[Bug ld/27566] [RISC-V] relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against aymbol
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27566 --- Comment #13 from Nelson Chu --- There are at least two reviewed patches should resolve this, https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2023-May/127413.html https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-May/134442.html Looks no one really care about this, so still no any comments for the two patches -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/32300] --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300 --- Comment #1 from Marc CHEVRIER --- This regression seems related to commit 057a2b4c4b5, 2024-06-26, binutils-2_43~266. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/31904] libdep.so plugin registers search path after default paths in bfd linker
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31904 Bug 31904 depends on bug 32300, which changed state. Bug 32300 Summary: --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300 What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27566] [RISC-V] relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against aymbol
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27566 --- Comment #14 from Nelson Chu --- > Yes. the relaxation like “.set ARCHOR0, . + 4598” being relaxed at 2nd pass > or 3rd pass would be fine I don't understand why the 2nd pass or 3rd pass should be fine? Even 2nd or 3rd passes still have chance to make the symbol value not shrinked with the section as expected since the it is over the section boundary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/32300] New: --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300 Bug ID: 32300 Summary: --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected Product: binutils Version: 2.43 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: marc.chevrier at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 15761 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15761&action=edit Minimal project to reproduce the --dependency-file problem ld 2.43, --dependency-file option does not provide all dependencies. Project objects and libraries are especially missing. This is a regression compared to version 2.42. Attached is a small project reproducing the problem. Included are the files link.2.42.d and link2.43.d produced, respectively, by ld versions 2.42.and 2.43. In this project, the link step for the target main requires files main.o and libfoo.so. In 2.43, these files are missing for the dependencies file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27566] [RISC-V] relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against aymbol
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27566 --- Comment #12 from lifang_xia at linux dot alibaba.com --- > 2024年10月25日 14:43，i at maskray dot me 写道： > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27566 > > Fangrui Song changed: > > What|Removed |Added > > CC||i at maskray dot me > > --- Comment #11 from Fangrui Song --- > (In reply to lifang_xia from comment #9) >> Hi we get this error a again. >> - >> .text >> >> hello: >>.rept 6000 >>lla a0, ARCHOR0 >>.endr >> >> >> .section .rodata >>.set ARCHOR0, . + 4598 >>.fill 100, 4, 0x12345678 >> >> .data >> .align 3 >> world: >>.rept 860 >>.long 0x1000 >>.endr >> - >> build command: >> >> binutils/build/gas/as-new -o 1.o 1.s -march=rv32gc -mabi=ilp32d >> binutils/build/ld/ld-new -o 1 1.o -e hello -m elf32lriscv >> >> we can get the error message: >> >> 1.o: in function `hello': >> (.text+0x0): relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against `ARCHOR0' >> - >> It looks like the max alignment should include page size if the symbol is >> not defined in the same section of GP. >> >> Any idea about this? > > This error still reproduces with GNU ld 2.43. lld can handle it correctly. > > This is might be BFD riscv's linker relaxation with `.set ARCHOR0, . + 4598` Yes. the relaxation like “.set ARCHOR0, . + 4598” being relaxed at 2nd pass or 3rd pass would be fine. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/32300] --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300 --- Comment #3 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6ecc44f6980c0f8c0f0934bc10412c1d7fa3c544 commit 6ecc44f6980c0f8c0f0934bc10412c1d7fa3c544 Author: Alan Modra Date: Sat Oct 26 08:57:49 2024 +1030 PR32300, --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected PR 32300 PR 31904 Revert patch accidentally committed with 057a2b4c4b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/31904] libdep.so plugin registers search path after default paths in bfd linker
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31904 --- Comment #11 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6ecc44f6980c0f8c0f0934bc10412c1d7fa3c544 commit 6ecc44f6980c0f8c0f0934bc10412c1d7fa3c544 Author: Alan Modra Date: Sat Oct 26 08:57:49 2024 +1030 PR32300, --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected PR 32300 PR 31904 Revert patch accidentally committed with 057a2b4c4b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/32300] --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||31904 CC||nickc at sourceware dot org --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- commit 057a2b4c4b5 says it is a reversion, but in addition it fixes a typo in binutils.texi and also commits Nick's proposed patch in pr31904. Referenced Bugs: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31904 [Bug 31904] libdep.so plugin registers search path after default paths in bfd linker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/31904] libdep.so plugin registers search path after default paths in bfd linker
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31904 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||32300 Referenced Bugs: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300 [Bug 32300] --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/32300] --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/31904] libdep.so plugin registers search path after default paths in bfd linker
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31904 --- Comment #12 from Alan Modra --- I'm guessing the proposed patch was committed accidentally. Please see pr32300. Reverting the accidental patch also ficed x86_64-w64-mingw32 FAIL: libdep test: did not get expected output from the linker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
