[Bug gas/775] New: New GAS testsuite fails

2005-02-28 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Running /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp ...
FAIL: .sleb128 tests
FAIL: .quad tests

/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new   -o dump.o /xxx/g
nu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/sleb128.s
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump  -s -j .da
ta dump.o > dump.out
extra regexps in /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/sleb128.d s
tarting with "^Contents of section .data:$";
EOF from dump.out
FAIL: .sleb128 tests
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new   -o dump.o /xxx/g
nu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/quad.s
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump  -s -j .da
ta dump.o > dump.out
extra regexps in /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/quad.d star
ting with "^Contents of section .data:$";
EOF from dump.out
FAIL: .quad tests

-- 
   Summary: New GAS testsuite fails
   Product: binutils
   Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=775

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/778] New: Hiding _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ breaks function pointer canonicalization

2005-03-05 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
This change breaks the linker on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu:

2004-11-02  Hans-Peter Nilsson  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* elflink.c (_bfd_elf_create_got_section): Hide _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_.

It introduces the following fails in the ld testsuite:

Running /home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp ..
.
FAIL: visibility (hidden_normal)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_normal) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (protected)
FAIL: visibility (protected) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def)
FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (protected_weak)
FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (normal)
FAIL: visibility (normal) (PIC main)

Running /home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/ld/testsuite/ld-shared/shared.exp ..
.
FAIL: shared
FAIL: shared (PIC main)

See gcc/config/pa/fptr.c to see why we need access to this symbol
on this target.  This 
<http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2005-
March/025994.html> message contains more details and a simplified test
case.

-- 
   Summary: Hiding _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ breaks function pointer
canonicalization
   Product: binutils
   Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
  Severity: critical
  Priority: P2
 Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=778

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/1443] New: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'

2005-10-08 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
This shows up in the ld testsuite:

/home/dave/binutils-2.16.91/objdir/ld/ld-new -m hppalinux  -o tmpdir/ld1 -dynami
c-linker /lib/ld.so.1 /usr/lib/crt1.o /usr/lib/crti.o /home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc
-4.0.2/lib/gcc/hppa-linux/4.0.2/crtbegin.o  tmpdir/ld-partial.o ../bfd/.libs/lib
bfd.a ../libiberty/libiberty.a   -L/usr/lib --start-group /home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc
/gcc-4.0.2/lib/gcc/hppa-linux/4.0.2/libgcc.a /home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.0.2/li
b/gcc/hppa-linux/4.0.2/libgcc_eh.a -lc --end-group /home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.
0.2/lib/gcc/hppa-linux/4.0.2/crtend.o /usr/lib/crtn.o
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
FAIL: bootstrap

It has something to do with debian libc6 2.3.5-6.0.1.  I'm not seeing this
problem with 2.3.2.ds1-22.  It's not entirely reproducible (e.g., changing
GCC version sometimes causes the problem to go away).

-- 
   Summary: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: critical
  Priority: P2
 Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-gnu-linux
  GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-gnu-linux
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-gnu-linux


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1443

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/1443] /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'

2005-10-08 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-09 
02:15 ---
For some reason, the symbols in /lib/ld.so.1 aren't being resolved.
Adding /lib/ld.so.1 to the link command resolves the symbols.  I see

Dynamic section at offset 0x140730 contains 24 entries:
  TagType Name/Value
 0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [ld.so.1]

in libc.so.6, so I'm not sure why the symbols aren't automatically
resolved.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1443

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/1443] /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'

2005-10-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-10 
19:01 ---
I should add that these dynamic symbols are references to global objects:

   200:  4 OBJECT  GLOBAL DEFAULT  UND [EMAIL PROTECTED] (1
4)
   848:    168 OBJECT  GLOBAL DEFAULT  UND [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(15)


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1443

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/1443] /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'

2005-10-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-11 
02:57 ---
Closing per comment #26.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1443

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/941] gas test macros fails

2005-10-12 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-13 
01:15 ---
Fixed http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00164.html.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=941

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1488] New: FAIL: .equ redefinitions

2005-10-16 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new   -o dump.o /xxx/g
nu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef.s
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump  -s -j .da
ta dump.o > dump.out
extra regexps in /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef.d sta
rting with "^Contents of section .data:$"
EOF from dump.out
FAIL: .equ redefinitions

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: .equ redefinitions
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
    ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1488

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1489] New: FAIL: .sleb128 tests

2005-10-16 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new   -o dump.o /xxx/g
nu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/sleb128.s
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump  -s -j .da
ta dump.o > dump.out
extra regexps in /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/sleb128.d s
tarting with "^Contents of section .data:$"
EOF from dump.out
FAIL: .sleb128 tests

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: .sleb128 tests
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
    ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1489

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1490] New: FAIL: .quad tests

2005-10-16 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new   -o dump.o /xxx/g
nu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/quad.s
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump  -s -j .da
ta dump.o > dump.out
extra regexps in /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/quad.d star
ting with "^Contents of section .data:$"
EOF from dump.out
FAIL: .quad tests

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: .quad tests
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
    ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1490

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1491] New: FAIL: macros dot

2005-10-16 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Executing /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new  -alm /x
xx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.s >&dump.out
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^.*:27: Error: unknown pseudo-op: .\.xyz.$"
line   "/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.s:16: Error:
unexpected end of file in macro `m' definition"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^.*:28: Error: .*$"
line   "GAS LISTING /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.s
page 1"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^[  ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+> \.data$"
line   "  25"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^[  ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+> labelA:labelB:labelC:labelD:x\.y\.z 4\+2$"
line   "  26 .purgem .xyz, x.y.z"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^[  ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+>> \.align 4$"
line   "  27 .xyz 0"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^[  ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+\?+[  ]+0606[ ]+>> \.byte 4\+2,4\+2$"
line   "  28x.y.z 0"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^[  ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+\?+[  ]+[ ]+> \.skip 2$"
line   "  29..."
extra regexps in /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.l st
arting with "^[ ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+> labelZ:labelY:labelX:labelW:\.xyz 4-
2$"
EOF from dump.out
FAIL: macros dot

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: macros dot
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
            Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1491

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1492] New: FAIL: macros purge

2005-10-16 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Executing /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new  --hash-
size=8000 /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/purge.s >&dump.
out
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^.*:11: Error: .*$"
line   "/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/purge.s:11: Fatal
 error: Not in a space."
extra regexps in /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/purge.l
starting with "^.*:12: Error: .*$"
EOF from dump.out
FAIL: macros purge

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: macros purge
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1492

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/1507] New: FAIL: objcopy (ELF unknown section type)

2005-10-20 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.91/objdir/gas/as-new /home/dave/
gnu/binutils-2.16.91/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/unknown.s  -o tmpdir/bi
ntest.o(timeout = 300)
/home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.91/objdir/binutils/objcopy  tmpdir/bintest.o tmpdir
/copy.o
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.91/objdir/binutils/objcopy  tmpd
ir/bintest.o tmpdir/copy.o   (timeout = 300)
cmp tmpdir/bintest.o tmpdir/copy.o
Executing on build: cmp tmpdir/bintest.o tmpdir/copy.o   (timeout = 300)
tmpdir/bintest.o tmpdir/copy.o differ: char 276, line 1
tmpdir/bintest.o tmpdir/copy.o differ: char 276, line 1

FAIL: objcopy (ELF unknown section type)

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: objcopy (ELF unknown section type)
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1507

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/1508] New: FAIL: ld-elf/unknown

2005-10-20 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
/home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.91/objdir/ld/../gas/as-new-o tmpdir/dump0.o /ho
me/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.91/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/../../../binutils/testsuite
/binutils-all/unknown.s
./ld-new  -L/home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.91/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf  -r -o tmpdi
r/dump tmpdir/dump0.o
/home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.91/objdir/ld/../binutils/readelf  -S tmpdir/dump >
tmpdir/dump.out
extra regexps in /home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.91/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/unknown
.d starting with "^  \[[ 0-9]+\] \.foo[ \t]+NOTE[ \t]+.*$"
EOF from tmpdir/dump.out
FAIL: ld-elf/unknown

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: ld-elf/unknown
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
    ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1508

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/1509] New: Change breaks hppa-linux

2005-10-20 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
 dm_table_event
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-snapshot.ko needs unkn
own symbol dm_register_target
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-snapshot.ko needs unkn
own symbol dm_vcalloc
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-snapshot.ko needs unkn
own symbol dm_table_get_mode
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-snapshot.ko needs unkn
own symbol dm_get_device
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-round-robin.ko needs u
nknown symbol dm_unregister_path_selector
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-round-robin.ko needs u
nknown symbol dm_register_path_selector
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-multipath.ko needs unk
nown symbol dm_put_device
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-multipath.ko needs unk
nown symbol dm_unregister_target
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-multipath.ko needs unk
nown symbol dm_table_event
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-multipath.ko needs unk
nown symbol dm_register_target
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-multipath.ko needs unk
nown symbol dm_table_get_mode
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-multipath.ko needs unk
nown symbol dm_get_device
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-mirror.ko needs unknow
n symbol kcopyd_client_destroy
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-mirror.ko needs unknow
n symbol kcopyd_copy
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-mirror.ko needs unknow
n symbol dm_put_device
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-mirror.ko needs unknow
n symbol kcopyd_client_create
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-mirror.ko needs unknow
n symbol dm_io_async_bvec
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-mirror.ko needs unknow
n symbol dm_unregister_target
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-mirror.ko needs unknow
n symbol dm_io_sync_vm
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-mirror.ko needs unknow
n symbol dm_table_event
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-mirror.ko needs unknow
n symbol dm_register_target
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-mirror.ko needs unknow
n symbol dm_table_get_mode
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-mirror.ko needs unknow
n symbol dm_get_device
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-crypt.ko needs unknown
 symbol dm_put_device
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-crypt.ko needs unknown
 symbol dm_unregister_target
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-crypt.ko needs unknown
 symbol dm_register_target
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-crypt.ko needs unknown
 symbol dm_table_get_mode
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.14-rc5-pa0/kernel/drivers/md/dm-crypt.ko needs unknown
 symbol dm_get_device
  CHK include/linux/version.h

I also believe that the change causes the problem reported here:

http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2005-October/027499.html

-- 
   Summary: Change breaks hppa-linux
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: critical
  Priority: P2
 Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1509

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1804] New: Wrong output for 64-bit difference of labels

2005-11-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
The assembler output for the following label difference is incorrect:

.dword  L$FE0061-L$FB0061

The order of the two 32-bit words in the 64-bit output are interchanged.
This doesn't happen in every label difference.  It has something to do
with label expressions since outputing the difference directly using a
hex constant works correctly.

As far as I can tell, this output is mainly done by generic code (cons).

Will attach the full test file shortly.

-- 
   Summary: Wrong output for 64-bit difference of labels
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: critical
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1804

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1804] Wrong output for 64-bit difference of labels

2005-11-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-04 
16:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=743)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=743&action=view)
Assembler testcase.

The original assembler output generated by GCC has been hacked
a bit.  The label xyzzy was added as a marker for the FDE that's
being incorrectly assembled.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1804

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1804] Wrong output for 64-bit difference of labels

2005-11-08 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-09 
03:37 ---
Fixed.  http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-11/msg00111.html.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1804

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/1860] New: binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.

2005-11-12 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Making info in doc
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/dave/binutils-2.16.91/objdir/binutils/doc'
rm -f config.texi
eval `grep '^ *VERSION=' ../../../src/binutils/doc/../../bfd/configure`; \
  echo "@set VERSION $VERSION" > config.texi
echo "@set UPDATED `date "+%B %Y"`" >> config.texi
echo "@set top_srcdir ../../../src/binutils" >> config.texi
restore=: && backupdir=".am$$" && \
am__cwd=`pwd` && cd ../../../src/binutils/doc && \
rm -rf $backupdir && mkdir $backupdir && \
for f in ../../../src/binutils/doc/binutils.info ../../../src/binutils/doc/binut
ils.info-[0-9] ../../../src/binutils/doc/binutils.info-[0-9][0-9] ../../../src/b
inutils/doc/binutils.i[0-9] ../../../src/binutils/doc/binutils.i[0-9][0-9]; do \
  if test -f $f; then mv $f $backupdir; restore=mv; else :; fi; \
done; \
cd "$am__cwd"; \
if makeinfo --split-size=500 --split-size=500   -I ../../../src/binutils
/doc \
 -o ../../../src/binutils/doc/binutils.info ../../../src/binutils/doc/binutils.t
exi; \
then \
  rc=0; \
  cd ../../../src/binutils/doc; \
else \
  rc=$?; \
  cd ../../../src/binutils/doc && \
  $restore $backupdir/* `echo "./../../../src/binutils/doc/binutils.info" | sed
's|[^/]*$||'`; \
fi; \
rm -rf $backupdir; exit $rc
../../../src/binutils/doc/binutils.texi:3495: @include [EMAIL PROTECTED]/../li
biberty/at-file.texi': No such file or directory.
makeinfo: Removing output file `../../../src/binutils/doc/binutils.info' due to
errors; use --force to preserve.
make[3]: *** [../../../src/binutils/doc/binutils.info] Error 2

The configure command was:

../src/configure --prefix=/home/dave/opt/gnu --host=hppa-linux --target=hppa64-
linux --disable-nls &&

Doesn't happen when not doing a cross.

-- 
   Summary: binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
            Status: NEW
  Severity: minor
  Priority: P2
 Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa-linux
  GCC host triplet: hppa-linux
GCC target triplet: hppa64-linux
inux


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1860

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1879] New: FAIL: weakref tests

2005-11-17 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
FAIL: weakref tests, relocations
FAIL: weakref tests, global syms
FAIL: weakref tests, local syms
FAIL: weakref tests, strong undefined syms
FAIL: weakref tests, weak undefined syms

