Bug#676327: ITP: http-icons -- classic MIME icons

2012-06-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard 

* Package name: http-icons
  Version : 0~20041010
  Upstream Author : Matt Comaione 

Re: this bug .. bugs me

2012-06-06 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:52:52AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> This bug is a textbook example of making the perfect the enemy of the
> good.  It's disconcerting that we, or our users, are willing to put up
> with this.

I see what you mean and I absolutely agree with the general principle.
We have a tradition of being "perfectionists" in Debian, which is great,
but that couldn't be at stake with actually getting something (decently)
working to our users.

But in this specific case, in which I've been involved a bit encouraging
the recent course of action, I think that was not the only issue.
Rather, the "problem" seemed to be a mixture of what you mentioned + the
usual difficulty in acknowledging we are busy and the willingness of
letting it go our control a bit, so that others could chime in. It is
human, understandable, to some extent normal, and very well-known in
Debian.

The problem seems now on good track to be properly solved for Wheezy,
thanks to the work of Michael, Stephen, and Ove. But if there is some
sort of a take away message on this, I think it should rather be that
opening up package maintenance when we're busy and others are willing to
contribute is often the right way to go. There is very little to lose,
very little that cannot be undone, and often a lot to gain for our
users.

Even better, maintainers can prevent this kind of things from happening
by opening up *by default*, allowing commit to package maintenance Vcs
to all DDs, and documenting that commits there are welcome as long as
they follow some house rules.

Cheers.
-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o .
Maître de conférences   ..   http://upsilon.cc/zack   ..   . . o
Debian Project Leader...   @zack on identi.ca   ...o o o
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: this bug .. bugs me

2012-06-06 Thread Jon Dowland
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:30:01PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> We are announcing our deferred uploads at least 10 days in advance
> (unless RC) with git commit references, so Ove can review and/or
> cancel/reject our work at any point.  Thus, we haven't taken any of
> his power away and it really can't be viewed as a "takeover".  A few
> of us are choosing to do the necessary work and review while Ove
> doesn't have the time to do either himself.

For some definition of "necessary" - still, thank you for doing *something*,
even if it's sticking to the letter, if not the spirit, of some seemingly
arbitrary rules.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120606084730.GA9629@debian



Re: Idea: mount /tmp to tmpfs depending on free space and RAM

2012-06-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Stephan Seitz  writes:

> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:33:13AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>Personally I thing DVD ISO images (downloaded) belong in your $HOME
>
> Don’t you think this is getting quite ridiculous? Big temporary
> files belong in your $HOME, but small temporary files in /tmp? Only to
> switch /tmp from disk to RAM?

No, I just don't consider a 4.7GiB download a temporary thing. I still
have the mindset that that should take time, cost money and therefore be
precious and should not be lost on reboot.

>>somewhere. And locally generated should just pipe the image to the
>>burner unless you want to upload the image somewhere, in which case
>
> Or you want to keep it safe, until you are sure the burned DVD is
> working.
>
> Of course, if I want to keep the ISO it will be stored in $HOME, but
> then it isn’t a *temporary* file anymore. And /tmp *is* for
> temporary files.
>
>>$HOME again. Just imagine a power failure after you painstackingly
>>uploaded 99.9% of the iso and then you have to start from scratch again
>>because a reboot cleans /tmp.
>
> TMPTIME exists and can be set according to your needs and your safety
> concern.

Yeah, as noticed somewhere else TMPTIME conflicts with tmpfs. Didn't
even know that variable existed. So many hidden magic things to
configure stuff ...

>>Just out of interest: Do you have /tmp on /? Because if you do already
>>have a seperate /tmp partition then that obviously stays used.
>
> I always have separate partitions for /, /usr, /var, /tmp, /usr/local
> and /home (allright, with crappy software like udev and Co. which
> starts wanting files in /usr needlessy at the early boot stages, I
> will merge / and /usr in time). It isn’t a problem for me.
>
> But we are talking about defaults. You wish to tell new users that
> there two TB disk can’t really be used as they wish because Debian
> has a strange distinction between temporary files belonging in /tmp
> and temporary files don’t belonging in /tmp?

But does the default have to be maximised for the dumbest possible user?
Or should the default rather be for the intelligent user doing the right
things?

> According to the discussion the installer will create one partition
> for swap and one for /. If this is true then the standard user has far
> more space on disk than he has RAM.

Just wait one more release and it will only be one partition with swap
files. And lets give that partition a drive letter like "C:\". :)
I realy don't like the direction DI is taking there.

> Shade and sweet water!
>
>   Stephan

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/873968ajsk.fsf@frosties.localnet



Re: this bug .. bugs me

2012-06-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Simon McVittie  writes:

> On 05/06/12 16:52, Joey Hess wrote:
>> This bug is a textbook example of making the perfect the enemy of
>> the good.
>
> Yes, pretty much. On the bright side, multiarch and a modern Wine
> version have both arrived (Wine 1.4 is admittedly only in experimental
> right now, but I hope it'll reach testing before we freeze), meaning
> this can finally work:
>
> archetype% dpkg --print-architecture
> amd64
> archetype% wine --version
> wine-1.4
> archetype% dpkg -s wine|grep Arch
> Architecture: i386
> archetype% dpkg -s ia32-libs
> Package `ia32-libs' is not installed and no info is available.
>
> ... so, thanks to everyone whose work and perseverance made that possible!
>
> S

Juppey. Thanks to all the workers and the NMUers that made this
possible.

Now if wine 1.4 enters unstable we are finaly ready to kill ia32-libs
for good.

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y5o094xx.fsf@frosties.localnet



Bug#676344: ITP: cairosvg -- SVG converter based on Cairo

2012-06-06 Thread Michael Fladischer
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Fladischer 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

* Package name: cairosvg
  Version : 0.4.3
  Upstream Author : Kozea 
* URL : http://cairosvg.org/
* License : LGPL
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description : SVG converter based on Cairo

CairoSVG is a SVG converter based on Cairo. It can export SVG files to PDF,
PostScript and PNG files.
The main part of CairoSVG is a SVG parser, trying to follow the SVG 1.1
recommandation from the W3C. Once parsed, the result is drawn to a Cairo
surface that can be exported to various formats: PDF, PostScript, PNG and
even SVG.


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk/PNd0ACgkQeJ3z1zFMUGYoRACdE5dRfR2QXh68EleerCXqlC00
5FgAoJUWmkpQuXbObE5Wgr4vPNTxydxc
=f0st
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120606105007.5603.91491.report...@root.fladi.at



Re: this bug .. bugs me

2012-06-06 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:36:42AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:52:52AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > This bug is a textbook example of making the perfect the enemy of the
> > good.  It's disconcerting that we, or our users, are willing to put up
> > with this.

May I bring in another example that bugs me:

Source: mime-support
Priority: standard
Maintainer: Brian White 
Standards-Version: 3.1.1.1

 -> standard package not team maintained not in Vcs

According to changelog a typical upload is about one to two times a year
mass closing several bugs.  This might not be very spectacular, however
when I scratched a bit on mime issues (Bug#497779) I and the submitter
of a patch (non-DD) were contacted via PM by Brian White whether one of
us want to maintain the package.  I asked why he does not try to orphan
or team maintain the package in case of admitted time constraints.  His
answer was that there is a difference between "any taker" and somebody
who has an interested in it.

This kind of handling things really bugs me as well.  If a maintainer
knows that he can not (fully) do the needed work but sitting silently
because not trusting the community to provide proper help is something
my English vocabulary is not sufficient to describe ...

IMHO this perfectly fits in the sequence of cases we recently discussed
here on this list which are a sign that something is broken in the way
we handle maintainership.

Kind regards

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120606112605.ga19...@an3as.eu



DUCK -the Debian Url Checker

2012-06-06 Thread Simon Kainz
Hi list,

as I had some problems in the past finding upstream sources and
homepages, I hacked up some scripts to monitor and display the results
of the Upstream Homepage entries in the package control files.

Please take a look at http://debian.tugraz.at/duck/

Currently the job runs once a day and the results are displayed. Maybe
this is of some use for some maintainers and/or developers.

One can also search for specific maintainers.

Please tell me what you think about it - I have already some more
features planned.

Regards,

Simon




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: DUCK -the Debian Url Checker

2012-06-06 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi

Dne Wed, 06 Jun 2012 15:24:50 +0200
Simon Kainz  napsal(a):

> as I had some problems in the past finding upstream sources and
> homepages, I hacked up some scripts to monitor and display the results
> of the Upstream Homepage entries in the package control files.
> 
> Please take a look at http://debian.tugraz.at/duck/

Thanks, looks useful!

> Currently the job runs once a day and the results are displayed. Maybe
> this is of some use for some maintainers and/or developers.
> 
> One can also search for specific maintainers.
> 
> Please tell me what you think about it - I have already some more
> features planned.

Maybe you could also check URL found in debian/copyright? 

-- 
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: this bug .. bugs me

2012-06-06 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 06/06/2012 04:23 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Please don't spread incorrect information.  The situation is by far not
> the same (as in: it's *much* better now), and that is also thanks to the
> discussion back then.  -devel FTW, ... sometimes :-)
>
> Cheers.
>   
I can see it, and I'm very happy of it! :)

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fcf75f2.7090...@debian.org



Bug#676384: ITP: libsort-key-top-perl -- select and sort top n elements

2012-06-06 Thread Laszlo Kajan
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Laszlo Kajan 


* Package name: libsort-key-top-perl
  Version : 0.06
  Upstream Author : Salvador Fandiño 
* URL : 
http://search.cpan.org/~salva/Sort-Key-Top-0.06/lib/Sort/Key/Top.pm
* License : Perl Artistic
  Programming Lang: Perl
  Description : select and sort top n elements in Perl

The functions available from this module select the top n elements from a list 
using several common orderings and custom key extraction procedures.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120606160231.26668.79895.reportbug@n0d.rostclust



Re: seeking co-maintainers for spamassassin

2012-06-06 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:48:23PM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> I'm perfectly happy to see patches attached to some of the open bugs, so
> please don't hesitate to send them in. Ideally I'd like to get a
> co-maintainer or two, though. 

BTW, this is bug #676317 in wnpp. Please follow up there if you'd like
to help.

noah



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Idea: mount /tmp to tmpfs depending on free space and RAM

2012-06-06 Thread Stephan Seitz

On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:09:31AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:

Stephan Seitz  writes:

Don’t you think this is getting quite ridiculous? Big temporary
files belong in your $HOME, but small temporary files in /tmp? Only to
switch /tmp from disk to RAM?

No, I just don't consider a 4.7GiB download a temporary thing. I still
have the mindset that that should take time, cost money and therefore be
precious and should not be lost on reboot.


Well, everything you do with your computer will cost money. The download 
will take its time, yes, but you don’t have to wait for it to be 
finished.


But for me your example still describes a temporary file *if* I want to 
delete the file after I burned the ISO.



But does the default have to be maximised for the dumbest possible user?
Or should the default rather be for the intelligent user doing the right
things?


But the intelligent user can change the default hisself, the dumbest 
can’t. And Debian does allow the inexperienced user to install his 
system.



According to the discussion the installer will create one partition
for swap and one for /. If this is true then the standard user has far
more space on disk than he has RAM.

Just wait one more release and it will only be one partition with swap
files. And lets give that partition a drive letter like "C:\". :)
I realy don't like the direction DI is taking there.


ROTFL, yes maybe. I agree that I don’t like one big partition as well, 
but how do you want to partition a disk by default?


Shade and sweet water!

Stephan

--
| Stephan Seitz  E-Mail: s...@fsing.rootsland.net |
| Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/keys.html |


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Idea: mount /tmp to tmpfs depending on free space and RAM

2012-06-06 Thread Salvo Tomaselli

> >But does the default have to be maximised for the dumbest possible user?
> >Or should the default rather be for the intelligent user doing the right
> >things?
> 
> But the intelligent user can change the default hisself, the dumbest
> can’t. And Debian does allow the inexperienced user to install his
> system.

Sometimes people are intelligent but that doesn't mean that they are willing 
to spend days just to fix these problems, maybe being intelligent doesn't make 
you interested in learning obscure switches for debian. (and knowing these 
doesn't make one intelligent).

So it's not about stupid users, it's about having a configuration that works 
by default, without requiring people to go throu mailing lists to learn what 
they need to install debian and have it working.


