[Bug gold/26827] New: ld.gold --threads segfault since 2.35
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26827 Bug ID: 26827 Summary: ld.gold --threads segfault since 2.35 Product: binutils Version: 2.35 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com Reporter: nick.gasson at arm dot com CC: ian at airs dot com Target Milestone: --- With latest binutils 2.35: $ gcc -fuse-ld=gold -Wl,--threads test.c malloc(): invalid next size (unsorted) collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 6 [Aborted], core dumped compilation terminated. $ gcc -fuse-ld=gold -Wl,--threads test.c $ gcc -fuse-ld=gold -Wl,--threads test.c double free or corruption (out) collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault], core dumped compilation terminated. The contents of the .c file don't matter. I think it was introduced with f37b21b481a7 PR 22843: ld, gold: Add --dependency-file option. Simple fix: --- a/gold/fileread.cc +++ b/gold/fileread.cc @@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ File_read::open(const Task* task, const std::string& name) gold_debug(DEBUG_FILES, "Attempt to open %s succeeded", this->name_.c_str()); this->token_.add_writer(task); + file_counts_initialize_lock.initialize(); Hold_optional_lock hl(file_counts_lock); record_file_read(this->name_); } -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gold/26200] ld terminated with signal 11 with LTO and -Wl,--thread-count=2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26200 --- Comment #7 from Nick Gasson --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > This helps. But it doesn't fix the problem. > When you say it doesn't fix the problem, perhaps you were running into the --threads segfault in bug 26827? I tried latest master with your patch above and the attached test case doesn't crash any more. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gold/26200] ld terminated with signal 11 with LTO and -Wl,--thread-count=2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26200 --- Comment #9 from Nick Gasson --- (In reply to Martin Liska from comment #8) > > > > When you say it doesn't fix the problem, perhaps you were running into the > > --threads segfault in bug 26827? I tried latest master with your patch above > > and the attached test case doesn't crash any more. > > It's a different problem related to a LTO plug-in. Please see H.J. brief > analysis. I mean you need to apply both patches - the one from comment 4 and the one from bug 26827 - in order not to get a segfault. I tried your test case after applying both and it no longer crashes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.