Re: standardizing pre-build maintainer actions
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 08:08:08PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: >> > Anyhow I was thinking at something more generic that only getting orig >> > sources >> I don't think a Debian diff.gz should contain arbitrary updates from >> upstream. > > I didn't imply that it should be some other kind of updates, but > generally some work that should be done before building the package. But > probably it is not such a widespread need, I don't think it's a question of "widespread need". I think the examples you gave (documentation updates and "microrelease patches") should not be treated this way. Either you take all that upstream provides at that point in time - then make a new upstream version (and use the date as (part of) the version number). Or review them individually, then you don't need a makefile target. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Re: 'Uploaded' buildd status
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:13:07AM +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote: > Could someone explain me (or point to a manual) what 'Uploaded' means > in http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=erlang ? > The package was initially uploaded for amd64 architecture. It was > built for i386 and stays in 'uploaded' state for several days. I > wonder why it can't become 'installed' as for the rest of > architectures. The same problem for m68k: http://unstable.buildd.net/buildd/m68k_stats.png -- Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150 Ingo \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Porting from OpenSSL to GnuTLS
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 21:45:50 Florian Weimer wrote: > * Bruno Costacurta: > > I might start thinking about porting an x509 application from OpenSSL to > > GnuTLS (Gnu Transport Layer Security) and so looking about feedbacks, > > experiences ..etc.. about such porting, libraries ..etc.. > > What kind of level of X.509 support do you need? Is chasing > certificate chains a must? Then it can be kind of hard. > > If you just look up the certificate in some kind of database, it's not > that difficult. In fact, I think the GNUTLS API is easier to work > with. Hello, indeed some functionalities might be hard to port. This porting OpenSSL --> GnuTLS might be requested by license / copyright policies from Debian as we intend to package this application under Debian. This is linked to a thread on the Debian legal mailing list : http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/06/msg00214.html Regards, Bruno Costacurta -- PGP key ID: 0x2e604d51 Key server: hkp://subkeys.pgp.net Key fingerprint = 713F 7956 9441 7DEF 58ED 1951 7E07 569B 2E60 4D51 -- pgpaDedfVsIul.pgp Description: PGP signature
[Help] WordNet -> dict conversion (Was: [Help] Autoconf problems when trying to build WordNet 3.0 package)
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Azazel wrote: There's an acinclude.m4 file in the 2.1 source which is missing from your 3.0 source which may be relevant. I've attached it. This hint seemed me very reasonable and worked fine. Thanks for all who provided help. Now I was able to prepare packages from WordNet 3.0 which are available at http://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/wordnet/ The last remaining problem is in the WordNet dict conversion program that was kindly provided by Sebastian Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. It just happens that $ dictl -d wn test works fine but $ dictl -d wn toast No definitions found for "toast", perhaps you mean: wn: oast boast roast Even if there is $ wn toast -over Overview of noun toast The noun toast has 4 senses (first 1 from tagged texts) ... So this problem was just solved by Sebastian for WordNet 2.1 and I just hope that he could review his code to make things work also under 3.0. Kind regards and thanks for the help Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reliability of data (Was: Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).)
Ter, 2007-06-12 às 10:26 -0300, Gustavo Franco escreveu: > Any idea on how to collect more reliable data in a opt-in base? Does a > survey on pentabarf (or public acessible) during debconf makes sense? Huh How can "opt-in" data be more reliable then disperse collection? daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Nexuiz 2.3
Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Jiri Palecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Jonas Meurer wrote: >> >>> On 21/06/2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 01:39:41PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Both packages have been uploaded at the same time, and I could not > forsee that it has still not been built and uploaded on sparc on > time. I think to avoid this situation in the future the correct way > was to use a versioned "Breaks" field on nexuiz-data: > > Breaks: nexuiz (<< 2.3) >> >> Does the testing script look at this? If not, (AFAIK it doesn't), you >> will create an uninstallable package in testing, which is not really >> good. > > Which is the current state, so no regression here. apt 0.7 now > understands breaks, other tools (britney, dpkg) still need to be fixed. > >>> This sounds like it would introduce circular dependencies, which tend to >>> break upgrades. Using a Breaks: header should be the right thing to do. >> >> What are the real problems? > > Confusing britney and apt, making upgrade paths hard. The question is, whether these "easier" upgrade paths are still correct. For example, britney might decide to remove the older binary in favour of newer data in your setting, which is legal, but, from the perspective of the user, useless. Jiri Palecek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reliability of data (Was: Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).)
On 6/28/07, Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ter, 2007-06-12 às 10:26 -0300, Gustavo Franco escreveu: > Any idea on how to collect more reliable data in a opt-in base? Does a > survey on pentabarf (or public acessible) during debconf makes sense? Huh How can "opt-in" data be more reliable then disperse collection? When the disperse collection doesn't point exact to the data (yes, the data not the result) you want to analyze. In other words, that's why some people are asked for who they're going to vote in a election (opt-in base but also a disperse collection) and the statistics aren't based on how much people are reporting bugs against Debian suite X, Y or Z. :-) regards, -- stratus http://stratusandtheswirl.blogspot.com get debian @ http://get.debian.net/
Bug#430896: general: GNOME or KDE desktops should issue a warning when the user unplugs USB media without unmounting.
I think KDE should issue a warning too. 2007/6/28, Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Rafael wrote: > Package: general > Severity: wishlist > > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: lenny/sid > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (500, 'testing') > Architecture: i386 (i686) > > Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-6-generic (SMP w/1 CPU core) > Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash > > Debian KDE, Gnome or XFCE desktops should issue a warning when the user unplugs USB media without unmounting it first, as Ubuntu > does. > Thanks for your atention. FWIW recent GNOME desktops in unstable using gnome-mount for doing the mounting stuff, already have this kind of functionality. Whenever you unmount a removable device, gnome-mount will show you a message via notification-daemon, when it is safe to unplug the device. I'm not sure if XFCE in Debian already uses gnome-mount, though. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Re: GCC 4.2 transition
Martin Michlmayr wrote: > GCC 4.2 was released on May 13 and has been in unstable since roughly > that time. The default version of gfortran was recently switched to > 4.2 and the Debian GCC maintainers would like to move to 4.2 as the > default compiler in unstable for all architectures and for all > languages with the exception of Java (which will follow later). > This message describes the plan to make this transition possible. Hi Martin, Does this imply that all FORTRAN-using packages will need to move from g77-3.4 to gfortran-4.2 in the near future? To my knowledge there has been no mass rebuild of FORTRAN packages with gfortran yet to see how smoothly this will work out... As I understand it the challenges involved in a mass switch to gfortran are two-fold. First, gfortran and g77 by default produce code with different ABIs (at least for functions that return REAL or COMPLEX; possibly also in other cases?) so probably a transition plan for libraries, similar to the C++ ABI change transitions, will be needed. Second, another complicating factor is that since gfortran is not going to provide an f77 or g77 symlink (I understand this is because it is not a complete standards-compliant implementation of a FORTRAN 77 compiler), all the build infrastructures of FORTRAN packages will need to be altered so that they call gfortran instead of f77 / g77 / $(FC) / $(F77). best regards, -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/Princeton University GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: GCC 4.2 transition
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:47:55PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > GCC 4.2 was released on May 13 and has been in unstable since roughly > that time. The default version of gfortran was recently switched to > 4.2 and the Debian GCC maintainers would like to move to 4.2 as the > default compiler in unstable for all architectures and for all > languages with the exception of Java (which will follow later). > This message describes the plan to make this transition possible. Could you say something about the state of play on arm and armel ? Regards, Paddy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is Elie Rosenblum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) MIA?
Hi, I'm trying to find Elie Rosenblum - He is currently listed as the maintainer for six packages in main and one in non-free [1], and has not had an upload since Sarge. mia-query says his last upload was in 2004-07. In 2006-12-12 there was a mail where he offered to orphan his packages (or so I understand from mia-query's output), which was not carried out. I just hijacked libnetaddr-ip-perl, for which a member of the pkg-perl team has been working on to bring it up to date. He has four other Perl modules packaged (libc-scan-perl, libdata-flow-perl, libnet-smtp-server-perl, libquota-perl), as well as procmail-lib. Elie: Of course, before continuing, do you consider coming back? Do you mind what I'm doing? I'm of course not trying to push you away, but to push Debian's quality up :) So... Is anybody interested in the packages right now? If nobody steps forward, the pkg-perl group can take the Perl modules - but it's always better if they are taken by somebody who actually uses them. Now, regarding his 'album' package in non-free: popcon reports 261 users - Not too much, but not too little :) If it is not taken, it should probably be removed. I'm right now filing O: bugs on all the packages. If nobody picks them up, I'll close them when importing into the pkg-perl group. Greetings, [1] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=fnord&comaint=yes -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF pgp60wq6HfZr6.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: GCC 4.2 transition
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-28 16:48]: > > default compiler in unstable for all architectures and for all > > languages with the exception of Java (which will follow later). > > This message describes the plan to make this transition possible. > > Could you say something about the state of play on arm and armel ? I compiled about 2000 packages on arm and didn't find any problems. I didn't test Java though. I also didn't test on armel. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GCC 4.2 transition
I've been unable to reproduce any of the "One Definition Rule" bugs you filed. Jigdo builds fine; apt builds successfully apart from #428623 (and #359634 on my local setup); and gnome-vfsmm2.6 is fine until it hits #422813. It looks like something was either fixed or reverted. I also tried compiling jigdo using the current gcc-snapshot, and it built fine after I added some missing #includes. So with your permission, I'd like to close those three bugs. BTW: anybody more versed in the bts system than I am, how can I get #359634 marked as not actually being fixed? My clumsy attempts just ended up making things more confused. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#229357: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for lenny?
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 14:33:26 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Bill Allombert writes ("Re: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for
> lenny?"):
> > At least, I would feel less alone.
>
> FWIW, I agree with you. I think the proposed `Build-Options' source
> control field is a sensible addition and the bug should be implemented
> immediately.
>
> Obviously the dpkg developers are rather busy at the moment. I think
> that the right thing to do is to offer to NMU.
Errr, what's the rush now to get this fixed? It's something that has
been there like forever, the bug report proposes adding a new field
which personally I don't like taking lightly.
I've been pondering on what's the cleanest way to fix it for some time,
and I tend to agree with Steve about using the make options to test
for the existence of the targets. But as others have pointed out it's
not clear why that change was reverted at the time.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 'Uploaded' buildd status
On 6/28/07, Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:13:07AM +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote: > Could someone explain me (or point to a manual) what 'Uploaded' means > in http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=erlang ? > The package was initially uploaded for amd64 architecture. It was > built for i386 and stays in 'uploaded' state for several days. I > wonder why it can't become 'installed' as for the rest of > architectures. The same problem for m68k: http://unstable.buildd.net/buildd/m68k_stats.png As I found in http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/wanna-build-states 'uploaded' state is a short-term state, so any delay longer than an hour should not be. Looking around http://buildd.debian.org/stats/ I've found several packages which stay in 'uploaded' state for a long time (more than 3 days): i386 (there's only one package which stays, others come and go): interpreters/erlang_1:11.b.4-4: Uploaded by buildd_i386-ninsei [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Built until 2007 Jun 25 02:24:32 ia64 (this one stays for months): admin/gps_1.1.0-6: Uploaded by buildd_ia64-caballero [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2006 Nov 23 17:48:17 mips (another very long-stay package): libdevel/mxml_2.2-2: Uploaded by buildd_mips-ball [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Built until 2006 Oct 16 10:21:24 m68k (very many packages, most of them were uploaded in June 11): utils/strace_4.5.15-1: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [standard:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 25 17:30:21 net/portmap_6.0-1: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [standard:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:56:48 libs/guichan_0.6.1-3: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 25 17:29:37 libs/libarchive_2.2.3-1: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:50:32 libs/libgtksourceviewmm_0.3.1-1: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 13:24:31 libs/libspf2_1.2.5.dfsg-2: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:51:11 devel/debreaper_0.2.1: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:46:49 devel/haddock_0.8-2: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:48:35 devel/syslog-ocaml_1.3-4: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:58:26 shells/mksh_29.6-2: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:51:50 graphics/mkvtoolnix_2.0.2-1: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:52:20 admin/menu_2.1.34: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:51:30 admin/sg3-utils_1.24-1: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:58:08 utils/xosview_1.8.2-13: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 13:01:55 x11/kdeaddons_4:3.5.7-2: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-aahz [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 10 10:41:01 net/libpam-afs-session_1.4-2: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:50:49 net/mrd6_0.9.5-rev3.dfsg-0.2: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:53:01 net/pidgin-extprefs_0.7-2: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:56:30 net/radvd_1:1.0-2: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:57:43 net/traffic-vis_0.34-19: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:59:51 net/twisted_2.5.0-2: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 13:00:42 mail/dbmail_2.2.5-1: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:46:31 mail/tart_3.07-2: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:59:02 gnome/deskbar-applet_2.18.1-2: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:47:08 kde/kaffeine_0.8.4-4: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:50:08 libdevel/ocaml-sqlite_0.3.5.arch.4-9: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2007 Jun 11 12:53:51 libdevel/pycaml_0.82-6: Uploaded by buildd_m68k-crest [optional:ou
Could someone clarify this...
Hi, I was just reading an interview[0] of someone from the 'Freetype' project and he said: ... Also, I still don't understand why Debian and Ubuntu keep distributing patent-infringing code in FreeType, while they keep MP3 and DVD playback out of their normal installs. I'm not even sure it's DFSG compliant... ... Cheers, K [0] http://osnews.com/story.php/18166/Interview-with-David-Turner-of-Freetype/ -- | .''`. == Debian GNU/Linux == | my web site: | | : :' : The Universal |mysite.verizon.net/kevin.mark/| | `. `' Operating System| go to counter.li.org and | | `-http://www.debian.org/ |be counted! #238656 | | my keyserver: subkeys.pgp.net | my NPO: cfsg.org | |join the new debian-community.org to help Debian! | |___ Unless I ask to be CCd, assume I am subscribed ___| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Could someone clarify this...
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > I was just reading an interview[0] of someone from the 'Freetype' project > and he said: > ... > Also, I still don't understand why Debian and Ubuntu keep distributing > patent-infringing code in FreeType, while they keep MP3 and DVD playback > out of their normal installs. I'm not even sure it's DFSG compliant... > ... Almost any interesting program, free software or otherwise, infringes some unknown, non-zero number of registered software idea patents. If that were the only criterion for a software work to fail the DFSG, Debian would be pretty much empty. My understanding is that Debian declares a work non-free if a holder of a software idea patent is *actively enforcing* a patent that covers the work, such that Debian cannot distrigute the work as free software. Fraunhofer has a track record of actively enforcing software idea patents against the algorithms in MP3 encoding software. Thus, such works cannot be redistributed as DFSG-free software by Debian. Ditto the DVD-CCA actively enforcing against DeCSS. I don't know whether that is true for any of the software idea patents that cover FreeType. -- \"Somebody told me how frightening it was how much topsoil we | `\ are losing each year, but I told that story around the campfire | _o__) and nobody got scared." -- Jack Handey | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Work-needing packages report for Jun 29, 2007
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 397 (new: 8) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 86 (new: 3) Total number of packages requested help for: 40 (new: 1) Please refer to http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for more information. The following packages have been orphaned: album (#430982), orphaned today (non-free) Installations reported by Popcon: 259 dvi2tty (#430129), orphaned 6 days ago Description: Previewing dvi-files on text-only devices Installations reported by Popcon: 806 libc-scan-perl (#430977), orphaned today Installations reported by Popcon: 45 libdata-flow-perl (#430978), orphaned today Reverse Depends: libc-scan-perl Installations reported by Popcon: 62 libnet-smtp-server-perl (#430979), orphaned today Installations reported by Popcon: 362 libquota-perl (#430980), orphaned today Reverse Depends: adduser-plugin-quota Installations reported by Popcon: 187 openbox (#430663), orphaned 2 days ago Description: standards compliant, fast, light-weight, extensible window manager Reverse Depends: bbappconf obconf openbox-themes Installations reported by Popcon: 632 procmail-lib (#430981), orphaned today Installations reported by Popcon: 270 389 older packages have been omitted from this listing, see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/orphaned for a complete list. The following packages have been given up for adoption: maildirsync (#430345), offered 5 days ago Description: simple and efficient Maildir synchronisation utility Installations reported by Popcon: 77 prokyon3 (#430431), offered 3 days ago Description: A mp3 and ogg/vorbis manager and tag editor Installations reported by Popcon: 76 refit (#430721), offered 2 days ago Description: graphical bootloader for EFI-based ia32 systems Installations reported by Popcon: 65 83 older packages have been omitted from this listing, see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/rfa_bypackage for a complete list. For the following packages help is requested: [NEW] dsniff (#430162), requested 6 days ago Description: Various tools to sniff network traffic for cleartext insecurities Installations reported by Popcon: 973 aboot (#315592), requested 735 days ago Description: Alpha bootloader: Looking for co-maintainers Reverse Depends: aboot aboot-cross dfsbuild ltsp-client-core Installations reported by Popcon: 105 apt-build (#365427), requested 425 days ago Description: Need new developer(s) Installations reported by Popcon: 785 apt-cacher (#403584), requested 192 days ago Description: caching proxy system for Debian package and source files Installations reported by Popcon: 349 apt-show-versions (#382026), requested 324 days ago Description: lists available package versions with distribution Installations reported by Popcon: 2724 athcool (#278442), requested 975 days ago Description: Enable powersaving mode for Athlon/Duron processors Installations reported by Popcon: 281 cdw (#398252), requested 228 days ago Description: Tool for burning CD's - console version Reverse Depends: cdw gcdw Installations reported by Popcon: 247 cvs (#354176), requested 490 days ago Description: Concurrent Versions System Reverse Depends: bonsai crossvc cvs-autoreleasedeb cvs-buildpackage cvs2cl cvs2html cvschangelogbuilder cvsconnect cvsd cvsdelta (17 more omitted) Installations reported by Popcon: 18290 dpkg (#282283), requested 950 days ago Description: dselect: a user tool to manage Debian packages Reverse Depends: alien alsa-source apt-build apt-cross apt-src backuppc build-essential bzr-builddeb clamsmtp crosshurd (85 more omitted) Installations reported by Popcon: 55053 foo2zjs (#429872), requested 8 days ago Description: Support for printing to ZjStream-based printers Installations reported by Popcon: 558 gentoo (#422498), requested 53 days ago Description: a fully GUI-configurable, two-pane X file manager Installations reported by Popcon: 277 gpsdrive (#406522), requested 168 days ago Description: Car navigation system Installations reported by Popcon: 431 grub (#248397), requested 1144 days ago Description: GRand Unified Bootloader Reverse Depends: dfsbuild replicator Installations reported by Popcon: 49898 gtkpod (#319711), requested 704 days ago Description: manage songs and playlists on an Apple iPod
Bug#430896: general: GNOME or KDE desktops should issue a warning when the user unplugs USB media without unmounting.
On jeu, 2007-06-28 at 06:24 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > I'm not sure if XFCE in Debian already uses > gnome-mount, though. No, and we don't really want to depends on gnome stuff, especially looking at the huge dependencies list of gnome-mount. We already use exo-mount, which doesn't yet provide this functionality, afaik. -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