-- 
Salvo Tomaselli


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201206061938.27022.tipos...@tiscali.it



Re: this bug .. bugs me

2012-06-06 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 06/06/2012 04:36 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Even better, maintainers can prevent this kind of things from happening
> by opening up *by default*, allowing commit to package maintenance Vcs
> to all DDs, and documenting that commits there are welcome as long as
> they follow some house rules.
>   
Technically, is there a way to allow write access to all DDs on an
Alioth Git repo, but not to anyone without upload rights?

When in a team, it's easy, a bit of chmod g+w is enough, but for all DDs?

Thomas

P.S: I'm on the low threshold NMU list, and I'd welcome anyone to send
me some git format-patch! :)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fcf9ca8.4000...@debian.org



Re: this bug .. bugs me

2012-06-06 Thread Steven Post
Hi,

Please forgive me if this is the wrong place to ask (or if I'm
completely wrong here).

On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 11:15 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[...]
> 
> Juppey. Thanks to all the workers and the NMUers that made this
> possible.
> 
> Now if wine 1.4 enters unstable we are finaly ready to kill ia32-libs
> for good.
> 

Reading this I assume ia32-libs will be removed from Debian (with which
I completely agree btw), what about packages outside of Debian that
currently depend upon ia32-libs? To name a certain package: skype. Its
AMD64 package from the official website depends on it.
Can we work around this somehow? I'm in no way affiliated with upstream
here, but looking at their particular history I don't expect any update
soon with a proper solution.

Regards,
Steven


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: this bug .. bugs me

2012-06-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:12:31 -0400, Michael Gilbert
 wrote:
>> They are members of pkg-wine already, so I think they can make changes
>> that can improve the status but not limited to minimal changes for
>> NMU. If Mike don't want to "hijack" at least for now, team upload is
>> good enough.
>
>Hopefully this will make some people happy: I pushed the first team
>upload of the 1.4 series to unstable about a half-an-hour ago :)

Yay! Congrats!

Greetings
Marc, making a fresh backup of the notebook and upgrading
-- 
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber |   " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1scksq-0004n4...@swivel.zugschlus.de



Re: this bug .. bugs me

2012-06-06 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Wed 06 Jun 2012 15:16:26 Steven Post escribió:
[snip]
> Reading this I assume ia32-libs will be removed from Debian (with which
> I completely agree btw), what about packages outside of Debian that
> currently depend upon ia32-libs? To name a certain package: skype. Its
> AMD64 package from the official website depends on it.
> Can we work around this somehow? I'm in no way affiliated with upstream
> here, but looking at their particular history I don't expect any update
> soon with a proper solution.

Disclaimer: I'm not througly following multiarch stuff.

Well, if Debian removes ia32-libs and friends, most surely Ubuntu will follow 
(if not there already). Then I think those third parties who depend on it 
should start thinking about doing the correct thing: release a new package.

My two cents, Lisandro.

-- 
9: Que es el "Explorador" de Windows
* El tipo que le roba las ideas a MacOs
Damian Nadales
http://mx.grulic.org.ar/lurker/message/20080307.141449.a70fb2fc.es.html

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


dropping ia32-libs [Was, Re: this bug .. bugs me]

2012-06-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 04:14:56PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer 
wrote:
> On Wed 06 Jun 2012 15:16:26 Steven Post escribió:
> [snip]
> > Reading this I assume ia32-libs will be removed from Debian (with which
> > I completely agree btw), what about packages outside of Debian that
> > currently depend upon ia32-libs? To name a certain package: skype. Its
> > AMD64 package from the official website depends on it.
> > Can we work around this somehow? I'm in no way affiliated with upstream
> > here, but looking at their particular history I don't expect any update
> > soon with a proper solution.

> Disclaimer: I'm not througly following multiarch stuff.

> Well, if Debian removes ia32-libs and friends, most surely Ubuntu will follow 
> (if not there already). Then I think those third parties who depend on it 
> should start thinking about doing the correct thing: release a new package.

> My two cents, Lisandro.

Ubuntu has already had a release in which ia32-libs is a transitional
package; and for the past two Ubuntu releases, the amd64 skype package has
not integrated correctly with the desktop (because it has Recommends that
must be satisfied by i386 packages that aren't part of ia32-libs).

So I guess we shouldn't expect this situation to change in the near future. 
OTOH, if Debian drops ia32-libs entirely, then the wrong package won't be
installable and users would *have* to install the right one (the i386 one),
so there's that at least.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: this bug .. bugs me

2012-06-06 Thread Arno Töll
On 06.06.2012 20:08, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 06/06/2012 04:36 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> Even better, maintainers can prevent this kind of things from happening
>> by opening up *by default*, allowing commit to package maintenance Vcs
>> to all DDs, and documenting that commits there are welcome as long as
>> they follow some house rules.
>>   
> Technically, is there a way to allow write access to all DDs on an
> Alioth Git repo, but not to anyone without upload rights?

That's collab-maint. All developers have automatically commit access to
it. This includes many non-DDs accounts too, who have applied explicitly
into collab-maint, but so what? A commit can be reverted easily and
people who abuse their rights probably won't have write access to
collab-maint for a long.

I fail to see why we would need /another/ repository for DDs only. You
know we welcome everyone [1] apparently.

[1] <20120606151810.gj4...@camblue.cbg.collabora.co.uk>

-- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#676438: ITP: libcatalyst-view-petal-perl -- Petal View Class for Catalyst

2012-06-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard 

* Package name: libcatalyst-view-petal-perl
  Version : 0.03
  Upstream Author : Christian Hansen, 
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-View-Petal/
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
  Programming Lang: Perl
  Description : Petal View Class for Catalyst

 Catalyst::View::Petal is the Catalyst view class for Petal. Your
 subclass should inherit from this class.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120606221742.32286.88625.report...@auryn.jones.dk



Re: this bug .. bugs me

2012-06-06 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:08:40AM +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> On 06/06/2012 04:36 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Even better, maintainers can prevent this kind of things from happening
> > by opening up *by default*, allowing commit to package maintenance Vcs
> > to all DDs, and documenting that commits there are welcome as long as
> > they follow some house rules.
> >   
> Technically, is there a way to allow write access to all DDs on an
> Alioth Git repo, but not to anyone without upload rights?
> 
> When in a team, it's easy, a bit of chmod g+w is enough, but for all DDs?

Hello Thomas,

this can be granted using ACLs.

http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/FAQ#How_do_I_give_write_permission_outside_my_Alioth_project_.3F

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Greetings from Singapore


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120606222904.gc23...@falafel.plessy.net



Re: Moving /tmp to tmpfs makes it useless

2012-06-06 Thread Joey Hess
So RAMTMP now defaults to off. I know it can be hard to give ground on
something you've invested a lot of work into, so Roger Leigh has my
respect for taking this thread into consideration.

A lot of people came down on the pro-tmpfs side in this thread. You have
some good reasons to want to make it available to users. I just wanted
to invite you to make it easier for users to enable tmpfs where
appropriate -- d-i's partman component needs to gain support for
managing tmpfs partitions (#245465). This would allow users to set up
tmpfs at install time, to preseed it, and even to have recipes
that include it.

Partman is not the easiest thing to work on, but if you know how to use
debconf, and shell script, and have some time and VirtualBox, this is
well within your grasp. Last time I added a filesystem (btrfs) to
partman, I did it by copying the partman-ext3 source and modifying
appropriately[1]. It was really just a few hundred lines of code.

If interested, contact me or debian-b...@lists.debian.org

-- 
see shy jo

[1] And then refactoring out a lot of common code of course.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: DUCK -the Debian Url Checker

2012-06-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, June 06, 2012 03:24:50 PM Simon Kainz wrote:
> Hi list,
> 
> as I had some problems in the past finding upstream sources and
> homepages, I hacked up some scripts to monitor and display the results
> of the Upstream Homepage entries in the package control files.
> 
> Please take a look at http://debian.tugraz.at/duck/
> 
> Currently the job runs once a day and the results are displayed. Maybe
> this is of some use for some maintainers and/or developers.
> 
> One can also search for specific maintainers.
> 
> Please tell me what you think about it - I have already some more
> features planned.

FWIW, it already noticed the homepage for one of my packages was 404.  I 
emailed the upstream and just heard back that they hadn't known the page had 
gone missing and will fix it.

Thanks,

Scott K


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5253430.Z2GAZWrkTq@scott-latitude-e6320