[Bug gprofng/29579] ld: .libs/libgp_collector_la-mmaptrace.o (symbol from plugin): in function `dlclose': on i586
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29579 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liska --- > If there will be no regression I send diffs for review tomorrow. Thanks for the update. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Re: ARMV7a: selected processor does not support requested special purpose register
On 04/10/2022 05:26, Umesh Kalappa wrote: Thank you Richard for the information and do you please point us to the reference ,which states the same ? Quick grep doesn't helped us ,Thank you again ~Umesh On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 9:24 PM Richard Earnshaw wrote: On 03/10/2022 16:48, Richard Earnshaw via Binutils wrote: On 03/10/2022 15:41, Umesh Kalappa via Binutils wrote: Hi All, We have problem to compile the following asm https://godbolt.org/z/hejMPoW69 and asm error out with the subject message . Is mrs for float special register not valid on cortex-a9 ? Thank you ~Umesh that's because the instruction you want is vmrs r4, fpscr R. Also note that the fmrrs mnemonic is not part of the UAL (unified assembly language) specification - it was deprecated a long time ago. The correct names these days all start with a V - the disassembler output shows the modern form. The legacy name for vmrs was fmrx. R. You won't find (well are extremely unlikely to find) any documentation for the legacy mnemonics online - the reference I have is from the ARMv5 ARM ARM from nearly 20 years ago, which was in paper form. The current UAL syntax is documented in the Arm ARM, which you can download from developer.arm.com - follow the links to the architecture. There's also a fairly good list of the mapping between the legacy mnemonics and UAL for VFP here: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0406/b/Application-Level-Architecture/Instruction-Details/Alphabetical-list-of-instructions/F---former-VFP-instruction-mnemonics- R.
Re: ARMV7a: selected processor does not support requested special purpose register
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022, Richard Earnshaw via Binutils wrote: > You won't find (well are extremely unlikely to find) any documentation for the > legacy mnemonics online - the reference I have is from the ARMv5 ARM ARM from > nearly 20 years ago, which was in paper form. It seems DDI0100I (v6 ARM) is still online: https://documentation-service.arm.com/static/5f8dacc8f86e16515cdb865a -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
[Bug gprofng/29593] error: '__u64' undeclared (first use in this function) for aarch64-linux-musl host
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29593 Kurt Goebel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kurt.goebel at oracle dot com Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Issue 48777 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_disas_ext-bfd_arch_csky: Direct-leak in xmalloc
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded Comment #3 on issue 48777 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_disas_ext-bfd_arch_csky: Direct-leak in xmalloc https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=48777#c3 This bug has exceeded our disclosure deadline. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
[Bug binutils/29647] [Infinite Loop]: objdump(version 2.39.50.20221003, commit e1fc9bcf)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29647 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed||2022-10-05 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- Missing from the instructions to reproduce is that you need a file on disk /data/clang.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29579] ld: .libs/libgp_collector_la-mmaptrace.o (symbol from plugin): in function `dlclose': on i586
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29579 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Mezentsev : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9c48ba47b36c3b243727af49bfebb867d7930de3 commit 9c48ba47b36c3b243727af49bfebb867d7930de3 Author: Vladimir Mezentsev Date: Tue Oct 4 09:13:56 2022 -0700 gprofng: fix build with --enable-pgo-build=lto gprofng/ChangeLog 2022-10-04 Vladimir Mezentsev PR gprofng/29579 * libcollector/dispatcher.c: Fix the symbol version in SYMVER_ATTRIBUTE. * libcollector/iotrace.c: Likewise. * libcollector/linetrace.c: Likewise. * libcollector/mmaptrace.c: Likewise. * libcollector/synctrace.c: Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29647] [Infinite Loop]: objdump(version 2.39.50.20221003, commit e1fc9bcf)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29647 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=306253b2cfa297c1eb0d30852bdcf96375db24e2 commit 306253b2cfa297c1eb0d30852bdcf96375db24e2 Author: Alan Modra Date: Wed Oct 5 11:25:26 2022 +1030 PR29647, objdump -S looping Fuzzed input with this in .debug_line [0x003b] Special opcode 115: advance Address by 8 to 0x401180 and Line by -2 to -1 PR 29647 * objdump.c (print_line): Don't decrement line number here.. (dump_lines): ..do so here instead, ensuring loop terminates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29647] [Infinite Loop]: objdump(version 2.39.50.20221003, commit e1fc9bcf)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29647 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.40 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- Fixed for 2.40 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
