Bug#3901: dotlock" should be setgid mail
> Unfortunately, "dotlock" (from the TkMail package) is not setgid mail like > it needs to be, and thus can't do the job. That was my bug report. It will be in the next release... > Also the duplication between dotlock (TkMail) and lockfile (procmail) is > rather pointless. It would be nice to see _all_ the Debian mail reader > packages non-setgid and just use lockfile/dotlock. (Plus it means we can > use a better locking method if one becomes available.) Yes, we may have a unique solution, but i'm not sure that _all_ the Debian mail reader packages could be configured to use this solution. -- Christophe Le Bars - Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01001DEBIAN0LINUX0110ESPERANTO00101011ML1010010GNU0111 10111010010100011 Utilisez Linux Debian! 10010101001110010
Re: Unanswered problem reports by maintainer and package
**On 30 Jul, In article "Unanswered problem reports by maintainer and package", ** OBDO ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes: OBDO>The following problem reports have not yet been marked as `taken up' by a OBDO>message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or or `forwarded' by a OBDO>message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OBDO> OBDO>(orphan) (4 bugs): OBDO> ifrench 1233 Bad french.hash file in ifrench.deb OBDO> ifrench 2605 #1233,#1793 (ifrench doesn't work...) OBDO> ifrench 3686 ifrench description: no ext OBDO> ifrench 3918 "ifrench" requires changes for multi-arch support If nobody want to take this orphaned package, i'll do. -- Christophe Le Bars - Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01001DEBIAN0LINUX0110ESPERANTO00101011ML1010010GNU0111 10111010010100011 Utilisez Linux Debian! 10010101001110010
