Re: Flash player?

2007-03-18 Thread Miguel Gea Milvaques
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

En/na Andrew Vaughan ha escrit:
> Hi
> 
> On Sunday 18 March 2007 10:09, Gabriel Molina wrote:
>> Hello, I've recently installed debian on a MAC Power PC G4 but I have not
>> been able to find a flash player to work on it.. The one I found (gnash)
>> did not work. Is there anything out there that I've over looked?
>>
>>   Thank you for your help,
>>
>>   Gabe.
> 
> There's also libflash (binary package libflash-mozplugin and 
> libflash-swfplayer).  I use the non-free Adobe player, so I've never tried 
> it.

I've readed swfdec last version is able to reproduce youtube videos. I
supose last version is still not in Debian, so you'll need to compile it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF/QY7NTNQylgICMQRArwfAJ9FvCycr05rL2WQr/Wu6K6GvsF5CACeMNqS
zeQ1lhraSBXN1isQ6tsks4E=
=LoIS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Results for General Resolution: Altering package upload rules

2007-03-18 Thread devotee
Greetings,

This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
 Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary

This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
 I remain, gentle folks,

Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Starting results calculation at Sun Mar 18 03:46:47 2007

Option 1 "I support the proposal"
Option 2 "Further Discussion"

In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.

  Option
  1 2 
===   === 
Option 1  132 
Option 2116   



Looking at row 2, column 1, Further Discussion
received 116 votes over I support the proposal

Looking at row 1, column 2, I support the proposal
received 132 votes over Further Discussion.

Option 1 Reached quorum: 132 > 48.3037265643138


Option 1 passes Majority.   1.138 (132/116) >= 1


  Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 132 -  116) =   16 votes.


The Schwartz Set contains:
 Option 1 "I support the proposal"



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The winners are:
 Option 1 "I support the proposal"

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

-- 
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
  ranksep=0.25;
 "I support the proposal\n1.14" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", 
shape=egg, fontcolor="Navy Blue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10  ];
 "I support the proposal\n1.14" -> "Further Discussion" [ label="16" ];
 "Further Discussion" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red", 
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10  ];
}


pgpwBvGTbBfky.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Compiling Debs on AMD vs. Intel and 32bit vs. 64bit

2007-03-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
"Michael S. Peek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hi gurus,
>
> I'm looking to buy or build an install host -- one machine dedicated
> to building and serving a local repository for the purposes of
> installing/upgrading/maintaining other Debian hosts throughout our
> organization.  The problem is, I'm a little clueless when it comes to
> hardware, and I want to make sure that I'm not about to shoot myself
> in the foot.  Some of the packages in my local repository require
> compiling.  Do I need to worry about AMD vs. Intel and/or 32-bit
> vs. 64-bit when building my install host?  (A machine that generates
> *.deb files that are only good on *that* one machine is useless to me.)
>
> How do you guys deal with this in your organizations?
>
> Thanks for your input,
>
> Michael Peek

The short answere is: No, you don't have to worry.

Debian packages are (by default) always build for the architecture of
the port you have installed regardless of the actual system used to
build the package. In fact it is a serious bug for a source to probe
the used hardware and build different depending on the result. Every
debian package build for a port must work on all systems supported by
that port.

In english that means even if you build a package under debian i386 on
an i686 or even amd64/em64t (em64t is intels name for amd64) cpu that
package must still work on an i486 [note that i386 support was droped
a while back but the name i386 remains for historical reasons]. Also a
package build on debian amd64 will on every amd64 or em64t system. For
how to do this correctly in your own packages you can read about this
in the debian policy, packaging reference and maintainer guide. man
dpkg-architecture can also give you a hint.

So the only thing you need to worry is that you are able to install
the debian ports that you want to build packages for. Since Debian
i386 will run just fine on an amd64/em64t CPU but not the other way
around (and for a lot of other reasons) you want an 64bit cpu. With a
64bit cpu you can install debian i386 and have a debian amd64 chroot
or vice versa provided you run a 64bit kernel flavour.

My further recommendation is to install a minimal Debian amd64 system
with xen and then the actual systems for hosting the repository,
building and tetsing packages as seperate xen domains under that. That
way you can mess up big time in the testing domain without affecting
e.g. the repository and easily recover. Also being able to just "ssh
build-32" from anywhere in your network to get into the 32bit build
environment is fun.

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#415331: ITP: libinotify-ruby -- Ruby interface to Linux's inotify system

2007-03-18 Thread Torsten Werner
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  Package name: libinotify-ruby
  Version : 0.0.0
  Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  URL : http://raa.ruby-lang.org/project/ruby-inotify/
  License : Ruby's dual license (either GPL or Ruby's own)
  Programming Lang: C, Ruby
  Description : Ruby interface to Linux's inotify system

 The Ruby package ruby-inotify allows to use Linux's inotify system.
 .
 This is a dependency package which depends on Debian's default Ruby version
 (currently 1.8.x).
 .
  Homepage: http://raa.ruby-lang.org/project/ruby-inotify/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#415337: ITP: affinity -- desktop search tool

2007-03-18 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* Package name: affinity
  Version : 0.1
  Upstream Author : Neil J. Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/affinity-search/
* License : GPL v2 or later
  Programming Lang: C, Python
  Description : desktop search tool

Current Features

  * Front-end to both the Beagle & Tracker desktop search engines.
  * Has actions (configurable through Desktop files), which speed
up common tasks.
  * Has in-built, user-configurable, filters which work in the
the entry box, so typing 'pics:london' will only bring uppictures.
  * Colours can be customised to your taste.
  * Lives in the system-tray, but can be called by a global key stroke. 
Default is Ctrl+Alt+a, but you can change it to anything you like!
  * Written in C for minimal impact on your system, but maximum speed! 
  * Preferences applet is written in Python.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-gentoo-r2
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: co-mentor for a GSoC proposal wanted: debbugs web submission

2007-03-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 23:38 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:

> > I still would like to have a search mechanism on the bug titles list.
> 
> Okay, after searching through the list of bugs open against reportbug, I
> found that this feature has been already requested twice: #358472 and
> #358760.  Of course, I visited the bugs.d.o/reportbug page to do the
> search.

The text interface of reportbug has the filter/search feature already:

(1-15/15) Is the bug you found listed above [y|N|m|r|q|s|f|?]? ?

f - Filter bug list using a pattern.
? - Display this help.

Very handy for wnpp :)

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: co-mentor for a GSoC proposal wanted: debbugs web submission

2007-03-18 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-19 00:57]:

> The text interface of reportbug has the filter/search feature already:
> 
> (1-15/15) Is the bug you found listed above [y|N|m|r|q|s|f|?]? ?
> 
> f - Filter bug list using a pattern.
> ? - Display this help.
> 
> Very handy for wnpp :)

Thanks for the tip.  I wish I knew enough Python to hack reportbug and port
the pattern search to the urwid UI...
 
-- 
Rafael


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Results for General Resolution: Altering package upload rules

2007-03-18 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Sonntag 18 März 2007 12:56 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Option 1 "I support the proposal"
> Option 2 "Further Discussion"
>
> In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
> option x received over option y.
>
>   Option
>   1 2
> ===   ===
> Option 1  132
> Option 2116
>
>
>
> Looking at row 2, column 1, Further Discussion
> received 116 votes over I support the proposal
>
> Looking at row 1, column 2, I support the proposal
> received 132 votes over Further Discussion.

Either my understanding of the english language is not good enough or I just 
don't get the math involved:
B = A+116 and A = B+132?

Looks strange to me. Maybe you can give a pointer on how to actually read 
this? The text above doesn't explain the result...

HS



Re: Results for General Resolution: Altering package upload rules

2007-03-18 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 07:18:51PM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>> Looking at row 2, column 1, Further Discussion
>> received 116 votes over I support the proposal
>>
>> Looking at row 1, column 2, I support the proposal
>> received 132 votes over Further Discussion.
> Either my understanding of the english language is not good enough or I just 
> don't get the math involved:
> B = A+116 and A = B+132?

116 people preferred 1 over 2. 132 people preferred 2 over 1.

> Looks strange to me. Maybe you can give a pointer on how to actually read 
> this? The text above doesn't explain the result...

Actually, it does.

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ATTENTION Progress Partners ( Progress, DB@, SAP, BEA, WEBSPHERE, CRM, GREAT PLAINS, EXCHANGE, SQL CUSTOMER LISTS)

2007-03-18 Thread mike gordon
I'd like to introduce our company, Repharm Technologies, to you. We are
a knowledge base company, and we sell contact lists. We have a variety
of lists available, from hardware, software, to technology companies,
with on average 10 executive contacts per organization. Our lists are
continuously maintained to ensure the highest level of accuracy and
completeness. We have hundreds of industry leaders as customers today -
many who's names you would recognize.

If you'd be interested, we could send you a sample of one of our lists
complete with summary information, so that you could evaluate our
content.

I see from your website that you are an Alliance Partner of Progress
 and wondered if you'd be interested in acquiring a copy of
their customer list?
Or, if you'd be interested in finding out about the various lists we
have available, in preparation for any sales or marketing campaigns that
your organization may be considering in future, we'd love to hear from
you. Or, perhaps you'd be interested in acquiring your competitors'
customer lists?

If you'd like more information, please contact Mike Gordon at our
Repharm office at (905) 728-6708, or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank you in advance for your consideration, and we look forward to
hearing from you.

Regards,

Margaret Moore
Business Development Representative
Repharm Technologies


***

If you would prefer not to receive communications from us in future,
please reply to this email with "remove" in the subject line.



