Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#705452: docbook-xml: Fail to upgrade due to pre-depend problem
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 general Bug #705452 [sgml-base] docbook-xml: Fail to upgrade due to pre-depend problem Bug reassigned from package 'sgml-base' to 'general'. No longer marked as found in versions sgml-base/1.26+nmu4. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #705452 to the same values previously set > affectes -1 + sgml-base xml-core docbook-xml Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > tags -1 + help Bug #705452 [general] docbook-xml: Fail to upgrade due to pre-depend problem Added tag(s) help. -- 705452: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705452 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b705452.1366186549898.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: affects 705452
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 705452 + sgml-base xml-core docbook-xml Bug #705452 [general] docbook-xml: Fail to upgrade due to pre-depend problem Added indication that 705452 affects sgml-base, xml-core, and docbook-xml > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 705452: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705452 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13661868102594.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Automatically satisfying Build-Depends from local control file
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 09:19:27PM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Has someone already written a tool to automate this? I.e., parse > debian/control and run the appropriate apt-get command? > > I think I am *not* looking for apt-get build-deps, because I'm talking > about source packages not included in an apt repository. You could use sbuild. Just run "sbuild -s -A -d $distribution" in the directory, and it'll get all the build-deps for you and do the build, albeit in a chroot rather than installing on the host system. You'll need to create a build chroot with sbuild-createchroot first. Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `-GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130417084532.gf1...@codelibre.net
Bug#705452: docbook-xml: Fail to upgrade due to pre-depend problem
On Tuesday, 16. April 2013 10:40:21 Helmut Grohne wrote: > Stuart Prescott also determined that kdepim + kde-plasma-desktop are > enough to reproduce this problem. I could reproduce the problem in piuparts with installing/upgrading these two packages, but it required --install-recommends. So there may be even a smaller set of packages needed to reproduce the problem by cutting out some recommended packages. On Wednesday, 17. April 2013 10:15:27 Helmut Grohne wrote: > To that end I looked for other options, specifically for why docbook-xml > Pre-Depends on xml-core. The reason here was a etch -> lenny upgrade ... > 2) docbook-xml does not need this Pre-Depends anymore. ... > docbook-xsl instead of docbook-xml. The issue is not reproducible this > way. This makes 2) a least possible. If you post a proposed patch for docbook-xml I can throw it into my piuparts engine and see if this has any bad effect on the squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201304171213.29392.a...@debian.org
Re: Automatically satisfying Build-Depends from local control file
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:19:27 -0700 Nikolaus Rath wrote: > When downloading a source package from somewhere else, I often find > myself in the situation that after.. > > $ dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc > > Has someone already written a tool to automate this? I.e., parse > debian/control and run the appropriate apt-get command? Yes, I have. embuilddeps. > I think I am *not* looking for apt-get build-deps, because I'm talking > about source packages not included in an apt repository. The packages *to install* need to be available from your standard apt sources but the debian/control file information comes directly from the same file as dpkg-buildpackage will use, so the source package you are trying to build does not need to appear in your apt sources cache. embuilddeps is designed for (old-style) cross-building dependency resolution but the first step is to do native build-deps so that the tools are available and it is this stage you need. Just omit the -a option. There is a simulate / dry-run option as well to check what it is about to do. $ dpkg -S embuilddeps xapt: /usr/sbin/embuilddeps apt-get install xapt -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadlhgmhkpy_th0rthhc2ikb-ksfokn6osoq6j_gsx8zm26v...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Plat'Home OpenBlocks discounted for Debian member and FLOSS Developer