/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new   -o dump.o /xxx/g
nu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1.s
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1.s: Assembler messag
es:
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1.s:192: Error: junk
at end of line, first unrecognized character is `='
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump  -r dump.o
 > dump.out
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump: 'dump.o':
 No such file
FAIL: weakref tests, relocations
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new   -o dump.o /xxx/g
nu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1.s
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1.s: Assembler messag
es:
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1.s:192: Error: junk
at end of line, first unrecognized character is `='
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/nm-new  --defined-
only --extern-only --no-sort dump.o > dump.out
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/nm-new: 'dump.o':
No such file
FAIL: weakref tests, global syms
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new   -o dump.o /xxx/g
nu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1.s
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1.s: Assembler messag
es:
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1.s:192: Error: junk
at end of line, first unrecognized character is `='
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/nm-new  --defined-
only --no-sort dump.o > dump.out
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/nm-new: 'dump.o':
No such file
FAIL: weakref tests, local syms
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new   -o dump.o /xxx/g
nu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1.s
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1.s: Assembler messag
es:
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1.s:192: Error: junk
at end of line, first unrecognized character is `='
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/nm-new  --undefine
d-only --no-sort dump.o > dump.out
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/nm-new: 'dump.o':
No such file
FAIL: weakref tests, strong undefined syms
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new   -o dump.o /xxx/g
nu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1.s
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1.s: Assembler messag
es:
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1.s:192: Error: junk
at end of line, first unrecognized character is `='
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/nm-new  --undefine
d-only --no-sort dump.o > dump.out
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/nm-new: 'dump.o':
No such file
FAIL: weakref tests, weak undefined syms

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: weakref tests
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
        AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1879

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1880] New: FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)

2005-11-17 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new   -o dump.o /xxx/g
nu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef3.s
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef3.s: Assembler messages
:
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef3.s:11: Error: junk at
end of line, first unrecognized character is `,'
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump  -rsj .dat
a dump.o > dump.out
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump: 'dump.o':
 No such file
FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
    ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1880

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1880] FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)

2005-11-17 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-18 
01:14 ---
This also fails under hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.  The following fail
in addition:

FAIL: .equ redefinitions
FAIL: .equ redefinitions (2)


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 GCC target triplet|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa*-*-hpux11.11


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1880

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1879] FAIL: weakref tests

2005-11-17 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-18 
01:15 ---
These also fail under hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 GCC target triplet|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa*-*-hpux11.11


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1879

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1893] New: FAIL: macros dot

2005-11-20 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Executing /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new  -alm /x
xx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.s >&dump.out
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^.*:27: Error: unknown pseudo-op: .\.xyz.$"
line   "/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.s:16: Error:
unexpected end of file in macro `m' definition"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^.*:28: Error: .*$"
line   "GAS LISTING /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.s
page 1"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^[  ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+> \.data$"
line   "  25"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^[  ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+> labelA:labelB:labelC:labelD:x\.y\.z 4\+2$"
line   "  26 .purgem .xyz, x.y.z"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^[  ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+>> \.align 4$"
line   "  27 .xyz 0"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^[  ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+\?+[  ]+0606[ ]+>> \.byte 4\+2,4\+2$"
line   "  28x.y.z 0"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^[  ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+\?+[  ]+[ ]+> \.skip 2$"
line   "  29..."
extra regexps in /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.l st
arting with "^[ ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+> labelZ:labelY:labelX:labelW:\.xyz 4-
2$"
EOF from dump.out
FAIL: macros dot

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: macros dot
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
            Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1893

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1894] New: FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)

2005-11-20 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new   -o dump.o /xxx/g
nu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef3.s
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef3.s: Assembler messages
:
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef3.s:11: Error: junk at
end of line, first unrecognized character is `,'
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump  -rsj .dat
a dump.o > dump.out
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.90/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump: 'dump.o':
 No such file
FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)

This test fails because .comm is different on hppa.

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
    ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1894

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1893] FAIL: macros dot

2005-11-20 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-20 
21:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=765)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=765&action=view)
Test output.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1893

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1879] FAIL: weakref tests

2005-11-20 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-20 
22:09 ---
See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-11/msg00310.html.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1879

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1895] New: FAIL: .equ redefinitions

2005-11-20 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.91/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new   -o dump.o /xxx/g
nu/binutils-2.15.91/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef.s
/home/gnu/binutils-2.15.91/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump  -s -j .d
ata dump.o > dump.out
extra regexps in /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.91/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef.d sta
rting with "^Contents of section .data:$"
EOF from dump.out
FAIL: .equ redefinitions

This failure can be fixed by removing the "-j" option to objdump and checking
for "$DATA$" as well as ".data".

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: .equ redefinitions
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1895

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1896] New: FAIL: .equ redefinitions (2)

2005-11-20 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
/xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.91/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new   -o dump.o /xxx/g
nu/binutils-2.15.91/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef2.s
/home/gnu/binutils-2.15.91/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump  -rsj .da
ta dump.o > dump.out
extra regexps in /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.15.91/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef2.d st
arting with "^RELOCATION RECORDS FOR .*$"
EOF from dump.out
FAIL: .equ redefinitions (2)

While the test currently fails because of "$DATA$" versus ".data" issues,
there appears to be a real bug present in the SOM target.  This is the
dump:

 dump.out
# less dump.out

dump.o: file format som

RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [$DATA$]:
OFFSET   TYPE  VALUE
 R_DATA_ONE_SYMBOL  sym
0008 R_DATA_ONE_SYMBOL  xtrn
0010 R_DATA_ONE_SYMBOL  sym


Contents of section $DATA$:
       """"
 0010  

The value of the first relocation should be "here" not "sym".

The redef3.s test would also fail for the same reason if the .comm portion
was removed.

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: .equ redefinitions (2)
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1896

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1894] FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)

2005-11-20 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-21 
04:33 ---
Test xfailed.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1894

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1895] FAIL: .equ redefinitions

2005-11-20 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-21 
04:35 ---
See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-11/msg00316.html.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1895

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1896] FAIL: .equ redefinitions (2)

2005-11-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-27 
19:12 ---
See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-11/msg00363.html.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1896

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1880] FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)

2005-11-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-27 
19:16 ---
See thread starting here:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-11/msg00316.html.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1880

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1492] FAIL: macros purge

2005-11-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-27 
19:17 ---
See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-11/msg00362.html.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1492

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1490] FAIL: .quad tests

2005-11-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-27 
19:19 ---
See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-11/msg00333.html.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1490

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1489] FAIL: .sleb128 tests

2005-11-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-27 
19:20 ---
See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-11/msg00333.html.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1489

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1488] FAIL: .equ redefinitions

2005-11-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-27 
19:22 ---
See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-11/msg00316.html.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1488

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1893] FAIL: macros dot

2005-11-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-27 
19:23 ---



*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1493 ***

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1893

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1491] FAIL: macros dot

2005-11-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   GCC host triplet|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11   |hppa*-*-hpux*
 GCC target triplet|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11   |hppa*-*-hpux*


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1491

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/775] New GAS testsuite fails

2005-11-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-27 
19:27 ---



*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1489 ***

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=775

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1489] FAIL: .sleb128 tests

2005-11-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-27 
19:27 ---
*** Bug 775 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1489

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1893] FAIL: macros dot

2005-11-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-27 
19:40 ---
Incorrect duplicate.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1893

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1893] FAIL: macros dot

2005-11-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-27 
19:41 ---



*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1491 ***

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1893

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1491] FAIL: macros dot

2005-11-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-27 
19:41 ---
*** Bug 1893 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1491

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1948] New: Error: symbol `test_equiv.eq.1_' is already defined as "*COM*"/16

2005-11-29 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Test file:

   .SPACE $PRIVATE$
   .SUBSPA $BSS$,QUAD=1,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=31,ZERO,SORT=82

test_equiv.eq.1_.comm 16
test_equiv.eq.1_.comm 16
test_equiv.eq.1_.comm 16

-bash-2.05b$ /opt/gnu/bin/as -o comm-bug.o comm-bug.s
comm-bug.s: Assembler messages:
comm-bug.s:5: Error: symbol `test_equiv.eq.1_' is already defined as "*COM*"/16
comm-bug.s:6: Error: symbol `test_equiv.eq.1_' is already defined as "*COM*"/16

The HP assembler accepts the above code.

-- 
   Summary: Error: symbol `test_equiv.eq.1_' is already defined as
"*COM*"/16
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1948

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/1948] Error: symbol `test_equiv.eq.1_' is already defined as "*COM*"/16

2005-12-05 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-12-05 
17:04 ---
Fixed by patch.  See
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-12/msg00030.html.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1948

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/2379] New: pie.exp: FAIL: weak undefined

2006-02-22 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc  -B/home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.91/objdir/ld/tmpdir/gas/ -I/home/dave/gnu/bi
nutils-2.16.91/src/ld/testsuite/ld-pie -g -O0   -L/home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.9
1/objdir/./ld -c -g -O0 -fPIC -c /home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.91/src/ld/testsuit
e/ld-pie/weakundef.c -o tmpdir/weakundef.o
gcc -L/home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.91/objdir/./ld -B/home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16
.91/objdir/ld/tmpdir/ld/ -L/home/dave/opt/gnu/hppa-linux/lib -L/home/dave/opt/gn
u/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/lib -L/usr/lib  -o tmpdir/weakundef -L/home/dave/gnu/b
inutils-2.16.91/src/ld/testsuite/ld-pie -pie tmpdir/weakundef.o
Running: tmpdir/weakundef > tmpdir/weakundef.out
tmpdir/weakundef: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc type 0x
42
FAIL: weak undefined

Also,

gcc  -B/home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.91/objdir/ld/tmpdir/gas/ -I/home/dave/gnu/bi
nutils-2.16.91/src/ld/testsuite/ld-pie -g -O0   -L/home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.9
1/objdir/./ld -c -g -O0 -fPIC -c /home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.91/src/ld/testsuit
e/ld-pie/weakundef-data.c -o tmpdir/weakundef-data.o
gcc -L/home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16.91/objdir/./ld -B/home/dave/gnu/binutils-2.16
.91/objdir/ld/tmpdir/ld/ -L/home/dave/opt/gnu/hppa-linux/lib -L/home/dave/opt/gn
u/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/lib -L/usr/lib  -o tmpdir/weakundef-data -L/home/dave/
gnu/binutils-2.16.91/src/ld/testsuite/ld-pie -pie tmpdir/weakundef-data.o
Running: tmpdir/weakundef-data > tmpdir/weakundef-data.out
tmpdir/weakundef-data: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc ty
pe 0x42
FAIL: weak undefined data

-- 
   Summary: pie.exp: FAIL: weak undefined
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2379

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/2379] pie.exp: FAIL: weak undefined

2006-03-19 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-20 
04:25 ---
Fixed by updating to glibc 2.3.6-3.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2379

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/2470] New: /opt/gnu64/bin/ld: main: Not enough room for program headers (allocated 5, need 6)

2006-03-20 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
-bash-2.05b$ cat xxx.sh
 -E -u main -a archive -o main /usr/ccs/lib/pa20_64/crt0.o 
/lib/pa20_64/unix98.o 
/test/gnu/gcc-4.1/objdir/gcc/stage1/crtbeginT.o -L/test/gnu/gcc-4.1/objdir/gcc/
stage1 -L/opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-4.1.0/lib/gcc/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/4.1.0 -L/usr/ccs/
lib/pa20_64 -L/opt/langtools/lib/pa20_64 -L/opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-4.1.0/lib/gcc/
hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/4.1.0/../../.. -L/lib/pa20_64 -L/usr/lib/pa20_64 main.o -v -
lgcc -lgcc_eh -lpthread -lc -a shared -ldld -a archive -lc -lgcc -lgcc_eh /usr/
lib/pa20_64/milli.a /test/gnu/gcc-4.1/objdir/gcc/stage1/crtend.o

-bash-2.05b$ /opt/gnu64/bin/ld `cat xxx.sh`
GNU ld version 2.16.91 20060318
/opt/gnu64/bin/ld: main: Not enough room for program headers (allocated 5, need 
6)
 Section to Segment mapping:
  Segment  Sections...
  00:   PHDR:
  01: INTERP:  .interp
  02:   LOAD:  .interp .dynamic .hash .dynsym .dynstr .rela.data 
.rela.dlt .text .rodata .PARISC.unwind
  03:   LOAD:  .eh_frame .tbss
  04:   LOAD:  .init .fini .init_array .fini_array .ctors .dtors .jcr 
.data.rel.ro .data .opd .dlt .sdata .sbss .bss .PARISC.ansi.common.1 
.PARISC.ansi.common.2 .PARISC.ansi.common.3 .PARISC.ansi.common.4 
.PARISC.ansi.common.5 .PARISC.ansi.common.6 .PARISC.ansi.common.7
  05:DYNAMIC:  .dynamic
/opt/gnu64/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2470

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/2958] New: FAIL: copy with setting section flags 3

2006-07-24 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
sed -f /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.17.50/src/binutils/testsuite/config/hppa.sed < /xxx/
gnu/binutils-2.17.50/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/bintest.s > asm.s
Executing on host: /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.17.50/objdir/gas/as-new asm.s  -o tmpdir
/bintest.o(timeout = 300)
/home/gnu/binutils-2.17.50/objdir/binutils/objcopy  --set-section-flags .text=a
lloc,data tmpdir/bintest.o tmpdir/copy.o
Executing on host: /home/gnu/binutils-2.17.50/objdir/binutils/objcopy  --set-se
ction-flags .text=alloc,data tmpdir/bintest.o tmpdir/copy.o   (timeout = 300)
/home/gnu/binutils-2.17.50/objdir/binutils/objdump  -h tmpdir/copy.o > tmpdir/d
ump.out
extra regexps in /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.17.50/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/
copy-3.d starting with "^  [0-9]* .text.*$"
EOF from tmpdir/dump.out
FAIL: copy with setting section flags 3

#/home/gnu/binutils-2.17.50/objdir/binutils/objdump  -h tmpdir/copy.o

tmpdir/copy.o: file format som

Sections:
Idx Name  Size  VMA   LMA   File off  Algn
  0 $TEXT$0008      01ec  2**3

  1 $CODE$0008      01ec  2**3
  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, CODE
  2 $LIT$       01f4  2**3
  ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE
  3 $MILLICODE$         01f4  2**3
  ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE
  4 $PRIVATE$ 0008      01f4  2**3

  5 $DATA$0008      01f4  2**3
  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, DATA
  6 $BSS$         2**3
  ALLOC

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: copy with setting section flags 3
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.18 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
    ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
  GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
GCC target triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2958

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/3015] -z relro may create PT_NULL segment

2006-09-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-09-04 
19:25 ---
I'm seeing these fails on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu:

FAIL: strip -z relro -shared (maxpage1)
FAIL: objcopy -z relro -shared (maxpage1)


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu dot
   |    |org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3015

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/4875] New: sha1.h:25:20: error: stdint.h: No such file or directory

2007-08-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src/ld -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I../../src/ld -I..
/bfd -I../../src/ld/../bfd -I../../src/ld/../include  -g -O2 -DLOCALEDIR="\"/opt
/gnu64/share/locale\""   -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werr
or -g -O2 -c ../../src/ld/sha1.c
In file included from ../../src/ld/sha1.c:27:
../../src/ld/sha1.h:25:20: error: stdint.h: No such file or directory

-- 
   Summary: sha1.h:25:20: error: stdint.h: No such file or directory
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.18 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
    ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa*-*-hpux*
  GCC host triplet: hppa*-*-hpux*
GCC target triplet: hppa*-*-hpux*


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4875

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/5322] New: ERROR: tcl error sourcing /home/dave/binutils-2.17.50/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/ gas.exp

2007-11-13 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Running /home/dave/binutils-2.17.50/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp ...
ERROR: tcl error sourcing /home/dave/binutils-2.17.50/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/
gas.exp.
ERROR: wrong # args: should be "regsub ?switches? exp string subSpec varName"
while executing
"regsub ">&" $redir """
(procedure "gas_host_run" line 12)
invoked from within
"gas_host_run "$AS $ASFLAGS $as_opts $srcdir/$subdir/$prog" ">&gas.out""
(procedure "gas_start" line 12)
invoked from within
"gas_start "comment.s" "-al""
(procedure "do_comment" line 7)
invoked from within
"do_comment"
(file "/home/dave/binutils-2.17.50/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp" line 1
35)
invoked from within
"source /home/dave/binutils-2.17.50/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp"
("uplevel" body line 1)
invoked from within
"uplevel #0 source /home/dave/binutils-2.17.50/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp
"
invoked from within
"catch "uplevel #0 source $test_file_name""
send: spawn id exp0 not open
while executing
"send_user "$message\n""
("default" arm line 2)
invoked from within
"switch -glob "$firstword" {
"PASS:" -
"XFAIL:" -
"KFAIL:" -
"UNRESOLVED:" -
"UNSUPPORTED:" -
"UNTESTED:" {
if {$all_flag} {
send_user "$m..."
(procedure "clone_output" line 10)
invoked from within
"clone_output "Running $test_file_name ...""
(procedure "runtest" line 9)
invoked from within
"runtest $test_name"
("foreach" body line 42)
invoked from within
"foreach test_name [lsort [find ${dir} *.exp]] {
if { ${test_name} == "" } {
continue
}
# Ignore this one if asked to.
if { ${ignore..."
("foreach" body line 54)
invoked from within
"foreach dir "${test_top_dirs}" {
if { ${dir} != ${srcdir} } {
# Ignore this directory if is a directory to be
# ignored.
if {[info..."
("foreach" body line 121)
invoked from within
"foreach pass $multipass {

# multipass_name is set for `record_test' to use (see framework.exp).
if { [lindex $pass 0] != "" } {
set multipass_..."
("foreach" body line 51)
invoked from within
"foreach current_target $target_list {
verbose "target is $current_target"
set current_target_name $current_target
set tlist [split $curren..."
    (file "/usr/share/dejagnu/runtest.exp" line 1624)
make[4]: *** [check-DEJAGNU] Error 1

-- 
   Summary: ERROR: tcl error sourcing /home/dave/binutils-
2.17.50/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/
gas.exp
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.19 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5322

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/5146] bfd build fails in alloca-conf.h when built without gcc

2007-12-28 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-12-28 
19:55 ---
Native build with gcc 4.2.2 on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 fails:

/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src/bf
d -I. -DHOST_HPPAHPUX -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DHPUX_CORE  -DHPUX_LARGE_AR_IDS -I.
 -I../../src/bfd -I../../src/bfd/../include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wm
issing-prototypes -Werror -g -O2 -c -o elf64-hppa.lo ../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c
libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src/bfd -I. -DHOST_HPPAHPUX -
D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DHPUX_CORE -DHPUX_LARGE_AR_IDS -I. -I../../src/bfd -I../..
/src/bfd/../include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -g
 -O2 -c ../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c  -DPIC -o .libs/elf64-hppa.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c: In function 'allocate_global_data_opd':
../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c:1189: warning: implicit declaration of function 'allo
ca'
../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c:1189: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of b
uilt-in function 'alloca'
../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c: In function 'elf64_hppa_finalize_opd':
../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c:2189: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of b
uilt-in function 'alloca'
make[4]: *** [elf64-hppa.lo] Error 1


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|FIXED   |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5146

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/5322] ERROR: tcl error sourcing /home/dave/binutils-2.17.50/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp

2007-12-28 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-12-28 
21:37 ---
Yes, it looks like expect linked against tcl8.3 has this problem.  I always
had more problems with expect linked against tcl8.4 although I haven't tested
this recently.

The line that causes the problem seems to be in gas-defs.exp:

set output_file [regsub ">&" $redir ""]



-- 
   What|Removed |Added

Summary|ERROR: tcl error sourcing   |ERROR: tcl error sourcing
   |/home/dave/binutils-|/home/dave/binutils-
   |2.17.50/src/gas/testsuite/ga|2.17.50/src/gas/testsuite/ga
   |s/all/  |s/all/gas.exp
   |gas.exp |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5322

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/5524] New: ld: I/O error, file "/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so": N o such file or directory

2007-12-28 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissin
g-prototypes -Werror -g -O2   -o libopcodes.la -rpath /opt/gnu64/lib -release `c
at ../bfd/libtool-soversion`  dis-buf.lo disassemble.lo dis-init.lo hppa-dis.lo
-Wl,/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so
libtool: link: gcc -shared -Wl,+h -Wl,libopcodes-2.18.50.20071228.sl -o .libs/li
bopcodes-2.18.50.20071228.sl  .libs/dis-buf.o .libs/disassemble.o .libs/dis-init
.o .libs/hppa-dis.o   -lc  -Wl,/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/lib
bfd.so
ld: I/O error, file "/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so": N
o such file or directory
Fatal error.
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

It seems like the make file is using the wrong shared library extension.

SHARED_LIBADD = -Wl,/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so

-- 
   Summary: ld: I/O error, file
"/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so
": N
o such file or directory
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.19 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
    ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.00
  GCC host triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.00
GCC target triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.00


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5524

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/5524] ld: I/O error, file "/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so": No such file or directory

2007-12-28 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-12-28 
21:57 ---
Looks like the configure.in files need updating.  For example, we have this
in opcodes:

if test "$enable_shared" = "yes"; then
  case "${host}" in
*-*-cygwin*)
  SHARED_LDFLAGS="-no-undefined"
  SHARED_LIBADD="-L`pwd`/../bfd -lbfd -L`pwd`/../libiberty -liberty -L`pwd`/
../intl -lintl -lcygwin"
  ;;
*)
  SHARED_LIBADD="-Wl,`pwd`/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so"
  SHARED_DEPENDENCIES="../bfd/libbfd.la"
  ;;
  esac
fi


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

Summary|ld: I/O error, file |ld: I/O error, file
   |"/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/op|"/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/op
   |codes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so|codes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so
   |": N|": No such file or directory
   |o such file or directory|


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5524

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/5322] ERROR: tcl error sourcing /home/dave/binutils-2.17.50/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp

2007-12-28 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-12-29 
00:51 ---
Patch here:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2007-12/msg00159.html


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5322

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/5146] bfd build fails in alloca-conf.h when built without gcc

2007-12-28 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-12-29 
01:48 ---
This is now fixed for builds with gcc by the following change:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2007-12/msg00160.html


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5146

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/5526] New: eh support is broken

2007-12-28 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
See
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-12/msg01393.html
versus
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-12/msg01394.html

The former was with ld 2.18.50.20071227.  The latter was with
2.18.50.20070929.

In the g++ tests, I see stuff like

Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++ -B/
home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../ /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc
/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/ice990323-2.C  -nostdinc++ -I/home/dave/
gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/hppa-linux -I/home/dave/gnu/g
cc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/include -I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libst
dc++-v3/libsupc++ -I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backward -I/
home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -fmessage-length=0   -ansi
 -pedantic-errors -Wno-long-long  -fno-show-column   -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/ob
jdir/hppa-linux/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs  -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-l
inux/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./libib
erty  -lm   -o ./ice990323-2.exe(timeout = 300)
PASS: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/ice990323-2.C (test for excess errors)
Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to .:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./libstdc+
+-v3/src/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/gcc:.:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./
libstdc++-v3/src/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./libstdc++-v3/s
rc/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/gcc:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-li
nux/libstdc++-v3/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libmudflap/.libs
:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libssp/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/ob
jdir/hppa-linux/libgomp/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/./gcc:/home/dave/gnu
/gcc-4.3/objdir/./prev-gcc:/usr/lib/debug
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'A
>'
terminate called recursively
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/ice990323-2.C execution test

In the libstdc++ tests, I see stuff like

Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/./gcc/g++ -shared-libgcc -B/hom
e/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa
-linux/libstdc++-v3/src -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/
src/.libs -B/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa-linux/bin/ -B/home/dave/opt/
gnu/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa-linux/lib/ -isystem 
/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa-
linux/include -isystem /home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa-linux/sys-include 
-g 
-O2 -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERT -fmessage-length=0 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -g 
-
O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -O2   -D_GNU_SOURCE -DLOCALEDIR="." -nostdinc++ 
-I/home/dave/
gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/hppa-linux -I/home/dave/gnu/
gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/include -I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/
libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ 
-I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backward
-I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -Wl,--gc-sections 
/home/
dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/18_support/bad_alloc/cons_virtual_d
erivation.cc-include bits/stdc++.h ./libtestc++.a  -lm   -o ./cons_virtual_d
erivation.exe(timeout = 600)
/home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: error in /tmp/cceASdJq.o(.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr
 table will be created.
output is:
/home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: error in /tmp/cceASdJq.o(.eh_frame); no 
.eh_frame_hdr 
table will be created.

FAIL: 18_support/bad_alloc/cons_virtual_derivation.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: error in /tmp/cceASdJq.o(.eh_frame); no 
.eh_frame_hdr 
table will be created.

-- 
   Summary: eh support is broken
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.19 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
    ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5526

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/5526] eh support is broken

2007-12-29 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-12-30 
02:39 ---
It appears this commit broke eh on hppa-linux:

CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-15 09:34:48

Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog ecoff.c elf-bfd.h elf-eh-frame.c 
 elflink.c section.c 

Log message:
bfd/
* elf-bfd.h (eh_cie_fde): Add u.fde.next_for_section and
u.cie.gc_mark.
(bfd_elf_section_data): Add fde_list.
(elf_fde_list): New macro.
(elf_obj_tdata): Add eh_frame_section.
(elf_eh_frame_section): New macro.
(_bfd_elf_gc_mark_reloc): Remove last parameter.
(_bfd_elf_gc_mark_fdes): Declare.
* elf-eh-frame.c (_bfd_elf_get_eh_frame_sec_info): Chain the FDEs
for each input section.
(mark_entry, _bfd_elf_gc_mark_fdes): New functions.
* elflink.c (_bfd_elf_gc_mark_reloc): Remove is_eh parameter.
(_bfd_elf_gc_mark): Update call accordingly.  Mark the relocations
againts the section's FDEs.  Don't mark the bfd's elf_eh_frame_section.
(bfd_elf_gc_sections): Parse each input bfd's .eh_frame before
marking any input sections.  Remove the current EH handling.
* section.c (bfd_section): Remove gc_mark_from_eh.
* ecoff.c (bfd_debug_section): Update initializer accordingly.

It's probably the unusal encoding (the only one that I could find that
allowed a eh frame header table given available relocation support):

/* This macro chooses the encoding of pointers embedded in the exception
   handling sections.  If at all possible, this should be defined such
   that the exception handling section will not require dynamic relocations,
   and so may be read-only.

   Because the HP assembler auto aligns, it is necessary to use
   DW_EH_PE_aligned.  It's not possible to make the data read-only
   on the HP-UX SOM port since the linker requires fixups for label
   differences in different sections to be word aligned.  However,
   the SOM linker can do unaligned fixups for absolute pointers.
   We also need aligned pointers for global and function pointers.

   Although the HP-UX 64-bit ELF linker can handle unaligned pc-relative
   fixups, the runtime doesn't have a consistent relationship between
   text and data for dynamically loaded objects.  Thus, it's not possible
   to use pc-relative encoding for pointers on this target.  It may be
   possible to use segment relative encodings but GAS doesn't currently
   have a mechanism to generate these encodings.  For other targets, we
   use pc-relative encoding for pointers.  If the pointer might require
   dynamic relocation, we make it indirect.  */
#define ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT(CODE,GLOBAL)   \
  (TARGET_GAS && !TARGET_HPUX   \
   ? (DW_EH_PE_pcrel\
  | ((GLOBAL) || (CODE) == 2 ? DW_EH_PE_indirect : 0)   \
  | (TARGET_64BIT ? DW_EH_PE_sdata8 : DW_EH_PE_sdata4)) \
   : (!TARGET_GAS || (GLOBAL) || (CODE) == 2\
  ? DW_EH_PE_aligned : DW_EH_PE_absptr))



-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rsandifo at sourceware dot
   ||org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5526

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/6906] New: TLS relocs prevent changing r19 to r27 when doing static link with PIC code on PA

2008-09-21 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
In trying to debug an eh bug, I tried a static link to minimize issues
wrt lazing binding.  The resulting application segfaults:

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00021610 in __tls_get_addr ()
Current language:  auto; currently asm
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00021610 in __tls_get_addr ()
#1  0x000151b4 in __cxa_get_globals ()
at ../../../../gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_globals.cc:68
#2  0x00014a50 in __cxa_allocate_exception (thrown_size=76)
at ../../../../gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_alloc.cc:137
#3  0x00012060 in doIt ()
at /home/dave/gcc-4.4/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/pr29166.C:79
#4  0x000120b0 in test ()
at /home/dave/gcc-4.4/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/pr29166.C:85
#5  0x00013878 in main (argc=1, argv=0xfdf008b4)
at /home/dave/gcc-4.4/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/pr29166.C:159
(gdb) disass __tls_get_addr
Dump of assembler code for function __tls_get_addr:
0x00021610 <__tls_get_addr+0>:  ldw 4(r26),r20
0x00021614 <__tls_get_addr+4>:  mfctl tr3,ret0
0x00021618 <__tls_get_addr+8>:  ldw 0(ret0),r19
0x0002161c <__tls_get_addr+12>: ldw 8(r19),ret0
0x00021620 <__tls_get_addr+16>: bv r0(rp)
0x00021624 <__tls_get_addr+20>: add,l ret0,r20,ret0
End of assembler dump.
(gdb) p/x $r26
$1 = 0x41aa
(gdb) disass __cxa_get_globals
Dump of assembler code for function __cxa_get_globals:
0x0001519c <__cxa_get_globals+0>:   stw rp,-14(sp)
0x000151a0 <__cxa_get_globals+4>:   addil L%2800,r19,r1
0x000151a4 <__cxa_get_globals+8>:   ldo 5c8(r1),r26
0x000151a8 <__cxa_get_globals+12>:  stw,ma r4,80(sp)
0x000151ac <__cxa_get_globals+16>:  b,l 0x21610 <__tls_get_addr>,rp
0x000151b0 <__cxa_get_globals+20>:  stw r19,-20(sp)
0x000151b4 <__cxa_get_globals+24>:  ldw -94(sp),rp
0x000151b8 <__cxa_get_globals+28>:  addil L%0,ret0,r1
0x000151bc <__cxa_get_globals+32>:  ldo 10(r1),ret0
0x000151c0 <__cxa_get_globals+36>:  bv r0(rp)
0x000151c4 <__cxa_get_globals+40>:  ldw,mb -80(sp),r4
End of assembler dump.

The problem is the addil at __cxa_get_globals+4.  In a static links,
instructions with relocations using the PIC register need to be instructions
using the global register.  Specifically, stuff like the following:

RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.text.__cxa_get_globals]:
OFFSET   TYPE  VALUE 
0004 R_PARISC_TLS_LDM21L  _ZZN12_GLOBAL__N_110get_globalEvE6global
0008 R_PARISC_TLS_LDM14R  _ZZN12_GLOBAL__N_110get_globalEvE6global
001c R_PARISC_TLS_LDO21L  _ZZN12_GLOBAL__N_110get_globalEvE6global
0020 R_PARISC_TLS_LDO14R  _ZZN12_GLOBAL__N_110get_globalEvE6global

-- 
   Summary: TLS relocs prevent changing r19 to r27 when doing static
link with PIC code on PA
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.20 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
         Component: ld
    AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/9743] --stub-group-size=1 does not help when linking stage1 GCC

2009-02-17 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9743

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/9861] New: FAIL: EABI attributes from directives

2009-02-18 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Many attribute tests fail:

FAIL: EABI attributes from directives
FAIL: EABI attribute defaults
FAIL: attributes for -march=all
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv1
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv2
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv2a
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv2s
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv3
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv3m
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv4
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv4t
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv4txm
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv4xm
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv5
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv5t
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv5te
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv5tej
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv5texp
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv5txm
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv6-m
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv6
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv6j
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv6k
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv6kt2
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv6t2
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv6z
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv6zk
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv6zkt2
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv6zt2
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv7-a
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv7-m
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv7-r
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv7
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv7a
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv7m
FAIL: attributes for -march=armv7r
FAIL: attributes for -march=iwmmxt
FAIL: attributes for -march=iwmmxt2
FAIL: attributes for -march=xscale
FAIL: EABI attributes from command line
FAIL: EABI attribute ordering
FAIL: EABI attributes .eabi_attribute overrides .cpu
FAIL: gas/arm/eabi_attr_1

../as-new   -o dump.o /home/dave/gnu/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/arm/attr-
cpu
-directive.s
Executing on host: sh -c {../as-new   -o 
dump.o /home/dave/gnu/binutils/src/gas/
testsuite/gas/arm/attr-cpu-directive.s 2>&1}  /dev/null gas.out (timeout = 300)
/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/readelf  -A dump.o
Executing on host: sh -c 
{/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../bin
utils/readelf  -A dump.o >dump.out 2>gas.stderr}  /dev/null  (timeout = 300)
extra lines in dump.out starting with "^  Tag_VFP_arch: VFPv2$"
EOF from /home/dave/gnu/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/arm/attr-cpu-directive.d
FAIL: EABI attributes from directives
FAIL: EABI attributes from directives
../as-new   -o dump.o /home/dave/gnu/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/arm/blank.s
Executing on host: sh -c {../as-new   -o 
dump.o /home/dave/gnu/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/arm/blank.s 
2>&1}  /dev/null gas.out (timeout = 300)
/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/readelf  -A dump.o
Executing on host: sh -c 
{/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/readelf  -A 
dump.o >dump.out 2>gas.stderr}  /dev/null  (timeout = 300)
extra lines in dump.out starting with "^  Tag_VFP_arch: VFPv2$"
EOF from /home/dave/gnu/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/arm/attr-default.d
FAIL: EABI attribute defaults

-bash-3.2$ ./as-new --version
GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.19.51.20090217
Copyright 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: EABI attributes from directives
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.20 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
    ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi
  GCC host triplet: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi
GCC target triplet: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9861

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/9862] New: FAIL: EABI attribute merging 4

2009-02-18 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
A number of attribute merging tests fail:

FAIL: EABI attribute merging 4
FAIL: EABI attribute merging 5
FAIL: EABI attribute arch merging 1
FAIL: EABI attribute arch merging 1 reversed
FAIL: EABI attribute arch merging 2
FAIL: EABI attribute arch merging 2 reversed
FAIL: ld-arm/attr-merge-unknown-2
FAIL: ld-arm/attr-merge-unknown-2r
FAIL: ld-arm/attr-merge-unknown-3

Executing on host: sh -c {/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld/ld-new  -o 
tmpdir/at
tr-merge-4 -L/home/dave/gnu/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-arm -r tmpdir/attr-
merg
e-4a.o tmpdir/attr-merge-4b.o 2>&1}  /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
Executing on host: sh -c {/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld/../binutils/readelf
-A tmpdir/attr-merge-4 >dump.out 2>ld.stderr}  /dev/null  (timeout = 300)
/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld/../binutils/readelf -A tmpdir/attr-merge-4
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^  Tag_also_compatible_with: v6-M$"
line   "  Tag_VFP_arch: VFPv2"
extra lines in dump.out starting with "^  Tag_also_compatible_with: v6-M$"
EOF from /home/dave/gnu/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-arm/attr-merge-4.attr
FAIL: EABI attribute merging 4

-bash-3.2$ ./ld-new --version
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.19.51.20090217
Copyright 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: EABI attribute merging 4
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.20 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi
  GCC host triplet: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi
GCC target triplet: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9862

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/9863] New: FAIL: Weak symbols in dynamic objects 1 (main test)

2009-02-18 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld/../gas/as-new   -o tmpdir/weak-dyn-
1b.o  /home
/dave/gnu/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/weak-dyn-1b.s
Executing on host: sh -c {/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld/../gas/as-new   -o 
t
mpdir/weak-dyn-1b.o  /home/dave/gnu/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/weak-dyn-
1b
.s 2>&1}  /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld/ld-new  -o tmpdir/libweakdyn1b.so -
L/home/dave
/gnu/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf -shared tmpdir/libweakdyn1a.so -Tweak-
dyn-
1.ld tmpdir/weak-dyn-1b.o
Executing on host: sh -c {/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld/ld-new  -o 
tmpdir/li
bweakdyn1b.so -L/home/dave/gnu/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf -shared 
tmpdir/l
ibweakdyn1a.so -Tweak-dyn-1.ld tmpdir/weak-dyn-1b.o 2>&1}  /dev/null ld.tmp 
(tim
eout = 300)
/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld/ld-new: warning: type and size of dynamic 
symb
ol `__data_start' are not defined
/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld/ld-new: warning: type and size of dynamic 
symb
ol `__data_start' are not defined
FAIL: Weak symbols in dynamic objects 1 (main test)

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: Weak symbols in dynamic objects 1 (main test)
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.20 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi
  GCC host triplet: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi
GCC target triplet: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9863

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/3807] binutils failure for mips-elf on HEAD

2009-03-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-03-01 
19:23 ---
With the test change proposed here
<http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-03/msg6.html>,
I see a similar fail on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 and hppa-unknown-linux-gnu.

tmpdir/copy.o: file format elf32-hppa-linux

SYMBOL TABLE:
 ld  .text   .text
 ld  .data   .data
 ld  .bss    .bss
2200 l   *ABS*   .hidden Ghidden
2300 l   *ABS*   .internal Ginternal
2100 g   *ABS*   Gdefault
2400 g   *ABS*   .protected Gprotected

extra regexps in /home/dave/gnu/binutils/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/loc
alize-hidden-1.d starting with "^0+1200 l .*\*ABS\* 0+ \.hidden Lhidden$"
EOF from tmpdir/dump.outFAIL: --localize-hidden test 1


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC|            |danglin at gcc dot gnu dot
   |    |org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3807

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/9921] New: FAIL: --localize-hidden test 2

2009-03-03 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
sed -f /xxx/gnu/binutils/src/binutils/testsuite/config/hppa.sed < /xxx/gnu/binut
ils/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/localize-hidden-2.s > asm.s
Executing on host: /xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/gas/as-new asm.s  -o tmpdir/bintest.
o(timeout = 300)
/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/binutils/objcopy  --localize-hidden tmpdir/bintest.o  t
mpdir/copy.o
Executing on host: /xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/binutils/objcopy  --localize-hidden 
tmpdir/bintest.o  tmpdir/copy.o   (timeout = 300)
/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/binutils/nm-new  -n tmpdir/copy.o
Executing on host: /xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/binutils/nm-new  -n tmpdir/copy.o  /
dev/null tmpdir/dump.out (timeout = 300)
0100 T G
extra regexps in /xxx/gnu/binutils/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/localize-
hidden-2.d starting with "^0+100 A G$"
EOF from tmpdir/dump.out
FAIL: --localize-hidden test 2

.set is poorly tested on this target.  The problem is the set is not setting
the symbol to the absolute section.  We need to play games like thos in pa_equ.

-- 
   Summary: FAIL: --localize-hidden test 2
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.20 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa*-*-hpux* (32-bit)
  GCC host triplet: hppa*-*-hpux* (32-bit)
GCC target triplet: hppa*-*-hpux* (32-bit)


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9921

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/9921] FAIL: --localize-hidden test 2

2009-03-07 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-03-07 
23:40 ---
Fixed.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9921

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10259] New: ld generates bad long branch stubs

2009-06-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
The following change to binutils breaks GCC bootstrap in stage1:

2009-05-22  Julian Brown  

* elf32-arm.c (THUMB16_BCOND_INSN, THUMB32_INSN, THUMB32_B_INSN): New
macros.

This is the error reported in my build log:

...
checking for armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi-
gcc... /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -
B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/ -B/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.5.0/armv5tejl-
unknown-linux-gnueabi/bin/ -B/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.5.0/armv5tejl-
unknown-linux-gnueabi/lib/ -isystem /home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.5.0/armv5tejl-
unknown-linux-gnueabi/include -isystem /home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-
4.5.0/armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-include
checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in 
`/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi/libgcc':
configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
See `config.log' for more details.

With the trivial program,

int
main ()
{
  return 0;
}

cc1 generates a SEGV here:

(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/cc1 -
iprefix /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/../lib/gcc/armv5tejl-unknown-linux-
gnueabi/4.5.0/ -isystem ./include -isystem ./include-fixed xxx.c -dumpbase 
xxx.c -auxbase xxx -version -o xxx.s

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x051e9414 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0  0x051e9414 in ?? ()
#1  0x0275d358 in __libc_csu_init ()
#2  0x400df8cc in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3  0x00068758 in _start ()

(gdb) disass 0x0275d348 0x0275d368
Dump of assembler code from 0x275d348 to 0x275d368:
0x0275d348 <__libc_csu_init+16>:mov r10, r0
0x0275d34c <__libc_csu_init+20>:mov r8, r1
0x0275d350 <__libc_csu_init+24>:mov r7, r2
0x0275d354 <__libc_csu_init+28>:bl  0x275d528 <___init_veneer>
0x0275d358 <__libc_csu_init+32>:ldr r3, [pc, #64]   ; 0x275d3a0 
<__libc_csu_init+104>
0x0275d35c <__libc_csu_init+36>:ldr r2, [pc, #64]   ; 0x275d3a4 
<__libc_csu_init+108>
0x0275d360 <__libc_csu_init+40>:rsb r3, r2, r3
0x0275d364 <__libc_csu_init+44>:asrsr5, r3, #2
End of assembler dump.
Starting program: /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/cc1 -
iprefix /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/../lib/gcc/armv5tejl-unknown-linux-
gnueabi/4.5.0/ -isystem ./include -isystem ./include-fixed xxx.c -dumpbase 
xxx.c -auxbase xxx -version -o xxx.s

Breakpoint 5, 0x0275d354 in __libc_csu_init ()
(gdb) stepi
0x0275d528 in ___init_veneer ()
(gdb) disass
Dump of assembler code for function ___init_veneer:
0x0275d528 <___init_veneer+0>:  ldr pc, [pc, #-4]   ; 0x275d52c 
<___init_veneer+4>
0x0275d52c <___init_veneer+4>:  ldreq   r9, [lr, #-1044]
End of assembler dump.
(gdb) stepi
0x0275d528 in ___init_veneer ()
Could not insert single-step breakpoint at 0x51e9414

-- 
   Summary: ld generates bad long branch stubs
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.20 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: ld
        AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,julian at codesourcery dot
com
 GCC build triplet: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi
  GCC host triplet: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi
GCC target triplet: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10259

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/10304] New: ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section.

2009-06-21 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4
.5/objdir/gcc/ -ggdb3 -DDEBUG_ASSERT -I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/libmudflap/tes
tsuite -I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/libmudflap/testsuite/.. -I.. -L/home/dave/gn
u/gcc-4.5/objdir/hppa-linux/./libmudflap/.libs
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.c/fail17-frag.c 
-static -fmudflap -lmudflap 
-L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/objdir/hppa-linux/./libmudflap/testsuite -ldl -lm   -o
./fail17-frag.exe(timeout = 300)/home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: Dwarf Error:
mangled line number section.
...

I suspect this is caused by the new line table discriminator support.

-- 
   Summary: ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section.
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.20 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10304

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-10 
16:13 ---
On hppa-unknown-linux-gnu:

Executing on host: sh -c {/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld/../binutils/readelf 
 -S --wide tmpdir/dump > tmpdir/dump.out 2>ld.tmp}  /dev/null  (timeout = 300)
extra regexps in /home/dave/gnu/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/relocatable.d s
tarting with "^  \[[ 0-9]+\] \.text.*[ \t]+PROGBITS[ \t]+0+80[ \t0-9a-f]+AX.
*$"
EOF from tmpdir/dump.out
FAIL: relocatable with script


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils