[Bug binutils/3535] GNU strip 2.17 corrupts Sun CC/cc binaries (ld issue?)
--- Additional Comments From psfales at alcatel-lucent dot com 2006-12-11
17:34 ---
Seeing something very similar here, except that the platform is Solaris-x86 2.7.
PSF[lss001]> cat foo.c
main() {}
PSF[lss001]> /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc foo.c -o foo
PSF[lss001]> ls -l foo
-rwxr-xr-x 1 expmake expmake 6352 Dec 11 11:31 foo
PSF[lss001]> ./foo
PSF[lss001]> /opt/exp/gnu/bin/strip --version
GNU strip 2.17
Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
the GNU General Public License. This program has absolutely no warranty.
PSF[lss001]> /opt/exp/gnu/bin/strip foo
BFD: stoHaqtX: warning: allocated section `.bss' not in segment
PSF[lss001]> ls -l foo
-rwxr-xr-x 1 expmake expmake 269164584 Dec 11 11:32 foo
PSF[lss001]> ./foo
Killed
--
What|Removed |Added
CC| |psfales at alcatel-lucent
| |dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3535
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3535] GNU strip 2.17 corrupts Sun CC/cc binaries (ld issue?)
--- Additional Comments From psfales at alcatel-lucent dot com 2007-02-22 14:36 --- I'm not sure what you mean by "different" - clearly all three are different in at least some ways, as they all have different sizes. The one stripped with the buggy 2.17 version is *much* larger than the unstripped version. I'm not sure if it will help, but I'll upload the following files: Size File 5484 hello (unstripped "hello world" binary) 3572 hello.binutils2.16.1_strip 265716 hello.binutils2.17_strip 3632 hello.sunstrip -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3535 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3535] GNU strip 2.17 corrupts Sun CC/cc binaries (ld issue?)
--- Additional Comments From psfales at alcatel-lucent dot com 2007-02-22 14:38 --- Created an attachment (id=1573) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1573&action=view) Unstripped "hello world" binary (Sparc Solaris 8) -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3535 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3535] GNU strip 2.17 corrupts Sun CC/cc binaries (ld issue?)
--- Additional Comments From psfales at alcatel-lucent dot com 2007-02-22 14:38 --- Created an attachment (id=1574) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1574&action=view) Stripped with /usr/ccs/bin/strip (fails to run) -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3535 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3535] GNU strip 2.17 corrupts Sun CC/cc binaries (ld issue?)
--- Additional Comments From psfales at alcatel-lucent dot com 2007-02-22 14:39 --- Created an attachment (id=1575) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1575&action=view) Stripped with binutils 2.16.1 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3535 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3535] GNU strip 2.17 corrupts Sun CC/cc binaries (ld issue?)
--- Additional Comments From psfales at alcatel-lucent dot com 2007-02-22 14:40 --- Created an attachment (id=1576) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1576&action=view) Stripped with bintutils-2.17 (fails to run) -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3535 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3535] GNU strip 2.17 corrupts Sun CC/cc binaries (ld issue?)
-- What|Removed |Added Attachment #1574|Stripped with |Stripped with description|/usr/ccs/bin/strip (fails to|/usr/ccs/bin/strip |run)| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3535 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3535] GNU strip 2.17 corrupts Sun CC/cc binaries (ld issue?)
--- Additional Comments From psfales at alcatel-lucent dot com 2007-02-22 14:43 --- I'm not sure were to get "a strip built from the current mainline binutils sources" but I should be able to try that too if you can point me to it. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3535 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3535] GNU strip 2.17 corrupts Sun CC/cc binaries (ld issue?)
--- Additional Comments From psfales at alcatel-lucent dot com 2007-02-22 21:37 --- That fix worked for me. The stripped binary waz the same length as the one stripped with 2.16.1 though it didn't compare identical. More importantly, it runs. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3535 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3535] GNU strip 2.17 corrupts Sun CC/cc binaries (ld issue?)
--- Additional Comments From psfales at alcatel-lucent dot com 2007-03-07 20:28 --- Seeing another problem with 2.17. Not sure if it's related or should be a new bug... We build thunderbird and firefox from source, and install it with stripped shared libraries to save space. Thunderbird-1.5.0.9 was stripped with 2.16.1 and worked fine, but after upgrading to 1.5.0.10 and incidentally stripping with 2.17, users started complaining about core dumps. The problem occurs on both Solaris-sparc and solaris-x86 and seems to be related to stripping with 2.17. If I don't strip the libraries, it works fine. If I then strip libprldap50.so with 2.16.1, it also works. (Just that one file - verything else is unstripped.) But if I strip that file with 2.17, thunderbird still starts up, but attempting to LDAP operations results in a core dump with the message: ld.so.1: /opt/exp/lib/thunderbird/lib/thunderbird-1.5.0.10/thunderbird-bin: fatal: relocation error: symbol not found: prldap_install_routines: referenced in /opt/exp1/lib/thunderbird/lib/thunderbird-1.5.0.10/components/libmozldap.so -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3535 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3535] GNU strip 2.17 corrupts Sun CC/cc binaries (ld issue?)
--- Additional Comments From psfales at alcatel-lucent dot com 2007-03-08 14:03 --- Yes, the problems I'm seeing are with the patched version of strip - I should have mentioned that in the report. I've attached a cpio file containing the unstripped shared library, the file stripped with 2.16.1 and the file stripped with 2.17 (which is quite a bit larger than the unstripped file!) -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3535 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3535] GNU strip 2.17 corrupts Sun CC/cc binaries (ld issue?)
--- Additional Comments From psfales at alcatel-lucent dot com 2007-03-08 14:05 --- Created an attachment (id=1602) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1602&action=view) stripped and unstripped libprldap.so stripped and unstripped libprldap.so -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3535 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3535] GNU strip 2.17 corrupts Sun CC/cc binaries (ld issue?)
--- Additional Comments From psfales at alcatel-lucent dot com 2007-03-16 19:20 --- The elf.c.patch2 file looks good from what I can see. (It didn't apply cleanly on top of elf.c.patch, but it wasn't too hard to apply manually) After making that change I retested all the known problems I've seen with 2.17 and they appear to be fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3535 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
