[Bug gold/5986] New: build failure with gcc 4.3.0
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.././gold -I. -I.././gold -I.././gold/../include
-I.././gold/../elfcpp -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/share/locale\""
-DBINDIR="\"/usr/bin\"" -DTOOLBINDIR="\"/usr/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin\""
-W -Wall -Werror -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -march=k8
-pipe -MT dynobj.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/dynobj.Tpo" -c -o dynobj.o dynobj.cc; \
then mv -f ".deps/dynobj.Tpo" ".deps/dynobj.Po"; else rm -f
".deps/dynobj.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
In file included from dynobj.cc:30:
script.h: In member function bool
gold::Version_script_info::symbol_is_local(const char*) const:
script.h:152: error: invalid use of incomplete type const struct
std::basic_string, std::allocator >
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.0/include/g++-v4/bits/stringfwd.h:56:
error: declaration of const struct std::basic_string, std::allocator >
script.h:153: error: invalid use of incomplete type const struct
std::basic_string, std::allocator >
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.0/include/g++-v4/bits/stringfwd.h:56:
error: declaration of const struct std::basic_string, std::allocator >
script.h: At global scope:
script.h:247: error: field name_ has incomplete type
script.h: In constructor gold::Symbol_assignment::Symbol_assignment(const
char*, size_t, gold::Expression*, bool, bool):
script.h:206: error: class gold::Symbol_assignment does not have any field
named name_
script.h: At global scope:
script.h:282: error: field message_ has incomplete type
script.h: In constructor
gold::Script_assertion::Script_assertion(gold::Expression*, const char*,
size_t):
script.h:267: error: class gold::Script_assertion does not have any field
named message_
script.h: At global scope:
script.h:376: error: field entry_ has incomplete type
make[4]: *** [dynobj.o] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/markus/binutils/src/gold'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/markus/binutils/src/gold'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/markus/binutils/src/gold'
make[1]: *** [all-gold] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/markus/binutils/src'
make: *** [all] Error 2
--
Summary: build failure with gcc 4.3.0
Product: binutils
Version: 2.19 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
AssignedTo: ian at airs dot com
ReportedBy: cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5986
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/6407] New: linux kernel linked with gold fails to boot
Any kernel linked with the latest (or any) version of gold (GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.18.50.20080415) 1.5) fails to boot. Normal kernel: # file kernel176 kernel176: Linux kernel x86 boot executable RO-rootFS, root_dev 0x801, swap_dev 0x1, Normal VGA kernel linked with gold: # file kernel177 kernel177: x86 boot sector; partition 4: ID=0x1, starthead 0, startsector 1, 134348799 sectors I guess linking fails in the last stages of kernel building. -- Summary: linux kernel linked with gold fails to boot Product: binutils Version: 2.19 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: ian at airs dot com ReportedBy: cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6407 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/6407] linux kernel linked with gold fails to boot
--- Additional Comments From cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com 2008-04-15 14:41 --- I narrowed it down to one linker script, namely arch/x86/boot/setup.ld . On my machine (amd64) running: ld -m elf_x86_64 -T arch/x86/boot/setup.ld arch/x86/boot/a20.o arch/x86/boot/cmdline.o arch/x86/boot/copy.o arch/x86/boot/cpu.o arch/x86/boot/cpucheck.o arch/x86/boot/edd.o arch/x86/boot/header.o arch/x86/boot/main.o arch/x86/boot/mca.o arch/x86/boot/memory.o arch/x86/boot/pm.o arch/x86/boot/pmjump.o arch/x86/boot/printf.o arch/x86/boot/string.o arch/x86/boot/tty.o arch/x86/boot/video.o arch/x86/boot/version.o arch/x86/boot/video-vga.o arch/x86/boot/video-vesa.o arch/x86/boot/video-bios.o -o arch/x86/boot/setup.elf and then objcopy -O binary arch/x86/boot/setup.elf arch/x86/boot/setup.bin using the default linker, I get: % file setup.bin setup.bin: Linux kernel x86 boot executable RO-rootFS, Normal VGA with gold I get: % file setup.bin setup.bin: x86 boot sector; partition 4: ID=0x1, starthead 0, startsector 0, 65535 sectors So something wents wrong here. I'm no linker expert, but maybe you immediately see whats wrong with arch/x86/boot/setup.ld. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6407 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/6407] linux kernel linked with gold fails to boot
--- Additional Comments From cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com 2008-04-15 15:04 --- Created an attachment (id=2695) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2695&action=view) dumpelf -vv setup.elf > dump_ld -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6407 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/6407] linux kernel linked with gold fails to boot
--- Additional Comments From cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com 2008-04-15 15:05 --- Created an attachment (id=2696) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2696&action=view) dumpelf -vv setup.elf >dump_gold -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6407 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/6407] linux kernel linked with gold fails to boot
-- What|Removed |Added Attachment #2695|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| Attachment #2695 is|0 |1 patch|| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6407 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/6407] linux kernel linked with gold fails to boot
-- What|Removed |Added Attachment #2696|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| Attachment #2696 is|0 |1 patch|| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6407 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13311] internal error, aborting at bfd.c line 649 in _bfd_default_error_handler
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13311 --- Comment #1 from Octoploid 2011-10-17 20:17:45 UTC --- Created attachment 6013 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6013 testcase -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13311] New: internal error, aborting at bfd.c line 649 in _bfd_default_error_handler
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13311 Bug #: 13311 Summary: internal error, aborting at bfd.c line 649 in _bfd_default_error_handler Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org ReportedBy: cryptooctopl...@gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Just came across this error while I was testing lto/linker-pluging settings: # make gcc -fuse-linker-plugin -Wl,--as-needed,--gc-sections luac.o liblua.so.5.1.4 /tmp/ccoAPG5W.ltrans0.ltrans.o: In function `combine.2469.2460': ccoAPG5W.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x461): undefined reference to `luaF_newproto' ccoAPG5W.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x4ba): undefined reference to `luaD_growstack' ccoAPG5W.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x4e6): undefined reference to `luaS_newlstr' ccoAPG5W.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x52d): undefined reference to `luaM_realloc_' ccoAPG5W.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x53b): undefined reference to `luaM_toobig' ccoAPG5W.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x579): undefined reference to `luaM_realloc_' ccoAPG5W.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x587): undefined reference to `luaM_toobig' /tmp/ccoAPG5W.ltrans0.ltrans.o: In function `pmain.2456.2241': ccoAPG5W.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x7e0): undefined reference to `luaU_print' ccoAPG5W.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x857): undefined reference to `luaU_dump' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `floor@GLIBC_2.2.5' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.22.51.20111015 internal error, aborting at bfd.c line 649 in _bfd_default_error_handler /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: Please report this bug. collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [all] Error 1 Testcase is attached -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13311] internal error, aborting at bfd.c line 649 in _bfd_default_error_handler
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13311 --- Comment #3 from Octoploid 2011-10-18 07:27:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Can you try applying the first hunk (ie. the elf_link_output_extsym change) > from the patch in http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-10/msg00123.html? Yes, this hunk fixes the error. Another thing that caught me eye are the undefined references to libc libraries with bfd and --as-needed: # make gcc -fuse-linker-plugin -Wl,--as-needed,--gc-sections luac.o liblua.so.5.1.4 /tmp/ccwugZXD.ltrans0.ltrans.o: In function `combine.2469.2460': ccwugZXD.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x461): undefined reference to `luaF_newproto' ccwugZXD.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x4ba): undefined reference to `luaD_growstack' ccwugZXD.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x4e6): undefined reference to `luaS_newlstr' ccwugZXD.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x52d): undefined reference to `luaM_realloc_' ccwugZXD.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x53b): undefined reference to `luaM_toobig' ccwugZXD.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x579): undefined reference to `luaM_realloc_' ccwugZXD.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x587): undefined reference to `luaM_toobig' /tmp/ccwugZXD.ltrans0.ltrans.o: In function `pmain.2456.2241': ccwugZXD.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x7e0): undefined reference to `luaU_print' ccwugZXD.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x857): undefined reference to `luaU_dump' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `floor@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `ceil@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `sinh@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `atan@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `tan@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `dlopen@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `dlerror@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `sqrt@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `cosh@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `fmod@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `log10@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `sin@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `dlclose@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `cos@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `atan2@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `acos@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `tanh@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `exp@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `log@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `dlsym@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `asin@GLIBC_2.2.5' liblua.so.5.1.4: undefined reference to `pow@GLIBC_2.2.5' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [all] Error 1 gold: # make gcc -fuse-linker-plugin -Wl,--as-needed,--gc-sections luac.o liblua.so.5.1.4 /tmp/ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.ltrans.o:ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.o:function combine.2469.2460: error: undefined reference to 'luaF_newproto' /tmp/ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.ltrans.o:ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.o:function combine.2469.2460: error: undefined reference to 'luaD_growstack' /tmp/ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.ltrans.o:ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.o:function combine.2469.2460: error: undefined reference to 'luaS_newlstr' /tmp/ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.ltrans.o:ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.o:function combine.2469.2460: error: undefined reference to 'luaM_realloc_' /tmp/ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.ltrans.o:ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.o:function combine.2469.2460: error: undefined reference to 'luaM_toobig' /tmp/ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.ltrans.o:ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.o:function combine.2469.2460: error: undefined reference to 'luaM_realloc_' /tmp/ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.ltrans.o:ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.o:function combine.2469.2460: error: undefined reference to 'luaM_toobig' /tmp/ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.ltrans.o:ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.o:function pmain.2456.2241: error: undefined reference to 'luaU_print' /tmp/ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.ltrans.o:ccG7JVZB.ltrans0.o:function pmain.2456.2241: error: undefined reference to 'luaU_dump' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [all] Error 1 But maybe this is harmless in this case, because the link fails anyway. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13311] internal error, aborting at bfd.c line 649 in _bfd_default_error_handler
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13311 --- Comment #4 from Octoploid 2011-10-18 12:07:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Another thing that caught me eye are the undefined references to libc > libraries > with bfd and --as-needed: This appears to be the same bug as http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13287 . -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13311] internal error, aborting at bfd.c line 649 in _bfd_default_error_handler
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13311 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #6 from Octoploid 2011-10-19 07:20:52 UTC --- Fixed. Thanks Alan. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/13245] PREVAILING_DEF reported too often.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13245 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #15 from Octoploid 2011-11-02 11:35:39 UTC --- fixed -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/14342] [gold] symbol 'std::__once_callable' used as both __thread and non-__thread
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14342 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cryptooctoploid at gmail ||dot com -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/6407] linux kernel linked with gold fails to boot
-- What|Removed |Added CC||andi at firstfloor dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6407 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/6407] linux kernel linked with gold fails to boot
--- Additional Comments From cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com 2008-05-30 16:42 --- The kernel still does not boot on my machine (amd64) using the current »gold« version. It prints this message: »bad gzip magic number« So we got a step further, but are still not quite there. I noticed that Andy Kleen reported a similar problem on the binutils mailinglist and wanted to look into the problem. Maybe he can give us an update? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6407 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/6407] linux kernel linked with gold fails to boot
--- Additional Comments From cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com 2008-05-30 17:51 --- >I assume you are building a 64-bit kernel on the amd64 box? Yes. >Should we track this problem in a separate PR so it gets a unique ID? Ok, I will enter a new bug. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6407 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/6584] New: kernel image decompression fails on 64bit machines (linked with gold)
A kernel linked with gold fails early in the boot process during the kernel image decompression (»bad gzip magic number«). This happens an 64bit machines running 64bit kernels. -- Summary: kernel image decompression fails on 64bit machines (linked with gold) Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: ian at airs dot com ReportedBy: cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com CC: andi at firstfloor dot org,bug-binutils at gnu dot org,kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6584 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/10698] gold 2.20.51.0.1.20091009 fails to link linux kernel 2.6.31.1
