[Bug gold/13764] gold doesn't take the LD_RUN_PATH environment variable into account

2012-04-26 Thread maxim.yegorushkin at gmail dot com 
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13764

Maxim Yegorushkin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||maxim.yegorushkin at gmail
   ||dot com

--- Comment #1 from Maxim Yegorushkin  
2012-04-26 23:57:51 UTC ---
I applied the patch to binutils-2.22 to build gcc-4.7.0 using gold linker and a
non-standard $PREFIX. It worked for me. Thanks for the patch.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/13764] gold doesn't take the LD_RUN_PATH environment variable into account

2013-07-27 Thread maxim.yegorushkin at gmail dot com 
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13764

--- Comment #3 from Maxim Yegorushkin  ---
Shouldn't it be LDFLAGS='-fuse-ld=gold'?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/13764] gold doesn't take the LD_RUN_PATH environment variable into account

2013-07-27 Thread maxim.yegorushkin at gmail dot com 
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13764



--- Comment #5 from Maxim Yegorushkin  
---

(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #4)

> (In reply to Maxim Yegorushkin from comment #3)

> > Shouldn't it be LDFLAGS='-fuse-ld=gold'?

> 

> It may work, but using CFLAGS is better (this is specific to MPFR and to 
the

> way GMP builds work).



Is not whatever works it better? Not trolling.



-- 

You are receiving this mail because:

You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils