Bugreport: kqemu results in kernel panic of the guest systems

2007-03-21 Thread Rick Rocker

Dear debian devs,

I don't know how to input bug reports into bugzilla so
I want to report a bug in Etch here:

I am running Etch with this kernel:
Linux funghi 2.6.18-4-686 #1 SMP Wed Feb 21 16:06:54
UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux

I installed these packages:
ii  kqemu-common 1.3.0~pre9-12
   Common files for the QEMU Accelerator module
ii  kqemu-modules-2.6-6862.6.18-4 
   QEMU Accelerator modules for Linux 2.6 on
PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/P4
ii  kqemu-modules-2.6.18-4-686   2.6.18+1.3.0~pre9-4  
   QEMU Accelerator modules for Linux 2.6.18 on
PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/P4
ii  qemu 0.8.2-4  
   fast processor emulator

So, I tried with this command:

qemu -m 256 -k de -net user -kernel-kqemu -cdrom
/dev/hdc -hda  -boot d 

to install 
a) Debian Sarge
b) Debian Etch 
c) Slackware
d) Sourcemage
(each from the respective installer cds)

but each booting from the install cds resulted in a
kernel panic of the guest.

Without "-kernel-kqemu" each tried install cd runs
fine.

Also the booting of the fully installed guest - after
installing without kqemu - with "-kernel-kqemu"
results in a kernel panic of the guest. But again
without "-kernel-kqemu" booting the fully installed
guest successes.

I wanted to make a good bug report, so I also tried
with 
kernel 2.6.18-4-486 and the respective kqemu-modules
packages.
The same failures as above occur with this kernel and
kqemu modules, too.

If you want to have more data I can give you.

Thank you
regards
rpg_kernel






___ 
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: 
http://mail.yahoo.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bugreport: kqemu results in kernel panic of the guest systems

2007-03-21 Thread Andrew Donnellan

On 3/21/07, Rick Rocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Dear debian devs,

I don't know how to input bug reports into bugzilla so
I want to report a bug in Etch here:


Debian does not use bugzilla, it uses Debian's own Bug Tracking System.

To report something to the BTS, use the 'reportbug' script which is
installed by default.
--
Andrew Donnellan
ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary)ajdlinuxATexemailDOTcomDOTau (secure)
http://andrewdonnellan.com http://ajdlinux.wordpress.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0x5D4C0C58
   http://linux.org.auhttp://debian.org
   Get free rewards - http://ezyrewards.com/?id=23484
   Spammers only === [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Ligue Grátis com o seu MSN

2007-03-21 Thread Hélio Cerqueira
Ligar do seu MSN Messenger para celular  e telefone fixo sem pagar nada...

Acabou a era do Skype.Foi lançado MSN VOIP,um software que você instala no seu 
MSN e com ele você  poderá discar para celulares ou telefones fixo sem pagar 
taxas de uso.
Basta instalar e sair ligando.

Maiores informaçoes e download em http://www.msnvoip.hotbox.ru/
--
GLOBO Anti-Spam
Este email foi enviado exclusivamente para debian-devel, 
debian-devel@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#415676: ITP: stymulator -- Curses based player and converter for the YM chiptune format

2007-03-21 Thread Adam Cecile
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


* Package name: stymulator
  Version : 0.21.dfsg
  Upstream Author : Grzegorz Tomasz Stanczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://atariarea.krap.pl/stymulator/
* License : GPL
  Programming Lang: C
  Description : Curses based player and converter for the YM chiptune format

 STYMulator is an Open Source (GPL License) player which plays music
files
 in the YM chiptune format. In particular the YM files are Yamaha YM2149
 soundchip music datas (registers) dumped from the ATARI 16-bit
computers.
 .
 The YM chiptune 'standard' has been introduced in the middle of 90's by
 Arnaud Carré aka Leonard/OXG. His sensational ST-Sound player has been
 released for Windows only. Ten years after the first ST-Sound creation
 he released ST-Sound library under GPL license.
 .
 STYMulator has a very simple terminal GUI. It has been written in pure
 ANSI C code with ncurses library. Sounds are generated through ALSA.
 .
 This package contains both ymplayer (curse based player) and ym2wav,
 a console YM to Wave converter.
 .
  Homepage: http://atariarea.krap.pl/stymulator/


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)



Re: Bugreport: kqemu results in kernel panic of the guest systems

2007-03-21 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:01:18AM +0100, Rick Rocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Dear debian devs,
> 
> I don't know how to input bug reports into bugzilla so
> I want to report a bug in Etch here:
(...)

This is a known bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=402289

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bugreport: kqemu results in kernel panic of the guest systems

2007-03-21 Thread Daniel Baumann
Mike Hommey wrote:
> This is a known bug:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=402289

i did build my own qemu packages with included upstream bios files, use
those if you want to kqemu, or build your own.

http://archive.daniel-baumann.ch/debian/packages-other/qemu/

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#415700: ITP: chmdeco -- Compiled HTML Help (CHM) decompiler

2007-03-21 Thread Paul Wise
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* Package name: chmdeco
  Version : 0.3.2 (to be released soon)
  Upstream Author : Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (yes, me)
* URL : http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/chmdeco/
* License : GPL
  Programming Lang: C
  Description : Compiled HTML Help (CHM) decompiler

 A program to convert the internal files of Compiled HTML Help (CHM) files back
 into the authoring files used by the CHM compiler to create the CHM files in
 the first place.

