Bug#612270: ITP: tagainijisho -- A Japanese dictionary and learning assistant

2011-02-07 Thread Thibaut VARENE
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thibaut VARENE 

* Package name: tagainijisho
  Version : 0.2.6.2
  Upstream Author : Alexandre COURBOT 
* URL : http://www.tagaini.net/
* License : GPL, CC-BY-SA 3.0
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description : A Japanese dictionary and learning assistant

 Tagaini Jisho is a Japanese vocabulary and kanji dictionary that aims at
 presenting results in a way that makes it easy to create connections
 in your mind and remember them. To allow this, it keeps track of all the
 entries you already know and allows you to tag and add notes to them. It
 also features kanji drawing animations for more than 6000 kanjis,
 flashcard-like training, production of paper material for studying,
 and extended search options for vocabulary and kanjis including
 part-of-speech and JLPT levels.
 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110207100530.11023.35160.reportbug@Kanti.h0m3



The "node" command in Debian

2011-02-07 Thread Jonathan Nieder
(please follow-up to debian-devel only)
Hi Debianites,

As you may know[0], there are currently two packages in Debian
experimental providing a "node" binary.

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/08/msg00568.html

The node.js project
---
One is from the node.js project.  It was renamed from "server" to
"node" on March 3, 2009.  The purpose of this tool is to run servers
and other event-based programs written in Javascript.

The maintainer for this package in Debian has written[1]:

| not having /usr/bin/node as nodejs binary path will without any
| doubt render nodejs package unuseful for a vast majority of users.

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=15;bug=611698

The LinuxNode project
-
The other is a frontend to libax25, an AX.25 implementation for Linux.
Hardware implementations of AX.25 are apparently called "terminal node
controllers" or "nodes" for short; hence this Linux-based
implementation was called LinuxNode and its binary called "node".  It
was introduced in January, 1996.  It seems that its family tree also
includes (unpackaged) implementations named AWZNode and FlexNode.

The node package does not seem to have a very active maintainer since
Joop Stakenborg retired.  On the debian-hams list, we read[2]:

| As a continuous very long term (about 1994) user of kernel ax25 I
| object strongly to this request which will affect far more users
| world-wide than just a few nodejs users.

[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-hams/2010/08/msg00032.html

Debian policy
-
Both of these projects are, of course, insane to use such a generic
binary name.  But Debian policy does not say "you must not use such a
generic name unless you are a net.god" --- only common sense does.

Problem: scripts may use the 'node' name to refer to either of these
programs.  Which should get the name?  You decide, based not on
popularity or priority but --- well, based on whatever makes sense.

If no consensus emerges, policy §10.1 in its Solomon-like wisdom says
_both_ commands must be renamed.  I hope we can do better.  I will be
happy to file release-critical bugs against both packages to that
effect if not.

With hope,
Jonathan

Disclaimer: I am ignorant about both packages.  Some naïve part of
me believes that it will be possible for mature people not ignorant
about them to figure out a reasonable solution.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110207104656.GA10756@elie



Re: The "node" command in Debian

2011-02-07 Thread Ian Jackson
Jonathan Nieder writes ("The "node" command in Debian"):
> (please follow-up to debian-devel only)

> If no consensus emerges, policy §10.1 in its Solomon-like wisdom says
> _both_ commands must be renamed.  I hope we can do better.  I will be
> happy to file release-critical bugs against both packages to that
> effect if not.

I think this is exactly the correct thing to do in this case.
At least no scripts will get the wrong program.

An alternative would be to somehow arrange for "node" to be

  #!/bin/sh
  cat >&2 

Re: The "node" command in Debian

2011-02-07 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> As you may know[0], there are currently two packages in Debian
> experimental providing a "node" binary.
> 
> [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/08/msg00568.html

...

> One is from the node.js project.  It was renamed from "server" to
> "node" on March 3, 2009.  The purpose of this tool is to run servers

So, this one has a past history of hazardous, poor thought-out behavior
re. the global namespace... and it blew its second chance when it went
from "server" (insanely bad choice) to "node" (another insanely bad
choice, for _exactly the same reasons_).

> The LinuxNode project
> -
> The other is a frontend to libax25, an AX.25 implementation for Linux.
> Hardware implementations of AX.25 are apparently called "terminal node
> controllers" or "nodes" for short; hence this Linux-based
> implementation was called LinuxNode and its binary called "node".  It
> was introduced in January, 1996.  It seems that its family tree also
> includes (unpackaged) implementations named AWZNode and FlexNode.

1996 was a long time ago, the world was much smaller back then.  It was
still a very very poor choice of naming, and it should have been named
ax25node from day one.

> | As a continuous very long term (about 1994) user of kernel ax25 I
> | object strongly to this request which will affect far more users
> | world-wide than just a few nodejs users.
> 
> [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-hams/2010/08/msg00032.html

You go for generic names in the common namespace, you set yourself up
for disaster, and you get what you deserve.

However, Debian has a lot of penetration in the HAM community, "node"
has preferred usage for networking matters in any Unix-like system due
to more than 20 years of tradition, and they have a previous claim for
the name.  Poorly named as it is, that package has been in Debian stable
releases since 1999.

If push comes to shove, nobody is going to try to force _them_ to give
up that name.  You can get the package itself renamed to ax25node, and
have the required "node" transitional package in squeeze+1, so as to
have no "node" package in squeeze+2, but rename the executable itself?
not likely.

> Problem: scripts may use the 'node' name to refer to either of these
> programs.  Which should get the name?  You decide, based not on
> popularity or priority but --- well, based on whatever makes sense.

The nasty thing is that whatever answers to "node" is defined by path
precedence, and often sbin is only included for root, so it is a large
pitfall.

> If no consensus emerges, policy §10.1 in its Solomon-like wisdom says
> _both_ commands must be renamed.  I hope we can do better.  I will be
> happy to file release-critical bugs against both packages to that
> effect if not.

1. they can declare a conflict with each other, so that the packaging
   system will never let both get installed in the same system.

   Unless both communities have a large overlap, this one makes both
   happy, until a third package shows up trying to claim "node".

2. they can be forced (by the TC) to drop their claim of "node" in the
   common namespace.  This is not likely to happen.

3. It is possible that they could do nothing, since there is no direct
   file conflict (different paths).  Not good for the unaware user that
   installs both, but I am not sure whether we forbid this kind of
   potential pitfall in the first place.

4. as the one with the weaker claim, node.js can move its executable out
   of the generic namespace or rename its executable to something else.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110207125424.ga26...@khazad-dum.debian.net



Bug#612288: RFP: phplist -- multi-list email campaign manager

2011-02-07 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

* Package name: phplist
  Version : 2.10.12
  Upstream Author : Michiel Dethmers et al
* URL : http://www.phplist.com
* License : GPL-2
  Programming Lang: PHP
  Description : multi-list email campaign manager

- From upstream's description:

phplist is a one-way email announcement delivery system. It is great for
newsletters, publicity lists, notifications, and many other uses. (It is
different from group mailing list systems like mailman.)
The Web Interface lets you write and send messages, and manage phplist over
the internet. phplist keeps sending messages from your web server, even after
you shut down your computer.

phplist is designed to manage mailing lists with hundreds of thousands of
subscribers. phplist manages message delivery with a message queue, ensuring
that every subscriber gets the email message, and that no subscribers receive
two copies, even if they're subscribed to more than one list.


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=fShL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110207130146.22972.36061.reportbug@lupin



Bug#612296: O: bacula

2011-02-07 Thread John Goerzen
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

Hi,

I am orphaning Bacula.  (I will also be orphaning the related package
bacula-doc, which has a separate upstream and Debian source tree.)

The package is in good shape, but due to a transition away from
tape-based backups, I will no longer be using it and therefore won't
have time to support it well.

The package is maintained in git and should be reasonably easy to take
over for a package of its size.

Thanks,

-- John



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110207141552.10064.62501.report...@hephaestus.lan.complete.org



Thank you

2011-02-07 Thread ▲▼amila▲▼
Hi All,

Thank you very much for everything on debian.
Im so glad to here that squeeze is released.
I ve been using it for few months after upgrading from lenny.


-- 

*Thank you and Regards, * *
 Amila *


Re: Upcoming FTPMaster meeting

2011-02-07 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Feb 07, Svante Signell  wrote:

> Now, with support for VMs like qemu, xen
> and virtualbox, more people are showing interest in GNU/Hurd. 
[citation needed]

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: The "node" command in Debian

2011-02-07 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Monday 07 February 2011 13.54:24 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> 1. they can declare a conflict with each other, so that the packaging
>system will never let both get installed in the same system.

JavaScript and AX.25 sounds like it might be quite a distance in terms of 
people involved, although this is really just a guess.

Start with a package conflict plus explanatory notice in README.Debian and 
move on to other measures if "enough" people complain, perhaps?

Downside is of course that this discussion will probably repeated a few 
times.

cheers
-- vbi

-- 
As we found out later, our activities had both saturated an uplink two
"hops" up from our university, at the Nordic University Network level
and made some DoS-alarms go off at the national level. All part of a fun
release.
-- serving Debian sarge and Ubuntu Breezy CD images
   http://www.acc.umu.se/~maswan/2005-12-10/2gbit-freesoftware.html


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: The "node" command in Debian

2011-02-07 Thread Ian Jackson
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes ("Re: The "node" command in Debian"):
> 1. they can declare a conflict with each other, so that the packaging
>system will never let both get installed in the same system.

No, this is explicitly forbidden by policy and quite rightly so.

Ian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/19792.4916.750805.893...@chiark.greenend.org.uk




Re: The "node" command in Debian

2011-02-07 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 07/02/2011 16:43, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Monday 07 February 2011 13.54:24 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> 1. they can declare a conflict with each other, so that the packaging
>>system will never let both get installed in the same system.
> 
> JavaScript and AX.25 sounds like it might be quite a distance in terms of 
> people involved, although this is really just a guess.
> 
> Start with a package conflict plus explanatory notice in README.Debian and 
> move on to other measures if "enough" people complain, perhaps?

+1
though against policy, it is the least frustration (and work) path.

> Downside is of course that this discussion will probably repeated a few 
> times.
Let's hope nobody want to drive ax25 through nodejs.

Jérémy.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d501428.5090...@edagames.com



Re: The "node" command in Debian

2011-02-07 Thread brian m. carlson
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:43:48PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes ("Re: The "node" command in Debian"):
> > 1. they can declare a conflict with each other, so that the packaging
> >system will never let both get installed in the same system.
> 
> No, this is explicitly forbidden by policy and quite rightly so.

What Policy actually says is (§10.1):

  Two different packages must not install programs with different
  functionality but with the same filenames.

The definition of "filename" here is unclear.  AX.25's node is in
/usr/sbin (IIRC) and nodejs's is in /usr/bin.  This, of course, poses
practical problems for people that have both in their path.  This is
usually the case for root, and for some users as well.

Lacking an official definition for "filename" in Policy, I think it's
reasonable to assume that it should not be read as "path", and instead
be read to forbid this use (as you said, Ian).  Nevertheless, I see how
reasonable people could disagree.

-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: The "node" command in Debian

2011-02-07 Thread Ian Jackson
brian m. carlson writes ("Re: The "node" command in Debian"):
> The definition of "filename" here is unclear.  AX.25's node is in
> /usr/sbin (IIRC) and nodejs's is in /usr/bin.  This, of course, poses
> practical problems for people that have both in their path.  This is
> usually the case for root, and for some users as well.

Yes.

> Lacking an official definition for "filename" in Policy, I think it's
> reasonable to assume that it should not be read as "path", and instead
> be read to forbid this use (as you said, Ian).  Nevertheless, I see how
> reasonable people could disagree.

The point of the exercise is not just to stop dpkg complaining when
the packages are installed (otherwise Conflicts would suffice).

The point is to try to arrange that when one bit of the system (or a
user) asks for something by name, they don't get something entirely
unrelated.

The same principle should apply to any namespace, not just the command
namespace.  So for example we would not tolerate a new kernel module
that used AF_INET for something strange, nor two applications which
used the same object paths in dbus for unrelated purposes, nor two
sets of packages which use the same virtual package name for unrelated
purposes, or anything else similar.

Nor should we accept two sets of shared libraries which exported the
same function names for different purposes (although I guess we don't
check for this automatically, and there would probably be more cases
where it would be easier to argue that there was no harm done).

Ian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/19792.8082.728268.491...@chiark.greenend.org.uk



Re: The "node" command in Debian

2011-02-07 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 07/02/2011 13:54, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> 1. they can declare a conflict with each other, so that the packaging
>system will never let both get installed in the same system.
> 
>Unless both communities have a large overlap, this one makes both
>happy, until a third package shows up trying to claim "node".
> 
> 2. they can be forced (by the TC) to drop their claim of "node" in the
>common namespace.  This is not likely to happen.
> 
> 3. It is possible that they could do nothing, since there is no direct
>file conflict (different paths).  Not good for the unaware user that
>installs both, but I am not sure whether we forbid this kind of
>potential pitfall in the first place.
> 
> 4. as the one with the weaker claim, node.js can move its executable out
>of the generic namespace or rename its executable to something else.
> 

Another proposal :

5. nodejs package provides /usr/bin/nodejs, following policy.
   nodejs-notrenamed package links /usr/bin/node to nodejs, and conflicts
   with node package.

+ Both packages node and nodejs can be installed, with full functionnality.
+ If the renaming is too much a burden for the user, he can install the
  not renamed version, knowing he can't install node package in that case.
- Depending on nodejs-notrenamed must be impossible (is this possible ?)
- All packages depending on nodejs must be able to work with /usr/bin/nodejs.
- It is still violating policy, though in a more flexible and twisted way.


Jérémy.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d502603.8040...@edagames.com



Re: The "node" command in Debian

2011-02-07 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Jérémy Lal  [110207 18:21]:
> > 2. they can be forced (by the TC) to drop their claim of "node" in the
> >common namespace.  This is not likely to happen.

If both camps can rightly argue that some other command called
"node" might make things in their camp call the wrong thing, then this
is the only reasonable solution.

> Another proposal :
>
> 5. nodejs package provides /usr/bin/nodejs, following policy.
>nodejs-notrenamed package links /usr/bin/node to nodejs, and conflicts
>with node package.
>
> + Both packages node and nodejs can be installed, with full functionnality.
> + If the renaming is too much a burden for the user, he can install the
>   not renamed version, knowing he can't install node package in that case.
> - Depending on nodejs-notrenamed must be impossible (is this possible ?)
> - All packages depending on nodejs must be able to work with /usr/bin/nodejs.
> - It is still violating policy, though in a more flexible and twisted way.

A user wanting to have a node command can also just create a symlink
manually (if things call only node without path, they can even just add
that into /usr/local/[s]bin without thinking about diversions (though
diversions would not really be necessary as path is essentially dead for
packages).

There is not really a need for a package if nothing can depend on it,
all tests should be done without and a user can get the same effect with
a single simple command.

Bernhard R. Link


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110207194229.ga26...@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de



Bug#612330: [general] Debian Live fails to restart

2011-02-07 Thread Filipus Klutiero

Package: general
Severity: important

I downloaded debian-live-6.0.0-i386-kde-desktop.img and managed to write 
it on a USB stick. Shutting down generally works, but restarting 
doesn't. After the init scripts finish, the console prints
"Please remove the USB flash drive and press ENTER to continue:", as 
when shutting down, and immediately followed by "[ time ] Starting new 
kernel"
After removing the flash drive and pressing ENTER, nothing happens, for 
many minutes (presumably until one will manually shut down the system).




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d504a92.3000...@gmail.com



Processed: Re: Bug#612330: [general] Debian Live fails to restart

2011-02-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 612330 debian-live
Bug #612330 [general] [general] Debian Live fails to restart
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'debian-live'.
Warning: Unknown package 'debian-live'
Warning: Unknown package 'debian-live'
Warning: Unknown package 'debian-live'
Warning: Unknown package 'debian-live'
Warning: Unknown package 'debian-live'
> severity 612330 normal
Bug #612330 [debian-live] [general] Debian Live fails to restart
Warning: Unknown package 'debian-live'
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'

Warning: Unknown package 'debian-live'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
612330: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612330
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129710814720715.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: Ideas for object-based git-like storage on Linux

2011-02-07 Thread Jens Peter Secher
On 2011-02-07 00:40, Roger Leigh wrote:
>   http://www.codelibre.net/~rleigh/hashlink.pdf

Interesting!  It seems that it would also be beneficial to
log-structured file systems [1].

I spotted a couple of typos:

Page 4:
"Files may be therefore be replaced" => "Files may therefore be replaced"

Page 8:
"that is to say it it written once" => "that is to say it is written once"
"storage is be used" => "storage is used"

Cheers,
-- 
Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1.

A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d5077fa.6090...@debian.org



Re: Ideas for object-based git-like storage on Linux

2011-02-07 Thread Roger Leigh
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:53:46PM +0100, Jens Peter Secher wrote:
> On 2011-02-07 00:40, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >   http://www.codelibre.net/~rleigh/hashlink.pdf
> 
> Interesting!  It seems that it would also be beneficial to
> log-structured file systems [1].
> 
> I spotted a couple of typos:
> 
> Page 4:
> "Files may be therefore be replaced" => "Files may therefore be replaced"
> 
> Page 8:
> "that is to say it it written once" => "that is to say it is written once"
> "storage is be used" => "storage is used"

Many thanks for catching those; I've now fixed them.

BTW, I didn't see a reference to [1], but I'd be very interested to
look at it!


Thanks,
Roger

-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?   http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#612358: ITP: lpg-generator-java -- Java Runtime support for the LPG parser

2011-02-07 Thread Niels Thykier
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niels Thykier 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

* Package name: lpg-generator-java
  Version : 2.0.20
  Upstream Author : Philippe Charles 
* URL : http://lpg.sourceforge.net/
* License : EPL-1.0
  Programming Lang: Java
  Description : Java Runtime support for the LPG parser

The LALR parser generator (LPG) is a tool for developing scanners and parsers
written in Java, C++ or C. Input is specified by BNF rules. LPG supports
backtracking (to resolve ambiguity), automatic AST generation and grammar
inheritance.


Rationale for packaging this: eclipse-cdt appears to have modules depending on
this, which are currently disabled.
  If it turns out that I also need the lpg-generator (written in C/C++), I will
probably put both parts into the same source package.

Note: On the upstream author I chose Philippe, because SF lists Philippe as
project manager and there did not appear to be a team mailing list.

~Niels


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=QM5H
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/2011020842.15341.46842.report...@getsu.thykier.net



Bug#612359: [general] Debian Live: some Boot menu options are invisible (Memory test)

2011-02-07 Thread Filipus Klutiero

Package: general
Severity: important

Debian Live 6's boot menu seems to contain 14 options. I used the image 
debian-live-6.0.0-i386-kde-desktop.img. There are 4 Live options, 4 Text 
options, 4 GUI options, and 2 more, the first being Memory test.
I tried the USB key on 3 PC, and I always only saw the first 8 before I 
used the arrow keys. The display was identical on the 3 PC-s. 2 are 
laptops with a 1366x768 resolution, one is a desktop with a 1440x900 LCD 
screen. They are all "widescreens".


First problem, nothing suggests there are 6 more options that will 
appear when going down. The menu seems to think its always showing 10 
options. Therefore if from the start I press the down arrow key 8 times, 
no option is highlighted but no scrolling happens. I have to press 10 
times. Then the options scroll by 4 and I see Text and GUI options. GUI 
Auto is the last option I can see. There is room in the screen to show 
one line below the last option shown, but not 2. Playing, it's possible 
to get the 13th option, Memory test, to flash, so I was able to use 
memtest anyway.


I guess if the fix is non-trivial, the most urgent thing is to be able 
to see the 2 last options. Ironically, the last option, the one truly 
invisible, seems to be the help.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d5088de.9060...@gmail.com



2011年2月 東京エリアDebian勉強会のおしらせ

2011-02-07 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
こんにちは。

2011年2月19日土曜日に東京エリアDebian勉強会を開催します。

内容は

Hadoop についてと、Debian Games Team 体験記、
そして、リリースされたSqueezeをインストールした結果を語る会を行う予定です。

詳細の確認と参加登録は以下のURLからできます。
http://tokyodebian.alioth.debian.org/2011-02.html

以上、よろしくお願いします。

岩松
-- 
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
   iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
   GPG ID: 40AD1FA6


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinDUNieKZXVYuLrEimY-_HUMYErkLtmF=+gm...@mail.gmail.com



Re: 2011年2月 東京エリアDebian勉強会のおしらせ

2011-02-07 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Sorry, I mistook in e-mail address.
This is an announcement of the meetings of Debian in Japan.

Nobuhiro

-- 
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
   iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
   GPG ID: 40AD1FA6

2011年2月8日9:37 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu :
> こんにちは。
>
> 2011年2月19日土曜日に東京エリアDebian勉強会を開催します。
>
> 内容は
>
> Hadoop についてと、Debian Games Team 体験記、
> そして、リリースされたSqueezeをインストールした結果を語る会を行う予定です。
>
> 詳細の確認と参加登録は以下のURLからできます。
> http://tokyodebian.alioth.debian.org/2011-02.html
>
> 以上、よろしくお願いします。
>
> 岩松
> --
> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
>   iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
>   GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktincwlrovcfvycjjgpkgxszounlfe4+df3x35...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#612363: ITP: faulthandler -- Display the Python backtrace on a crash

2011-02-07 Thread Miriam Ruiz
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miriam Ruiz 


* Package name: python-faulthandler
  Version : 1.3
  Upstream Author : Victor Stinner 
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/faulthandler/
* License : BSD-2
  Programming Lang: C, Python
  Description : Display the Python backtrace on a crash

 Fault handler for SIGSEGV, SIGFPE, SIGBUS and SIGILL signals: it displays
 the Python backtrace and restores the previous handler. It allocates an
 alternate stack for this handler, if signaltstack() is available, to be
 able to allocate memory on the stack, even on stack overflow.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110208005734.27269.14153.report...@alioth.debian.org



Squeeze Release Coincides with "Toy Story Marathon"

2011-02-07 Thread Stephen Powell
Congratulations to all the Debian developers on the Squeeze release over the
weekend.  You all deserve a big round of applause.  On the very day that
Squeeze was going production, Saturday, February 5, 2011, The Disney Channel
was running a "Toy Story Marathon" in which all three of the Toy Story
movies were being shown back-to-back-to-back.  Isn't that an amazing
co-incidence?  Or was it?  ;-)

Thank you very much.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1574427890.656047.1297132384086.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Bug#612374: ITP: python-nose-achievements -- unlock achievements for running your tests

2011-02-07 Thread Ricardo Kirkner
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ricardo Kirkner 


* Package name: python-nose-achievements
  Version : 0.2pre
  Upstream Author : Brian Beck 
* URL : http://exogen.github.com/nose-achievements/
* License : GPLv3
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description : unlock achievements for running your tests

Unit Testing Achievements
 * Unlock achievements for running your test suite!
 * Works with nose, unittest, and Django
 * Tested with Python 2.6 and 3.1
 * Entry points for discovering more achievements



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110208031227.8452.37782.reportbug@localhost6.localdomain6



Bug#612375: ITP: stimfit -- view and analyze electrophysiological data

2011-02-07 Thread NeuroDebian Team
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: NeuroDebian Team 


* Package name: stimfit
  Version : 0.10.7
  Upstream Author : Christoph Schmidt-Hieber 
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/stimfit/
* License : GPL-2
  Programming Lang: C, Python
  Description : view and analyze electrophysiological data
 Stimfit is a free, fast and simple program for viewing and analyzing
 electrophysiological data.  It features an embedded Python shell that
 allows you to extend the program functionality by using numerical
 libraries such as NumPy and SciPy.
 .
 It includes stfio module which supports some electrophysiological
 file formats:
  - Read/write: CFS binary data, HDF5 files, Axon text files,
ASCII files
  - Read-only: Axon binary files (*.abf), Axograph files (*.axgd,
*.axgx), HEKA files (*.dat, from version 0.10)
* Write-only: Igor binary waves (*.ibw)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110208032743.19501.97112.report...@novo.onerussian.com