Re: Conflicting deps: python (>= 2.6.6), python (<< 2.6)
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 01:27:47AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Motiejus Jakštys , 2012-02-04, 17:45: > > This look very much like bug #644573. I unarchived the bug and > marked it as found in the squeeze's version. Thank you very much. I believe relevant people will get the notification, and, since the patch is already present, and there is not much I can do now? Otherwise, if necessary, I can happily ping people in debian-python@. :) > BTW, debian-python@ (or even debian-mentors@) would be a better > place to ask such questions. When skimming through the debian-lists I missed these. Thanks for the guidance. Motiejus Jakštys -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120205101010.ga4...@jakstys.lt
Bug#658693: ITP: rudeconfig -- C++ config library for reading and writing configuration in .ini files
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: medhamsh * Package name: rudeconfig Version : 5.0.5 Upstream Author : Matthew Flood * URL : http://rudeserver.com/config/index.html * License : (GPL) Programming Lang: (C++) Description : C++ config library for reading and writing configuration in .ini files The C++ Config File library is used for reading and writing configuration / .ini files. The Config component provides fully customizable delimiters and comment characters, ensuring compatability with most existing config/ini file formats. It allows multiline values using backslash escapes. Comments within the config file are fully preserved when the contents are re-saved. Furthermore, deleted values can become commented out when the object is re-saved - preserving old data. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120205104400.8706.61481.report...@hackersbox.iiit.ac.in
Re: severity for bugs in ignoring TMP/TMPDIR?
On 2012-02-05, Paul Wise wrote: > If I notice that software in Debian is ignoring TMP/TMPDIR (since I use > libpam-tmpdir), what severity should I file the resulting bugs at? wishlist? /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnjisoib.p7v.nos...@sshway.ssh.pusling.com
Re: severity for bugs in ignoring TMP/TMPDIR?
On 2012-02-05 11:04, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2012-02-05, Paul Wise wrote: >> If I notice that software in Debian is ignoring TMP/TMPDIR (since I use >> libpam-tmpdir), what severity should I file the resulting bugs at? > wishlist? > > /Sune > Depends on how bit the files it uses in tmpdir. I've a bug in some code i'm using ( a FUSE filesystem that uses a cache in /tmp) that runs as root, that at times places arbitrarily large files (in my workflow, 5-100 GB) in /tmp, which is on the root filesystem. When a process accesses a 100 GB file it overflows / . So I needed to get it to use an alternate $TMPDIR. Ignoring $TMPDIR is a critical severity bug for me. - Alastair -- Alastair McKinstry , , http://blog.sceal.ie Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist - Kenneth Boulter, Economist. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2e6676.8020...@sceal.ie
Bug#658699: ITP: meandmyshadow -- A puzzle / platform game
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Maass * Package name: meandmyshadow Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Luka Horvat * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/meandmyshadow * License : GPLv3 Programming Lang: C++ Description : A puzzle / platform game -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120205122554.5352.49204.report...@mase2.setho.org
Bug#658718: ITP: phpvirtualbox-4.0 -- An open source, AJAX implementation of the VirtualBox user interface written in PHP.
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Marcus Osdoba I have started work on packaging phpvirtalbox (V4.0) and intend to upload it through a sponsor. The package is (not only) useful in server environments and I use it on my own on a headless server. Version 4.0 is not api compatible with 4.1 so there will be a second package for 4.1. * Package name: phpvirtualbox-4.0 Version : 7 Upstream Author : Ian Moore * URL : http://code.google.com/p/phpvirtualbox/ * License : GPLv3 Programming Lang: PHP5 Description : An open source, AJAX implementation of the VirtualBox user interface written in PHP. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120205141626.8751.37301.reportbug@debian-virtual
Bug#658720: ITP: phpvirtualbox-4.1 -- An open source, AJAX implementation of the VirtualBox user interface written in PHP.
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Marcus Osdoba I have started work on packaging phpvirtualbox (V4.1) and intend to upload it through a sponsor. The package is (not only) useful in server environments and I use it on my own on a headless server. Version 4.1 is not api compatible with 4.0 so there will be a second package for 4.0. * Package name: phpvirtualbox-4.1 Version : 7 Upstream Author : Ian Moore * URL : http://code.google.com/p/phpvirtualbox/ * License : GPLv3 Programming Lang: PHP5 Description : An open source, AJAX implementation of the VirtualBox user interface written in PHP. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120205142211.8809.22408.reportbug@debian-virtual
Re: PHP 5.4 transition in unstable
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/02/msg6.html > Have you co-ordinated this transition with the release team? I don't > see anything here: > > https://wiki.debian.org/OngoingTransitions > http://release.debian.org/transitions/ O. -- Ondřej Surý -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caljhhg9a30puzu1coji0mjohlftoma22d-vjn98x31te05e...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#637232: Meet swingers in your metro looking to hook up.
Meet swingers in your metro looking to hook up. http://lessn.ca/2 - If you would like to not be contacted from us in the future please press on the link below: http://lessn.ca/3 or write to: P.O. Box 71, 46 St., Vancouver, Canada -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120205092734.6...@web004.nyc1.bluetie.com
Re: PHP 5.4 transition in unstable
Ondřej Surý (05/02/2012): > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/02/msg6.html Please don't top-post. Also, can you link to the reply of the release team? Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: PHP 5.4 transition in unstable
Ondřej Surý (05/02/2012): http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/02/msg6.html Please don't top-post. Also, can you link to the reply of the release team? Mraw, KiBi. There is no response in (1) yet. And there is bug report (2) - also without response until now. Cheers, Martin 1: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/02/maillist.html 2: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657077 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2e9d7d.4010...@gmx.de
Re: PHP 5.4 transition in unstable
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 15:53, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ondřej Surý (05/02/2012): >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/02/msg6.html > > Please don't top-post. Oh, come on... > Also, can you link to the reply of the release team? No reply yet, I was going to bug them via irc next week. Anyway this is something we cannot avoid if we want to have supported php in next stable. And I don't think it will clash with any existing transition. So it is just matter of timing and the sooner the better. O. -- Ondřej Surý -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALjhHG85QJJYPPMa=qf08sjqsmqjbyz-xmbfydpffk-ocdm...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#658718: ITP: phpvirtualbox-4.0 -- An open source, AJAX implementation of the VirtualBox user interface written in PHP.
Hi! Marcus Osdoba writes: > Version 4.0 is not api compatible with 4.1 so there will be a second package > for 4.1. I guess compatible with 4.1 means compatible with virtualbox 4.1? As unstable currently has 4.1 (and will definitely not release with 4.0) and your pacakge will surely never enter squeeze what's the point in a 4.0 package? I'm also wondering whether upstream is commited to do (security) fixes for 4.0 or are you intending and able to do the fixing? Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87haz5uwjl@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: Bug#658718: ITP: phpvirtualbox-4.0 -- An open source, AJAX implementation of the VirtualBox user interface written in PHP.
Am 05.02.2012 16:31, schrieb Christoph Egger: I guess compatible with 4.1 means compatible with virtualbox 4.1? As unstable currently has 4.1 (and will definitely not release with 4.0) and your pacakge will surely never enter squeeze what's the point in a 4.0 package? I'm also wondering whether upstream is commited to do (security) fixes for 4.0 or are you intending and able to do the fixing? Hi, thanks for the statement. Yes, 4.0 works with vbox 4.0 and phpvb 4.1 works with vbox 4.1 instances. phpvirtualbox connects to the soap interface of the vbox-installation, this could be any kind of host (rhel running vbox, windows running vbox) so there is no direct dependency to the vbox pkg in debian. Debian is often used on servers, so I think it's worth to provide phpvirtualbox as package (not only for vbox instances on the same server). The Innotek-team still maintains 3.2.x and 4.0 branches (surpisingly even under Oracle). The 4.1.x version is the current "development" or lets say evolving version and I guess there are still 3.2 and 4.0 installations out there in "stable" deployments. (Personally I still deploy 4.0 , 4.1 only on the backup/testing node) I understood your objection, but hopefully I explained my intentions clearly ;-) I'm able to use the debian/patches directory and test the resulting pkg. I'm not in direct contact with upstream, but I could sent some patch requests. I doubt, I will be able to track every CVE issue concerning php5. I've uploaded the packages on mentors already, please let me know, if I could save my breath for sending a RFS-mail. Thanks and kind regards, Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2ebed2.6000...@googlemail.com
Bug#658774: O: openhackware -- OpenFirmware emulator for PowerPC
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I intend to orphan the openhackware package. Ideally Aurelien or the QEMU team should take preference over the adoption, if they so desire. The package description is: OpenHackWare is an OpenFirmware emulator intended to be used on PowerPC machines. It is not a real OpenFirmware as it knows nothing about Forth. It emulates the OpenFirmware boot time interface as well as the RTAS interface. It also emulates some known "interpret" strings, to make it able to launch known OSes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120205235838.ga10...@gaara.hadrons.org
Bug#658776: O: vgabios -- VGA BIOS software for the Bochs and Qemu emulated VGA card
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I intend to orphan the vgabios package. Ideally Aurelien or the QEMU team should take preference over the adoption, if they so desire. Thre's currently an RC bug, but I think it's actually just important. The package description is: The goal of this project is to provide a Video BIOS for Bochs and Qemu. This VGA BIOS is very specific to the bochs/qemu emulated VGA card. . WARNING: It is NOT meant to drive a physical vga card. You will probably fry it if you try. You have been warned. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120206000546.ga10...@gaara.hadrons.org
Bug#658783: ITP: mate-common -- common scripts and macros to develop with MATE
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stefano Karapetsas * Package name: mate-common Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : Perberos * URL : http://www.mate-desktop.org/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: Shell Description : common scripts and macros to develop with MATE mate-common is an extension to autoconf, automake and libtool for the MATE environment and MATE using applications. Included are mate-autogen.sh and several macros to help in MATE source trees. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120206002723.9590.96601.reportbug@hp530
Please test dpkg with multiarch support
Hello, Guillem just released a "work-in-progress" version of dpkg that supports multiarch to experimental (dpkg 1.16.2~wipmultiarch). Beware: There will likely be some small "interface" changes between this version and the version that will be released later in unstable (possibly in the output of dpkg --get-selections, dpkg --list, maybe other commands). Once installed, you add a supplementary architecture to your system by doing “sudo dpkg --add-architecture ” (e.g. i386 if you are on amd64, and vice-versa). APT will automatically pick up the new architecture and start downloading the Packages file for the new architecture (it uses dpkg --print-foreign-architectures to know about them). >From there on you can install packages from the "foreign" architectures with "apt-get install foo:". Many packages will not be installable because some of their dependencies have not yet been updated to work with in a multiarch world (libraries must be installed in a multiarch-compliant path so as to be co-installable, and then marked "Multi-Arch: same"). Other dependencies might need to be marked "Multi-Arch: foreign". See http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation for more HOWTO-like explanations. Now is a good time to see if you can cross-install the packages that you could need in such a setup and to help to convert the required libraries. If you discover any bug in dpkg's multiarch implementation, please report it to the BTS (against the version 1.16.2~wipmultiarch). That's not all, if you're a C programmer and have some good knowledge of dpkg (or are willing to learn more of it), we would certainly benefit from more eyes reviewing the multiarch branch. If you want to discuss some design issues of the multiarch implementation in dpkg (or have questions related to your review), please use debian-d...@lists.debian.org. The latest version of the branch is pu/multiarch/master in Guillem's personal repository. I have my own version of the branch (pu/multiarch/full) which is usually a snapshot of Guillem's branch with my own submitted fixes. $ git clone git://git.debian.org/dpkg/dpkg.git $ cd dpkg $ git remote add guillem git://git.hadrons.org/git/debian/dpkg/dpkg.git $ git remote add buxy git://git.debian.org/~hertzog/dpkg.git $ git fetch guillem && git fetch buxy If you followed the instructions above, the relevant branches are thus guillem/pu/multiarch/master and buxy/pu/multiarch/full. Both branches are regularly rebased on top of master where Guillem merges progressively the commits from the multi-arch branch as his review progresses. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/liberation/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120206073115.gb2...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com