ATTENTION Progress Partners ( Progress, DB@, SAP, BEA, WEBSPHERE, CRM, GREAT PLAINS, EXCHANGE, SQL CUSTOMER LISTS)

2007-03-18 Thread mike gordon
I'd like to introduce our company, Repharm Technologies, to you. We are
a knowledge base company, and we sell contact lists. We have a variety
of lists available, from hardware, software, to technology companies,
with on average 10 executive contacts per organization. Our lists are
continuously maintained to ensure the highest level of accuracy and
completeness. We have hundreds of industry leaders as customers today -
many who's names you would recognize.

If you'd be interested, we could send you a sample of one of our lists
complete with summary information, so that you could evaluate our
content.

I see from your website that you are an Alliance Partner of Progress
 and wondered if you'd be interested in acquiring a copy of
their customer list?
Or, if you'd be interested in finding out about the various lists we
have available, in preparation for any sales or marketing campaigns that
your organization may be considering in future, we'd love to hear from
you. Or, perhaps you'd be interested in acquiring your competitors'
customer lists?

If you'd like more information, please contact Mike Gordon at our
Repharm office at (905) 728-6708, or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank you in advance for your consideration, and we look forward to
hearing from you.

Regards,

Margaret Moore
Business Development Representative
Repharm Technologies


***

If you would prefer not to receive communications from us in future,
please reply to this email with "remove" in the subject line.



Re: Flash player?

2007-03-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* Miguel Gea Milvaques:

> I've readed swfdec last version is able to reproduce youtube
> videos. I supose last version is still not in Debian, so you'll need
> to compile it.

youtube-dl and mplayer work surprisingly well for that purpose.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Call for testers: reportbug-ng

2007-03-18 Thread Bastian Venthur
Hi Devs,

two weeks ago I started to write reportbug-ng an (hopefully) easy to use
alternative to Debian's classic reportbug.

  http://reportbug-ng.alioth.debian.org/

>From the feedback I received so far it looks like people actually like
it and encouraged me to move on. So before real users get used to that
tool too much, I'd like to stress test it a bit.

If you can spare some time please play around with this tool and report
bugs, send suggestions or write patches if you like.

It's written in python and pyqt3 -- if you have some python and/or qt
skills, you're very welcome to look through the code (it isn't really
that much) and send suggestions/corrections/fixes.

Problems I'm currently aware of:
 * Getting the version of installed packages a package depends on is
   slow
 * Searching for a bugs of a package does not yet check the
   source-package's bugs as well
 * Grepping information from HTML-code is unreliable and ugly. The BTS
   should support answers in machine readable format

besides that I consider the package itself feature complete (for now)
and stable enough to be usable (I know you'll prove me wrong).

Oh, and since some people already asked, the package is not intended to
emulate reportbug 1:1. In fact, it was written from scratch (although I
obviously borrowed some ideas from reportbug). Target audience are users
and devs (in that order).

The package is available in unstable (reportbug-ng).


Thanks in advance and cheers,

Bastian

-- 
Bastian Venthur  http://venthur.de
Debian Developer venthur at debian org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Call for testers: reportbug-ng

2007-03-18 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>  * Grepping information from HTML-code is unreliable and ugly. The BTS
>should support answers in machine readable format

We do, using the SOAP interface. If you want more features than it has
currently, you need only file wishlist bugs.
 

Don Armstrong

-- 
"There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
 -- Jeremy S. Anderson

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



debian-keyring package in jetring

2007-03-18 Thread Joey Hess
I've created a version of the debian-keyring package that uses jetring.
I started with the package in the archive, and then updated it
using the more current keyrings James keeps on keyring.debian.org. For
details, see the typescript.

A few issues with jetring did come to light. It does not preserve a few
signatures on keys in debian-keyring.gpg. I suspect these are old
expired signatures, but have not double-checked. When processing
emeritus-keyring.gpg, it fails to import keys 76578289 (Stephen J.
Carpenter), and C998F231 (Lonnie Sauter) due to a missing (expired?)
self-signature, and the same also happens with numerous keys in
removed-keys.gpg. I decided not to set up a jetring for removed-keys at
least until this is resolved. Also, I did not set up a jetring for
extra-keys.pgp since it seems static.

One thing I want to do but have not yet tackled is generating the
debian/changelog using the same format that it's always used. I assume
that James has a tool that takes gpg output and generates those
changelog entries, and I'd prefer not to reinvent that wheel if I can
avoid it. I'm hoping I'll get lucky and find a copy of that tool, and
maybe I'll be extra lucky and can just pipe jetring-diff output to it.

At this point the package stands as a demo of using jetring, but if
James wants, I'm willing to work on it a bit more and upload it to the
archive and maintain it based on the changes James makes to the
keyring.debian.org keyrings.

http://kitenet.net/~joey/tmp/debian-keyring/

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Flash player?

2007-03-18 Thread Andreas Tille

On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:


I supose last version is still not in Debian, so you'll need to compile it.


Well, if you know that a new version is better than the old version
in Debian, why don't you report this as wishlist bug?  I did so (#415333)
and learned now that a new version is sitting in NEW for a month.

Do we have a problem with NEW queue?

Kind regards

   Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]