[clang] [clang] check deduction consistency when partial ordering function templates (PR #100692)
yashssh wrote: We at grace cpu are also facing same crashes on SPEC FP https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100692 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[clang] [Clang][Parser] Accept P2741R3 (static_assert with user-generated message) in C++11 as an extension (PR #102044)
yashssh wrote: Reigniting the discussion around `__cpp_static_assert`'s value set to `202306L` . We are seeing some failures in perennial c++20 tests who assume the value of macro to be `201411L` which is consistent with how GCC defines value of these macros (see https://godbolt.org/z/xE9bWsdKT) >From the discussions earlier I'm getting the impression that this has more to >do with c++ standard not properly defining the values of these macros for >older revisions. What can be the best way forward to fix this? Have it >consistent with GCC? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102044 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[clang] [Clang][Parser] Accept P2741R3 (static_assert with user-generated message) in C++11 as an extension (PR #102044)
yashssh wrote: https://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4860.pdf according to this, cpp_static_assert should be 201411L for c++20 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102044 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