 CHM files are used on the Micosoft Windows platform to store program
 documentation, almost always in the form of HTML, with some non-standard
 quirks. CHM files are a form of archive known as InfoTech Storage Format
 (ITSF) files and contain some special files to implement features of the CHM
 viewer. On Windows they are accessed through a kind of virtual filesystem
 exposed by a dynamically loaded library. ITSF files have UTF-8 filenames and
 use an LZX cruncher to compress all the files in one big chunk. Both the ITSF
 and the formats of the internal CHM files are highly indexed and their designs
 are all clearly optimised for read-only access.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#415703: /etc/modules has no function/should be deleted

2007-03-21 Thread Olaf Zaplinski

Package: general

/etc/modules is not owned by any package, and its content is ignored when 
building an initrd image. I just checked. By default the module loop is 
defined in /etc/modules, but it is not included in my new initrd image.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#415703: marked as done (/etc/modules has no function/should be deleted)

2007-03-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:09:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415703: /etc/modules has no function/should be deleted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---

Package: general

/etc/modules is not owned by any package, and its content is ignored when 
building an initrd image. I just checked. By default the module loop is 
defined in /etc/modules, but it is not included in my new initrd image.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
also sprach Olaf Zaplinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.03.21.1239 +0100]:
> /etc/modules is not owned by any package, and its content is ignored when 
> building an initrd image. I just checked. By default the module loop is 
> defined in /etc/modules, but it is not included in my new initrd image.

initrd images use /etc/initramfs-tools/modules or
/etc/initrd-tools/modules. /etc/modules is used by
/etc/rc2.d/S20module-init-tools to load modules during startup.
Files in /etc need not all be owned by packages.

Closing this bug.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
--- End Message ---


debhelper and debconf: package and protocol versions

2007-03-21 Thread Magnus Holmgren
dh_installdebconf adds a fixed dependency on debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0 to 
${misc:Depends} if debconf is actually needed. But judging from the changelog 
of debconf version 1.2.0 is needed if there are any template translations, 
and I think dh_installdebconf should be so smart. Not that it matters now, 
over four years later, but it makes me wonder: Are there any other versions 
where new functionality was added, prompting a versioned dependency on a 
newer version? I've found debconf-escape from 1.4.72.

Further, will transitioning to cdebconf be possible if the only common 
specification is that behind the debconf-2.0 virtual package 
(http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/debconf_specification.html)? 
Should everything that isn't on the other end of the communication channel 
from the point of view of the maintainer scripts be separate packages, 
including debconf-escape as well as /usr/share/confmodule? All packages that 
depend on debconf should simply add debconf-2.0 as an alternative, but AFAICS 
almost no packages can possibly work without debconf, because they need 
confmodule at the very least.

Can somebody clarify?

(I've seen http://bugs.debian.org/395166 (dh_installdebconf: Should try to 
figure out the debconf version needed).)

-- 
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpC5AkB1jxN2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#415703: /etc/modules has no function/should be deleted

2007-03-21 Thread Stephen Stafford

On 21/03/07, Olaf Zaplinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Package: general

/etc/modules is not owned by any package, and its content is ignored when
building an initrd image. I just checked. By default the module loop is
defined in /etc/modules, but it is not included in my new initrd image.


It's a very handy place to put modules which should be loaded at boot.
Please don't remove it.

Cheers,
Stephen
--
Stephen Stafford


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



margo provider

2007-03-21 Thread Merle Koehlera
Here's your chance
CEO A M E R I C A INC 
SYM-C E O A
Cannot go wrong at 6 cents
Watch it like a hawk

AN ALL AMERICAN COMPANY
Get IN Before the rush TOMORROW

cohesion because of injuries, illnesses, trades and suspensions. The Nuggets   
two free throws made it 109-73 in the waning seconds of the third quarter.
"I want to move as quickly as I can, but some of the coaches we're might be   
night.   Carmelo Anthony augmented Iverson's night by adding 29 points in 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



But whinny

2007-03-21 Thread Desmondt Rhoda
Ground floor to the future
C E O AMERICA I N C
Sym-CEOA
Extremely b ullish at 6 Cents
Add this to your radar

AN ALL AMERICAN COMPANY
Get IN Before the rush TOMORROW

 annual contributions of ,000. By firing him, the school keeps the invested 
money, 13-for-20. And many of the shots were alley-oop dunks and rim-rattling 
jams  points - since their 129-127 double-overtime win at Dallas on Wednesday 
night.  handle on any night.''   At one point, both Iverson and Anthony were 
12-for-16


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



EM64T announcement and Linus (was Re: Compiling Debs on AMD vs. Intel and 32bit vs. 64bit)

2007-03-21 Thread Pierre THIERRY
Scribit Peter Samuelson dies 17/03/2007 hora 03:29:
> Linus Torvalds read Intel's announcement and was a bit disgusted that
> Intel tried as hard as they could to imply (without actually saying
> so) that the architecture was their own invention 

Would you have any reference to this?

