[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2007-05-24 Thread dj at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From dj at redhat dot com  2007-05-24 16:49 ---
IMHO the bug is that cygwin's bash isn't correctly stripping line endings while
doing command substitution; it should always allow CR/LF at the end of ``
substitutions, regardless of the mount mode.  Also, it should allow CR/LF as
word delimiters.

I don't think sticking our head in the sand is the right way to address this
problem.  Perhaps we should *test* for bogus CR/LF handling, and issue a more
appropriate error message?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/16763] RL78 - Ranges of relative branches are not checked correctly

2014-04-02 Thread dj at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16763

dj at redhat dot com  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||dj at redhat dot com
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from dj at redhat dot com  ---
Please see https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-04/msg00025.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/17940] See unexpected diagnostic from msp430-elf-objdump BFD: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section.

2015-02-06 Thread dj at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17940

dj at redhat dot com  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org   |dj at redhat dot com

--- Comment #1 from dj at redhat dot com  ---
Reproduced

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/6878] '% found after symbol for non-H-TICK-HEX tokens

2008-09-18 Thread dj at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From dj at redhat dot com  2008-09-18 16:45 ---
Subject: Re:  '% found after symbol for non-H-TICK-HEX tokens


The warning is for people who use the ' character without realizing
exactly how it will work.  It does not do what most people expect,
unless they've carefully read the documentation.  For example, the
string hello'there gets converted to hello116here, which is rarely
useful, and thus should generate a warning.

It's more useful like this:

.byte   'h, 0x07, '$, 0x0a

Where there would be no warning anyway.

Ports that support h' hex use it like this:

.byte   H'07, H'FE, H'0A


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6878

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils