[Bug binutils/782] objdump not working for target rs6000-aix
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2005-03-10 00:01 --- I built a copy of binutils like so: ~/source/src/configure --target=rs6000-aix && make all-binutils and ran objdump directly from the build directory like so: ./binutils/objdump -d foo.o It worked. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=782 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/2446] .ident documented behaviour different from reality
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |bje at sources dot redhat |redhat dot com |dot com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2446 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/2446] .ident documented behaviour different from reality
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-16 23:59 --- Patch posted: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-03/msg00226.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2446 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/2412] DOCUMENTATION BUG
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |bje at sources dot redhat |redhat dot com |dot com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2412 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1298] m68k-dis.c:1348: warning: argument 'info' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork'
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |bje at sources dot redhat |redhat dot com |dot com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1298 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/997] invalid error messages, and internal error abort
-- What|Removed |Added GCC host triplet|Freebsd i386|i386-pc-freebsd http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=997 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/998] generates non-optimal instruction...
-- What|Removed |Added GCC host triplet|Freebsd i386|i386-pc-freebsd http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=998 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/845] GAS .rept pseudo op-code
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-17 00:39 --- Hi Nick I cannot reproduce this bug either. It's almost been a year since you responded to the submitter and they have not responded. I propose that we close this bug report. Cheers, Ben -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=845 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/2446] .ident documented behaviour different from reality
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-17 00:45 --- Fixed with this patch: Checking in doc/as.texinfo; /cvs/src/src/gas/doc/as.texinfo,v <-- as.texinfo new revision: 1.141; previous revision: 1.140 done -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2446 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/1009] .pred.rel.mutex doesn't understand .rotp values
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |wilson at sources dot redhat |redhat dot com |dot com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/1008] Internal error on valid code
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-17 01:02 --- Reproduced using CVS HEAD. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/642] objcopy testsuite CC/CFLAGS make enviroment
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |bje at sources dot redhat |redhat dot com |dot com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=642 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/800] Slow linking on network disks (no output buffering?)
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=800 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1027] unable to utilise ar function when linking dynamically
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-17 01:11 --- There is nothing here to suggest a problem with binutils, but more likely, a non-functional build system for the package that the user is trying to build. No further feedback for almost 9 months. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1027 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/2335] gprof reads executable 10x slower on opteron/x86_64
-- What|Removed |Added GCC host triplet|opteron linux x86_64|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2335 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/2345] The rule 17 in IA64 dependency table isn't handled correctly
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |wilson at sources dot redhat |redhat dot com |dot com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2345 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/747] Profiling of nested functions
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-17 01:50 --- Changing to an enhancement request. -- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=747 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/2412] DOCUMENTATION BUG
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-17 02:29 --- These aren't pseudo-ops as such. These are part of the assembly language syntax which is not normally documented in the GAS manual for each target. This documentation can be obtained elsewhere. However, you may submit a patch. :-) Cheers, Ben -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2412 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2322] Improve linker ELF program header error message
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-17 02:34 --- HJ's patch (http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00146.html) was committed: 2006-02-16 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR ld/2322 * elf.c (get_segment_type): New function. (_bfd_elf_print_private_bfd_data): Use it. (print_segment_map): New function. (assign_file_positions_for_segments): Call print_segment_map when there are not enough room for program headers. Closing the PR. -- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2322 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/1387] .equiv may not detect already defined symbol
-- What|Removed |Added GCC host triplet|*-*-* | GCC target triplet|*-*-* | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1387 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/845] GAS .rept pseudo op-code
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-21 00:04 --- Unable to reproduce; no submitter feedback in over 6 months. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=845 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/641] file format not recognized; treating as linker script
