[Bug gas/29052] LoongArch：binutils2.28 are not compatible with the upcoming gcc release 12
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29052 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to liuzhensong from comment #0) > Gas used to use parameter -mabi=lp64 (version 2.28), but after Just to confirm - you are talking about the 2.38 binutils release, not the 2.28 release, correct ? > commit(2dbf4f28b85d07e9913105e0a93abbec8a376daa) it uses parameter That number did not reference a real object in the git repository, but I was able to track down a correct value: 3b14682a432e > So can binutils2.28 patched this commit? Done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29052] LoongArch：binutils2.28 are not compatible with the upcoming gcc release 12
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29052 --- Comment #2 from liuzhensong --- Sorry, the version number is wrong, it is binutils 2.38 release -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29052] LoongArch：binutils2.28 are not compatible with the upcoming gcc release 12
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29052 --- Comment #3 from liuzhensong --- (In reply to liuzhensong from comment #2) > Sorry, the version number is wrong, it is binutils 2.38 release I will report this bug exactly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29059] New: LoongArch：binutils 2.38 are not compatible with the upcoming gcc release 12
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29059 Bug ID: 29059 Summary: LoongArch：binutils 2.38 are not compatible with the upcoming gcc release 12 Product: binutils Version: 2.38 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: liuzhensong at loongson dot cn Target Milestone: --- LoongArch：binutils 2.38 are not compatible with the upcoming gcc release 12 Gas used to use parameter -mabi=lp64 (version 2.38), but after commit(2dbf4f28b85d07e9913105e0a93abbec8a376daa) it uses parameter -mabi=lp64d. In gcc12, the parameter -mabi=lp64d will be passed to gas. So can binutils 2.38 patched this commit? > commit 2dbf4f28b85d07e9913105e0a93abbec8a376daa > Author: liuzhensong > Date: Mon Feb 21 14:28:29 2022 +0800 > >LoongArch: Update ABI eflag in elf header. > > Update LoongArch ABI eflag in elf header. >ilp32s 0x5 >ilp32f 0x6 >ilp32d 0x7 >lp64s 0x1 >lp64f 0x2 >lp64d 0x3 > > bfd/ >* elfnn-loongarch.c Check object flags while ld. > > gas/ >* tc-loongarch.c Write eflag to elf header. > > include/elf >* loongarch.h Define ABI number. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29059] LoongArch：binutils 2.38 are not compatible with the upcoming gcc release 12
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29059 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 29052 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29052] LoongArch：binutils2.28 are not compatible with the upcoming gcc release 12
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29052 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 29059 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29059] LoongArch：binutils 2.38 are not compatible with the upcoming gcc release 12
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29059 liuzhensong changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from liuzhensong --- This bug fixed. commit 2dbf4f28b85d07e9913105e0a93abbec8a376daa had been merged to binutils-2_38-branch. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29042] opcodes libtool regression
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 Maciej W. Rozycki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||macro at orcam dot me.uk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Issue 45198 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xrealloc
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 45198 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xrealloc https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=45198#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 43761 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xrealloc
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Comment #4 on issue 43761 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xrealloc https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=43761#c4 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
[Bug binutils/29042] opcodes libtool regression
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 --- Comment #2 from Toolybird --- Created attachment 14062 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14062&action=edit log of failing libtool/linker command invocation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29042] opcodes libtool regression
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 --- Comment #3 from Toolybird --- Created attachment 14063 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14063&action=edit log with --verbose -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/28968] gprofng doesn't build with -Werror=format-security
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28968 Toolybird changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toolybird at tuta dot io -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29058] Quadratic(?) slowdown of m68k-as on m68k_frob_symbol()
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29058
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Adding a bit of debugging to get the idea what symbol types and values are most
frequent at being checked for alignment:
--- a/gas/config/tc-m68k.c
+++ b/gas/config/tc-m68k.c
@@ -4735,6 +4735,8 @@ m68k_frob_symbol (symbolS *sym)
{
struct label_line *l;
+ fprintf(stderr, "m68k_frob_symbol('%s') value = %#lx\n", S_GET_NAME
(sym), S_GET_VALUE (sym));
+
for (l = labels; l != NULL; l = l->next)
{
if (l->label == sym)
$ ./as-new a.S
m68k_frob_symbol('%d0') value = 0x1
m68k_frob_symbol('%D0') value = 0x1
m68k_frob_symbol('%d2') value = 0x3
m68k_frob_symbol('%D2') value = 0x3
m68k_frob_symbol('%d4') value = 0x5
m68k_frob_symbol('%D4') value = 0x5
m68k_frob_symbol('%d6') value = 0x7
m68k_frob_symbol('%D6') value = 0x7
m68k_frob_symbol('%a0') value = 0x9
m68k_frob_symbol('%A0') value = 0x9
m68k_frob_symbol('%a2') value = 0xb
m68k_frob_symbol('%A2') value = 0xb
m68k_frob_symbol('%a4') value = 0xd
m68k_frob_symbol('%A4') value = 0xd
m68k_frob_symbol('%a6') value = 0xf
...
m68k_frob_symbol('.LVU1') value = 0x1
m68k_frob_symbol('.LVU3') value = 0x1
m68k_frob_symbol('.LVU5') value = 0x1
m68k_frob_symbol('.LVU7') value = 0x3
m68k_frob_symbol('.LVU11') value = 0x1
m68k_frob_symbol('.LVU13') value = 0x1
...
My guess is that these symbols can't be used as text labels and could be
skipped earlier.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
