[Bug binutils/10061] The binutils suite will not compile on systems without a bash shell
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-04-11 15:21 --- Most likely the shell has a problem with the handing of here-documents. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10061 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/10218] man says "--", ld says "-"
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-05-29 23:30 --- The options --output-def and --out-implib are only supported by the i386pe linker emulation. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10218 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/10250] RPATH $ORIGIN doesn't work if resulting path has colons in it
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-06-07 09:21 --- Not a binutils bug. The linker just records the rpath in the executable without any interpretation, and the runtime linker is part of glibc. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10250 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10367] ar --help and ar texinfo documentation out of sync
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-07-05 15:17
---
[member-name] and [count] are the arguments of the a, b and N modifiers, and
correspond to the [...@var{relpos}] and [...@var{count}] parts in the texinfo
description.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution||INVALID
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10367
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10380] cannot build binutils statically
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-07-10 18:24 --- binutils uses libtool, and libtool uses -all-static instead. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10380 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/10536] Incorrect install-pdf/install-html
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-08-19 08:14
---
install-{html,pdf}-recursive have nothing to do with the existence of a doc
directory, they just recurse into $(SUBDIRS). Please include the actual error
message.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10536
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/10853] Relocations for ppc assembler apply to entire field argument
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-10-27 20:08 --- Powerpc uses RELA relocations where the addend is stored in the relocation entry. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10853 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11002] ld string merge does not respect symbol size
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-11-23 12:19 --- The contents of "MS" sections must be zero-terminated strings. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11002 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11002] ld string merge does not respect symbol size
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-11-23 14:48 --- > a = 'ab\0b\0' This is not a valid zero-terminated string. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11002 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11014] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-11-24 21:42 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11017 *** -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11014 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11017] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-11-24 21:42 --- *** Bug 11014 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11017 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11416] a small miscode in binutils/readelf.c
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-03-22 16:00 --- http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2010-03/msg00096.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11416 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/11426] ld/configure.host does not behave as expected if /bin/sh is dash and not bash
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-03-24 14:27 --- Trying to get backslashes through echo is bound to fail. <http://opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/echo.html#tag_20_37_05>: "If any of the operands contain a character, the results are implementation-defined." -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11426 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11700] 'UPAGES' undeclared in compiling trad-core.c
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-06-16 14:24 --- http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc- ports.git;a=commit;h=08b1b36387286ed1ba48c56a32e52429b5ef6963 -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11700 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/6957] i386 NOPs must be derived from march not mtune
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-06-21 11:08 --- That does not work for me. $ cat nopl.s cmove %eax,%edx .align 8 $ as --32 -mtune=i686 nopl.s $ objdump -dr | grep nopl 3: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopl 0x0(%eax,%eax,1) $ as --32 -mtune=i686 -march=i486 nopl.s nopl.s: Assembler messages: nopl.s:1: Error: `cmove' is not supported on `i486' There should be a way to set -mtune while letting -march alone. -- What|Removed |Added CC| |schwab at linux-m68k dot org Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6957 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/6957] i386 NOPs must be derived from march not mtune
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-06-21 14:48 --- I want that the assembler does not sneak in nopl. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-06-21 14:48:07 date|| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6957 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/6957] i386 NOPs must be derived from march not mtune
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-06-21 16:01 --- But the docs say that -mtune only uses non-generic insns when -march is also given. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6957 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/6957] i386 NOPs must be derived from march not mtune
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-06-21 16:37 --- nopl is not always available on i686. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6957 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/6957] i386 NOPs must be derived from march not mtune
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-07-01 15:27 --- What does that say about other vender's models? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6957 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
bug-binutils@gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-07-22 09:02 --- & is special in the altmacro syntax. You need to double it to get a literal &. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11829 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
bug-binutils@gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-07-22 10:19 --- You need to double & for every level of expansion. .irp introduces another such level. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11829 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
bug-binutils@gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-07-22 11:25 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11829 *** -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11830 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
bug-binutils@gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-07-22 11:25 --- *** Bug 11830 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11829 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/11893] "pushq $0xbf800000" doesn't work
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-08-07 11:48 --- IMHO the assembler should accept it anyway. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11893 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11977] ld updates output timestamp even when compiler fails
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-09-03 18:47 --- Not a binutils bug. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11977 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