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-28 00:57 --- The problem here is that you are using the -M option to GCC. I don't know what this option's meaning is for Microsoft's compiler, but for GCC, it means: `-M' Instead of outputting the result of preprocessing, output a rule suitable for `make' describing the dependencies of the main source file. The preprocessor outputs one `make' rule containing the object file name for that source file, a colon, and the names of all the included files, including those coming from `-include' or `-imacros' command line options. Closing. -- What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=641 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/760] ar (version 050223 20050223) segfaults at line 4422
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-28 00:59 --- Eric, did you resolve this bug? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=760 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2267] Segfault linking mips-elf binaries
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-28 02:27 --- Can you please supply some object files that help to trigger the crash? Just attach them to this bug report. Thanks. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2267 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1202] mcore disassembler: wrong address loopt
-- What|Removed |Added CC||bje at sources dot redhat ||dot com GCC host triplet|i586-suse-linux | GCC target triplet|mcore-be-elf|mcore-elf http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1202 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/960] recent change makes bootstrap / 'make install' fail
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-28 03:05 --- This PR looks like it can be closed now. Correct? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=960 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1030] objcopy doesn't work properly on "partially linked" input
-- What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet|GNU objcopy 2.16.1 | GCC host triplet|SunOS 5.9 Solaris *** AND |sparc-sun-solaris2.9 |*** OSF1 V5.1 2650 alpha | Summary|objcopy doen't work properly|objcopy doesn't work |on "partially linked" input |properly on "partially ||linked" input http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1030 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1860] binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
-- What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet|hppa64-linuxinux|hppa64-linux http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/1491] FAIL: macros dot
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-28 03:58 --- This test is passing on my system -- is it still failing on HP-UX, Dave? -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1491 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/868] bfd leaks memory in several places
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=868 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/2032] GDB don't recognize debug information of crt0.s
-- What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet|GNU AS 2.16.1 | GCC host triplet|Windows2000 | Version|unspecified |2.16 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2032 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/2032] GDB don't recognize debug information of crt0.s
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-28 04:29 --- How are you compiling your assembly and main.c files into the executable? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2032 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/760] ar (version 050223 20050223) segfaults at line 4422
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-28 04:51 --- Reporter never responded after more than a year. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=760 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/754] --image-base / --enable-auto-image-base silently disregarded if .def used
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-28 04:54 --- No response from the reporter after more than a year. Anyway, Danny seems confident that the bug is fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=754 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/755] objdump creating mis-aligned listing using latest CVS MAIN/HEAD
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-28
05:53 ---
objdump is behaving correctly.
It sounds like you want the --file-start-context option:
`--file-start-context'
Specify that when displaying interlisted source code/disassembly
(assumes `-S') from a file that has not yet been displayed, extend
the context to the start of the file.
When this option is omitted (as you were doing), the default is to show five
previous lines from a file that has not been displayed before. When I use the
option, I see:
-- snip --
Disassembly of section .text:
:
typedef struct {
int a;
int b;
int c;
int d;
int f;
int g;
} s;
int main (void){
0: c0 e0 ldi r28, 0x00 ; 0
2: d0 e0 ldi r29, 0x00 ; 0
4: de bf out 0x3e, r29 ; 62
6: cd bf out 0x3d, r28 ; 61
[.. etc ..]
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution||WORKSFORME
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=755
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/805] linking error: cannot handle R_MEM_INDIRECT reloc when using symbolsrec output
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-28 05:56 --- No response from the reporter in over a year. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=805 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1259] windres does crash while converting res to coff
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-29 02:19 --- I don't think this patch is correct. The allocated d->data is not overrun by the code in res_to_bin_accelerator: put_16 (big_endian, a->flags | (a->next != NULL ? 0 : ACC_LAST), d->data); put_16 (big_endian, a->key, d->data + 2); put_16 (big_endian, a->id, d->data + 4); put_16 (big_endian, 0, d->data + 6); Are you sure this is where your observed crash is occuring? Can you please post a backtrace? -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1259 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1298] m68k-dis.c:1348: warning: argument 'info' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork'
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-29 05:25 --- The warning does not indicate a bug, as the indirect return to the setjmp site leads to an early return -- the `info' parameter is never used. if (setjmp (priv.bailout) != 0) /* Error return. */ return -1; The question now is how to eliminate the warning. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1298 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/2015] Segfault in setlocale() call makes programs unusable
