[clang] [compiler-rt] Rtsan fbsd (PR #125389)

[Brooks Davis via cfe-commits]

brooksdavis wrote:

rtsan seems like something we'd want on FreeBSD. If this is all that's required 
it seems like a no-brainer.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125389
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang][LoongArch] Add FreeBSD targets (PR #119191)

[Brooks Davis via cfe-commits]

https://github.com/brooksdavis approved this pull request.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119191
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang][LoongArch] Add FreeBSD targets (PR #119191)

[Brooks Davis via cfe-commits]

@@ -231,6 +231,9 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY FreeBSDTargetInfo : public 
OSTargetInfo {
 case llvm::Triple::riscv32:
 case llvm::Triple::riscv64:
   break;
+case llvm::Triple::loongarch32:

brooksdavis wrote:

I'm of two minds about adding loongarch32 triples. It's harmless and parallels 
riscv, but the chances of a new 32-bit port being importing into the FreeBSD 
are close to zero.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119191
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Driver][FreeBSD] Remove FreeBSD/loongarch32 support (PR #122515)

[Brooks Davis via cfe-commits]

https://github.com/brooksdavis commented:

Retroactive, but LGTM. No need to leave riscv32 around providing a confusing 
trail for future architectures.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122515
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits