2
> and unversioned libticcutils-dev (which Conflicts: libticcutils1-dev,
> libticcutils2-dev and Replaces: libticcutils1-dev, libticcutils2-dev).
>
> 2) Submit a bug to release.debian.org, requesting "transition tracking"
> (as per http://release.debian.org/transitions/), apologising for previous
> mistake and requesting an ACK for uploading ticcutils 0.4-4.
>
> 3) Once ACK'd, upload and keep an eye on autobuilders
>
> Correct?

Indeed.

Please ensure that you test the upgrade path using piuparts though.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caktje6ekq1ibbrrwxqncx_czsse7m9lh82e881flopaq_x9...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#712442: ITP: fonts-noto -- Noto is a "No Tofu" font family for over 30 scripts

2013-06-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vasudev Kamath 

* Package name: fonts-noto
  Version : 2013-04-11
  Upstream Author : Noto font developers
* URL : https://code.google.com/p/noto
* License : Apache 2.0
  Programming Lang: font
  Description : Noto is a "No Tofu" font family for over 30 scripts

When there is no  font to display a piece of text we see square boxes
which are called as tofu. This font family want to remove tofu from the
web and hence the name Noto.
.
Noto helps to make the web more beautiful across platforms for all
languages. Currently, Noto covers over 30 scripts, and will cover all of
Unicode in the future.
.
Noto fonts are intended to be visually harmonious across multiple
languages, with compatible heights and stroke thicknesses.

-- 
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4  C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature