Re: c/7946: -std=gnu99 and casted empty srtuct initializers

[jsm28]

Synopsis: -std=gnu99 and casted empty srtuct initializers

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: jsm28
State-Changed-When: Tue Sep 17 08:24:50 2002
State-Changed-Why:
This is deliberate.  C99 compound literals are not
constant expressions but unnamed variables intitialized
in a given way.  The code you give is equivalent to

foo_t compound_literal = { };
foo_t baz = compound_literal;

which of course fails.  As an allowance for existing
code written for old GNU compound literals rather than
C99 compound literals (the Linux kernel), this case
is permitted in gnu89 mode but not gnu99 mode.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7946


___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

[Bug hurd/2489] Missing definitions for SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX

[jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2489

Joseph Myers  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|FIXED   |---

--- Comment #2 from Joseph Myers  ---
I don't see SIGRTMIN in sysdeps/unix/bsd/bits/signum.h which looks like what
Hurd would use.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.