Bug#942562: Use opencv.pc
Hi, Is there any reason to use opencv4.pc as filename? Previously, it was opencv.pc, so now, we need to modify all references to it. Since pkg-config already provides a way to check version, I think it's better to keep the old unversioned name. Have a nice day, Adrien
Bug#830683: Missing dependency on module-udev?
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 23:37:01 -0300 Felipe Sateler wrote: > > Do you have disabled installation of Recommends? > Hi, I guess he did, just like me, because installing recommends often leads to a workload of useless packages. Even if I totally understand that the packager is not expected to support every configuration, maybe a line or two in NEWS.Debian should be enough. I read each Changelog.Debian, I saw the split announcement, but I totally missed the fact that it will render my system soundless. Adrien
Bug#323032: Same problem two years later with the last upgrade
Hello, right after this morning last upgrade, my proftp server and my webmin stopped to work throwing out these errors : /var/log/webmin/miniserv.error:/usr/bin/perl: relocation error: /lib/libresolv.so.2: symbol __res_iclose, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference And (accepting connections): relocation error: /lib/libresolv.so.2: symbol __res_iclose, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference I just had to restart those services then everything worked well... Perhaps the upgrade script for libc6 should look which running services are using libc6 and restart them ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#1023697: can wolfssl bug be closed?
Can this be closed? Are there any action items remaining for this bug? I am still getting messages that packages depending on wolfssl are "marked for autoremoval from testing on 2023-01-27" Thank you. Glenn
Bug#1021021: wolfssl: CVE-2022-38152 CVE-2022-38153 CVE-2022-39173
> I plan to upload version 5.5.1 in the near future. Felix, a month has passed and we are still waiting for an upload. Failure to upload a version with security fixes within the next few days will result in wolfssl and packages which depend on wolfssl to be removed from Debian Testing. Please act accordingly and please look to engage others to help you to maintain wolfssl in Debian. Security fixes should not be unduly delayed. Thank you. Glenn
