Bug#486192: RFH: darcs -- an advanced revision control system
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request assistance with maintaining the darcs-server package. Specifically, I need one or two volunteers to help me by testing prospective packages (prior to uploading to Debian) to make sure that darcs-server works correctly. Since I don't use darcs-server personally and don't know how to test it, it's currently possible for me to accidentally break the package and not realize it until AFTER the broken package hits Debian. The only testing it currently gets is "did it build without errors, and does the script exist in the .deb?" The package description is: This package contains the cgi script which allows users to conveniently browse your repositories on the web. Darcs is a revision control system, along the lines of CVS or arch. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some debian project machines uncontactable?
gluck, merkel, samosa and raff uncontactable (192.25.206.* network problem?) I don't know anything more at this time, but wanted to push a small message out so that others know it isn't just them and lists and IRC are both still up, as far as I can see so far. We now return you to your regular guestbook-spam. [Please cc me on any replies.] -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for signing the guestbook
Thank you for signing the guestbook! -Christian & Christina -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ecki is retiring (Debian RT)
owner 486000 ! thanks Vincent Bernat wrote: >> net-acct -> can probably be removed from distribution? > > I know that it is widely used in some places despite the existence of > better solutions. I prefer to adopt it instead of letting it getting out > of Debian. I will take care of this package, with Vincent's agreement and sponsorship. Cheers, -- Stéphane Glondu signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#486242: ITP: bzr-loom -- Focused patch plugin support for Bazaar
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: bzr-loom Version : 1.4.0 Upstream Author : Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Aaron Bentley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://launchpad.net/bzr-loom * License : GPL Programming Lang: Python Description : Focused patch plugin support for Bazaar Loom is a Bazaar plugin to assist in developing focused patches. It adds a 'loom' to a bzr branch. . A loom allows the development of multiple patches at once, while still giving each patch a branch of its own. - -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers gutsy APT policy: (500, 'gutsy'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAkhT6IoACgkQDLQl4QYPZuVlewP8DF5/4TI6aIh0xgrHurHu7KiY sWe7h17++Hjoea93+8IpGUMdxmktmM+1A2XJ1tmE49X1PaSM0UYDc9T9GhnmPKZa uBIFvEE2baaepM3KAkCMbjqhzxZCbwHNYPBiPVPBV2qc0gRwR45jjfFWXanV1HEQ X/klts+2n5gf8PT8mos= =KjmY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLC 0.8.6a - Why hasn't the package been upgraded?
Greetings! I have a working install of Debian Etch over here and it's installed on an Powerbook G3 "Lombard" and the version of VLC which is part of Debian Etch is still version 0.8.6a and I'm wondering why you people haven't done a package of version 0.8.6e yet? I'm thinking of maybe trying to compile the source on my own, but I don't want to break the current installation of VLC, so, so far I haven't tried it. Björn Johansson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLC 0.8.6a - Why hasn't the package been upgraded?
On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 20:35 +0200, Björn Johansson wrote: > Greetings! > > I have a working install of Debian Etch over here and it's installed on > an Powerbook G3 "Lombard" and the version of VLC which is part of Debian > Etch is still version 0.8.6a and I'm wondering why you people haven't > done a package of version 0.8.6e yet? It has been done: http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/vlc.html Latest version 0.8.6.e-2.3 That version is currently only in Debian Sid (unstable) and is part of an ongoing transition so that it can be part of Lenny. Can't check on backports right now - server unresponsive. -- Neil Williams = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Correct way to rename a binary package
Luca Capello wrote: Since I want to support smooth upgrades, I need to do the following: Package: hunchentoot Version: 2.0 Provides: cl-hunchentoot [1] Replace: cl-hunchentoot (<< 2.0) Conflicts: cl-hunchentoot (<< 2.0) Package: cl-hunchentoot Depends: hunchentoot I was under the impression the "conflicts" was considered bad (it makes upgrading from an old version of cl-hunchentoot to hunchentoot harder), and it was generally better to leave the conflicts out and rely on the replaces header alone. Or... maybe this is a slightly different situation. Brian May -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLC 0.8.6a - Why hasn't the package been upgraded?
Hi, But here is your answer. On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 08:35:36PM +0200, Björn Johansson wrote: > > Greetings! > > I have a working install of Debian Etch over here and it's installed on > an Powerbook G3 "Lombard" and the version of VLC which is part of Debian > Etch is still version 0.8.6a and I'm wondering why you people haven't > done a package of version 0.8.6e yet? Because Etch is stable release, I guess. We keep old one intentinally for the sake of stability. http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=vlc&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all Package vlc * sarge (oldstable) (graphics): multimedia player for all audio and video formats 0.8.1.svn20050314-1sarge3: alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc * etch (stable) (graphics): multimedia player and streamer 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-5.1+etch2 [security]: alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc * etch-m68k (graphics): multimedia player and streamer 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-5: m68k * lenny (testing) (graphics): multimedia player and streamer 0.8.6.c-6+lenny5 [security]: alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc 0.8.6.c-6: armel * sid (unstable) (graphics): multimedia player and streamer 0.8.6.e-2.3+b1: amd64 i386 mips mipsel 0.8.6.e-2.3: alpha arm armel hppa ia64 m68k powerpc s390 sparc 0.8.6.e-2.1 [debports]: kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 So Debian is quite up-to-date :) > I'm thinking of maybe trying to compile the source on my own, but I > don't want to break the current installation of VLC, so, so far I > haven't tried it. If you want to use very latest softwares (even with some trouble), use * testing (now lenny) or * unstable (sid) > Björn Johansson I sense that you need to get to know How Debian operates a bit more. Good luck. Osamu http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ (old) http://people.debian.org/~osamu/pub/getwiki/html/index.en.html (new) http://people.debian.org/ is down for last some hours, though.. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLC 0.8.6a - Why hasn't the package been upgraded?
Hi, > If you want to use very latest softwares (even with some trouble), use > * testing (now lenny) or > * unstable (sid) or create a backport, or look at backports.org if there's one already. Cheers, Bernd -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer GPG Fingerprint: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for signing the guestbook
Thank you for the support and signing the guessed book. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
