[Bug binutils/26423] UBSAN error: bfd/elf32-arm.c:10236:24:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26423 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |2.36 Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/26420] UBSAN error: gas/config/tc-arm.c:23588:32:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26420 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |2.36 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/26421] UBSAN error: gas/config/tc-arm.c:2283:28:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26421 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |2.36 Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/26429] UBSAN error: bfd/elf32-arm.c:15432:46:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26429 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |2.36 Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/26425] UBSAN error: gas/config/tc-arm.c:8292:25:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26425 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.36 Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug admin/26427] UBSAN error: gas/config/tc-arm.c:8799:16:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26427 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |2.36 Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/26427] UBSAN error: gas/config/tc-arm.c:8799:16:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26427 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Component|admin |gas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/26551] A definition referenced by an unneeded (--as-needed) shared object should be exported
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26551 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #5) > ld.bfd a.o --as-needed b.so > > Let a.o define a function which will be called by b.so via dlopen. In this > case, ld should export the function. This justification may look weak but I > think it is moving toward the right direction if we consider that GNU ld > from binutils 2.22 defaulted to --no-copy-dt-needed-entries (doing less > shared object traversal for more proper dependency tracking and avoiding > unneeded work). LD creates dynamic section only if dynamic relocation is needed. For this test, since no dynamic relocation is needed, there is no dynamic section. Since there is no dynamic section, there is no dynamic symbol table. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25213] [RISCV] SUB6 applied without 6-bit mask
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25213 kito cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||npickito at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25354] On RISCV64 LD, with EXACTLY 72 headers/sections, PhysAddr for first Program Header is wrong
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25354 kito cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||npickito at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25212] [RISCV] gas doesn't flag invalid march and mabi combinations
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25212 kito cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||npickito at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25258] RISC-V: relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against `.LANCHOR2'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25258 kito cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||npickito at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/26551] A definition referenced by an unneeded (--as-needed) shared object should be exported
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26551
--- Comment #7 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #5)
> > ld.bfd a.o --as-needed b.so
> >
> > Let a.o define a function which will be called by b.so via dlopen. In this
> > case, ld should export the function. This justification may look weak but I
> > think it is moving toward the right direction if we consider that GNU ld
> > from binutils 2.22 defaulted to --no-copy-dt-needed-entries (doing less
> > shared object traversal for more proper dependency tracking and avoiding
> > unneeded work).
>
> LD creates dynamic section only if dynamic relocation is needed.
> For this test, since no dynamic relocation is needed, there is no
> dynamic section. Since there is no dynamic section, there is no
> dynamic symbol table.
>a.c <
int foo() { return 42; }
int main() {
void *h = dlopen("./b.so", RTLD_LAZY);
int (*bar)(void) = dlsym(h, "bar");
return bar();
}
e
>b.c < symbol lookup error: ./b.so: undefined symbol: foo
-fuse-ld=gold or -fuse-ld=lld is good.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
