[Bug ld/29310] [2.39 Regression] copy relocation against non-copyable protected symbol `__cxa_ pure_virtual' on aarch64-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #9 from Matthias Klose --- and I cannot reproduce that anymore with updated binutils and gcc builds. closing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29362] Some memory leaks occur when binutils code is tested using the binutils fuzz test suite.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29362 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|minor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29363] Some memory leaks occur when binutils code is tested using the binutils fuzz test suite.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29363 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|minor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29370] dwarf.c: infinite loop in display_debug_abbrev
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29370 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed||2022-07-20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29389] New: Failed assertions in bfd/cofflink.c and bfd/coff-x86_64.c during the linking stage (MSYS2 MinGW64)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389
Bug ID: 29389
Summary: Failed assertions in bfd/cofflink.c and
bfd/coff-x86_64.c during the linking stage (MSYS2
MinGW64)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.39
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: luca.bacci at outlook dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi! First of all, thanks for developing such great tools!
We've encountered an issue while building a few projects on an up-to-date MSYS2
MinGW64 envirnoment. What happens is that during the final link stage of
executables, ld.exe hits two failed assertions and exits:
ld.exe: warning:
subprojects/glib/gobject/libgobject-2.0.dll.a(libgobject_2_0_0_dll_d000431.o):
local symbol `0' has no section
ld.exe: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.38.90.20220720 assertion fail
../../binutils-gdb/bfd/cofflink.c:2279
ld.exe: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.38.90.20220720 assertion fail
../../binutils-gdb/bfd/coff-x86_64.c:696
ld.exe:
subprojects/glib/gobject/libgobject-2.0.dll.a(libgobject_2_0_0_dll_d000431.o):
bad reloc address 0x126 in section `.text'
That happens both with the current stable binutils release (version 2.38) and a
custom build from binutils-2_39-branch.
Reproduction steps:
* Install the needed packages with the command: pacman -S --needed git
mingw-w64-x86_64-{cc,meson,libadwaita,gtksourceview5,pkgconf,gobject-introspection}
* Open the MSYS2 MinGW64 Shell (or alternatively the MSYS2 CLang64 Shell)
* Type the following command:
git clone https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-text-editor
cd gnome-text-editor
meson setup builddir -Dforce_fallback_for=libadwaita && meson compile -C
builddir/
Issue originally reported at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/5053
I remain at your disposal for any needed information or testing.
Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29390] New: On aarch64 binaries readelf --debug-dump=frames reports DW_CFA_AARCH64_negate_ra_state as DW_CFA_GNU_window_save
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29390
Bug ID: 29390
Summary: On aarch64 binaries readelf --debug-dump=frames
reports DW_CFA_AARCH64_negate_ra_state as
DW_CFA_GNU_window_save
Product: binutils
Version: 2.37
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: wcohen at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
When reviewing the output of readelf --debug-dump=frames I noticed that the
output for aarch64 contained DW_CFA_GNU_window_save rather than the expected
DW_CFA_AARCH64_negate_ra_state. Both of the call frame instructions are coded
as 0x2d. However, the DW_CFA_GNU_window_save is for sparc binaries and the
DW_CFA_AARCH64_negate_ra_state is for aarch64 binaries.
It is pretty easy to demonstrate the issue on a fedora 36 aarch64 system with
the steps below. They shows many DW_CFA_GNU_window_save entries rather than
DW_CFA_AARCH64_negate_ra.
sudo dnf install systemtap
readelf --debug-dump=frames /usr/bin/stap |grep -v "^0" | awk -F: '{print
$1}'|grep DW_CFA |sort | uniq -c
26096 DW_CFA_advance_loc
783 DW_CFA_advance_loc1
193 DW_CFA_advance_loc2
5 DW_CFA_def_cfa
5908 DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset
2 DW_CFA_def_cfa_register
5901 DW_CFA_GNU_window_save
5014 DW_CFA_nop
27676 DW_CFA_offset
35 DW_CFA_offset_extended
3110 DW_CFA_remember_state
26685 DW_CFA_restore
32 DW_CFA_restore_extended
3110 DW_CFA_restore_state
1 DW_CFA_undefined
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Issue 47073 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_nm: Timeout in fuzz_nm
Updates: Labels: Deadline-Approaching Comment #2 on issue 47073 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_nm: Timeout in fuzz_nm https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=47073#c2 This bug is approaching its deadline for being fixed, and will be automatically derestricted within 7 days. If a fix is planned within 2 weeks after the deadline has passed, a grace extension can be granted. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
[Bug binutils/29370] dwarf.c: infinite loop in display_debug_abbrev
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29370 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=695c6dfe7e85006b98c8b746f3fd5f913c94ebff commit 695c6dfe7e85006b98c8b746f3fd5f913c94ebff Author: Alan Modra Date: Thu Jul 21 09:56:15 2022 +0930 PR29370, infinite loop in display_debug_abbrev The PR29370 testcase is a fuzzed object file with multiple .trace_abbrev sections. Multiple .trace_abbrev or .debug_abbrev sections are not a violation of the DWARF standard. The DWARF5 standard even gives an example of multiple .debug_abbrev sections contained in groups. Caching and lookup of processed abbrevs thus needs to be done by section and offset rather than base and offset. (Why base anyway?) Or, since section contents are kept, by a pointer into the contents. PR 29370 * dwarf.c (struct abbrev_list): Replace abbrev_base and abbrev_offset with raw field. (find_abbrev_list_by_abbrev_offset): Delete. (find_abbrev_list_by_raw_abbrev): New function. (process_abbrev_set): Set list->raw and list->next. (find_and_process_abbrev_set): Replace abbrev list lookup with new function. Don't set list abbrev_base, abbrev_offset or next. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29370] dwarf.c: infinite loop in display_debug_abbrev
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29370 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |2.40 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Fixed for 2.40 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29337] [readelf] CU/TU mixup in .gdb_index
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29337 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29337] [readelf] CU/TU mixup in .gdb_index
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29337 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e82295b23d0e52b0dadffb8c0d0b99462cd20fa8 commit e82295b23d0e52b0dadffb8c0d0b99462cd20fa8 Author: Alan Modra Date: Thu Jul 21 14:54:54 2022 +0930 PR29337, readelf CU/TU mixup in .gdb_index Commit 244e19c79111 changed a number of variables in display_gdb_index to count entries rather than words. PR 29337 * dwarf.c (display_gdb_index): Correct use of cu_list_elements. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29337] [readelf] CU/TU mixup in .gdb_index
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29337 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_39-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=aabc43be527ff501a2fbed7c3641af544c22e47b commit aabc43be527ff501a2fbed7c3641af544c22e47b Author: Alan Modra Date: Thu Jul 21 14:54:54 2022 +0930 PR29337, readelf CU/TU mixup in .gdb_index Commit 244e19c79111 changed a number of variables in display_gdb_index to count entries rather than words. PR 29337 * dwarf.c (display_gdb_index): Correct use of cu_list_elements. (cherry picked from commit e82295b23d0e52b0dadffb8c0d0b99462cd20fa8) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29337] [readelf] CU/TU mixup in .gdb_index
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29337 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.39 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- Fixed for 2.39 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
