Re: init patch
>This patch allows the computer to reboot if the user does not enter
>a value for the path to a server.
>
> Didn't I post something similar a while back?
Humm, if you did I did find it in the archives.
Looks like something ate my mail. This is what I posted:
2003-01-10 Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* init.c (start_child): Issue an error message (and loop forever)
if creating a console fails.
--- init.c.~1.129.~ 2002-05-08 16:02:18.0 +0200
+++ init.c 2003-01-10 23:20:57.0 +0100
@@ -1028,7 +1028,14 @@
err = argz_create ((char **) argv, &args, &arglen);
}
}
- assert_perror (err);
+
+ if (err)
+{
+ error (0, err, "could not create a console");
+ /* Loop forever or untill someone presses the reboot button. */
+ for (;;)
+ ;
+}
file = file_name_lookup (args, O_EXEC, 0);
if (file == MACH_PORT_NULL)
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Re: init: cannot reboot
I havn't followed this thread so I'm just shooting in the dark. But did you add the correct entries to /etc/ttys? ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Re: init patch
These patches are unrelated. One has to do with finding the initial translators: proc, auth; the other, yours, has to do with initialization of the system: runsystem. Make sense? However, here is probably a better version of your patch, since it uses crash_system(). Returning err, causes launch_something () to retry start_child as it needs to and crashes the system if nothing works. James A. Morrison 2003-01-22 James A. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * init.c (start_child): Return err on error. Index: init.c === RCS file: /cvsroot/hurd/hurd/init/init.c,v retrieving revision 1.129 diff -u -r1.129 init.c --- init.c 8 May 2002 09:20:38 - 1.129 +++ init.c 22 Jan 2003 15:37:14 - @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /* Start and maintain hurd core servers and system run state - Copyright (C) 1993,94,95,96,97,98,99,2000,01,02 + Copyright (C) 1993,94,95,96,97,98,99,2000,01,02,03 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This file is part of the GNU Hurd. @@ -1028,7 +1029,8 @@ err = argz_create ((char **) argv, &args, &arglen); } } - assert_perror (err); + if (err) +return err; file = file_name_lookup (args, O_EXEC, 0); if (file == MACH_PORT_NULL) ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Re: init: cannot reboot
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 03:35:31PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > I havn't followed this thread so I'm just shooting in the dark. But > did you add the correct entries to /etc/ttys? tty1"/libexec/getty 38400" hurdon secure trusted console and similar lines for tty2 to tty6. Thanks for trying. -- Lionel msg06296/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
oskit mach needs patch?
Hi, I find I have have to apply the following patch to get the oskit mach branch from the gnumach cvs module on subversions: diff -u -r1.22.2.20 Makefile.in --- Makefile.in 23 May 2002 06:36:21 - 1.22.2.20 +++ Makefile.in 22 Jan 2003 19:51:48 - @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ kernel-%.o: $(OSKIT_LIBDIR)/multiboot.o $(objfiles) init-%.o $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -nostdlib -nostartfiles $(LDFLAGS) -r -o $@ \ - -Wl,-\( $^ $(OSKIT_LIBS) -Wl,-\) -lgcc + -Wl,-\( $^ -L$(OSKIT_LIBDIR)/.. $(OSKIT_LIBS) -Wl,-\) -lgcc ^L # # Installation This seems like a resonable bug fix to me. Do others need to to this too? Should I commit this fix? Thanks, Derek ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
oskit mach needs patch?
Hi, I find I have have to apply the following patch to get the oskit mach branch from the gnumach cvs module on subversions: diff -u -r1.22.2.20 Makefile.in --- Makefile.in 23 May 2002 06:36:21 - 1.22.2.20 +++ Makefile.in 22 Jan 2003 19:51:48 - @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ kernel-%.o: $(OSKIT_LIBDIR)/multiboot.o $(objfiles) init-%.o $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -nostdlib -nostartfiles $(LDFLAGS) -r -o $@ \ - -Wl,-\( $^ $(OSKIT_LIBS) -Wl,-\) -lgcc + -Wl,-\( $^ -L$(OSKIT_LIBDIR)/.. $(OSKIT_LIBS) -Wl,-\) -lgcc ^L # # Installation This seems like a resonable bug fix to me. Do others need to to this too? Should I commit this fix? Thanks, Derek ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Re: oskit mach needs patch?
--- Derek L Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I find I have have to apply the following patch to get the oskit mach > branch from the gnumach cvs module on subversions: > > diff -u -r1.22.2.20 Makefile.in > --- Makefile.in 23 May 2002 06:36:21 - 1.22.2.20 > +++ Makefile.in 22 Jan 2003 19:51:48 - > @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ > > kernel-%.o: $(OSKIT_LIBDIR)/multiboot.o $(objfiles) init-%.o > $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -nostdlib -nostartfiles $(LDFLAGS) -r -o $@ \ > - -Wl,-\( $^ $(OSKIT_LIBS) -Wl,-\) -lgcc > + -Wl,-\( $^ -L$(OSKIT_LIBDIR)/.. $(OSKIT_LIBS) -Wl,-\) > -lgcc > ^L > # > # Installation > > > This seems like a resonable bug fix to me. Do others need to to this > too? Should I commit this fix? > > Thanks, > Derek Why are you using version 1.22.2.20 whereas the version from head is 1.36. jim@hurdtest:~/cvs/gnumach$ cvs status Makefile.in === File: Makefile.in Status: Up-to-date Working revision:1.36 Repository revision: 1.36/cvsroot/hurd/gnumach/Makefile.in,v Sticky Tag: (none) Sticky Date: (none) Sticky Options: (none) Here is what the my Makefile.in looks like around line 329 kernel-%.o: $(OSKIT_LIBDIR)/multiboot.o $(objfiles) init-%.o $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -nostdlib -nostartfiles $(LDFLAGS) -r -o $@ \ -Wl,-\( $^ -L$(OSKIT_LIBDIR)/.. $(OSKIT_LIBS) -Wl,-\) -lgcc = James Morrison University of Waterloo Computer Science - Digital Hardware 2B co-op http://hurd.dyndns.org Anyone referring to this as 'Open Source' shall be eaten by a GNU __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
