[Bug ld/29235] Some glibc tests crash in DT_RELR relocation on powerpc64le
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29235 --- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton --- FYI binutils-2.38-15.fc37 should contain the fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Issue 45897 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Timeout in fuzz_as
Updates: Labels: Deadline-Approaching Comment #2 on issue 45897 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Timeout in fuzz_as https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=45897#c2 This bug is approaching its deadline for being fixed, and will be automatically derestricted within 7 days. If a fix is planned within 2 weeks after the deadline has passed, a grace extension can be granted. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
[Bug ld/3243] Mips R_MIPS_16 relocation incorrectly handled
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3243 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d712f2768ac5e71027657d85b921fc0e85d94bcd commit d712f2768ac5e71027657d85b921fc0e85d94bcd Author: Alan Modra Date: Sun Jun 12 16:29:05 2022 +0930 BFD_RELOC_MIPS_16 MIPS should not be using BFD_RELOC_16 for its R_MIPS_16 relocation, since R_MIPS_16 specifies a 16-bit field in a 32-bit word. BFD_RELOC_16, emitted by generic code to handle fixups on 16-bit data directives, expects fixups to operate on the whole of a 16-bit word. This patch corrects the problem by using BFD_RELOC_MIPS_16, a new bfd reloc that is used to generate R_MIPS_16. BFD_RELOC_16 is handled in md_apply_fix for cases where the fixup can be applied at assembly time. Like BFD_RELOC_8, BFD_RELOC_16 now has no corresponding object file relocation, and thus .half, .hword, .short and .dc.w must be resolved at assembly time. BFD_RELOC_MIPS_REL16 is removed by this patch since it isn't used. PR 3243 PR 26542 * reloc.c (BFD_RELOC_MIPS_16): Rename from BFD_RELOC_MIPS_REL16. * elf32-mips.c (mips_reloc_map): Map BFD_RELOC_MIPS_16 to R_MIPS_16. * elf64-mips.c (mips_reloc_map): Likewise, delete BFD_RELOC_MIPS_REL16. * elfn32-mips.c (mips_reloc_map): Likewise. * libbfd.h: Regenerate. * bfd-in2.h: Regenerate. gas/ * config/tc-mips.c (append_insn): Handle BFD_RELOC_MIPS_16. (macro_build): Likewise. (mips_percent_op <%half>): Generate BFD_RELOC_MIPS_16. (md_apply_fix): Handle BFD_RELOC_16 and BFD_RELOC_MIPS_16 when fx_done. ld/ * testsuite/ld-mips-elf/reloc-local-overflow.d, * testsuite/ld-mips-elf/reloc-local-overflow.s: Rewrite. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/26542] R_MIPS_16 operates on a 32-bit field
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26542 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d712f2768ac5e71027657d85b921fc0e85d94bcd commit d712f2768ac5e71027657d85b921fc0e85d94bcd Author: Alan Modra Date: Sun Jun 12 16:29:05 2022 +0930 BFD_RELOC_MIPS_16 MIPS should not be using BFD_RELOC_16 for its R_MIPS_16 relocation, since R_MIPS_16 specifies a 16-bit field in a 32-bit word. BFD_RELOC_16, emitted by generic code to handle fixups on 16-bit data directives, expects fixups to operate on the whole of a 16-bit word. This patch corrects the problem by using BFD_RELOC_MIPS_16, a new bfd reloc that is used to generate R_MIPS_16. BFD_RELOC_16 is handled in md_apply_fix for cases where the fixup can be applied at assembly time. Like BFD_RELOC_8, BFD_RELOC_16 now has no corresponding object file relocation, and thus .half, .hword, .short and .dc.w must be resolved at assembly time. BFD_RELOC_MIPS_REL16 is removed by this patch since it isn't used. PR 3243 PR 26542 * reloc.c (BFD_RELOC_MIPS_16): Rename from BFD_RELOC_MIPS_REL16. * elf32-mips.c (mips_reloc_map): Map BFD_RELOC_MIPS_16 to R_MIPS_16. * elf64-mips.c (mips_reloc_map): Likewise, delete BFD_RELOC_MIPS_REL16. * elfn32-mips.c (mips_reloc_map): Likewise. * libbfd.h: Regenerate. * bfd-in2.h: Regenerate. gas/ * config/tc-mips.c (append_insn): Handle BFD_RELOC_MIPS_16. (macro_build): Likewise. (mips_percent_op <%half>): Generate BFD_RELOC_MIPS_16. (md_apply_fix): Handle BFD_RELOC_16 and BFD_RELOC_MIPS_16 when fx_done. ld/ * testsuite/ld-mips-elf/reloc-local-overflow.d, * testsuite/ld-mips-elf/reloc-local-overflow.s: Rewrite. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/3243] Mips R_MIPS_16 relocation incorrectly handled
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3243 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Fixed, you now can't use R_MIPS_16 on data. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/26542] R_MIPS_16 operates on a 32-bit field
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26542 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29230] nm-new segv in lookup_symbol_in_variable_table:dwarf2.c:3303
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29230 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-06-14 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29230] nm-new segv in lookup_symbol_in_variable_table:dwarf2.c:3303
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29230 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 29231 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29231] objdump crashes on show_line:objdump.c:1958
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29231 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- Same underlying cause *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 29230 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
