[Bug gold/32198] unsupported target loongarch64-unknown-elf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32198 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- This has been corrected by commit f09a9dd319e in the gcc repository, needs to be merged to binutils-gdb. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/32191] --rosegment places .note.gnu.property in executable PT_LOAD segment for -z separate-code
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32191 Bug 32191 depends on bug 32190, which changed state. Bug 32190 Summary: [2.44 Regression] pr22393 test failures https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32190 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/32190] [2.44 Regression] pr22393 test failures
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32190 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Thanks H.J. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/32201] New: [display html] Do not suppress zero valued metrics
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32201 Bug ID: 32201 Summary: [display html] Do not suppress zero valued metrics Product: binutils Version: 2.43.1 Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- The current code does not print any metrics that are zero. This is potentially confusing, since they are stored in the experiment. The user may wonder why they are missing. Secondly, a zero value is information too. This is why the code should be changed to no longer suppress the zero value metric(s). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/32201] [display html] Do not suppress zero valued metrics
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32201 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com |om | Severity|minor |enhancement Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/32200] gprofng is not compatible with the Phytium (CPU) platform.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32200 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |sunyanhong2101 at phytium dot com. |om |cn Last reconfirmed||2024-09-24 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- The fix looks good to me. For your Phytium machine, could you attach the output of: perf list --details and cat /proc/cpuinfo Thank you, -Vladimir -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/32200] gprofng is not compatible with the Phytium (CPU) platform.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32200 --- Comment #2 from Sun Yanhong --- Created attachment 15715 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15715&action=edit The output of the command 'perf list --details' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/32200] gprofng is not compatible with the Phytium (CPU) platform.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32200 --- Comment #3 from Sun Yanhong --- Created attachment 15716 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15716&action=edit The output of the command 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/32200] gprofng is not compatible with the Phytium (CPU) platform.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32200 Sun Yanhong changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #15712|0 |1 is patch|| Attachment #15712|application/mbox|text/plain mime type|| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32022 --- Comment #16 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9e0840deed38b0a52a895c0abd3d5b0adacbc8a5 commit 9e0840deed38b0a52a895c0abd3d5b0adacbc8a5 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Sep 24 05:02:22 2024 +0800 x86: Enable TLS relocation check only for ELF Since TLS relocation check is ELF specific, enable it only for ELF. PR gas/32022 * config/tc-i386.c (x86_tls_error_type): Define only if OBJ_MAYBE_ELF or OBJ_ELF is defined. (x86_check_tls_relocation): Likewise. (x86_report_tls_error): Likewise. (i386_assemble): Check TLS relocations only if OBJ_MAYBE_ELF or OBJ_ELF is defined. (md_show_usage): Output -mtls-check= only if OBJ_MAYBE_ELF or OBJ_ELF is defined. Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/32204] New: x86_64-pc-mingw64 CFI test failures when compression is enabled
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32204
Bug ID: 32204
Summary: x86_64-pc-mingw64 CFI test failures when compression
is enabled
Product: binutils
Version: 2.44 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
When --enable-compressed-debug-sections=gas is enabled for x86_64-pc-mingw64, I
got
extra regexps in
/export/gnu/import/git/gitlab/x86-binutils/gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/reloc-pe-i386.d
starting with "^RELOCATION RECORDS FOR \[.debug_frame\]:$"
EOF from tmpdir/dump.out
FAIL: reloc-pe-i386
and
Executing on host: sh -c {./ld-new
-L/export/gnu/import/git/gitlab/x86-binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-pe --file-align 1
--section-align 1 -o tmpdir/dump tmpdir/cfia.o tmpdir/cfib.o 2>&1} /dev/null
dump.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]^M
./ld-new: tmpdir/cfia.o: warning: COMDAT symbol '.debug_frame$abc' does not
match section name '.zdebug_frame$abc'
./ld-new: tmpdir/cfib.o: warning: COMDAT symbol '.debug_frame$abc' does not
match section name '.zdebug_frame$abc'
succeeded with: <./ld-new: tmpdir/cfia.o: warning: COMDAT symbol
'.debug_frame$abc' does not match section name '.zdebug_frame$abc'
./ld-new: tmpdir/cfib.o: warning: COMDAT symbol '.debug_frame$abc' does not
match section name '.zdebug_frame$abc'>, no expected output
FAIL: ld-pe/cfi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/32096] UBSAN issues in gprofng
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32096 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- Updated status as resolved/fixed. Let me know if you find other UBSAN issues in gprofng. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/32092] gprofng testsuite fails with -flto (ERROR: comparison of results in synprog failed)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32092 Bug 32092 depends on bug 32096, which changed state. Bug 32096 Summary: UBSAN issues in gprofng https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32096 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/32200] gprofng is not compatible with the Phytium (CPU) platform.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32200 --- Comment #4 from Sun Yanhong --- (In reply to Vladimir Mezentsev from comment #1) > The fix looks good to me. > > > For your Phytium machine, could you attach the output of: > perf list --details > and > cat /proc/cpuinfo > > Thank you, > -Vladimir The results of the commands 'perf list --details' and 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' have been uploaded as attachments -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
