[Bug gas/29844] [2.40 Regression] arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c:31: Error: register type mismatch for `lar'

2022-12-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29844

--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org  ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=859aa2c86dc9721424d96584879385a18ccf76ed

commit 859aa2c86dc9721424d96584879385a18ccf76ed
Author: H.J. Lu 
Date:   Fri Dec 2 18:43:20 2022 -0800

x86: Allow 16-bit register source for LAR and LSL

Since LAR and LSL only access 16 bits of the source operand, regardless
of operand size, allow 16-bit register source for LAR and LSL, and always
disassemble LAR and LSL with 16-bit source operand.

gas/

PR gas/29844
* testsuite/gas/i386/i386.s: Add tests for LAR and LSL.
* testsuite/gas/i386/x86_64.s: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/i386/intelbad.s: Remove "lar/lsl eax, ax".
* testsuite/gas/i386/i386-intel.d: Updated.
* testsuite/gas/i386/i386.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/i386/intel-intel.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/i386/intel.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/i386/intelbad.l: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/i386/x86_64-intel.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/gas/i386/x86_64.d: Likewise.

opcodes/

PR gas/29844
* i386-dis.c (MOD_0F02): Removed.
(MOD_0F03): Likewise.
(dis386_twobyte): Restore larS and lslS.
(mod_table): Remove MOD_0F02 and MOD_0F03.
* i386-opc.tbl: Allow 16-bit register source for LAR and LSL.
* i386-tbl.h: Regenerated.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug gas/29844] [2.40 Regression] arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c:31: Error: register type mismatch for `lar'

2022-12-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29844

H.J. Lu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
   Target Milestone|--- |2.40
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu  ---
Fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug binutils/29846] New: NULL pointer segmentation fault when accessing field `the_bfd` in function `compare_symbols`

2022-12-03 Thread r3tr0spect2019 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29846

Bug ID: 29846
   Summary: NULL pointer segmentation fault when accessing field
`the_bfd` in function `compare_symbols`
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.40 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: minor
  Priority: P2
 Component: binutils
  Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
  Reporter: r3tr0spect2019 at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 14478
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14478&action=edit
PoC

# Reproduce

cd binutils-gdb
git reset --hard aaa8dbc1b31233f66131476e03ab8635805e515d
mkdir build && cd build
../configure --disable-gdb --disable-gdbserver --disable-gdbsupport
--disable-libdecnumber --disable-readline --disable-sim --disable-libbacktrace
--disable-gas --disable-ld --disable-werror --enable-targets=all
CPPFLAGS=-DDEBUG CFLAGS="-g -O0 -fsanitize=address"
make all-binutils MAKEINFO=true && true
binutils/objdump -d the_bfd_null.elf

# Output

../the_bfd_null.elf: file format elf32-sparc

binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf: invalid string offset 626704 >= 3037 for
section `.dynstr'
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf: invalid string offset 557220 >= 3037 for
section `.dynstr'
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf: invalid string offset 896064 >= 3037 for
section `.dynstr'
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf: invalid string offset 1232935 >= 3037
for section `.dynstr'
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf: invalid string offset 536969381 >= 3037
for section `.dynstr'
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf: invalid string offset 536990215 >= 3037
for section `.dynstr'
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf: invalid string offset 536903819 >= 3037
for section `.dynstr'
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf: invalid string offset 2684360832 >= 3037
for section `.dynstr'
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf: invalid string offset 447495 >= 3037 for
section `.dynstr'
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf: invalid string offset 536990727 >= 3037
for section `.dynstr'
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf: invalid string offset 2686440967 >= 3037
for section `.dynstr'
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf: invalid string offset 1073709872 >= 3037
for section `.dynstr'
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf: invalid string offset 2684396036 >= 3037
for section `.dynstr'
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf: invalid string offset 536903844 >= 3037
for section `.dynstr'
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 50 has invalid
symbol index 2304
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 51 has invalid
symbol index 1041
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 52 has invalid
symbol index 7044096
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 53 has invalid
symbol index 495360
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 55 has invalid
symbol index 1041
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 56 has invalid
symbol index 16342016
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 57 has invalid
symbol index 507904
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 59 has invalid
symbol index 1041
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 60 has invalid
symbol index 16596992
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 61 has invalid
symbol index 518656
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 62 has invalid
symbol index 2304
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 64 has invalid
symbol index 6054912
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 65 has invalid
symbol index 526336
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 66 has invalid
symbol index 2304
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 68 has invalid
symbol index 16527360
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 69 has invalid
symbol index 534784
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 70 has invalid
symbol index 2304
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 71 has invalid
symbol index 32786
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 72 has invalid
symbol index 3463168
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 73 has invalid
symbol index 545536
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 74 has invalid
symbol index 2304
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 75 has invalid
symbol index 20498
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 76 has invalid
symbol index 1664
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 77 has invalid
symbol index 557312
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 78 has invalid
symbol index 2304
binutils/objdump: ../the_bfd_null.elf(.rela.plt): relocation 80 has inva

[Bug binutils/29846] NULL pointer segmentation fault when accessing field `the_bfd` in function `compare_symbols`

2022-12-03 Thread r3tr0spect2019 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29846

2019  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target||objdump
  Build||aaa8dbc1b31233f66131476e03a
   ||b8635805e515d

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.