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 08:53:24AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Plat'Home is one of the Debconf 13 sponsor will sell at discount to > Debian member and FLOSS Developer for the OpenBlocks of small ARM micro > server. > > https://openblocks.plathome.com/form/obs_verification/input.html > > Two types of the machine will be sold. > > * OpenBlocks A6 / $250 >ARM (kirkwood) 600 MHz CPU and 512 MB onboard memory. >http://openblocks.plathome.com/products/a6/ > > * OpenBlocks AX3 / $450 >Dualcore ARM (armadaXP) 1.33 GHz CPU and 1 GB onboard memory. >http://openblocks.plathome.com/products/ax3/ > > If you are interested, please contact to the following URL. > > https://openblocks.plathome.com/form/obs_verification/input.html You have to provide proof that you are active in a given community? That's silly. And company name is mandatory, which seems odd for what is often a community of volunteers doing things at home in their spare time. When I bought my i.MX53 QSB, freescale just asked what I was planning to use it for, but had no problem selling developer boards to random interested people. It certainly did some help in getting debian armhf going, and I believe the initial work on rapbian was also done on i.MX53 QSB because they were easy to get, decent performance, and recommended by other Debian community members working on arm. It also seems rather expensive compared to the other arm systems I have of similar features and performance. My prediction will be that with that price and the required information to order one, you won't get much interest. That's a shame. It does look pretty though. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130417145451.gv21...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
Bug#705653: ITP: numatop -- display Linux processes on a NUMA system
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: numatop Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Jin Yao * URL : https://01.org/numatop * License : See below Description : display Linux processes on a NUMA system Description NumaTOP is an observation tool for runtime memory locality characterization and analysis of processes and threads running on a NUMA system. It helps the user characterize the NUMA behavior of processes and threads and identify where the NUMA-related performance bottlenecks reside. License Copyright (c) 2013, Intel Corporation Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * Neither the name of Intel Corporation nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130418031036.ga10...@master.debian.org
Bug#705656: ITP: libreverseproxy-formfiller-perl -- Let Apache fill and submit any html form in place of the user
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Xavier Guimard * Package name: libreverseproxy-formfiller-perl Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : François-Xavier Deltombe * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/ReverseProxy-FormFiller * License : Artistic or GPL-1+ Programming Lang: Perl Description : Let Apache fill and submit any html form in place of the user ReverseProxy::FormFiller makes an Apache server, positioned as a frontal server or as a reverse-proxy, fill and (possibly) submit html forms in place of users. This is particularly intended for authentication forms, if you want users to be authenticated with some account, but if you don't want them to know and type any password. But it also works with any html POST form. ReverseProxy::FormFiller is based on Apache2 mod_perl filters. So, you have to enable mod_perl. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130418041621.20305.21378.reportbug@localhost
Bug#705452: docbook-xml: Fail to upgrade due to pre-depend problem
Helmut Grohne wrote: > > Stuart Prescott also tried demoting this Pre-Dependency to Depends and > > showed that the very same upgrade failure occurs. So this is not an > > option. > > The conclusion here is that the only way to fix this bug in sgml-base is > to have *no* dependency on dpkg at all. Actually, removing the dependency on dpkg doesn't change the outcome at all -- dpkg is already unpacked and configured in the debug output we have. (I also edited Packages to remove the sgml-base→dpkg relationship and verified it still fails in the same way). Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Stuart Prescott also determined that kdepim + kde-plasma-desktop are > > enough to reproduce this problem. > > I could reproduce the problem in piuparts with installing/upgrading these two > packages, but it required --install-recommends. So there may be even a > smaller set of packages needed to reproduce the problem by cutting out some > recommended packages. I don't doubt that there is a smaller subset of packages that can reproduce this failure, especially since installing those two drags in several hundred others -- that was just as far as I had managed to get in narrowing it down (sufficient vs necessary). Yes, the vm in which I have been testing this on is a minimal installation + standard task and I've not touched defaults such as installing recommends. Some further testing narrows it down further to: # apt-get --no-install-recommends install kde-window-manager # sed -i s/squeeze/wheezy/ /etc/apt/sources.list; apt-get update; apt-get -s - o Debug::pkgPackageManager=true dist-upgrade → FAIL with error we have seen # dpkg -r kde-window-manager # apt-get -s -o Debug::pkgPackageManager=true dist-upgrade → PASS # dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/kde-window-manager*deb # apt-get -s -o Debug::pkgPackageManager=true dist-upgrade → FAIL with error we have seen kde-window-manager has a dependency on perl which is involved in the failure here, but it's not obvious to me why this is happening (and kde-window-manager still drags in about 200 packages so we've still got a large problem space to look at). cheers Stuart -- Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org GPG fingerprintBE65 FD1E F4EA 08F3 23D4 3C6D 9FE8 B8CD 71C5 D1A8 GPG fingerprint90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D BBC1 7EBB 1396 F2F7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201304181458.23106.stu...@debian.org