--- Additional Comments From cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com 2009-10-19 15:38 --- Fixed in the 2.20 release here. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10698 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/12557] New: Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 Summary: Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redhat.com ReportedBy: cryptooctopl...@gmail.com Please see also: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375#c53 Firefox 4 fails to build with the following flags: CXXFLAGS="-march=native -fpermissive -flto=4 -fuse-linker-plugin -fwhole-program" LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--as-needed,--no-keep-memory" c++ -o xpcshell -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wcast-align -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wno-variadic-macros -Werror=return-type -Wno-long-long -march=native -fpermissive -flto=4 -fuse-linker-plugin -fwhole-program -fno-strict-aliasing -fshort-wchar -pthread -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O3 xpcshell.o -lpthread -Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--as-needed,--no-keep-memory -Wl,-rpath-link,/var/tmp/mozilla-central/moz-build-dir/dist/bin -Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/lib -L../../../../dist/bin -L../../../../dist/lib ../../../../dist/lib/libxpcomglue_s.a -L/var/tmp/mozilla-central/moz-build-dir/dist/bin -lxpcom -lmozalloc -lxul -L/var/tmp/mozilla-central/moz-build-dir/dist/bin -lxpcom -lmozalloc -lxul -Wl,-R/usr/lib64 -L/usr/lib64 -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 -lpthread -ldl -ldl ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_smprintf_free' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_SetEnv' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_Now' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_GetErrorText' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_FindFunctionSymbol' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_PushIOLayer' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_ntohs' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_FormatTimeUSEnglish' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_MemMap' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_LocalTimeParameters' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_GetDefaultIOMethods' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_ReadDir' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_SetPollableEvent' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_FindSymbol' /usr/lib/libssl3.so: undefined reference to `PR_OpenAnonFileMap' /usr/lib/libssl3.so: undefined reference to `PR_ExportFileMapAsString' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_Delete' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_AtomicSet' /usr/lib/libnss3.so: undefined reference to `PR_NewRWLock' ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so: undefined reference to `PR_SetNetAddr' ... It builds fine without the "--as-needed" LDFLAG. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cryptooctoploid at gmail ||dot com Component|binutils|ld -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #2 from Octoploid 2011-03-10 06:31:09 UTC --- The problem comes from: "-Wl,-R/usr/lib64 -L/usr/lib64 -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 -lpthread -ldl -ldl" If I remove "-lnspr4" from above, ld links without any problem. When I remove the whole system library part: "-Wl,-R/usr/lib64 -L/usr/lib64 -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 -lpthread -ldl -ldl" ld still links fine. So it seems that ld gets irritated when you explicitly specify system libraries that it already figured out itself in the -flto/--as-needed case. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #4 from Octoploid 2011-03-10 16:30:57 UTC --- Created attachment 5285 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5285 mozconfig No, there's only one libnspr4.so on my system. # cd / / # find . -name "libnspr4*" ./usr/lib/libnspr4.so ./usr/lib/libnspr4.so.8 / # And I build Firefox with --with-system-nspr ... I've attached my .mozconfig in case someone would like to reproduce the issue. (Just run "make -f client.mk" in the Firefox top directory) -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5285|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #5 from Octoploid 2011-03-10 16:37:22 UTC --- Created attachment 5286 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5286 Correct mozconfig (use this one) -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #7 from Octoploid 2011-03-10 17:43:09 UTC --- Created attachment 5287 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5287 output_bad -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #8 from Octoploid 2011-03-10 17:43:32 UTC --- Created attachment 5288 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5288 map_bad -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #9 from Octoploid 2011-03-10 17:43:59 UTC --- Created attachment 5289 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5289 output_good -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #10 from Octoploid 2011-03-10 17:45:27 UTC --- Created attachment 5290 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5290 map_good Everything is attached. Good > without --as-needed Bad > with --as-needed -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #12 from Octoploid 2011-03-10 18:28:19 UTC --- Thanks. Unfortunately nothing obvious stands out in vimdiff. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5289|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #13 from Octoploid 2011-03-11 07:27:50 UTC --- Created attachment 5292 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5292 output_good This may be better for comparison: removed: "-Wl,-R/usr/lib64 -L/usr/lib64 -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 -lpthread -ldl -ldl" -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5290|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #14 from Octoploid 2011-03-11 07:28:28 UTC --- Created attachment 5293 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5293 map_good -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #15 from Octoploid 2011-03-11 07:34:09 UTC --- Now two lines stands out in "vimdiff verbose_good verbose_bad": libnspr4.so needed by ../../../../dist/bin/libxul.so found libnspr4.so at /usr/lib/libnspr4.so These two lines are missing in verbose_bad... -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #17 from Octoploid 2011-03-11 18:22:34 UTC --- Created attachment 5294 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5294 gcc_verbose_good -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #18 from Octoploid 2011-03-11 18:23:03 UTC --- Created attachment 5295 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5295 gcc_verbose_bad -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever Confirmed|1 |0 --- Comment #22 from Octoploid 2011-03-11 19:02:50 UTC --- GNU ld (Linux/GNU Binutils) 2.21.51.0.7.20110306 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #24 from Octoploid 2011-03-11 19:24:33 UTC --- >I really need a small testcase. Understood. I will take a deeper look. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] gcc & Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Firefox fails to build with |gcc & Firefox fails to |-flto and --as-needed |build with -flto and |LDFLAGS |--as-needed LDFLAGS -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] gcc & Firefox fail to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gcc & Firefox fails to |gcc & Firefox fail to build |build with -flto and|with -flto and --as-needed |--as-needed LDFLAGS |LDFLAGS -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] gcc & Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #25 from Octoploid 2011-03-11 21:02:12 UTC --- Even gcc fails to build with the same combination (-flto and Wl,--as-needed): ... /var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/./prev-gcc/g++ -B/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -nostdinc++ -B/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -I/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -I/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include -I/var/tmp/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -L/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -march=native -O2 -pipe -flto=jobserver -frandom-seed=1 -fprofile-use -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc gcov.o intl.o version.o errors.o ../libcpp/libcpp.a ../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a -o gcov /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_argv@GLIBC_PRIVATE' /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_rtld_global_ro@GLIBC_PRIVATE' /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `__tls_get_addr@GLIBC_2.3' /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_rtld_global@GLIBC_PRIVATE' /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `__libc_enable_secure@GLIBC_PRIVATE' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [gcov] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs rm gfortran.pod cpp.pod gcov.pod gcc.pod fsf-funding.pod gfdl.pod make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/gcc' make[2]: *** [all-stagefeedback-gcc] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir' make[1]: *** [stagefeedback-bubble] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir' make: *** [profiledbootstrap] Error 2 Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.6.0 --includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/include --datadir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0 --mandir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/man --infodir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/info --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/include/g++-v4 --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --disable-altivec --disable-fixed-point --without-ppl --without-cloog --enable-lto --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --with-system-zlib --disable-werror --enable-build-with-cxx --enable-initfini-array --with-gold --enable-secureplt --enable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --enable-libgomp --enable-cld --with-python-dir=/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/python --enable-checking=release --disable-libgcj --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-multilib --enable-clocale=gnu --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto And build with: make -j4 BOOT_CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" STAGE1_CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-march=native -O2 -pipe" LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--as-needed" profiledbootstrap -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] gcc & Firefox fail to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #26 from Octoploid 2011-03-11 22:12:02 UTC --- Hmm, the LDFLAGS are simply ignored by gcc. And gcc builds fine when I configure it with: --with-boot-ldflags=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--as-needed -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] gcc & Firefox fail to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #28 from Octoploid 2011-03-14 16:39:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) > I have no problems with gcc bootstrap using > > .../configure --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld > --prefix=/usr/gcc-4.7.0 --with-local-prefix=/usr/local > --enable-gnu-indirect-function > --with-boot-ldflags=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--as-needed > --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --enable-cloog-backend=isl > --with-ppl-include=/opt/gnu/include --with-ppl-lib=/opt/gnu/lib64 > --with-cloog-include=/opt/gnu/include --with-cloog-lib=/opt/gnu/lib64 > --with-fpmath=sse Yes, the problem only occurs when you configure gcc without "--with-boot-ldflags=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--as-needed". I've tested this a little further: /var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/./prev-gcc/g++ -B/lib -B/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -nostdinc++ -B/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -pipe -flto -frandom-seed=1 -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc gcov.o intl.o version.o errors.o ../libiberty/libiberty.a -o gcov /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_argv@GLIBC_PRIVATE' /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_rtld_global_ro@GLIBC_PRIVATE' /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `__tls_get_addr@GLIBC_2.3' /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_rtld_global@GLIBC_PRIVATE' /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `__libc_enable_secure@GLIBC_PRIVATE' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Without -static-libstdc++ it compiles fine. Without -flto it also compiles fine. When I use xgcc instead of g++ there aren't any problems. When I use gold as linker there aren't any problems either. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] gcc & Firefox fail to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #30 from Octoploid 2011-03-16 08:06:47 UTC --- Thanks H.J.. Both issues are fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12898] gold throws "internal error in segment_precedes" when building kvm
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12898 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5796|text/x-asm |text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12898] New: gold throws "internal error in segment_precedes" when building kvm
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12898 Summary: gold throws "internal error in segment_precedes" when building kvm Product: binutils Version: 2.21 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: i...@airs.com ReportedBy: cryptooctopl...@gmail.com Created attachment 5796 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5796 failing linker script gold fails to link the new kernel kvm tool. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1155280 ld -T bios/rom.ld.S -o bios/bios.bin.elf bios/bios.o bios/e820.o bios/int10.o ld: error: allocated section not in any segment ld: error: allocated section not in any segment ld: internal error in segment_precedes, at /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.21.52.0.2/work/binutils-2.21.52.0.2/gold/layout.cc:2803 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12898] gold throws "internal error in segment_precedes" when building kvm
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12898 --- Comment #2 from Octoploid 2011-06-17 14:58:02 UTC --- Created attachment 5802 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5802 input files -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12898] gold throws "internal error in segment_precedes" when building kvm
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12898 --- Comment #5 from Octoploid 2011-06-29 06:44:52 UTC --- And thank you for the quick fix. KVM is linking fine now. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/13019] New: "error: load segment overlap" when linking Linux kernel
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13019 Summary: "error: load segment overlap" when linking Linux kernel Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: i...@airs.com ReportedBy: cryptooctopl...@gmail.com Created attachment 5857 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5857 output of "readelf -lSW ./vmlinux" When I try to build the latest kernel git tree with gold I get this error: ld -m elf_x86_64 --build-id -o vmlinux -T arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o arch/x86/kernel/head64.o arch/x86/kernel/head.o arch/x86/kernel/init_task.o init/built-in.o --start-group usr/built-in.o arch/x86/built-in.o kernel/built-in.o mm/built-in.o fs/built-in.o ipc/built-in.o security/built-in.o crypto/built-in.o block/built-in.o lib/lib.a arch/x86/lib/lib.a lib/built-in.o arch/x86/lib/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o sound/built-in.o firmware/built-in.o arch/x86/pci/built-in.o arch/x86/video/built-in.o net/built-in.o --end-group .tmp_kallsyms2.o ld: error: dot may not move backward ld: error: dot may not move backward ld: error: load segment overlap [0x180 -> 0x18940e0] and [0x1893000 -> 0x1893c10] ld.bfd links without any problems. The output of "readelf -lSW ./vmlinux" is attached. Program Headers: Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align LOAD 0x20 0x8100 0x0100 0x7d1000 0x7d1000 R E 0x20 LOAD 0xa0 0x8180 0x0180 0x0940e0 0x0940e0 RW 0x20 LOAD 0xc0 0xff60 0x01893000 0x001000 0x001000 R E 0x20 LOAD 0xe0 0x 0x01895000 0x012500 0x012500 RW 0x20 LOAD 0xea8000 0x818a8000 0x018a8000 0x085000 0x152000 RWE 0x20 NOTE 0x71bb34 0x8151bb34 0x0151bb34 0x24 0x24 0x4 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/13023] gold misinterprets dot assignments in sections
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13023 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cryptooctoploid at gmail ||dot com -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/13245] PREVAILING_DEF reported too often.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13245 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cryptooctoploid at gmail ||dot com --- Comment #2 from Octoploid 2011-10-02 08:19:49 UTC --- I cannot reproduce this issue: % gcc t2.C --shared -o t2.so -fPIC -L ./ -lt -flto --save-temps [Leaving LTRANS /tmp/ccVZyHEi.args] [Leaving LTRANS t2.so.ltrans.out] [Leaving LTRANS /tmp/ccqiTieX.args] [Leaving LTRANS t2.so.ltrans0.o] % < t2.res 1 t2.o 2 172 54331a27 PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY_EXP _Z5test2v 176 54331a27 RESOLVED_DYN _Z5test3v % nm t2.so 1618 d _DYNAMIC 1830 d _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ w _Jv_RegisterClasses 055c t _Z4testv.local.0.2237 054c T _Z5test2v U _Z5test3v 1860 d __JCR_END__ ... -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/13245] PREVAILING_DEF reported too often.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13245
--- Comment #5 from Octoploid 2011-10-02
13:01:38 UTC ---
What about the following naive patch?
diff --git a/gold/plugin.cc b/gold/plugin.cc
index b5880a1..d999254 100644
--- a/gold/plugin.cc
+++ b/gold/plugin.cc
@@ -889,10 +889,10 @@ Pluginobj::get_symbol_resolution_info(int nsyms,
res = LDPR_RESOLVED_EXEC;
else if (lsym->object()->pluginobj() == this)
{
- if (is_referenced_from_outside(lsym))
- res = LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF;
- else if (is_visible_from_outside(lsym))
+ if (is_visible_from_outside(lsym))
res = ldpr_prevailing_def_ironly_exp;
+ else if (is_referenced_from_outside(lsym))
+ res = LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF;
else
res = LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY;
}
@@ -910,10 +910,10 @@ Pluginobj::get_symbol_resolution_info(int nsyms,
res = LDPR_PREEMPTED_REG;
else if (lsym->object() == static_cast(this))
{
- if (is_referenced_from_outside(lsym))
- res = LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF;
- else if (is_visible_from_outside(lsym))
+ if (is_visible_from_outside(lsym))
res = ldpr_prevailing_def_ironly_exp;
+ else if (is_referenced_from_outside(lsym))
+ res = LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF;
else
res = LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY;
}
It fixes the issue:
% gcc t2.C --shared -o t2.so -fPIC -L ./ -lt -flto --save-temps
[Leaving LTRANS /tmp/ccHFvJ09.args]
[Leaving LTRANS t2.so.ltrans.out]
[Leaving LTRANS /tmp/ccwhzNf0.args]
[Leaving LTRANS t2.so.ltrans0.o]
% < t2.res
1
t2.o 3
164 e040fa02d1822684 PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY_EXP _Z4testv
172 e040fa02d1822684 PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY_EXP _Z5test2v
176 e040fa02d1822684 RESOLVED_DYN _Z5test3v
% nm -CD t2.so
w _Jv_RegisterClasses
w test()
056c T test2()
U test3()
1898 A __bss_start
w __cxa_finalize
w __gmon_start__
1898 A _edata
189c A _end
0584 T _fini
04a0 T _init
It also survived bootstrap-lto of gcc and an "-flto -fno-fat-lto-objects" build
of Firefox.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/13245] PREVAILING_DEF reported too often.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13245 --- Comment #7 from Octoploid 2011-10-02 18:41:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > > Cool! If you happen to have a lot of memory (15GB), you may try if it > > solves > the -fprofile-generate -flto problem. Yes, it does solve the problem here (I have 8GB of RAM and used a large swapfile on my SSD. It took ~10 minutes to output all ltrans.o files). > In meantime I suceeded building FDO+LTO firefox with -fprofile-generate > -fno-lto train run (that makes more sense > anyway, I am trying to debug the other just to be sure that there are no more > problems in this area) -fprofile-generate should set -fno-lto automatically IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/13245] PREVAILING_DEF reported too often.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13245 --- Comment #13 from Octoploid 2011-10-15 06:44:54 UTC --- Any update on this? The issue just got fixed on the bfd side: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elflink.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.423&r2=1.424 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
