[Bug binutils/31283] windmc (s390x) fails with: parser: syntax error
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31283 Richard Jones changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjones at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 from Richard Jones --- Created attachment 15329 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15329&action=edit 0001-binutils-windmc-Parse-input-correctly-on-big-endian-.patch Potential fix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/31283] windmc (s390x) fails with: parser: syntax error
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31283 --- Comment #3 from Dan Horak --- LGTM(In reply to Richard Jones from comment #2) > Created attachment 15329 [details] > 0001-binutils-windmc-Parse-input-correctly-on-big-endian-.patch > > Potential fix LGTM, thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/31283] windmc (s390x) fails with: parser: syntax error
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31283 --- Comment #4 from Richard Jones --- v2: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-January/132096.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/31289] New: --fatal-warnings doesn't work for command-line options
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31289 Bug ID: 31289 Summary: --fatal-warnings doesn't work for command-line options Product: binutils Version: 2.43 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- For example: $ ld.bfd -z bad-option --fatal-warnings -e 0/dev/null ld.bfd: warning: -z bad-option ignored $ echo $? 0 ie the warning about the ignored option is not being treated as an error. This happens because the --fatal-warnings option only takes affect after it has been processed, and we process the options in a linear order. So the following works: $ ld.bfd --fatal-warnings -z bad-option -e 0 /dev/null ld.bfd: warning: -z bad-option ignored $ echo $? 1 This behaviour differs from gold and lld, both of which honour --fatal-warnings no matter where it occurs on the command line. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/31289] --fatal-warnings doesn't work for command-line options
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31289 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Also it looks strange: $ ld.bfd --fatal-warnings -z bad-option -e 0 /dev/null ld.bfd: warning: -z bad-option ignored $ echo $? 1 Why do we say "warning: -z bad-option ignored" when it is an error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/31289] --fatal-warnings doesn't work for command-line options
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31289 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