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-29 05:27 --- There appear to be various AIX patchsets that relate to setlocale. Have you tried applying those? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2015 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/753] ld 2.13.90 from mingw 3.3.1 cores on malformatted .def file
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-29 05:44 --- By modifying a simple DEF file based on the example in the ld info pages, I get: ./ld-new: foo.def:1: syntax error I think this has already been fixed. Moreover, there has been no response from the bug reporter in over a year. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=753 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/945] [PATCH] dlltool import library compatibility with BCPP
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Priority|P2 |P3 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=945 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/2015] Segfault in setlocale() call makes programs unusable
-- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2015 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/1299] itbl-lex.c, no previous prototype errors on flex-generated file
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-29 05:55 --- Fixed by: 2005-11-01 Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR gas/1299 * Makefile.am: Disable -Werror for the itbl-lex.o rule. * Makefile.in: Regenerate. If there are continued problems with the code generated by flex, we should work to get those corrected in flex itself. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1299 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/831] Get assert in ld
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-29 06:03 --- No response from the reporter after almost a year. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=831 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/945] [PATCH] dlltool import library compatibility with BCPP
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-29 06:10 --- Thanks for your patch -- and to think of archiving your discussion in the bug tracking system! I think it is worth proposing that it be incorporated into the mainline tree, however for a patch of this size that adds a new feature, it will be necessary to complete FSF paperwork. You should send the patch to binutils@ and see where it goes from there. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=945 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2267] Segfault linking mips-elf binaries
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-29 11:26 --- The two attachments seem to be identical? Is one of them supposed to be app2.o? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2267 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2267] Segfault linking mips-elf binaries
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-30 00:22 --- Fixed with the following patch (which has been committed to mainline CVS): 2006-03-30 Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR ld/2267 * elflink.c (elf_fixup_link_order): Ensure `elfsec' is not a special section number that exceeds the number of ELF sections (eg. SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON). -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2267 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/983] gas/ld .info doc's built in src/doc, not bld/doc directory if specifed.
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-30 00:42 --- gas and ld use Automake-generated Makefiles. These build the Info documentation within the source tree so that the Info documentation is present when a distribution is prepared. GNU conventions are that users are shipped the Info documentation without an expectation that they will have Texinfo installed to build it themselves. If you feel strongly that this is wrong, Automake is the place to fix it. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=983 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/2338] objdump -d -l doesn't work correctly
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-30 03:06 --- Fixed with this patch (and verified): 2006-03-05 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alan Modra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR binutils/2338 * dwarf2.c (loadable_section): New struct. (dwarf2_debug): Add loadable_section_count and loadable_sections. (new_line_sorts_after): New. (add_line_info): Use new_line_sorts_after to compare line addresses. (check_function_name): Removed. (unset_sections): New. (place_sections): New. (_bfd_dwarf2_find_nearest_line): Updated. Call place_sections and unset_sections on relocatable files. (_bfd_dwarf2_find_line): Likewise. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2338 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2218] Weak undefined symbol doesn't work properly with PIE
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-30 03:20 --- 2006-02-24 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR ld/2218 * elf-bfd.h (elf_backend_data): Add elf_backend_fixup_symbol. (_bfd_elf_link_hash_fixup_symbol): New. * elflink.c (_bfd_elf_link_hash_fixup_symbol): New. (_bfd_elf_fix_symbol_flags): Call elf_backend_fixup_symbol if it isn't NULL. * elfxx-ia64.c (elf_backend_fixup_symbol): Defined. * elfxx-target.h (elf_backend_fixup_symbol): New. (elfNN_bed): Initialize elf_backend_fixup_symbol. 2006-02-21 Alan Modra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR ld/2218 * elf32-arm.c (allocate_dynrelocs): Ensure undef weak sym in pie is dynamic. * elf32-hppa.c (allocate_dynrelocs): Likewise. * elf32-i386.c (allocate_dynrelocs): Likewise. * elf32-s390.c (allocate_dynrelocs): Likewise. * elf32-sh.c (allocate_dynrelocs): Likewise. * elf64-s390.c (allocate_dynrelocs): Likewise. * elf64-x86-64.c (allocate_dynrelocs): Likewise. * elf32-m32r.c (allocate_dynrelocs): Likewise. Discard relocs on undef weak with non-default visibility too. * elfxx-sparc.c (allocate_dynrelocs): Ditto. 2006-02-17 Alan Modra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR ld/2218 * elf64-ppc.c (allocate_dynrelocs): Ensure undef weak sym is dynamic. (ppc64_elf_relocate_section): Check output reloc section size. * elf32-ppc.c (allocate_dynrelocs): Simplify undef weak test. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2218 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/841] mips64-elf-readelf was crashed by EABI64 binary.
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-30 05:33 --- No test case supplied in almost a year. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=841 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/2097] 2.16.91.0.5 internal error wants to be reported ...
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-30 05:34 --- Herbert, can you please supply a test case that helps to demonstrate the problem? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2097 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1860] binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-31 02:05 --- I have examined the problem more extensively. The problem exists up to Texinfo version 4.3 (and point releases of 4.3). Texinfo 4.4 adds the necessary support for @include @value and is now the minimum required version. Texinfo 4.2 was released on 1 April 2002. Texinfo 4.3 was released on 14 November 2002. Texinfo 4.4 was released in 31 January 2003. I think that raising the minimum requirement on Texinfo to version 4.4 is quite safe. I will submit a patch. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1860] binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-31 02:18 --- A patch is posted at: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-03/msg00364.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1860] binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
-- What|Removed |Added GCC host triplet|hppa-linux | GCC target triplet|hppa64-linux| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1860] binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-31 02:33 --- Fixed: 2006-03-31 Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR binutils/1860 * configure.in: Require makeinfo 4.4 or higher. * configure: Regenerate. Checking in configure.in; /cvs/src/src/configure.in,v <-- configure.in new revision: 1.302; previous revision: 1.301 done Checking in configure; /cvs/src/src/configure,v <-- configure new revision: 1.215; previous revision: 1.214 done -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED GCC build triplet|hppa-linux | Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/642] objcopy testsuite CC/CFLAGS make enviroment
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-31 03:43 --- The right way to specify tool specific variables is to put them in the RUNTESTFLAGS variable (relevant section of the runtest man page is shown below). ``Makefile style variables are used to specify tool names and their flags; these and other configuration dependent values are saved in the file site.exp, created during configuration.'' Alternatively, you can add lines like these to your site.exp: set CC_FOR_TARGET mygcc set CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET -W Note that the variables you are thinking of are not called CC and CFLAGS in the test framework. They're called CC_FOR_TARGET and CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET. Sorry for taking so long to respond! -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=642 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/594] ld refuses to put data into PT_NOTE segment
-- What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet|i | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=594 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1298] m68k-dis.c:1348: warning: argument 'info' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork'
-- What|Removed |Added GCC host triplet|ia64-linux-gnu | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1298 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1298] m68k-dis.c:1348: warning: argument 'info' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork'
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1298 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1219] binutils fail to recognize executables and shared libraries generated by Sun Studio 10 CC
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-31 05:06 --- Can you attach two example executables to this bug report (one that binutils recognises and one that does it does not)? Thanks. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1219 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/452] ar can't handle object name conflict
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |bje at sources dot redhat |redhat dot com |dot com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=452 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1298] m68k-dis.c:1348: warning: argument 'info' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork'
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-04-03 23:56 --- Thanks for the excellent analysis, Jim. I think I will just rework the code to avoid this warning. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1298 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/596] non-dynamic global symbols in .dynstr and .hash sections
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com |redhat dot com | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=596 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/660] Segmentation fault with big shared libraries
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com |redhat dot com | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=660 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/702] mipsel a.out always more than 64 kbyte
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com |redhat dot com | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=702 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/846] MIPS/ELF doesn't set DT_MIPS_UNREFEXTNO correctly
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com |redhat dot com | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=846 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/993] fail to link if address of libc function taken in n64
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com |redhat dot com | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=993 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/1018] MIPS ld creates unnecessary DT_NEEDED entry on libgcc_s.so
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com |redhat dot com | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1018 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1129] MIPS objdump wrong decode of Config1 ops
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com |redhat dot com | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1129 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/2097] 2.16.91.0.5 internal error wants to be reported ...
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com |redhat dot com | Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2097 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1185] [mips16] wrong opcode definition in src/opcodes/mips16-opc.c
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com |redhat dot com | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1185 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/658] i386 assembler and disassembler can't handle SIB with INDEX==4
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net |redhat dot com |dot au http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=658 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/850] linker issued assertion failure elf64-ppc.c:7771
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net |redhat dot com |dot au Status|WAITING |NEW http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=850 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/2484] ar to merge in another library (.a file)
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net |redhat dot com |dot au http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2484 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2112] Binutils LD fails at line 6419 of elflink.c
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net |redhat dot com |dot au http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2112 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1198] Segfault when executing objdump on a special file...
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |bje at sources dot redhat |redhat dot com |dot com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1198 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/2335] gprof reads executable 10x slower on opteron/x86_64
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |bje at sources dot redhat |redhat dot com |dot com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2335 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/149] configure incorrectly assumes presence of gettext implies presence of msgfmt
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |bje at sources dot redhat |redhat dot com |dot com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2503] Problem allocated section
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal Priority|P1 |P2 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2503 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/2454] incorrect syntax in avr disassembly
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-04-04 01:54 --- This patch suggests that you are trying to make the disassembler's output suitable for input back into the assembler, correct? This is not normally something that the disassembler strives for. What are you trying to do? -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2454 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/997] invalid error messages, and internal error abort
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net |redhat dot com |dot au http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=997 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/998] generates non-optimal instruction...
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net |redhat dot com |dot au http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=998 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2378] Incorrect opcode in __do_clear_bss if bss has more than 15 bytes
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-04-04 01:57 --- Updating priority. -- What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2378 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/2335] gprof reads executable 10x slower on opteron/x86_64
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-04-04 06:02 --- Can you attach some example binaries, please? It does not make sense that x86-64 binaries produced by a modern version of GCC would produce stabs debugging info. I suspect your debugging session has given you that impression, but that it would not be the case. Thanks. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2335 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/2512] movsd in intel syntax mode
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net |redhat dot com |dot au http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2512 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gprof/2335] gprof reads executable 10x slower on opteron/x86_64
-- What|Removed |Added Component|binutils|gprof http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2335 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/149] configure incorrectly assumes presence of gettext implies presence of msgfmt
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-04-06 00:51 --- It is true that binutils releases do not require maintainer tools like msgfmt. It is only a requirement when building using snapshots from CVS. I don't think it's unreasonable to require developers to properly install the suite of gettext utilities. On my Debian GNU/Linux system, msgfmt is packaged in the "gettext" package and gettext is packaged in "gettext-base". I have them both installed. I don't think you should have to install readline Cygwin packages to get these utilities -- who would guess that? I notice, however, that the Cygwin package list (at http://cygwin.com/packages) mentions "gettext" and "gettext-devel" packages. You might like to investigate installing these instead. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/427] dllwrap docs missing
-- What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 Version|unspecified |2.17 (HEAD) http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=427 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/427] dllwrap docs missing
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-04-06 01:08 --- It's not worth the effort to write a man page as dllwrap is deprecated. You should not use it for any new code. Use ld --shared instead. If you'd like to contribute a small placeholder man page that repeats what I've said, patches are welcome. :-) -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=427 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gprof/2335] gprof reads executable 10x slower on opteron/x86_64
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-04-07 00:36 --- You should not be seeing a .stabs section in an x86 Linux binary, either. Can you please attach some example binaries to this bug report? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2335 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/594] ld refuses to put data into PT_NOTE segment
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-04-27 06:19 --- Fixed by: 2006-04-21 Alan Modra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * elf.c (assign_file_positions_except_relocs): Move code setting file position of non-loaded sections.. (assign_file_positions_for_segments): ..to here. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=594 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gprof/2335] gprof reads executable 10x slower on opteron/x86_64
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2007-03-12 03:25 --- It may be the same -- Dirk, were you running with --line, by chance? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2335 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/6767] New: program linked with gold seg faults
The gengenrtl program seg faults on startup when trying to build GCC on a powerpc64-linux system with gold as the linker: $ build/gengenrtl Segmentation fault Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x1000faf4 in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 0x1000faf4 in ?? () #1 0x100016f8 in __libc_csu_init () #2 0x0fe64698 in generic_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 #3 0x0fe648c0 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 #4 0x in ?? () -- Summary: program linked with gold seg faults Product: binutils Version: 2.19 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: ian at airs dot com ReportedBy: bje at sources dot redhat dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: powerpc64-linux http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6767 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/7041] New: ld -pie on a final executable fails to report undefined symbols
The powerpc64-linux linker does not report undefined symbols when there are some present. Tiny test case: .text bl .foo % as -a64 foo.s -o foo.o % ld -pie foo.o -o foo.x (No linker error is produced.) -- Summary: ld -pie on a final executable fails to report undefined symbols Product: binutils Version: 2.20 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: ld AssignedTo: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au ReportedBy: bje at sources dot redhat dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,paulus at samba dot org GCC host triplet: powerpc64-linux http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7041 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