Curiously,
Pierre
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: EM64T announcement and Linus (was Re: Compiling Debs on AMD vs. Intel and 32bit vs. 64bit)

2007-03-21 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Pierre THIERRY may or may not have written...

> Scribit Peter Samuelson dies 17/03/2007 hora 03:29:
>> Linus Torvalds read Intel's announcement and was a bit disgusted that
>> Intel tried as hard as they could to imply (without actually saying so)
>> that the architecture was their own invention

> Would you have any reference to this?

http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/2/21/110

-- 
| Darren Salt| linux or ds at  | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army
|   Let's keep the pound sterling

Everything should be transparent to the user.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: May one use ~rc1 within versions although older lintians are complaining?

2007-03-21 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
said: 

> On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a
>> version number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?

> If you use that number, the upstream version should be 1.0.8~rc1.
> Is that the upstream number?  If you want to have release candidates
> of your _own_ package, you should do: 1.0.8-1~rc1

Hmm? Suppose upstream version is currently 1.07 released, and
 they are  planning on releasing 1.08 in the future. Now they are
 running through 1.08 release candidates, and so we have 1.08 rc1,
 soon to be followed by 1.08 rc2.  The upstream version variables,
 used by them, are all at 1.08 (not 1.08 '~'.

How do you propose the debian releases of the release
 candidates be numbered?  When upstream releases, upstream releases
 shall have 1.08, 1.08.1 or 1.08-1, and so on.

manoj

-- 
When people say nothing, they don't necessarily mean nothing.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#415766: ITP: bzr-email -- Notification email plugin for Bazaar

2007-03-21 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


* Package name: bzr-email
  Version : 0.0.1~bzr25
  Upstream Author : Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://launchpad.net/bzr-email/
* License : GPL
  Description : Notification email plugin for Bazaar

Plugin for Bazaar that can send notification emails at commit time.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-3-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: debhelper and debconf: package and protocol versions

2007-03-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:13:18PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> dh_installdebconf adds a fixed dependency on debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0 
> to 
> ${misc:Depends} if debconf is actually needed. But judging from the changelog 
> of debconf version 1.2.0 is needed if there are any template translations, 
> and I think dh_installdebconf should be so smart. Not that it matters now, 
> over four years later, but it makes me wonder: Are there any other versions 
> where new functionality was added, prompting a versioned dependency on a 
> newer version? I've found debconf-escape from 1.4.72.

Yes, the debconf 'error' template type was added in a version later than
what shipped in sarge.  But then, to use this feature you can't depend on '|
debconf-2.0' either, you have to know exactly which version of cdebconf
implemented the same template type and depend on the 'or' of these two
packages specifically.  So at that point, I'm not sure the behavior of
dh_installdebconf vis à vis ${misc:Depends} is relevant.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: debhelper and debconf: package and protocol versions

2007-03-21 Thread Jean-Christophe Dubacq
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:09:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:13:18PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > dh_installdebconf adds a fixed dependency on debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0 
> > to 
> > ${misc:Depends} if debconf is actually needed. But judging from the 
> > changelog 
> > of debconf version 1.2.0 is needed if there are any template translations, 
> > and I think dh_installdebconf should be so smart. Not that it matters now, 
> > over four years later, but it makes me wonder: Are there any other versions 
> > where new functionality was added, prompting a versioned dependency on a 
> > newer version? I've found debconf-escape from 1.4.72.
> 
> Yes, the debconf 'error' template type was added in a version later than
> what shipped in sarge.  But then, to use this feature you can't depend on '|
> debconf-2.0' either, you have to know exactly which version of cdebconf
> implemented the same template type and depend on the 'or' of these two
> packages specifically.  So at that point, I'm not sure the behavior of
> dh_installdebconf vis à vis ${misc:Depends} is relevant.

I had an error triggered today starting from a minimal (only basic unix
machine selected in tasksel) debian etch machine upgraded to a
full-fledged unstable, by tetex-base (saying that the "description"
format was not understood). Installation of debconf-utils (which
probably pulled something else related to debconf) repaired the thing
(tetex-base could not be removed nor configured, due to the debconf
error). This error may come from the fact that I preseeded the debconf
tree (and I use a non-default debconf configuration).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: debhelper and debconf: package and protocol versions

2007-03-21 Thread Joey Hess
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Further, will transitioning to cdebconf be possible if the only common 
> specification is that behind the debconf-2.0 virtual package 
> (http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/debconf_specification.html)? 

This remains to be seen. The best way to find out would be for
adventerous people to start installing cdebconf, exporting
DEBCONF_USE_CDEBCONF=1, and seeing what breaks. Probably quite a few
things will, initially.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature