[Bug binutils/27113] libdep not correctly loaded on Windows
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27113 Alexey Brodkin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexey.brodkin at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from Alexey Brodkin --- Any chance to get that removal of "libdep.dll.a" implemented? With this "libdep.dll.a" in place Windows builds of recent Binutils frighten users :) See https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/issues/7890 and https://github.com/foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/toolchain/issues/376. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27825] ld: -z unique-symbol behavior when .1 exists
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27825 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com Last reconfirmed||2021-05-05 Version|unspecified |2.37 (HEAD) Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|--- |2.37 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- A patch is posted at https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-May/116506.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27823] [z80-unknown-elf] invalid instruction `ld h, ()` should not assemble
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27823 --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 13420 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13420&action=edit Patch which fixes this bug and adds tests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27823] [z80-unknown-elf] invalid instruction `ld h, ()` should not assemble
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27823 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27415] eZ80 relocation computation fails unexpectedly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27415 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27415] eZ80 relocation computation fails unexpectedly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27415 --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- Term "high word" means word which is higher than low word: x >> 16. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27415] eZ80 relocation computation fails unexpectedly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27415 --- Comment #2 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 13421 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13421&action=edit Workaround patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27415] eZ80 relocation computation fails unexpectedly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27415 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Issue 33844 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Stack-buffer-overflow in vms_traverse_index
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 33844 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Stack-buffer-overflow in vms_traverse_index https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=33844#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
[Bug gold/27815] gold fails to build with latest GCC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27815 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Cary Coutant --- I haven't had the chance to build a new-enough GCC to test, but it looks like the proper fix is to use nullptr instead of NULL. Does that sound right? That would require that I raise the minimum version of GCC that can build gold from 4.1.3 to at least 4.6. I'm not sure if anyone needs to build with such an old version, but if so, maybe I could just use a static cast here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27825] ld: -z unique-symbol behavior when .1 exists
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27825 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4467df35a93e4c8e5ff7549e8d23324c64f527bd commit 4467df35a93e4c8e5ff7549e8d23324c64f527bd Author: H.J. Lu Date: Wed May 5 20:28:39 2021 -0700 elf: Always append ".COUNT" to local symbols Always append ".COUNT" to local symbols to avoid potential conflicts with existing local symbol "XXX.COUNT". bfd/ PR ld/27825 * elflink.c (elf_link_output_symstrtab): Always append ".COUNT" to local symbols. ld/ PR ld/27825 * testsuite/ld-elf/pr27825-1.d: New file. * testsuite/ld-elf/pr27825-1a.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/pr27825-1b.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/pr27825-2.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/pr27825-2a.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/pr27825-2b.s: Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
