[Bug gprofng/31116] New: gprofng test fails with "comparison of results in synprog failed" on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31116 Bug ID: 31116 Summary: gprofng test fails with "comparison of results in synprog failed" on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: binutils Version: 2.42 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: doko at debian dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 15239 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15239&action=edit test log this fails with trunk 20231206, attaching the test log. There seems to be something wrong with the shell script. In the /gprofng I see an unexpected file: ls builddir-single/gprofng/ '&1'config.logdoc gprofng.sumMakefile stamp-h1 config.cache config.status gp-display-html libcollector site.exp tmpdir config.h development.exp gprofng.log libtoolsrc $ cat builddir-single/gprofng/?? Error: Warning! Source file `tmpdir/setpath_map/src/t.c' is newer than the experiment data === gprofng tests === Schedule of variations: unix Running target unix Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for target. Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target. Using /home/packages/binutils/binutils-2.41.50.20231206/gprofng/testsuite/config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file. ### LD_LIBRARY_PATH: /home/packages/binutils/binutils-2.41.50.20231206/builddir-single/gprofng/tmpdir/root/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gprofng:/home/packages/binutils/binutils-2.41.50.20231206/builddir-single/gprofng/tmpdir/root/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gprofng/.. ### GPROFNG_SYSCONFDIR: /home/packages/binutils/binutils-2.41.50.20231206/builddir-single/gprofng/tmpdir/root/etc ### GPROFNG: /home/packages/binutils/binutils-2.41.50.20231206/builddir-single/gprofng/tmpdir/root/usr/bin/gprofng Running /home/packages/binutils/binutils-2.41.50.20231206/gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/display.exp ... ERROR: comparison of results in synprog failed Running /home/packages/binutils/binutils-2.41.50.20231206/gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/gp-archive.exp ... Running /home/packages/binutils/binutils-2.41.50.20231206/gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/gp-collect-app_F.exp ... Running /home/packages/binutils/binutils-2.41.50.20231206/gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/setpath_map.exp ... === gprofng Summary === # of expected passes4 # of unresolved testcases 1 # of unsupported tests 1 make[5]: *** [Makefile:924: check-small] Error 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/31115] [ARM] The minimalistic DWARF DIE for function has wrong address in Thumb mode
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31115 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||nickc at redhat dot com Last reconfirmed||2023-12-06 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/31115] [ARM] The minimalistic DWARF DIE for function has wrong address in Thumb mode
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31115 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 15240 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15240&action=edit Proposed patch Hi Thiago, Please could you try out this patch and let me know if it works for you ? Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/31115] [ARM] The minimalistic DWARF DIE for function has wrong address in Thumb mode
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31115 --- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > Created attachment 15240 [details] > Proposed patch > > Hi Thiago, > > Please could you try out this patch and let me know if it works for you ? > > Cheers > Nick Hello Nick, Thank you for the quick response! I tested the patch, but unfortunately the DIE still has the LSB bit set in DW_AT_low_pc, and GDB still fails: <1><1fe>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_subprogram) <1ff> DW_AT_name: (strp) (offset: 0x47a): main <203> DW_AT_external: (flag_present) 1 <203> DW_AT_type: (ref_udata) <0x209> <204> DW_AT_low_pc : (addr) 0x10517 <208> DW_AT_high_pc : (udata) 12 (gdb) x /i main+8 0x1051f :b.n 0x10c62 (gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/pr25124.exp: disassemble thumb instruction (1st try) Without the patch, DW_AT_low_pc had value 0x10519: $ diff -U 4 main-86b775c51597/readelf-w.out patch-6eab43ba8bd7/readelf-w.out --- main-86b775c51597/readelf-w.out 2023-12-04 14:48:06.217429953 -0300 +++ patch-6eab43ba8bd7/readelf-w.out2023-12-06 14:37:58.742262164 -0300 @@ -316,9 +316,9 @@ <1><1fe>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_subprogram) <1ff> DW_AT_name: (strp) (offset: 0x47a): main <203> DW_AT_external: (flag_present) 1 <203> DW_AT_type: (ref_udata) <0x209> -<204> DW_AT_low_pc : (addr) 0x10519 +<204> DW_AT_low_pc : (addr) 0x10517 <208> DW_AT_high_pc : (udata) 12 <1><209>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_unspecified_type) <1><20a>: Abbrev Number: 0 Compilation Unit @ offset 0x20b: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/31109] gprofng not built and installed in a combined binutils+gcc build
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31109 --- Comment #7 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- I configured my gcc trank build: /configure --prefix=`pwd`/INSTALL --enable-gprofng I see the binutils-gdb targets in Makefile. For example: % grep gprof Makefile maybe-configure-gprof \ maybe-configure-gprofng \ all-host: maybe-all-gprof all-host: maybe-all-gprofng info-host: maybe-info-gprof info-host: maybe-info-gprofng But after `make -j 40`, there are no gprofng, gprof, libctf, etc in build. How should I configure my build to reproduce errors ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Issue 63660 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_objdump: Direct-leak in xmalloc
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 63660 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objdump: Direct-leak in xmalloc https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=63660#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 63742 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_objdump_safe: Segv on unknown address in bfd_getl32
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 63742 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objdump_safe: Segv on unknown address in bfd_getl32 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=63742#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
[Bug gprofng/31116] gprofng test fails with "comparison of results in synprog failed" on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31116 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/31120] New: ld-scripts/fill2 fails when bfd_vma is 32 bits
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31120 Bug ID: 31120 Summary: ld-scripts/fill2 fails when bfd_vma is 32 bits Product: binutils Version: 2.42 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- regexp_diff match failure regexp "^ 0x0020 00010203 04050607 04050607 04050607 $" line " 0x0020 00010203 04050607 " FAIL: ld-scripts/fill2 The reason for the failure is that FILL ($0001020304050607) in fil2.t has the value read by strtoul (via scan_bfd_vma in ldlex.l), and strtoul returns -1 on overflow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
