[Bug ld/29310] [2.39 Regression] copy relocation against non-copyable protected symbol `__cxa_ pure_virtual' on aarch64-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310 --- Comment #8 from Szabolcs Nagy --- still cannot reproduce it, the gcc i used for the build was gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/work/bgcc/install/libexec/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/12/lto-wrapper Target: aarch64-linux-gnu Configured with: /work/bgcc/src/gcc-12/configure -v --enable-languages=c,ada,c++ --prefix=/work/bgcc/install --with-gcc-major-version-only --program-prefix= --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --disable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-libquadmath --disable-libquadmath-support --enable-plugin --with-system-zlib --with-target-system-zlib=auto --enable-multiarch --enable-fix-cortex-a53-843419 --disable-werror --enable-checking=yes,extra,rtl --build=aarch64-linux-gnu --host=aarch64-linux-gnu --target=aarch64-linux-gnu --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.1.1 20220705 (GCC) and i built a trunk gcc with trunk binutils. gnat1 has only weak refs to __cxa_pure_virtual (the gnat1 link command is the same as the failed cmd in the build log). i dont have more ideas how to move forward with this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29320] [gas] gas/app.c: -Werror, 'struct obstack' declared inside parameter list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29320 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- I found out why I wasn't seeing the error. My /usr/include/stdio.h has a "struct obstack;" declararion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29320] [gas] gas/app.c: -Werror, 'struct obstack' declared inside parameter list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29320 --- Comment #5 from Pekka Seppänen --- Oh, I see. Of course, so it seems that glibc indeed has that. I usually just look at (and use) vanilla POSIX interfaces so I didn't realize this at all. Nice catch! I confirm that binutils now builds fine again. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29116] gprofng fails to build on i686-linux-gnu, aarch64-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29116 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #14 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- Update status as resolved/fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
