[Bug ld/27358] when building with glibc 2.33, the "Run property 4/5" tests fail on i686-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27358 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=38a143aa8c633225e000fd006a5a171f0b6c80ee commit 38a143aa8c633225e000fd006a5a171f0b6c80ee Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sun Feb 7 13:11:16 2021 -0800 ld: Remove x86 ISA level run-time tests Remove x86 ISA level run-time tests since with glibc 2.33, they will fail to run on machines with lesser x86 ISA level: tmpdir/property-5-pie: CPU ISA level is lower than required PR ld/27358 * testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp: Remove property 3/4/5 run-time tests. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27358] when building with glibc 2.33, the "Run property 4/5" tests fail on i686-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27358 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_36-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=43f6058fb2cd2b90f62893fcec5c30a7bfe24350 commit 43f6058fb2cd2b90f62893fcec5c30a7bfe24350 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sun Feb 7 13:11:16 2021 -0800 ld: Remove x86 ISA level run-time tests Remove x86 ISA level run-time tests since with glibc 2.33, they will fail to run on machines with lesser x86 ISA level: tmpdir/property-5-pie: CPU ISA level is lower than required PR ld/27358 * testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp: Remove property 3/4/5 run-time tests. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Likewise. (cherry picked from commit 38a143aa8c633225e000fd006a5a171f0b6c80ee) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27358] when building with glibc 2.33, the "Run property 4/5" tests fail on i686-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27358 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed for 2.37 and 2.36 branch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.