Issue 46809 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xrealloc
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 46809 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xrealloc https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=46809#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 47562 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Unexpected-exit in xexit
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 47562 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Unexpected-exit in xexit https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=47562#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 47852 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Null-dereference in section_symbol
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 47852 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Null-dereference in section_symbol https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=47852#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 48094 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Undefined-shift in resolve_expression
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 48094 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Undefined-shift in resolve_expression https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=48094#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 48218 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Out-of-memory in fuzz_as
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 48218 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Out-of-memory in fuzz_as https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=48218#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 48410 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xmalloc
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 48410 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xmalloc https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=48410#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 48515 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Use-of-uninitialized-value in operand
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 48515 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Use-of-uninitialized-value in operand https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=48515#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
[Bug gprofng/29350] New: Incorrect function name assigned
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29350
Bug ID: 29350
Summary: Incorrect function name assigned
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The gp-display-text tool assigns an incorrect name to a function. This is a
snippet from the source listing as produced with the source command from
gp-display-text:
184. MEM_STATIC unsigned MEM_64bits(void) { return sizeof(size_t)==8; }
185.
186. MEM_STATIC unsigned MEM_isLittleEndian(void)
187. {
188. const union { U32 u; BYTE c[4]; } one = { 1 }; /* don't use static
: performance detrimental */
189. return one.c[0];
190. }
Note that function MEM_isLittleEndian is labeled as MEM_64bits.
In the output of the fsummary command, I see this. Note that I removed the path
names:
MEM_64bits
Exclusive Total CPU Time: 1.551 ( 2.1%)
Inclusive Total CPU Time: 1.551 ( 2.1%)
Size: 6
PC Address: 12:0x00028b00
Source File:
Object File:
Load Object:
Mangled Name:
Aliases: MEM_isLittleEndian
I'm not sure if this is indeed an alias for the same function though.
This code cannot be shared easily, but I can prepare a test case. Let me know
if there is interest in this.
I observed this problem with various gcc releases by the way. I'm using an OCI
instance with a Haswell processor, running Oracle Linux 8:
Linux 5.4.17-2102.202.5.el8uek.x86_64 #2 SMP Sat May 22
16:16:03 PDT 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29350] Incorrect function name assigned
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29350 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29351] New: [display html] Move dynamic loading of modules to a later stage
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29351 Bug ID: 29351 Summary: [display html] Move dynamic loading of modules to a later stage Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Currently, gp-display-html tries to dynamically load certain modules that are needed as early as possible. This approach potentially creates a build time issue, because the --help and --version options that are used by help2man to generate the man page, fail as well. The solution is to move the module loading part past the point where these two options are parsed and processed. In that way, the man page will be generated regardless of any missing modules. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29351] [display html] Move dynamic loading of modules to a later stage
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29351 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29352] New: [gp-display-html] Fix the message Hexadecimal number > 0xffffffff non-portable
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29352
Bug ID: 29352
Summary: [gp-display-html] Fix the message Hexadecimal number >
0x non-portable
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following Perl warning message is displayed several times:
Hexadecimal number > 0x non-portable
While this does not seem to affect the correctness of the results, these
messages need to be addressed and fixed.
It is worth noting that so far, these have only been observed on a Sun
Microsystems X5-2 server using the Intel E5-2600 v3 ("River Forest/Haswell")
processor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29352] display html] Fix the message Hexadecimal number > 0xffffffff non-portable
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29352 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[gp-display-html] Fix the |display html] Fix the |message Hexadecimal number |message Hexadecimal number |> 0x non-portable |> 0x non-portable Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29353] New: [display html] Fix a lay-out issue in the html disassembly files
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29353 Bug ID: 29353 Summary: [display html] Fix a lay-out issue in the html disassembly files Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- The generated html has a lay-out issue. In some html lines, the instruction is not aligned with the other instructions in the same file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29353] [display html] Fix a lay-out issue in the html disassembly files
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29353 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29352] [display html] Fix the message Hexadecimal number > 0xffffffff non-portable
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29352 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|display html] Fix the |[display html] Fix the |message Hexadecimal number |message Hexadecimal number |> 0x non-portable |> 0x non-portable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
