[Bug binutils/32324] New: Stripping BOLT'ed binaries leads to unwanted behaviour
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32324 Bug ID: 32324 Summary: Stripping BOLT'ed binaries leads to unwanted behaviour Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Hi, Similar to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56738 when we use Binutil's strip to strip a binary optimized with BOLT it leads to diagnostic messages like: $ aarch64-none-linux-gnu-strip bolted_binary.out aarch64-none-linux-gnu-strip: stRViEky: section `.eh_frame' can't be allocated in segment 2 LOAD: .text .text.cold .eh_frame .eh_frame_hdr aarch64-none-linux-gnu-strip: stRViEky: section `.eh_frame_hdr' can't be allocated in segment 2 LOAD: .text .text.cold .eh_frame .eh_frame_hdr Upon inspection, just like was pointed out in the llvm ticket linked above it seems the PHDR and LOAD header have been given the same offset but different alignments. The resulting binary also segfaults when run. I am not familiar enough with ELF specs to know whether BOLT is at wrong here, or this should be allowed. I haven't checked how LLVM fixed this, but the llvm-strip I used recently did not show this behaviour, so I'm guessing they have at least worked around it. Any suggestions? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/32324] Stripping BOLT'ed binaries leads to unwanted behaviour
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32324 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-none-linux-gnu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/32324] Stripping BOLT'ed binaries leads to unwanted behaviour
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32324 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv ||m-project/issues/56738 CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25207] ld: support --image-base= for elf (and -Ttext-segment -z separate-code strangeness)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25207 --- Comment #3 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=afc1f137e18363138d5fa4c88a9a2816926a3d5c commit afc1f137e18363138d5fa4c88a9a2816926a3d5c Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Oct 31 05:04:15 2024 +0800 ld-elf/pr25207.d: Pass --no-rosegment to ld Pass --no-rosegment to ld to support linker configured with --enable-rosegment, PR ld/25207 * ld-elf/pr25207.d: Pass --no-rosegment to ld. Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/32256] Observed local symbols while `-mno-relax' on riscv
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32256 --- Comment #5 from Akhilesh Kumar --- Also I observed R_RISCV_RVC_JUMP and RISCV_BRANCH RISC-V-specific relocations are completely removed but R_RISCV_PCREL and R_RISCV_CALL_PLT are present in some modules -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
