Processed: reassign 484308 to buildd.emdebian.org
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > reassign 484308 buildd.emdebian.org Bug#484308: Lack of source packages in Emdebian toolchain and cross repositories Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 480515 to buildd.emdebian.org, reassign 480518 to buildd.emdebian.org ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> reassign 480515 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480515: buildd.emdebian.org: gconf unable to be uploaded, libldap-2.4-2
failed to cross build
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480518 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480518: buildd.emdebian.org: libgpewidget needs DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nodocs"
support in debhelper
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480521 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480521: buildd.emdebian.org: gpe-clock inherits wrong configure environment
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480706 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480706: buildd.emdebian.org: coreutils fails to cross build
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480709 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480709: buildd.emdebian.org: cupsys fails to cross build, cannot be updated
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480710 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480710: buildd.emdebian.org: avahi cannot be updated, new version fails to
cross build
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480711 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480711: buildd.emdebian.org: curl cross built but unable to upload, missing
dependencies
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480712 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480712: buildd.emdebian.org: e2fsprogs fails to cross build, unable to
update package
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480715 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480715: buildd.emdebian.org: New version of 'file' fails to cross build,
unable to update package.
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480717 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480717: buildd.emdebian.org: [RM] {arm} (unstable) gcc-4.2 not needed in
Emdebian anymore?
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480718 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480718: buildd.emdebian.org: Unable to update gnome-vfs, new version fails
to cross build
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480722 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480722: buildd.emdebian.org: gtk+2.0 fails to update, udeb fails to cross
build
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480729 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480729: buildd.emdebian.org: ncurses cannot be updated, new version fails
to cross build
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480730 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480730: buildd.emdebian.org: Unable to update ntp - new version fails to
cross build
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480841 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480841: buildd.emdebian.org: libssh2-1 fails to cross build, prevents ssh
support in libcurl3
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480848 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480848: buildd.emdebian.org: unable to update glibc - FTBFS on arm and on
arm crossbuild
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480904 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480904: buildd.emdebian.org: cdebconf Gtk+ frontend unavailable - needs a
package split
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 484274 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#484274: buildd.emdebian.org: lintian support and busybox long options
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 486246 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#486246: buildd.emdebian.org: avahi fails to cross-build
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 486250 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#486250: buildd.emdebian.org: gnupg fails to crossbuild - problem with curl?
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 486255 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#486255: buildd.emdebian.org: libusb fails to cross-build within a chroot
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 496980 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#496980: mawk: should have Build-Conflicts against byacc
Bug reassigned from package `mawk' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 481681 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#481681: buildd.emdebian.org: need to reinstate XC-Package-Type: tdeb once
support is available.
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 481764 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#481764: buildd.emdebian.org: libofx not currently available due to size of
libosp5
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 484567 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#484567: general: buildd.emdebian.org - Busybox vs. full gnu versions of
utilites
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
> reassign 480716 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480716: buildd.emdebian.org: New version of findutils fails to cross build,
prevents update
[Fwd: Re: Release Update: freeze guidelines, testing, BSP, rc bug fixes]
Hello, Regarding the wiki page NewInLenny[1] and the possibility to reuse it's content in the Release Notes, I'm wondering what's the actual license that apply to the R.N ? We would have two option to migrate the wiki page license : 1. Ask each contributor to re-license his contribution under license X. 2. Use Vincent's idea, described below, and use [Include(NewInLenny-oldlicense)] to include the old page in the new one (so it remains visible). and content can be move from one page to the other by it's author I am quite interested in the first scheme, as it would be a trial for we can do for the whole wiki. Franklin [1] http://wiki.debian.org/NewInLenny Forwarded Message > From: Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Debian Developers > Franklin PIAT wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 11:46 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 08:01:29AM +0200, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> was heard to say: > >>> Release notes > >>> ~ > >>> There is still quite a lot of work to be done on the lenny release notes. > >>> Coordination for this will happen on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> mailing list (further information to appear in a mail to that list). If > >>> you know of any issues that need to be documented, file them as bugs > >>> against the ``release-notes'' pseudo package. > >> Do you know where I can find the current version of the release notes? > >> I don't want to file bugs asking for documentation of things that are > >> already documented. > > > >> Or is the NewInLenny page the staging ground for the release notes? > > > > Due to license incompatibility, the content of the NewInLenny wiki page > > can't be copied to the release notes. > > Cannot you rename NewInLenny to NewInLenny-oldlicense and recreate a > NewInLenny page (with a link to NewInLenny-oldlicense ?) > The new NewInLenny page would have a licence compatible with the > release notes and can be fed up with the content of the current release > notes... > > > So if you write some text, then you should also send a mail to the > > release-notes maintainers (We won't repeat that mistake for Squeeze). > > > > Franklin > > Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal invitation from Prof Swapan Garain
Hi, On 8/20/2008 10:53:10 PM, you were invited to join Prof Swapan Garain's UNYK address book so he/she would always have access to your contact info and you to his/hers. To accept his/her request, Click here. http://www.unyk.com/ml/65/5/?i=84006383ece6448a8c0491d27df1be41 UNYK is a smart and simple way to manage your contacts so you never lose anyones contact information again. No more worrying about your contacts' info. From now on, let them do it for you. By changing their information in UNYK.com, you address book will be automatically updated. By changing your information in UNYK.com, their address book will be automatically updated. Its so simple and its free Already 6 million users. Click here if you no longer wish to receive invitations to try UNYK from your contacts! http://www.unyk.com/ml/65/6/unsubscribe.asp?i=84006383ece6448a8c0491d27df1be41 UNYK, the first smart address book that updates itself!
Processed: reassign
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 495295 debian-i18n Bug#495295: i18n.debian.org: [DDTP] Rename language code "km_KH" to "km" Bug reassigned from package `general' to `debian-i18n'. > reassign 495294 debian-i18n Bug#495294: i18n.debian.org: [DDTP] Remove wrong language code 'go' Bug reassigned from package `general' to `debian-i18n'. > reassign 495643 debian-i18n Bug#495643: i18n.debian.org: [DDTP] Catalan DDTP issues Bug reassigned from package `general' to `debian-i18n'. > reassign 497433 debian-i18n Bug#497433: i18n.debian.org: [DDTP] Getting "old" descriptions when requesting new ones Bug reassigned from package `general' to `debian-i18n'. > reassign 105337 debian-i18n Bug#105337: i18n.debian.org: a central database for translated templates Bug reassigned from package `general' to `debian-i18n'. > reassign 480514 buildd.emdebian.org Bug#480514: general: buildd.emdebian.org : Need a crossbuilding buildd compliant with Emdebian Policy Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Fwd: Re: Release Update: freeze guidelines, testing, BSP, rc bug fixes]
On 2008-09-03 09:27, Franklin PIAT wrote: > Regarding the wiki page NewInLenny[1] and the possibility to reuse it's > content in the Release Notes, I'm wondering what's the actual license > that apply to the R.N ? We are currently asking all contributors to agree to GPL2 (unfortunately without the famous "or later" a.k.a. GPL2+). > I am quite interested in the first scheme, as it would be a trial for we > can do for the whole wiki. If somebody does not answer in a given time frame or does not agree, you still have to remove their contribution. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: does this problem still exist?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 464551 usbutils Bug#464551: general: USB devices missing in lsusb Bug reassigned from package `general' to `usbutils'. > tags 464551 +moreinfo Bug#464551: general: USB devices missing in lsusb There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#464551: does this problem still exist?
reassign 464551 usbutils tags 464551 +moreinfo thanks Hi Rafael, you submitted this issue in February, are your devices correctly displayed by lsusb nowadays? regards, Holger, udev+linux-2.6 were other reassign candidates and if the submitter doesnt reply in 14 days I suggest close ;-) pgp63rUOuws7L.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: another usecase for debtags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 311868 debtags Bug#311868: base: Packages do not indicate whether installing them changes system operation Bug reassigned from package `general' to `debtags'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#170472: marked as done (info: top Info pages of different packages wildly differ)
Your message dated Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:29:53 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line "How 'bout just filing wishlist bugs with patches?" has caused the Debian Bug report #170472, regarding info: top Info pages of different packages wildly differ to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 170472: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=170472 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: info Version: 4.1-2 Severity: normal Gentlemen, the top Info pages of different packages wildly differ: e.g. $ info m4 has a nice header "GNU m4" but $ info gawk has a lower level header 'General introduction', while $ info yorick has a menu without a header, while $ info emacs says "the emacs editor", even better than "GNU m4" which doesn't mention if it is an editor or a language, etc. Therefore folks should make top Info nodes with proper headers. How about a debian Info pages policy. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5 Versions of packages info depends on: ii libc62.2.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.2.20020112a-7 Shared libraries for terminal hand --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, (this bug is about "top Info pages of different packages wildly differ".) "How 'bout just filing wishlist bugs with patches?" sounds like a reasonable approach to me, thus closing this meta bugreport. Also _not_ reassigning to debian-policy, as there is no consensus to demand this and policy shall describe current best practice, which obviously doesnt exist here. regards, Holger pgpuu878BkUvz.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#311868: another usecase for debtags
reassign 311868 debtags thanks Hi, I read in this bugreport that it would be a good idea to use debtags to indicate whether a package installs remotely accessable services or not. (The other modifications suggested in this bugreport are mostly prohibited by policy) Does such a tag exist? If so, please close this bugreport, if not, please create one :-) regards, Holger pgphLNpsCkDcK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Mes cordiales salutations
Salut très cher, Suite a mes profondes recherches sur le net que je suis arrivé a vous extraire parmi tant d'adresse .Je suis de la nationalité Canadienne ,je me nomme Celine CARIER .Vous savez chez nous, l'amitié est très précieuse. La rencontre d'une personne nous apporte toujours quelque chose de nouveau.C'est donc une très grande expérience pour moi de communiquer avec d'autres au bout du monde d'origines différentes et aussi de différentes régions.Alors, si tu es une personne de sérieux qui cherche une correspondante sache que tu l'ai deja.. J'ai 23ans j'habite dans mon propre appartement que mon père m'a offert Au québec (Canada).Je suis la première fille à mes parents.Ils ont trois enfants mon petit frère Eric et ma petite s?ur Rosalie et moi . Mon papa Thomas CARIER est diplomate et ma maman Lucienne BA est employée au département de l'éducation de Montréal.Je suis célibataire à cause des multiples trahisons que m'ont fait vivre les garçons. J'aime lire, la musique, la conduite sur de longues distances et surtout les voyages. Je déteste beaucoup la moindre mensonge. J'aime la nature et je rêve un jour d'avoir ma propre maison en campagne pour sentir l'air fraîche de la montagne et de l'herbe fraîche et surtout, planter dans mon propre jardin avec un grand espace. S'il vous plais j'aimerais bien te lire prochainement. Bonne reception. je te laisse mon adresse au besoin Celine CARIER Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] CLSC Laurentien 1320, rue St-Paul Ancienne-Lorette G2E 1Z4 Amicalement, -- mes cordiales salutations -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone looked at Chromium for Debian yet?
Hey, Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet? http://code.google.com/chromium/ http://dev.chromium.org/developers/ http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/chrome/ Looks like a 3-clause BSD, was going to check out the code and scour it for potential DFSG issues but my downlink was slow. >From what I gather, a GNU/Linux build might be possible, with a bit of >massaging here and there... though I obviously haven't done much research into this yet. I notice that as of yesterday evening, no one had filed an ITP. Best, -- Noah Slater, http://bytesexual.org/nslater -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anyone looked at Chromium for Debian yet?
2008/9/3 Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hey, > > Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet? > > http://code.google.com/chromium/ > http://dev.chromium.org/developers/ > http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/chrome/ > > Looks like a 3-clause BSD, was going to check out the code and scour it for > potential DFSG issues but my downlink was slow. I've downloaded it and started to play with the code. It doesn't work yet neither in Linux, nor in 64 bits. Greetings, Miry [1] http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/build-instructions-linux [2] http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/64-bit-support -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anyone looked at Chromium for Debian yet?
Noah Slater wrote: > Hey, > > Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet? > > http://code.google.com/chromium/ > http://dev.chromium.org/developers/ > http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/chrome/ > > Looks like a 3-clause BSD, was going to check out the code and scour it for > potential DFSG issues but my downlink was slow. > >>From what I gather, a GNU/Linux build might be possible, with a bit of >>massaging > here and there... though I obviously haven't done much research into this yet. > > I notice that as of yesterday evening, no one had filed an ITP. > > Best, > Google stands it doesn't available under Linux, what do you suggest to package? :) -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Anyone looked at Chromium for Debian yet?
Em Qua, 2008-09-03 às 15:17 +0200, Miriam Ruiz escreveu: > 2008/9/3 Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet? > I've downloaded it and started to play with the code. It doesn't work > yet neither in Linux, nor in 64 bits. A friend of mine reported[0] a successful build in Debian. Greetings. 0: https://listas.dcc.ufmg.br/pipermail/grad041/2008-September/022464.html It sais: I compiled it here nicely in Debian. I had only to change a little bit in the source of __tt_main_proc.c, which made a native call to Windows' systray. -- marcot Página: http://marcotmarcot.googlepages.com/ Blog: http://marcotmarcot.blogspot.com/ Correio: [EMAIL PROTECTED] XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefone: 25151920 Celular: 98116720 Endereço: Rua Turfa, 639/701 Prado 30410-370 Belo Horizonte/MG Brasil -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anyone looked at Chromium for Debian yet?
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 02:13:34PM +0100, Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, > > Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet? > > http://code.google.com/chromium/ > http://dev.chromium.org/developers/ > http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/chrome/ > > Looks like a 3-clause BSD, was going to check out the code and scour it for > potential DFSG issues but my downlink was slow. > > >From what I gather, a GNU/Linux build might be possible, with a bit of > >massaging > here and there... though I obviously haven't done much research into this yet. > > I notice that as of yesterday evening, no one had filed an ITP. I would advise anyone interested in packaging Chromium to not consider it before Lenny release and help fixing the annoying RC bugs in iceweasel/xulrunner instead. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anyone looked at Chromium for Debian yet?
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 10:32:12AM -0300, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote: > A friend of mine reported[0] a successful build in Debian. [...] > https://listas.dcc.ufmg.br/pipermail/grad041/2008-September/022464.html > It sais: I compiled it here nicely in Debian. I had only to change a > little bit in the source of __tt_main_proc.c, which made a native call > to Windows' systray. Ah yes, I was sure I had seen something about it working... I concur that we have bigger things to be worrying about right now, was just interested in a quick canvas of opinions, thoughts &c. -- Noah Slater, http://bytesexual.org/nslater -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anyone looked at Chromium for Debian yet?
Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote: Em Qua, 2008-09-03 às 15:17 +0200, Miriam Ruiz escreveu: 2008/9/3 Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet? I've downloaded it and started to play with the code. It doesn't work yet neither in Linux, nor in 64 bits. A friend of mine reported[0] a successful build in Debian. Greetings. 0: https://listas.dcc.ufmg.br/pipermail/grad041/2008-September/022464.html It sais: I compiled it here nicely in Debian. I had only to change a little bit in the source of __tt_main_proc.c, which made a native call to Windows' systray. It's going here too. Look closely at the small print.. .all your searches are belong to us (google) Enjoy -- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: untag patch as there is no consensus if this is the right approach
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 387446 -patch Bug#387446: amd64 system not compliant with FHS Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#356930: marked as done (general: X adding bad info in last -d -i)
Your message dated Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:11:10 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #356930, regarding general: X adding bad info in last -d -i to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 356930: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356930 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: general Severity: normal When you start an X-server, it appears to add bad info to last -d -i tested with 2 different boxes, it adds a line like the following scot pts/2192.168.1.5 Tue Mar 13 20.19 still logged in scot :0 148.33.21.64 Tue Mar 13 20.10 still logged in reboot system boot 0.0.0.0 Tue Mar 13 20.08 if you stop X running the line does not display the 148.33.21.64 info, i even tested this with no internet connection to the box, that IP Address if it is an IP Address is in America, I am in the uk hope this helps scot -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, closing this old bug (it was filed before etch was released) an the assumptions that a.) I dont see this bug on my etch systems and b.) a lot has changed in Xorg since then. Feel free to reopen if you still see this. regards, Holger pgpqDTatXTacR.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#199653: marked as done (SIGCHLD being ignored somewhere)
Your message dated Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:14:23 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing this 5 year old bug about a rootkit on someones computer :-) has caused the Debian Bug report #199653, regarding SIGCHLD being ignored somewhere to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 199653: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199653 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: apt Version: 0.5.4 Debian version: woody Description: I can't use apt-get update. I get the following error message: $ apt-get update Get:1 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages [130kB] Get:2 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Release [110B] Err http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages Waited, for gzip but it wasn't there Fetched 130kB in 5s (23.4kB/s) Failed to fetch http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-i386/Packages Waited, for gzip but it wasn't there Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done W: Couldn't stat source package list http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_stable_updates_main_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory) W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. This has happened to me ever since I have Debian installed (february 2003), but once, about a month ago, it did work and I was able to upgrade my system. This is the content of my /etc/apt/sources.list: deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-7 (20021218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-6 (20021218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-5 (20021218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-4 (20021218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-3 (20021218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-2 (20021218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-1 (20021218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main #deb http://security.debian.org/ woody/updates main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main The last two lines I have tested uncommenting one or the other with the same result. Kernel: 2.2.20-idepci Shared C library: /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.2.5.so Thanks for your wonderful work. Regards, Sasha ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sextocontinente.org Humanizar la Tierra! ** --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, yes, right. regards, Holger pgp1qDO3tcANF.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#140230: marked as done (general: Ad-hoc proxy configuration)
Your message dated Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:15:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line global proxy configuration is there has caused the Debian Bug report #140230, regarding general: Ad-hoc proxy configuration to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 140230: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=140230 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: general Version: N/A; reported 2002-03-27 Severity: normal Configuring http/ftp proxies for a host is too complicated. There are too many places where the administrator (or user) needs to enter the proxy configuration. At system install time, you are prompted for the proxy settings, but these settings appear to only be used by apt. It would be nice if there were a global proxy configuration, which every package would use. Incidentally, here is a list of the packages that had to be configured by hand: wget-ssl reportbug konqueror mozilla-browser -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux godot 2.4.18-586tsc #2 Wed Mar 20 20:18:44 EST 2002 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, global proxy configuration works via the http_proxy variable works with most programs, if not, please file seperate bugs against those packages. regards, Holger pgpjvpKwdX9Nt.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#206187: marked as done (apt-get update fails to get index package list and therefore does nothing)
Your message dated Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:14:23 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing this 5 year old bug about a rootkit on someones computer :-) has caused the Debian Bug report #199653, regarding apt-get update fails to get index package list and therefore does nothing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 199653: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199653 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: apt Version: 0.5.4 (debian woody 3.0r1) Session: mafalda:~# apt-get update Get:1 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages [146kB] Get:2 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Release [110B] Err http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages Waited, for gzip but it wasn't there Fetched 147kB in 6s (21.5kB/s) Failed to fetch http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-i386/Packages Waited, for gzip but it wasn't there Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done W: Couldn't stat source package list http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_stable_updates_main_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory) W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. Kernel version: Linux mafalda 2.2.20-idepci #1 Sat Apr 20 12:45:19 EST 2002 i586 unknown Shared C library version: 2.2.5 (/lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.2.5.so) Comentaries: I have tried to update my system many times, this problem is happening since at least 4-5 months. I'm not sure, but maybe my machine has a rootkit. Anyway, everything seems to work ok except for this bug I'm reporting. ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sextocontinente.org Humanizar la Tierra! ** --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, yes, right. regards, Holger pgpn5kcWFGNXs.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Re: Bug#206187: marked as done (apt-get update fails to get index package list and therefore does nothing)
Without more information, I would think the "Waited, for gzip but it wasn't there" message meant that gzip wasn't installed. "apt-get install gzip" should have fixed that, should it not? - Lawrence On Wednesday, September 3, 2008 12:51:07 pm Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Waited, for gzip but it wasn't there -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#356930: closing
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 17:11:10 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > closing this old bug (it was filed before etch was released) an the > assumptions that a.) I dont see this bug on my etch systems and b.) a lot has > changed in Xorg since then. > That would be the display manager, not X, in any case. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anyone looked at Chromium for Debian yet?
Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 02:13:34PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: >> >> Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet? >> > I would advise anyone interested in packaging Chromium to not consider > it before Lenny release and help fixing the annoying RC bugs in > iceweasel/xulrunner instead. That's right, but at the same time some of us also want to have some fun in Debian. Happy hacking, Franklin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#206187: marked as done (apt-get update fails to get index package list and therefore does nothing)
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:03:58PM -0230, Lawrence Williams wrote: > Without more information, I would think the "Waited, for gzip but it wasn't > there" message meant that gzip wasn't installed. > > "apt-get install gzip" should have fixed that, should it not? Think again :-) Hint: man 5 deb Cheers, -- Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Anyone looked at Chromium for Debian yet?
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 05:44:45PM +0200, Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 02:13:34PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > >> > >> Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet? > >> > > I would advise anyone interested in packaging Chromium to not consider > > it before Lenny release and help fixing the annoying RC bugs in > > iceweasel/xulrunner instead. > > > >That's right, but at the same time some of us also want to have >some fun in Debian. I want fun, too. Maybe I should orphan these packages. > > Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anyone looked at Chromium for Debian yet?
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want fun, too. Maybe I should orphan these packages. Please try the chromium package already in Debian instead. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#206187: marked as done (apt-get update fails to get index package list and therefore does nothing)
Hi Lawrence, On Wednesday 03 September 2008 17:33, Lawrence Williams wrote: > Without more information, I would think the "Waited, for gzip but it wasn't > there" message meant that gzip wasn't installed. read the merged bugreport 199653. regards, Holger pgpQbAiWhFQP7.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Anyone looked at Chromium for Debian yet?
Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 05:44:45PM +0200, Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Mike Hommey wrote: >>> I would advise anyone interested in packaging Chromium to not consider >>> it before Lenny release and help fixing the annoying RC bugs in >>> iceweasel/xulrunner instead. >> >> >>That's right, but at the same time some of us also want to have >>some fun in Debian. > > I want fun, too. Maybe I should orphan these packages. I don't think so. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Can't connect to bugs.debian.org:80 (connect: Connection refused)
Urg..., as titled. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't connect to bugs.debian.org:80 (connect: Connection refused)
On 01:23 Thu 04 Sep , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jjo> Urg..., as titled. bug #50 has been posted? ;) -- . ''`. Dmitry E. Oboukhov : :’ : email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber://[EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `~’ GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21 `- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555 E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
換季囉!針織系列 別家賣390元 我們 只賣120 唷
新款上市囉peridotite 針織系列 別家賣390元 我們只賣120元唷 款式眾多 歡迎團購 批發 http://tw.f5.page.bid.yahoo.com/tw/auction/e28120355?u=may26tw 雅虎首頁 - 搜 尋 ~~莓莓批發~~ 就能找到唷q, O, 1 ___ 雅虎邮箱，您的终生邮箱！ http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NewInLenny wiki page (Relicensing)
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 10:06 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2008-09-03 09:27, Franklin PIAT wrote: > > Regarding the wiki page NewInLenny[1] and the possibility to reuse it's > > content in the Release Notes, I'm wondering what's the actual license > > that apply to the R.N ? > > We are currently asking all contributors to agree to GPL2 > (unfortunately without the famous "or later" a.k.a. GPL2+). The license of the wiki page NewInLenny have been changed to GPL2. All contributors to this page are invited to relicense their contribution, by adding their name at the bottom of the page. > > I am quite interested in the first scheme, as it would be a trial for we > > can do for the whole wiki. > > If somebody does not answer in a given time frame or does not > agree, you still have to remove their contribution. Of course, unfortunately. (I would take care of it). Franklin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
