Re: [Cython] Header file bug

2011-06-08 Thread Greg Ewing

Seth Shannin wrote:

I would still make the case that currently
something is a bit off in that the header file tries to use something
which it has no information about


Yes, I agree that it could do with improvement. I'm not sure
that automatically putting the struct declaration in the
header is the best idea, though, since with mangled names it's
hard to do anything with it from external C code (that's why
you're required to manually supply type and object struct names).

Maybe it should just be an error to make a declaration public
if it uses something that's non-public?

--
Greg
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel


Re: [Cython] Header file bug

2011-06-08 Thread sshannin

Yeah, I think just erroring would be perfectly reasonable.

-Seth

Quoting "Greg Ewing" :


Seth Shannin wrote:

I would still make the case that currently
something is a bit off in that the header file tries to use something
which it has no information about


Yes, I agree that it could do with improvement. I'm not sure
that automatically putting the struct declaration in the
header is the best idea, though, since with mangled names it's
hard to do anything with it from external C code (that's why
you're required to manually supply type and object struct names).

Maybe it should just be an error to make a declaration public
if it uses something that's non-public?

--
Greg
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel




___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel


Re: [Cython] Header file bug

2011-06-08 Thread Robert Bradshaw
I agree.

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:47 AM,   wrote:
> Yeah, I think just erroring would be perfectly reasonable.
>
> -Seth
>
> Quoting "Greg Ewing" :
>
>> Seth Shannin wrote:
>>>
>>> I would still make the case that currently
>>> something is a bit off in that the header file tries to use something
>>> which it has no information about
>>
>> Yes, I agree that it could do with improvement. I'm not sure
>> that automatically putting the struct declaration in the
>> header is the best idea, though, since with mangled names it's
>> hard to do anything with it from external C code (that's why
>> you're required to manually supply type and object struct names).
>>
>> Maybe it should just be an error to make a declaration public
>> if it uses something that's non-public?
>>
>> --
>> Greg
>> ___
>> cython-devel mailing list
>> cython-devel@python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
>>
>
>
> ___
> cython-devel mailing list
> cython-devel@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
>
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel