[Bug binutils/27268] mingw-w64 fails with dwarf5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268 --- Comment #2 from Hannes Domani --- Looks like adding only .debug_loclists is not enough. For another example I also needed to add .debug_rnglists. That makes me think that probably all DWARF 5 debug sections listed here are necessary: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=ld/scripttempl/DWARF.sc;hb=HEAD -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27425] erroneous __ImageBase relocation using Microsoft COFF .OBJ linked to .ELF x86_64
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27425 --- Comment #2 from Kilian Kegel --- Hi H.J. your solution is perfect for part 1 of the issue. Additional it also fixes the entries for exception handling in the .pdata section - perfect. I will create a separate bug for part 2 of the problem. Thanks a lot. Kilian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27432] New: erroneous symbol offsets taken with __ImageBase relocation using Microsoft COFF .OBJ linked to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27432 Bug ID: 27432 Summary: erroneous symbol offsets taken with __ImageBase relocation using Microsoft COFF .OBJ linked to Product: binutils Version: 2.36.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: minnowware at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Hi H.J. the symbol addresses taken for __ImageBase addressing scheme are wrong. RIP relative addresses taken from the same section instead are correct. https://github.com/KilianKegel/GNU-ld-for-MicrosoftCOFF-to-LinuxELF#addr32nb-offset-miscalculation I would really appreciate if you could fix this issue. Best regards, Kilian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27432] erroneous symbol offsets taken with __ImageBase relocation using Microsoft COFF .OBJ linked to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27432 --- Comment #1 from Kilian Kegel --- Created attachment 13230 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13230&action=edit screenshot wrong offset calculation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27200] Bad RiscV64 ELF header flag using ld -b binary
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27200 Nelson Chu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #18 from Nelson Chu --- Mark as resolved/fixed as it is fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24685] [RISCV] R_RISCV_CALL_PLT should not create a canonical PLT in -no-pie mode
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24685 Nelson Chu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org --- Comment #4 from Nelson Chu --- I can get the expected results when using the current mainline binutils. $ riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -fuse-ld=bfd -fpie -pie a.c -o a && riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-readelf -W --dyn-s a | grep puts 4: 0 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT UND puts@GLIBC_2.27 (2) $ riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -fuse-ld=bfd -fpie -no-pie a.c -o a && riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-readelf -W --dyn-s a | grep puts 1: 00010400 0 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT UND puts@GLIBC_2.27 (2) I believe the commit 3b1450b38c644f99aa2e211747b428b9f8d15cca fix it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
