[Bug ld/26681] The section flag 'o' doesn't work on NOTE section
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26681 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7026832e52cff026f877616ac0033c7bb8d1df6f commit 7026832e52cff026f877616ac0033c7bb8d1df6f Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri Oct 2 11:08:19 2020 +0100 Allow note sections to be discarded when they are linked to another discarded secction. PR 26681 bfd * elflink.c (bfd_elf_gc_sections): Do not arbitrarily keep note sections which are linked to another section. ld * testsuite/ld-elf/pr26681.s: New test. * testsuite/ld-elf/pr26681.d: New test driver. * testsuite/ld-elf/pr26681.l: New test output. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/26681] The section flag 'o' doesn't work on NOTE section
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26681 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi H.J. Sorry - you were right and I was wrong. I have applied your patch. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/26694] gas x86-32: "can't handle non absolute segment in `lcall'" (or `ljmp')
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26694 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to TK Chia from comment #1) > Created attachment 12881 [details] > Proposed patch > > I have enclosed a proposed patch --- including test case changes, and > possible gas/ChangeLog entry. > > Thank you! Please also include a linker testcase to show that the final binary is correct. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/26694] gas x86-32: "can't handle non absolute segment in `lcall'" (or `ljmp')
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26694 --- Comment #3 from TK Chia --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2) > Please also include a linker testcase to show that the final binary is > correct. May I know where the test case should go within the source tree? Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/26694] gas x86-32: "can't handle non absolute segment in `lcall'" (or `ljmp')
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26694 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to TK Chia from comment #3) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2) > > > Please also include a linker testcase to show that the final binary is > > correct. > > May I know where the test case should go within the source tree? > > Thank you! You need to test both i386 and x86-64. Linker tests should go into ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64 and ld/testsuite/ld-i386. Please also check for linker overflow errors. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/26253] Support SHF_LINK_ORDER with sh_link=0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26253 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 12886 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12886&action=edit Proposed patch Hi Fangrui, Please could you try out the attached patch and see if it does what you expect. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/26253] Support SHF_LINK_ORDER with sh_link=0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26253 --- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2) > Created attachment 12886 [details] > Proposed patch > > Hi Fangrui, > > Please could you try out the attached patch and see if it does what you > expect. > > Cheers > Nick Thanks, Nick! I have tested it on Linux x86-64. LLVM's integrated assembler hard codes 0 but I think supporting other numerical indexes is fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/26701] New: Ability to suppress warnings due to tags in a library
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26701 Bug ID: 26701 Summary: Ability to suppress warnings due to tags in a library Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: eyalroz at technion dot ac.il Target Milestone: --- This is a generalization of bug 12017. Compilers typically allow the user to suppress specific warnings, either globally or locally at specific places in the code. Now, the linker apparently emits a warning when a symbol is used whose library entry(/ies) indicate such a warning needs to be emitted. It should have an option to suppress such warnings, in at least the following resolutions IMHO: 1. Globally 2. By (library, symbol name) pair 3. By library (e.g. glibc warnings) 4. By call site Let's ignore (4.) for now because this is more complex and would require compiler support for users to make work and focus on (1.)through (3.) . IIANM, neither is currently possible with ld right now. Now, (1.) should be really easy to implement; and (2.) and (3.) should not be difficult to implement, and in a away such that the cost is minimal (e.g. have a flag for whether _any_ specific suppressions are used, so when none are used it's an extra flag check when having to emit a warning - a tolerable cost.) If this were implemented, it would allow for an easy resolution of 12017. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/26701] Ability to suppress warnings due to tags in a library
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26701 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=12017 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/26701] Ability to suppress warnings due to tags in a library
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26701 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/12017] Would like to disable compiler warning re use of tmpnam
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12017 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eyalroz at technion dot ac.il --- Comment #7 from Eyal Rozenberg --- I've suggested an approach which would resolve this issue, as bug 26701 . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/26701] Ability to suppress warnings due to tags in a library
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26701 Kib changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vampyrebat at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
