[Bug gas/29487] New: all/gas.exp test failure (new in 2.39): FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29487
Bug ID: 29487
Summary: all/gas.exp test failure (new in 2.39): FAIL: .equ
redefinitions (3)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.39
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: dilfridge at gentoo dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Gentoo Linux, installed: gcc 11.3, binutils 2.38; building binutils 2.39
Running
/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.39/work/binutils-2.39/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp
...
FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)
[...]
=== gas Summary ===
# of expected passes1603
# of unexpected failures1
# of unsupported tests 1
/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.39/work/build/gas/as-new 2.39.0
>From the log:
PASS: .equ redefinitions (2)
../as-new -o tmpdir/redef3.o
/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.39/work/binutils-2.39/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef3.s
Executing on host: sh -c {../as-new -o tmpdir/redef3.o
/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.39/work/binutils-2.39/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef3.s
2>&1} /dev/null dump.t
mp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.39/work/build/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump
-rsj .data tmpdir/redef3.o > tmpdir/dump.out
Executing on host: sh -c
{/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.39/work/build/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump
-rsj .data tmpdir/redef3.o > tmpdir/dump.out 2>dump.tmp}
/dev/null (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
exited abnormally with 1,
output:/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.39/work/build/binutils/.libs/objdump:
error while loading shared libraries:
/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.39/work/build/opcodes/.libs/libopcodes-2.39.0.gentoo-sys-devel-binutils-st.so:
file too short
FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)
huettel@noumea /tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.39/work/build/gas/testsuite $
ls -la
/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.39/work/build/opcodes/.libs/libopcodes-2.39.0.gentoo-sys-devel-binutils-st.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 huettel huettel 1242864 15. Aug 00:45
/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.39/work/build/opcodes/.libs/libopcodes-2.39.0.gentoo-sys-devel-binutils-st.so
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29487] all/gas.exp test failure (new in 2.39): FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29487 Andreas K. Huettel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toolchain at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Issue 49081 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_objdump: Undefined-shift in som_set_reloc_info
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 49081 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objdump: Undefined-shift in som_set_reloc_info https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=49081#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 49134 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_strings: Null-dereference in spu_elf_object_p
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 49134 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_strings: Null-dereference in spu_elf_object_p https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=49134#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 50018 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_objdump: Null-dereference READ in som_set_reloc_info
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 50018 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objdump: Null-dereference READ in som_set_reloc_info https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=50018#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
[Bug gas/29487] all/gas.exp test failure (new in 2.39): FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29487 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29487] all/gas.exp test failure (new in 2.39): FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29487 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- > opcodes/.libs/libopcodes-2.39.0.gentoo-sys-devel-binutils-st.so: file too > short That's an error from ld.so. I think that says you have a problem in your file system, or you are somehow re-building libopcodes at the same time as using it. objdump is run for other tests before this one, so why didn't it fail loading libopcodes.so on other tests? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29489] New: dlltool is not deterministic
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29489 Bug ID: 29489 Summary: dlltool is not deterministic Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: mh-sourceware at glandium dot org Target Milestone: --- Both ar and objcopy default to build deterministic archives, but dlltool doesn't. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29491] New: program strip-new bug report
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29491 Bug ID: 29491 Summary: program strip-new bug report Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sophrosx at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 14276 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14276&action=edit the testcases triggered dead loop problem Hello, I detected the dead loop problem through fuzz testing, which I think be a vulnerability. The configuration of binutils is: $ ./configure --disable-shared && make -j and compiled with gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 I use the program strip-new in ~/binutils-gdb-binutils-2_39/binutils/strip-new with parameter "-o tmp ./dead_loop_input", and after waiting 6 hours, the program neither giving any outputs nor terminating. The testcase that trigger such results are in the attachment. Thanks & Best Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29362] Some memory leaks occur when binutils code is tested using the binutils fuzz test suite.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29362 --- Comment #1 from Cunlong Li --- Created attachment 14277 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14277&action=edit Fix some memory leaks in objcopy.c I try to fix memory leak about symbol_htabs in objcopy. Please check it out -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29491] program strip-new bug report
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29491 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- Fixed with commit ef186fe54aa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29362] Some memory leaks occur when binutils code is tested using the binutils fuzz test suite.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29362 --- Comment #2 from Cunlong Li --- Created attachment 14278 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14278&action=edit Fix memory leak in objcopy.c Fix memory leak in objcopy.c Please check it out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29362] Some memory leaks occur when binutils code is tested using the binutils fuzz test suite.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29362 --- Comment #3 from Cunlong Li --- Created attachment 14279 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14279&action=edit Fix some memory leaks in dwarf.c and objdump.c I try to fix memory leak about free_debug_. Please check it out -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
